Association between reproductive health and nonionizing radiation exposure

References

• Agarwal, A., F. Deepinder, R. K. Sharma, G. Ranga, and J. Li. 2008. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: An observational study. Fertil. Steril. 89:124–28. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., N. R. Desai, K. Makker, A. Varghese, R. Mouradi, E. Sabanegh, and R. Sharma. 2009. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: An in vitro pilot study. Fertil. Steril. 92:1318–25. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, R. J., L. E. Bennetts, D. Sawyer, A. M. Wiklendt, and B. V. King. 2005. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int. J. Androl 28:171–79. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00531.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin-Meferij, M. M., and A. F. El-Kott. 2015. The radioprotective effects of Moringa oleifera against mobile phone electromagnetic radiation-induced infertility in rats. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med 8:12487–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonde, J. P. Mar 2010. Male reproductive organs are at risk from environmental hazards. Asian J. Androl. 12:152–56. doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Costa, H., G. Trueman, L. Tang, U. Abdel-Rahman, W. Abdel-Rahman, K. Ong, and I. Cosic. 2003. Human brain wave activity during exposure to radiofrequency field emissions from mobile phones. Aust. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 26:162–67. doi:10.1007/BF03179176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Iuliis, G. N., R. J. Newey, B. V. King, and R. J. Aitken. 2009. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS ONE 4:e6446. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delavarifar, S., Z. Razi, A. Tamadon, F. Rahmanifar, D. Mehrabani, M. Owifard, O. Koohi-Hpseinabadi, and S. Zaker Abasali. 2020. Low-power density radiations emitted from common wi-fi routers influence sperm concentration and sperm histomorphometric parameters: Anew horizon on male infertility treatment. J Biomed Phys Eng 10:167–76. doi:10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Depinder, F., K. Makkler, and A. Agarwal. 2007. Cell phones and male infertility: Dissecting the relationship. Reprod. Biomed. Online 3:266–70. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60338-0.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, A. K. 2011. Study of electromagnetic radiation pollution in an Indian city. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184:6507–12. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2436-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohle, G. R. 2010. Male infertility in cancer patients: Review of the literature. Int. J. Urol. 17:327–31. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02484.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durney, C. 1986. Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook. 4th ed. UT, USA: The University of Utah Salt Lake City.
   Google Scholar
• Erogul, O., E. Oztas, I. Yildirim, T. Kir, E. Aydur, G. Komesli, I. H C, I. M K, and P. A F. 2006. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: An in vitro study. Arch Med Res. 2006 Oct;37(7):840-3.
   Google Scholar
• Falzone, N., C. Huyser, D. R. Franken, and D. Leszczynski. 2010. Mobile phone radiation does not induce pro-apoptosis effects in human spermatozoa. Radiat. Res. 174:169–76. doi:10.1667/RR2091.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falzone, N., C. Huyser, F. Fourie, T. Toivo, D. Leszczynski, and D. Franken. 2008. In vitro effect of pulsed 900 MHz GSM radiation on mitochondrial membrane potential and motility of human spermatozoa. Bioelectromagnetics 29:268–76. doi:10.1002/bem.20390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falzone, N., C. Huyser, P. Becker, D. Leszczynski, and D. R. Franken. 2011. The effect of pulsed 900-MHz GSM mobile phone radiation on the acrosome reaction, head morphometry and zona binding of human spermatozoa. Int. J. Androl. 34:20–26. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01054.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejes, I., Z. Za´vaczki, J. Szo¨llosi, S. Kolosza´r, J. Daru, and P. A. Kova´csL. 2005. Is there a relationship between cell phone use and semen quality? Arch. Androl. 51:385–93. doi:10.1080/014850190924520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., R. S. Sharma, and R. Singh. 2020. Non-ionizing radiation as possible carcinogen. Int J Environ Health Res 1–25. doi:10.1080/09603123.2020.1806212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutschi, T., B. Mohamad Al-Ali, R. Shamloul, K. Pummer, and H. Trummer. 2011. Impact of cell phone use on men’s semen parameters. J. Andrologia 43:312–16. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01075.x.
   Google Scholar
• Habash, R. W. Y. 2008. Bioeffects and therapeutic applications of electromagnetic energy. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagras, A. M., E. A. Toraih, and M. Fawzy. 2016. Mobile phones electromagnetic radiation and NAD+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase as a mitochondrial marker in asthenozoospermia. Biochim Open.  25;3:19-25.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, A. J., A. Singh, and A. Agarwal. 2011. Cell phones and their impact on male fertility: Fact or fiction. Open Reproductive Science Journal 5:125–37.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, B. J., B. Nixon, K. E. McEwan, J. H. Martin, B. V. King, R. J. Aitken, and G. N. De Iuliis. 2019. Whole-body exposures to radiofrequency-electromagnetic energy can cause DNA damage in mouse spermatozoa via an oxidative mechanism. Sci Rep 9: doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53983-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. J., and S. M. Shalet. 2005. Spermatogenesis after cancer treatment: Damage and recovery. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monographs 34:12–17. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. 1998. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.. Health physics 74: 494–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurewicz, J., W. Hanke, M. Radwan, and J. P. Bonde. 2009. Environmental factors and semen quality. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 22:305–29. doi:10.2478/v10001-009-0036-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari, K. K., and J. Behari. 2010. Microwave exposure affecting reproductive system in male rats. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol 162:416–28. doi:10.1007/s12010-009-8722-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari, K. K., R. Meena, J. Nirala, J. Kumar, and H. N. Verma. 2014. Effect of 3G cell phone exposure with computer controlled 2-D stepper motor on non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway in rat brain. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 68:347–58. doi:10.1007/s12013-013-9715-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari, K. K., S. Kumar, and J. Behari. 2010. Mobile phone usage and male infertility in Wistar rats. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 48:987–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari, K. K., S. Kumar, and J. Behari. 2011. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic wave exposure from cellular phones on the reproductive pattern in male Wistar rats. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 164:546–59. doi:10.1007/s12010-010-9156-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari, K. K., S. Kumar, J. Nirala, M. H. Siddiqui, and J. Behari. 2013. Biophysical evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic field effects on male reproductive pattern. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 65:85–96. doi:10.1007/s12013-012-9414-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari, KK ,Behari J. 2010. Effects of microwave at 2.45 GHz radiations on reproductive system of male rats. Toxicoll Environ Chem 92:1135–47. doi:10.1080/02772240903233637.
   Google Scholar
• Khillare B, Behari J. 1998. Effect of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency radiation on reproduction pattern in rats. Electromagn Biol Med 17:43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarenko, A. V., and U. Tan. 2003. Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human EEG: A brain mapping study. Int. J. Neurosci. 113:1007–19. doi:10.1080/00207450390220330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., J. P. Nirala, J. Behari, and R. Paulraj. 2014. Effect of electromagnetic irradiation produced by 3G mobile phone on male rat reproductive system in a simulated scenario. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 52:890–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., K. K. Kesari, and J. Behari. 2011. The therapeutic effect of a pulsed electromagnetic field on the reproductive patterns of male Wistar rats exposed to a 2.45-GHz microwave field. Clin (Sao Paulo) 66:1237–45. doi:10.1590/S1807-59322011000700020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan-Hoong, N. (2003). Non-ionizing radiations–sources, biological effects, emissions and exposures, proceedings of the international conference on non-ionizing radiation at UNITEN (ICNIR2003) Kualalampur, Malasia Electromagnetic Fields and Our Health.
   Google Scholar
• La Vignera, S., R. A. Condorelli, E. Vicari, R. D’Agata, and A. E. Calogero. 2012. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: A review of the literature. J. Androl. 33:350–56. doi:10.2164/jandrol.111.014373.
   Google Scholar
• Makker, K., A. Varghese, N. R. Desai, R. Mouradi, and A. Agarwal. 2009. Cell phones: Modern man’s nemesis? Reprod. Biomed. Online 18:148–57. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60437-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meena, R., K. Kumari, J. Kumar, P. Rajamani, H. Verma, and K. K. Kesari. 2014. Therapeutic approaches of melatonin in microwave radiations‐induced oxidative stress‐mediated toxicity on male fertility pattern of Wistar rats. Electromagn Biol Med 33:81–91. doi:10.3109/15368378.2013.781035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merhi, Z. O. Apr 2012. Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 29:293–97. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9722-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naziroglu, M., M. Yuksel, S. A. Kose, and M. O. Ozkaya. 2013. Recent reports of Wi-Fi and mobile phone-induced radiation on oxidative stress and reproductive signaling pathways in females and males. J. Membr. Biol 246:869–75. doi:10.1007/s00232-013-9597-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy, P. J., A. Monteiro, P. A. Fowler, and I. D. Morris. 2014. Identification of Leydig cell-specific mRNA transcripts in the adult rat testis. Reproduction 147:671–82. doi:10.1530/REP-13-0603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okechukwu, C. E. 2019. Effects of mobile phone radiation and exercise on testicular function in male wistar rats. J. Exp. Clin. Biosci. 6:51. doi:10.4103/njecp.njecp_18_18.
   Google Scholar
• Ozguner, M., A. Koyu, G. Cesur, M. Ural, F. Ozguner, A. Gokcimen, and N. Delibas. 2005. Biological and morphological effects on the reproductive organ of rats after exposure to electromagnetic field. Saudi Med J 26:405–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, N., and S. Giri. 2018. Melatonin attenuates radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz)-induced oxidative stress, DNA damage and cell cycle arrest in germ cells of male Swiss albino mice. Toxicol Ind Health 34:315–27. doi:10.1177/0748233718758092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, F., J. Zhang, H. Cao, C. Yi, J. X. Li, and J. Nie. 2012. Effects of 1800-MHz radiofrequency fields on circadian rhythm of plasma melatonin and testosterone in male rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 75:1120–28. doi:10.1080/15287394.2012.699846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rago, R., P. Salacone, L. Caponecchia, A. Sebastianelli, I. Marcucci, A. E. Calogero, R. Condorelli, E. Vicari, G. Morgia, V. Favilla, et al. 2013. The semen quality of the mobile phone users. J Endocrinol Invest. 36(11):970-4.
   Google Scholar
• Redmayne, M., E. Smith, and M. J. Abramson. 2011. Adolescent in-school cell phone habits: A census of rules, survey of their effectiveness, and fertility implications. Reprod Toxicol ;32(3):354-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, E. P., E. L. Rhoden, M. M. Horn, C. Rhoden, L. P. Lima, and L. Toniolo. 2007. Effects of subchronic exposure to radiofrequency from a conventional cellular telephone on testicular function in adult rats. J. Urol. 177:395–99. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts J A., Y. L H, and C. Manolis. 2014. The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 3254–65.
   Google Scholar
• Romano-Spica, V., N. Mucci, C. L. Ursini, A. Ianni, and N. K. Bhat. 2000. Ets1 oncogene induction by ELF-modulated 50 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics 21:8–18. doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-186x(200001)21:1<8::aid-bem3>3.0.co;2-g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosli, M., G. Michel, C. E. Kuehni, and A. Spoerri. 2007. Cellular telephone use and time trends in brain tumour mortality in Switzerland from 1969 to 2002. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 16:77–82. doi:10.1097/01.cej.0000203618.61936.cd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikhun, J., Y. Kitiyanant, V. Vanadurongwan, and K. Pavasuthipaisit. 1998. Effects of sauna on sperm movement characteristics of normal men measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis. Int. J. Androl. 21:358–63. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2605.1998.00138.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salama, N., T. Kishimoto, and H. O. Kanayama. 2010. Effects of exposure to a mobile phone on testicular function and structure in adult rabbit. Int. J. Androl. 33:88–94. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00940.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama, N., T. Kishimoto, and K. S. Kanayama H-O. 2009. The mobile phone decreases fructose but not citrate in rabbit semen: A longitudinal study. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 55:181–87. doi:10.3109/19396360903013126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., R. Nath, A. K. Mathur, and R. S. Sharma. 2018. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health. Indian J. Med. Res. 148 2018 Dec:S92–S99. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1056_18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skakkebaek, N. E., N. Jorgensen, K. M. Main, E. R.-D. Meyts, H. Leffers, A.-M. Andersson, A. Juul, E. Carlsen, G. Mortensen, T. K. Jensen, et al. 2006. Is human fecundity declining? Int. J. Androl. 29:2–11. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00573.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• wang, S.-M., D. Wang, R.-Y. Peng, Y.-B. Gao, Y. Yang, W.-H. Hu, H.-Y. Chen, Y.-R. Zhang, and Y. Gao. 2003. Effect of electromagnetic pulse irradiation on structure and function of Leydig cells in mice. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 9:327–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wdowiak, A., L. Wdowiak, and H. Wiktor. 2007. Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 14:169–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2014. Fact Sheet No. 193. Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Mobile Phones. Geneva. Available on: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/electromagnetic-fields-and-public-health-mobile-phones(Accessed on-17/08/2020)
   Google Scholar
• Yu, G., Z. Tang, H. Chen, Z. Chen, L. Wang, H. Cao, … Z. Bai Science of The Total Environment, 133860 (2020). Long-term exposure to 4G smartphone radio frequency electromagnetic radiation diminished male reproductive potential by directly disrupting Spock3–MMP2-BTB axis in the testes of adult rats.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., X. B. Wang, J. Q. Yang, Y. Liu, and G. B. Zhang. 2005. Influence of electromagnetic irradiation on P450scc mRNA expression in rat testis tissues and protective effect of the shield. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 11:269–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zini, A., K. Kamal, D. Phang, J. Willis, and K. Jarvi. 2001. Biologic variability of sperm DNA denaturation in infertile men. Urology 58:258–61. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01180-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar