Evaluation of frequency magnetic field, static field, and Temozolomide on viability, free radical production and gene expression (p53) in the human glioblastoma cell line (A172)

References

• Adams, D. J., Jr, and I. N. Odunze. 1991. Oxygen free radicals and Parkinson’s disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 10:161–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(91)90009-R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi-Zeidabadi, M., Z. Akbarnejad, M. Esmaeeli, Y. Masoumi-Ardakani, L. Mohammadipoor-Ghasemabad, H. Eskandary. 2019. Impact of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (100 Hz, 100 G) exposure on human glioblastoma U87 cells during Temozolomide administration. Electromagn Biol. Med. 38:198–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2019.1625784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari, A., and G.-A. Jelodar. 2013. The effect of oxidative stress and antioxidants on men fertility. Zahedan. J. Res. Med. Sci. 15:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Akbarnejad, Z., H. Eskandary, L. Dini, C. Vergallo, S. N. Nematollahi-Mahani, A. Farsinejad, M. F. S. Abadi, M. Ahmadi. 2017. Cytotoxicity of temozolomide on human glioblastoma cells is enhanced by the concomitant exposure to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (100 Hz, 100 G). Biomed. Pharmacother. 92:254–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.05.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, T. E., K. W. Andrews, and A. R. Liboff. 2001. Brain cancer risk and electromagnetic fields (EMFs): Assessing the geomagnetic component. Arch. Environ. Health 56:314–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00039890109604462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, M. M., C. Gomez-Manzano, B. N. Bekele, W. K. A. Yung, J. Fueyo. 2007. Adenovirus-based strategies overcome temozolomide resistance by silencing the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter. J. Cancer Res. 67:11499–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5312.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri, M., M. Basiri, H. Eskandary, Z. Akbarnejad, M. Esmaeeli, Y. Masoumi-Ardakani, M. Ahmadi-Zeidabadi. 2018. Cytotoxicity of carboplatin on human glioblastoma cells is reduced by the concomitant exposure to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (50 Hz, 70 G). Electromagn Biol. Med. 37:138–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2018.1477052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenijevic, D., H. Onuma, C. Pecqueur, S. Raimbault, B. S. Manning, B. Miroux, E. Couplan, M.-C. Alves-Guerra, M. Goubern, R. Surwit, et al. 2000. Disruption of the uncoupling protein-2 gene in mice reveals a role in immunity and reactive oxygen species production. Nat. Genet. 26:435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/82565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baehner, R. L., L. A. Boxer, and J. Davis. 1976. The biochemical basis of nitroblue tetrazolium reduction in normal human and chronic granulomatous disease polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Blood 48:309–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V48.2.309.309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, H., B. GÜnther, I. Hilger, M. Radeva, N. Traitcheva, L. Wollweber. 2010. Bioelectromagnetic field effects on cancer cells and mice tumors. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 29:132–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/15368371003776725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brix, G., E. A. Nekolla, D. Nosske, J. Griebel. 2009. Risks and safety aspects related to PET/MR examinations. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 36:131–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0937-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, I. L., M. S. Markov, and W. E. Hardman. 2014. Optimization of a therapeutic electromagnetic field (EMF) to retard breast cancer tumor growth and vascularity. Cancer Cell Int. 14:125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-014-0125-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., E. J. Lee, M. Son, J.-H. Lee, D. Yoo, J.-W. Kim, S. W. Park, J.-S. Shin, and J. Cheon. 2012. A magnetic switch for the control of cell death signalling in in vitro and in vivo systems. Nat. Mater 11:1038. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciejka, E., P. Kleniewska, B. Skibska, and A. Goraca. 2011. Effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on oxidative balance in brain of rats. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 62:657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, C., E. Costantini, M. Kamal, and M. Reale. 2015. Experimental model for ELF-EMF exposure: Concern for human health. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22:75–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dini, L. 2010. Static magnetic field interferes with the physiological removal of circulating apoptotic lymphocytes. PIERS Online 6:252–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.2529/PIERS091005094213.
   Google Scholar
• Dini, L., and L. Abbro. 2005. Bioeffects of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on cell cultures. Micron 36:195–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2004.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, J. 2008. Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3:139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falone, S., S. Santini, V. Cordone, P. Cesare, A. Bonfigli, M. Grannonico, G. Di Emidio, C. Tatone, M. Cacchio, F. Amicarelli, et al. 2017. Power frequency magnetic field promotes a more malignant phenotype in neuroblastoma cells via redox-related mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 7:11470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11869-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipovic, N., T. Djukic, M. Radovic, D. Cvetkovic, M. Curcic, S. Markovic, A. Peulic, and B. Jeremic. 2014. Electromagnetic field investigation on different cancer cell lines. Cancer Cell Int. 14:84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-014-0084-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, R. H., T. Monsees, and N. Özkucur. 2009. Electromagnetic effects–From cell biology to medicine. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 43:177–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proghi.2008.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnari, F. B., T. Fenton, R. M. Bachoo, A. Mukasa, J. M. Stommel, A. Stegh, W. C. Hahn, K. L. Ligon, D. N. Louis, C. Brennan, et al. 2007. Malignant astrocytic glioma: Genetics, biology, and paths to treatment. Genes Dev. 21:2683–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1596707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomelli, C., L. Natali, M. L. Trincavelli, S. Daniele, A. Bertoli, G. Flamini, A. Braca, and C. Martini. 2016. New insights into the anticancer activity of carnosol: P53 reactivation in the U87MG human glioblastoma cell line. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 74:95–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2016.02.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofseth, L. J., S. P. Hussain, and C. C. Harris. 2004. p53: 25 years after its discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 25:177–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2004.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., L. Dong, Y. Chen, H. Qi, and D. Xiao. 2006. Effects of sinusoidal magnetic field observed on cell proliferation, ion concentration, and osmolarity in two human cancer cell lines. Electromagn Biol. Med. 25:113–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370600719067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanzawa, T., J. Bedwell, Y. Kondo, S. Kondo, and I. M. Germano. 2003. Inhibition of DNA repair for sensitizing resistant glioma cells to temozolomide. J. Neurosurg. 99:1047–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.6.1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiseleva, L., A. Kartashev, N. Vartanyan, A. A. Pinevich, and M. P. Samoilovich. 2016. CHARACTERISTICS OF A172 AND T98G CELL LINES. Tsitologiia 58:349–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klautke, G., M. Schütze, I. Bombor, R. Benecke, J. Piek, and R. Fietkau. 2006. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with Topotecan for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J. Neuro-Oncol. 77:199–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-005-9028-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwich, T. P., X. Liu, B. B. Singh, J. Jadlowiec, S. Weiland, and I. S. Ambudkar. 2000. Assembly of Trp1 in a signaling complex associated with caveolin-scaffolding lipid raft domains. J. Biol. Chem. 275:11934–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.16.11934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyakoshi, J. 2005. Effects of static magnetic fields at the cellular level. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 87:213–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, M. E. C., and M. A. Barcinski. 2004. Apoptotic cell and phagocyte interplay: Recognition and consequences in different cell systems. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 76:93–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652004000100009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosmann, T. 1983. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65:55–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz, J. L., V. Rodriguez-Cruz, N. D. Walker, S. J. Greco, and P. Rameshwar. 2015. Temozolomide resistance and tumor recurrence: Halting the Hedgehog. Cancer Cell & Microenv 2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naganuma, H., E. Satoh, T. Kawataki, Satoh, H. and Nukui, H.. 2003. Cell density regulates thrombospondin-1 production in malignant glioma cells. Neuro Oncol 63:147–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023927417433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, E., X. Jin, W. Wu, T. Yu, X. Zhou, T. Zhi, Z. Shi, J. Zhang, N. Liu, Y. You, et al. 2016. BACH1 promotes temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma through antagonizing the function of p53. Sci. Rep. 6:39743. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, V., and R. Brown. 2005. Signalling cell cycle arrest and cell death through the MMR System. Carcinogenesis 27:682–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgi298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Q. T., H. Gittleman, J. Fulop, M. Liu, R. Blanda, C. Kromer, Y. Wolinsky, C. Kruchko, and J. S. Barnholtz-Sloan. 2015. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro. Oncol. 17:iv1–iv62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini, S., G. B. Vannelli, T. Barni, M. Ruggiero, I. Sardi, P. Pacini, and M. Gulisano. 1999. Effect of 0.2 T static magnetic field on human neurons: Remodeling and inhibition of signal transduction without genome instability. Neurosci. Lett. 267:185–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00362-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D. J., L. H. Margaritis, A. A. Pilla, and A. Liboff. 2003. Mechanisms of action of emfs on biological systems in biological effects of electromagnetic fields, 4–113. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pazur, A., C. Schimek, and P. Galland. 2007. Magnetoreception in microorganisms and fungi. Open Life Sci 2:597–659. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-007-0032-z.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, S., H. Yin, C. Yang, Y. Dou, Z. Liu, P. Zhang, H. Yu, Y. Huang, J. Feng, J. Hao, et al. 2016. A magnetic protein biocompass. Nat. Mater. 15:217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes-Guerrero, G., C. Guzmán, D. E. García, I. Camacho-Arroyo, and M. Vázquez-García. 2010. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields differentially regulate estrogen receptor-α and -β expression in the rat olfactory bulb. Neurosci. Lett. 471:109–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, J. G., A. R. Pendleton, K. O. Monson, B. K. Murray, and K. L. O’Neill. 2002. Decreased DNA repair rates and protection from heat induced apoptosis mediated by electromagnetic field exposure. Bioelectromagnetics 23:106–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollwitz, J., M. Lupke, and M. Simkó. 2004. Fifty-hertz magnetic fields induce free radical formation in mouse bone marrow-derived promonocytes and macrophages. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1674:231–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronchetto, F., D. Barone, M. Cintorino, M. Berardelli, S. Lissolo, R. Orlassino, P. Ossola, and S. Tofani. 2004. Extremely low frequency‐modulated static magnetic fields to treat cancer: A pilot study on patients with advanced neoplasm to assess safety and acute toxicity. Bioelectromagnetics 25:563–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, A. D. 2003. Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems. Cell Biochem. Biophys 39:163–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1385/CBB:39:2:163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz‐Gómez, M., L. De la Peña, M. Prieto‐Barcia, J. M. Pastor, L. Gil, and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2002. Influence of 1 and 25 Hz, 1.5 mT magnetic fields on antitumor drug potency in a human adenocarcinoma cell line. Bioelectromagnetics 23:578–525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gómez, M. J., and M. Martínez-Morillo. 2009. Electromagnetic fields and the induction of DNA strand breaks. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 28:201–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370802608696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahebjamei, H., P. Abdolmaleki, and F. Ghanati. 2007. Effects of magnetic field on the antioxidant enzyme activities of suspension‐cultured tobacco cells. Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics 28:42–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, R. 2005. Static magnetic fields: Animal studies. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 87:225–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenck, J. F. 1996. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. ‎Med. Phys 23:815–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenck, J. F. 2005. Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 87:185–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simkó, M., and M. O. Mattsson. 2004. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields as effectors of cellular responses in vitro: Possible immune cell activation. J. Cell. Biochem. 93:83–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sladowski, D., S. J. Steer, R. H. Clothier, and M. Balls. 1993. An improved MIT assay. J. Immunol. Methods 157:203–07. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(93)90088-O.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupp, R., P.-Y. Dietrich, S. O. Kraljevic, A. Pica, I. Maillard, P. Maeder, R. Meuli, R. Janzer, G. Pizzolato, R. Miralbell, et al. 2002. Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J. Clin. Oncol. 20:1375–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupp, R., W. P. Mason, M. J. Van Den Bent, M. Weller, B. Fisher, M. J. B. Taphoorn, K. Belanger, A. A. Brandes, C. Marosi, U. Bogdahn, et al. 2005. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 352:987–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar, Z., E. Thivat, E. Planchat, P. Gimbergues, E. Gadea, C. Abrial, and X. Durando. 2013. Temozolomide and unusual indications: Review of literature. Cancer Treat. Rev 39:125–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatarov, I., A. Panda, D. Petkov, K. Kolappaswamy, K. Thompson, A. Kavirayani, M. M. Lipsky, E. Elson, C. C. Davis, S. S. Martin, et al. 2011. Effect of magnetic fields on tumor growth and viability. Comp. Med 61:339–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawbin, H., T. Stahelin, and J. Gordon. 1979. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets. Proc Not 4350–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350.
   Google Scholar
• Tenuzzo, B., C. Vergallo, and L. Dini. 2009. Effect of 6 mT static magnetic field on the bcl-2, bax, p53 and hsp70 expression in freshly isolated and in vitro aged human lymphocytes. Tissue Cell 41:169–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2008.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofani, S., D. Barone, M. Berardelli, Berno, E., Cintorino, M., Foglia, L., Ossola, P, et al. 2003. Static and ELF magnetic fields enhance the in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of cis-platin against lewis lung carcinoma, but not of cyclophosphamide against B16 melanotic melanoma. Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 48:83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Tofani, S., M. Cintorino, D. Barone, M. Berardelli, M. M. De Santi, A. Ferrara, R. Orlassino, P. Ossola, K. Rolfo, F. Ronchetto, et al. 2002. Increased mouse survival, tumor growth inhibition and decreased immunoreactive p53 after exposure to magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 23:230–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilev, P. M., R. T. Dronzine, M. P. Vassileva, and G. A. Georgiev. 1982. Parallel arrays of microtubules formed in electric and magnetic fields. Biosci. Rep. 2:1025–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01122171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. I., A. Torsello, B. Tedesco, S. Fasanella, A. Boninsegna, M. D’Ascenzo, C. Grassi, G. B. Azzena, and A. Cittadini. 2005. 50-Hz extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance cell proliferation and DNA damage: Possible involvement of a redox mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1743:120–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., and Z. Ye. 2015. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field induces apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells via oxidative stress. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 44:323–28.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, S.-A., and M. Uesaka. 2006. Bioelectrodynamics in living organisms. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 44:67–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2005.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar