Effect of low frequency magnetic field on efficiency of chromosome break repair

References

• Aylon, Y., B. Liefshitz, G. Bitan-Banin, and M. Kupiec. 2003. Molecular dissection of mitotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1403–17. doi:10.1128/MCB.23.4.1403-1417.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, A. K., A. Goranov, A. Amon, and S. R. Manalisa. 2010. Measurement of mass, density, and volume during the cell cycle of yeast. PNAS 107:999–1004. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901851107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantoni, O., P. Sestili, M. Fiorani, and M. Dachá. 1996. Effect of 50 Hz sinusoidal electric and/or magnetic fields on the rate of repair of DNA single strand breaks in cultured mammalian cells exposed to three different carcinogens: Methylmethane sulphonate, chromate and 254 nm UV radiation. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 38:527–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fatahi, M., A. Reddig, F. B. Vijayalaxmi, R. Hartig, T. J. Prihoda, J. Ricke, D. Roggenbuck, D. Reinhold, and O. Speck. 2016. DNA double strand-breaks and micronuclei in human blood lymphocytes after repeated whole body exposures to 7T Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Neuroimage 133:288–93. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl, A. A., M. Kiechle, B. Fellerhoff, and F. Eckardt-Schupp. 1998. Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Influence of DNA repair pathways. Genetics 148:975–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, J. D., and R. P. Liburdy. 1997. Environmental magnetic fields inhibit the antiproliferative action of tamoxifen and melatonin in a human breast cancer cell line. Bioelectromagnetics 18:555–62. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-186X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höytö, A., M. Herrala, J. Luukkonen, J. Juutilainen, and J. Naarala. 2017. Cellular detection of 50 Hz magnetic fields and weak blue light: Effects on superoxide levels and genotoxicity. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 93:646–52. doi:10.1080/09553002.2017.1294275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaberi, F. M., S. Keshtgar, A. Tavakkoli, E. Pishva, B. Geramizadeh, N. Tanideh, and M. M. Jaberi. 2011. A moderate–Intensity static magnetic field enhances repair of cartilage damage in rabbits. Arch. Med. Res. 42:268–73. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubinyi, G., Z. Zeitler, G. Thuróczy, P. Juhász, J. Bakos, H. Sinay, and J. László. 2010. Effects of homogeneous and inhomogeneous static magnetic fields combined with gamma radiation on DNA and DNA repair. Bioelectromagnetics 31:488–94. doi:10.1002/bem.20577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., H. M. Chen, L. K. Yeh, M. Y. Hong, G. S. Huang. 2012. Dosage-dependent inducton of behavioral decline in Caenorhabditis elegans by long-term treatment of static magnetic fields. J. Radiat. Res. 53:24–32. doi:10.1269/jrr.11057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., A. Liimatainen, J. Juutilainen, and J. Naarala. 2014. Induction of genomic instability, oxidative processes, and mitochondrial activity by 50Hz magnetic fields in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Mutat. Res. 760:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyagi, N., K. Sato, Y. Rong, S. Yamamura, H. Katagiri, K. Kobayashi, and H. Iwata. 2000. Effects of PEMF on a murine osteosarcoma cell line: Drug-resistant (P-glycoprotein-positive) and non-resistant cells. Bioelectromagnetics 21:112–21. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-186X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, M., A. Nakamura, T. Hondou, and H. Miyata. 2016. Evaluation of cell viability, DNA single-strand breaks, and nitric oxide production in LPS-stimulated macrophage RAW264 exposed to a 50-Hz magnetic field. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 92:583–89. doi:10.1080/09553002.2016.1206224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz Gómez, M. J., J. M. Pastor Vega, L. de la Peña, L. Gil Carmona, and M. Martínez Morillo. 1999. Growth modification of human colon adenocarcinoma cells exposed to a low-frequency electromagnetic field. J. Physiol. Biochem. 55:79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M., F. Sendra-Portero, and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2010a. Effect of 2.45 mT sinusoidal 50 Hz magnetic field on Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains deficient in DNA strand breaks repair. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 86:602–11. doi:10.3109/09553001003734519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M. J., L. de la Peña, M. I. Prieto-Barcia, J. M. Pastor, L. Gil, and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2002. Influence of 1 and 25 Hz, 1.5 mT magnetic fields on antitumor drug potency in a human adenocarcinoma cell line. Bioelectromagnetics 23:578–85. doi:10.1002/bem.10054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M. J., and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2005. Enhancement of the cell-killing effect of ultraviolet-C radiation by short-term exposure to a pulsed magnetic field. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 81:483–90. doi:10.1080/09553000500196805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M. J., and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2009. Electromagnetic fields and the induction of DNA strand breaks. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 28:201–14. doi:10.1080/15368370802608696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M. J., M. D. Merino-Moyano, M. G. Cebrián-Martín, M. I. Prieto-Barcia, and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2008. No effect of 50 Hz 2.45 mT magnetic field on the potency of cisplatin, mitomycin C and methotrexate in S. cerevisiae. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 27:289–97. doi:10.1080/15368370802277740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M. J., M. I. Prieto-Barcia, E. Ristori-Bogajo, and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2004. Static and 50 Hz magnetic fields of 0.35 and 2.45 mT have no effect on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioelectrochemistry 64:151–55. doi:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2004.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M. J., E. Ristori-Bogajo, M. I. Prieto-Barcia, and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2010b. No evidence of cellular alterations by milliTesla-level static and 50 Hz magnetic fields on S. cerevisiae. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 29:154–64. doi:10.3109/07435800.2010.505158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian Franco, J. L., A. Sanchis Otero, J. Roldan Madroñero, and S. M. San Martin. 2013. Dielectric characterization of the yeast cell budding cycle. Prog. Electromagnet. Res. 134:1–22. doi:10.2528/PIER12100406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simkó, M., and M. O. Mattsson. 2004. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields as effectors of cellular responses in vitro: Possible immune cell activation. J. Cell. Biochem. 93:83–92. doi:10.1002/jcb.20198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, K., S. H. Im, Y. J. Yoon, H. M. Kim, H. J. Lee, and G. S. Park. 2018. A 60 Hz uniform electromagnetic field promotes human cell proliferation by decreasing intracellular reactive oxygen species levels. PLoS ONE 13:e0199753. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodori, L., A. Giovanetti, M. C. Albertini, M. Rocchi, B. Perniconi, M. G. Valente, and D. Coletti. 2014. Static magnetic fields modulate X-ray-induced DNA damage in human glioblastoma primary cells. J. Radiat. Res. 55:218–27. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrt107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeford, R. 2004. The cancer epidemiology of radiation. Oncogene 23:6404–28. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walch, A., A. Brachat, R. Pöhlmann, and P. Philippsen. 1994. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793–808. doi:10.1002/yea.320101310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbine, L., J. Haines, M. Coster, L. Barazznol, E. Ainsbury, Z. Sienkiewicz, and P. Jeggo. 2015. The rate of X–Ray–Induced DNA double–Strand break repair in the embryonic mouse brain is unaffected by exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 91:495–99. doi:10.3109/09553002.2015.1021963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar