Analysis of membrane permeability due to synergistic effect of controlled shock wave and electric field application

References

• Abidor, I. G., V. B. Arakelian, V. Pastushenko, M. R. Tarasevich, L. Chernomordik, and I. Chizmadzhev. 1978. Electrical breakdown of bilayer lipid-membranes. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 240:733–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attig, N., K. Binder, H. Grubmuller, and K. Kremer. 2004. Computational soft matter: From synthetic polymers to proteins. Juelich, Germany: John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC).
   Google Scholar
• Bolhassani, A., A. Khavari, and Z. Orafa. 2014. Electroporation–Advantages and drawbacks for delivery of drug, gene and vaccine. Pp. 386-389, in Application of nanotechnology in drug delivery. London, UK: IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Cadossi, R., M. Ronchetti, and M. Cadossi. 2014. Locally enhanced chemotherapy by electroporation: Clinical experiences and perspective of use of electrochemotherapy. Future Oncol. 10:877–90. doi:10.2217/fon.13.235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubey, A., M. Vedadi, K. I. Nomura, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta. 2011. Poration of lipid bilayers by shock-induced nanobubble collapse. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98:023701. doi:10.1063/1.3518472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delius, M. 1994. Medical applications and bioeffects of extracorporeal shock waves. Shock Waves 4:55–72. doi:10.1007/BF01418569.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. M. 2010 October. The shape of the blast wave: Studies of the Friedlander equation. In Proceeding of the 21st International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS), 1–9, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Dunki‐Jacobs, E. M., P. Philips, and R. C. G. Martin Ii. 2014. Evaluation of thermal injury to liver, pancreas and kidney during irreversible electroporation in an in vivo experimental model. Br. J. Surg. 101:1113–21. doi:10.1002/bjs.9536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar‐Chávez, J. J., D. Bonilla‐Martínez, M. A. Villegas‐González, and A. L. Revilla‐Vázquez. 2009. Electroporation as an efficient physical enhancer for skin drug delivery. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 49:1262–83. doi:10.1177/0091270009344984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre, J. M., K. Kaddur, M. P. Rols, and A. Bouakaz. 2010. In vitro gene transfer by electrosonoporation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36:1746–55. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.06.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, S., N. Asproulis, and D. Drikakis. 2014. Chemotherapy efficiency increase via shock wave interaction with biological membranes: A molecular dynamics study. Microfluid Nanofluidics 16:613–22. doi:10.1007/s10404-013-1258-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambihler, S., M. Delius, and J. W. Ellwart. 1992. Transient increase in membrane permeability of L1210 cells upon exposure to lithotripter shock waves in vitro. Naturwissenschaften 79:328–29. doi:10.1007/BF01138714.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gregory, C. D., C. Courtois, I. M. Hall, J. Howe, N. C. Woolsey, and D. M. Chambers. Laser-related effects on shock wave propagation. Central Laser Facility Annual Report 2004/2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, G. A., S. B. Dev, S. Dimmer, and G. S. Nanda. 1999. Electroporation therapy: A new approach for the treatment of head and neck cancer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:752–59. doi:10.1109/10.764952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, S. 2018. A molecular dynamic study of the change in permeability of DPPC under the influence of shock wave and electric field. Doctoral diss., Central Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., S. Hossain, and R. P. Joshi. 2018. Analysis of a dual shock-wave and ultrashort electric pulsing strategy for electro-manipulation of membrane nanopores. J. Phys. D 51:285403. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aaca7a.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, S. W. 2008. Overview of drug delivery and alternative methods to electroporation. In Electroporation protocols, 91–107. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaroszeski, M. J., R. Gilbert, C. Nicolau, and R. Heller. 1999. In vivo gene delivery by electroporation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 35:131–37. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00068-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. P., and K. H. Schoenbach. 2010. Bioelectric effects of intense ultrashort pulses. Crit. Rev™ Biomed. Eng. 38: 255.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, T., M. R. Hamblin, and A. G. Doukas. 2000. Cytoplasmic molecular delivery with shock waves: Importance of impulse. Biophys. J. 79:1821–32. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76432-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshiyama, K., T. Kodama, T. Yano, and S. Fujikawa. 2006. Structural change in lipid bilayers and water penetration induced by shock waves: Molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 91:2198–205. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.077677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, U., E. Bürgelt, Z. Squire, K. Messmer, P. H. Hofschneider, M. Gregor, and M. Delius. 1997. Shock wave permeabilization as a new gene transfer method. Gene Ther. 4:710. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loske, A. M. 2017. Shock wave interaction with matter. In Medical and biomedical applications of shock waves, 43–82. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, X. M., B. Yuan, X. R. Zhang, K. Yang, and Y. Q. Ma. 2017. Molecular modeling of transmembrane delivery of paclitaxel by shock waves with nanobubbles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110:023701. doi:10.1063/1.4973592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrink, S. J., A. H. De Vries, and A. E. Mark. 2004. Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 108:750–60. doi:10.1021/jp036508g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrink, S. J., H. J. Risselada, S. Yefimov, D. P. Tieleman, and A. H. De Vries. 2007. The MARTINI force field: Coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111:7812–24. doi:10.1021/jp071097f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. L., S. V. Pislaru, and J. F. Greenleaf. 2002. Sonoporation: Mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 27:115–34. doi:10.1023/A:1022983907223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mir, L. M. 2001. Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 53:1–10. doi:10.1016/S0302-4598(00)00112-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, J. A., A. Tóth-Kischkat, and R. Schultheiss. 2001. Principles of shock wave therapy. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1976–2007) 387:8–17. doi:10.1097/00003086-200106000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohl, C. D., M. Arora, R. Ikink, M. Delius, B. Wolfrum, and T. P. Insitute. (2003 November). Drug delivery following shock wave induced cavitation. In Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation, 1–8, Osaka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Okino, M., and H. Mohri. 1987. Effects of a high-voltage electrical impulse and an anticancer drug on in vivo growing tumors. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. GANN 78:1319–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pepe, J., M. Rincón, and J. Wu. 2004. Experimental comparison of sonoporation and electroporation in cell transfection applications. Acoust. Res. Lett. Online 5:62–67. doi:10.1121/1.1652111.
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, J., J. H. Jürgens, F. Deschamps, L. Tselikas, K. Uhde, O. Kosiek, and T. De Baere. 2015. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) fails to demonstrate efficacy in a prospective multicenter phase II trial on lung malignancies: The ALICE trial. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 38:401–08. doi:10.1007/s00270-014-1049-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saulis, G. 1999. Cell electroporation: Estimation of the number of pores and their sizes. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 35:291–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheffer, H. J., K. Nielsen, M. C. de Jong, A. A. van Tilborg, J. M. Vieveen, A. R. Bouwman, M. R. Meijer, C. van Kuijk, P. M. van den Tol, and M. R. Meijerink. 2014. Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in the clinical setting: A systematic review of safety and efficacy. J. Vas. Interv. Radiol. 25:997–1011. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, K. H., R. P. Joshi, J. F. Kolb, N. Chen, M. Stacey, P. F. Blackmore, E. S. Buescher, and S. J. Beebe. 2004. Ultrashort electrical pulses open a new gateway into biological cells. Proc. IEEE 92:1122–37. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2004.829009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seror, O. 2015. Ablative therapies: Advantages and disadvantages of radiofrequency, cryotherapy, microwave and electroporation methods, or how to choose the right method for an individual patient? Diagn. Interv. Imaging 96:617–24. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2015.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama, K., and K. Ohtani. 2005. Applications of shock wave research to medicine. WIT Trans. Modell. Simul. 41: 653–55.
   Google Scholar
• Vedadi, M., A. Choubey, K. I. Nomura, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, P. Vashishta, and A. C. T. Van Duin. 2010. Structure and dynamics of shock-induced nanobubble collapse in water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105:014503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.014503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernier, P. T., Y. Sun, L. Marcu, S. Salemi, C. M. Craft, and M. A. Gundersen. 2003. Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 310:286–95. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.08.140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. J., W. Schaden, and J. Y. Kuo, eds. 2018. Shockwave medicine. S. Karger AG, Basel: Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. C. 2000. Electroporation of cells and tissues. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 28:24–33. doi:10.1109/27.842820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar