An Evaluation of the Genotoxic Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation at 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, and 2100 MHz Frequencies with a SMART Assay in Drosophila melanogaster

References

• Ahmed, N. A., N. M. Radwan, H. S. A. Ezz, N. A. Salama. 2017. The antioxidant effect of green tea mega egcg against electromagnetic radiation-induced oxidative stress in the hippocampus and striatum of rats. Electromagnet Biol. Med 36:63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, R. J., L. E. Bennetts, D. Sawyer, A. M. Wiklendt, B. V. King. 2005. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int. J. Andrology 28:171–79. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00531.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akdag, M. Z., S. Dasdag, F. Canturk, D. Karabulut, Y. Caner, N. Adalier. 2016. Does prolonged radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi devices induce DNA damage in various tissues of rats? J. Chem. Neuroanat. 75:116–22. doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpinar, D., N. Ozturk, S. Ozen, A. Agar, P. Yargicoglu. 2012. The effect of different strengths of extremely low-frequency electric fields on antioxidant status, lipid peroxidation, and visual evoked potentials. Electromagnet. Biol. Med. 31:436–48. doi:10.3109/15368378.2012.692342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkis, M. E., H. M. Bilgin, V. Akpolat, S. Dasdag, K. Yegin, M. C. Yavas, M. Z. Akdag. 2019. Effect of 900-, 1800-, and 2100-MHz radiofrequency radiation on DNA and oxidative stress in brain. Electromagnet. Biol. Med 38:32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. 2009. Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology 16:191–99. doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bilgici, B., A. Akar, B. Avci, O. K. Tuncel. 2013. Effect of 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on oxidative stress in rat brain and serum. Electromagnet. Biol. Med 32:20–29. doi:10.3109/15368378.2012.699012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodera, P., W. Stankiewicz, B. Antkowiak, M. Paluch, J. Kieliszek, J. Sobiech, M. Niemcewicz. 2015. Influence of electromagnetic field (1800 MHz) on lipid peroxidation in brain, blood, liver and kidney in rats. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 28:751–59. doi:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodera, P., W. Stankiewicz, K. Zawada, B. Antkowiak, M. Paluch, J. Kieliszek, B. Kalicki, A. Bartosiński, I. Wawer. 2013. Changes in antioxidant capacity of blood due to mutual action of electromagnetic field (1800MHz) and opioid drug (tramadol) in animal model of persistent inflammatory state. Pharmacol. Rep. 65:421–28. doi:10.1016/S1734-1140(13)71017-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdineaud, J. P., M. Srut, A. Stambuk, M. Tkalec, D. Brèthes, K. Malarić, G. I. V. Klobučar. 2017. Electromagnetic fields at a mobile phone frequency (900 MHz) trigger the onset of general stress response along with DNA modifications in eisenia fetida earthworms. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology 68:142–52. doi:10.1515/aiht-2017-68-2928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, G. C., R. Kavet, and L. I. Kheifets. 1999. The relationship between electromagnetic field and light exposures to melatonin and breast cancer risk: A review of the relevant literature. J. Pineal Res 26:65–100. doi:10.1111/j.1600-079X.1999.tb00568.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugarolas, J., C. Chandrasekaran, J. I. Gordon, D. Beach, T. Jacks, G. J. Hannon. 1995. Radiation-induced cell-cycle arrest compromised by P21 deficiency. Nature 377:552–57. doi:10.1038/377552a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadet, J., E. Sage, and T. Douki. 2005. Ultraviolet radiation-mediated damage to cellular DNA. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen 571:573–517. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., W. Zhang, M. X. Lu, Q. Xu, Q. Q. Meng, J. H. Nie, and J. Tong. 2009. 900-MHz microwaveradiation enhances gamma-ray adverse effects on SHG44 cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 72:727–32. doi:10.1080/15287390902841466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celiker, M., A. Ozgur, L. Tumkaya, S. Terzi, M. Yilmaz, Y. Kalkan, E. Erdogan. 2017. Effects of exposure to 2100 MHz GSM-like radiofrequency electromagnetic field on auditory system of rats. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 83:691–96. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., Q. L. Ma, C. Liu, P. Deng, G. Zhu, L. Zhang, M. He, Y. Lu, W. Duan, L. Pei, et al. 2014. Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation impairs neurite outgrowth of embryonic neural stem cells. Scientific Reports 4:5103. doi: 10.1038/srep05103
   Google Scholar
• Cucurachi, S., W. L. M. Tamis, M. G. Vijver, W. J. G. M. Peijnenburg, J. F. B. Bolte, G. R. de Snoo. 2013. A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environ. Int. 51:116–40. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2012.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danese, E., G. Lippi, R. Buonocore, M. Benati, C. Bovo, C. Bonaguri, G. L. Salvagno, G. Brocco, D. Roggenbuck, M. Montagnana, et al. 2017. Mobile phone radiofrequency exposure has no effect on DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in human lymphocytes. . Annals of Translational Medicine 5:1–7. doi:10.21037/atm.2017.04.35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, W. M. U., I. L. Pitout, T. J. O. Afullo, M. V. Mabandla. 2009. The effect of electromagnetic radiation in the mobile phone range on the behaviour of the rat. Metabolic Brain Disease 24:629–41. doi:10.1007/s11011-009-9164-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Iuliis, G. N., R. J. Newey, B. V. King, R. J. Aitken. 2009. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. Plos One 4:e6446. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eker, E. D., B. Arslan, M. Yildirim, A. Akar, N. Aras. 2018. The effect of exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation on epidermal growth factor, caspase-3, Hsp27 and p38MAPK gene expressions in the rat eye. Bratislava Medical Journal 119:588–92. doi:10.4149/BLL_2018_106.
   Google Scholar
• Erdemli, C., S. Omeroglu, B. Sirav, M. Colbay, N. Seyhan, S. Ozkan, I. Yetkin. 2017. Effects of 2100 MHz radio frequency radiation on ductus epididymis tissue in rats. Bratislava Medical Journal 118:759–64. doi:10.4149/BLL_2017_143
   Google Scholar
• Ertilav, K., F. Uslusoy, S. Ataizi, M. Naziroglu. 2018. Long term exposure to cell phone frequencies (900 and 1800 MHz) induces apoptosis, mitochondrial oxidative stress and TRPV1 channel activation in the hippocampus and dorsal root ganglion of rats. Metab. Brain Dis 33:753–63. doi:10.1007/s11011-017-0180-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele, G., M. D. Edwards, S. Bhutani, J. M. Hares, M. Murbach, E. W. Green, S. Dissel, M. H. Hastings, E. Rosato, C. P. Kyriacou, et al. 2014. Genetic analysis of circadian responses to low frequency electromagnetic fields in drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genetics 10:e1004804. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons, R. J., J. R. Farley, W. Adey, D. J. Baylink. 1989. Frequency dependence of increased cell proliferation, in vitro, in exposures to a low-amplitude, low-frequency electric field: Evidence for dependence on increased mitogen activity released into culture medium. Journal of Cellular Physiology 139:586–91. doi:10.1002/jcp.1041390319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei, H., and F. E. Würgler. 1988. Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative, or inconclusive result. Mutat. Res. Environ. Mutagen. Relat. Subj 203:297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geronikolou, S., S. Zimeras, C. H. Davos, I. Michalopoulos, S. Tsitomeneas. 2014. Diverse radiofrequency sensitivity and radiofrequency effects of mobile or cordless phone near fields exposure in Drosophila melanogaster. Plos One 9:e112139. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardini, L., G. Ciuti, S. Tognarelli, C. Cinti. 2014. Searching for the perfect wave: The effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15:5366–87. doi:10.3390/ijms15045366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokcek-Sarac, C., and H. Er. 2017b. Effects of different duration time of exposure to 2100 MHz electromagnetic radiation on behaviour and hippocampal levels of protein kinases on rats. J. Neurol. Sci. [Turk] 34:322–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokcek-Sarac, C., H. Er, C. K encebay Manas, D. Kantar Gok, S. Ozen, N. Derin. 2017a. Effects of acute and chronic exposure to both 900 MHz and 2100 MHz electromagnetic radiation on glutamate receptor signaling pathway. . International Journal of Radiation Biology 93:980–89. doi:10.1080/09553002.2017.1337279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, U., and D. Singer. 1992. Genotoxicity testing of promutagens in the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental 8:15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, U., F. E. Würgler, A. J. Katz, H. Frei, H. Juon, C. B. Hall, P. G. Kale. 1984. Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Environmental Mutagenesis 6:153–88. doi:10.1002/em.2860060206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grémiaux, A., S. Girard, V. Guérin, J. Lothier, F. Baluska, E. Davies, P. Bonnet, A. Vian. 2016. Low-amplitude, high-frequency electromagnetic field exposure causes delayed and reduced growth in Rosa hybrida. J. Plant Physiol 190:144–53. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2015.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. K., M. K. Mesharam, and S. Krishnamurthy. 2018. Electromagnetic radiation 2450 MHz exposure causes cognition deficit with mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in rats. J. Biosci. 43:263–76. doi:10.1007/s12038-018-9744-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbuz, N., B. Sirav, M. Colbay, I. Yetkin, N. Seyhan. 2014. No genotoxic effect in exfoliated bladder cells of rat under the exposure of 1800 and 2100 MHz radio frequency radiation. Electromagnet. Biol. Med. 33:296–301.
   Google Scholar
• Hanci, H., E. Odaci, H. Kaya, Y. Aliyazioglu, I. Turan, S. Demir, S. Çolakoglu. 2013. The effect of prenatal exposure to 900-MHz electromagnetic field on the 21-old-day rat testicle. Reprod. Toxicol 42:203–09. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L. 2018. Effects of Mobile Phones on Children’s and Adolescents’ Health: A Commentary. Child Development 89:137–40. doi:10.1111/cdev.12831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., and C. Sage. 2008. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed. Pharmacother. 62:104–09. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Q., L. Zong, Y. Sun, Vijayalaxmi, T. J. Prihoda, J. Tong, Y. Cao. 2017. Adaptive response in mouse bone marrow stromal cells exposed to 900MHz radiofrequency fields: Impact of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 820:819–25. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidisoglu, E., D. Kantar-Gok, S. Ozen, P. Yargicoglu. 2018. Short-term 2.1 GHz radiofrequency radiation treatment induces significant changes on the auditory evoked potentials in adult rats. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 94:858–71. doi:10.1080/09553002.2018.1492166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidisoglu, E., D. K antar Gok, H. Er, D. Akpinar, F. Uysal, G. Akkoyunlu, S. Ozen, A. Agar, Piraye Yargicoglu. 2016. 2100-MHz electromagnetic fields have different effects on visual evoked potentials and oxidant/antioxidant status depending on exposure duration. Brain Res. 1635:1631–1611. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Him, A., N. B. Deniz, and M. E. Önger. 2018. The effect of caffeine on neuron number of rats exposed to 900-MHz electromagnetic field. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 42:198–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Q., M. L. Wang, S. C. Wu, X. Ma, G. An, H. Liu, F. Xie. 2015. Oxidative changes and apoptosis induced by 1800-MHz electromagnetic radiation in NIH/3T3 cells. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 34:85–92. doi:10.3109/15368378.2014.900507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husni, N. A., M. T. Islam, M. R. I. Faruque, N. Misran. 2013. Effects of electromagnetic absorption towards human head due to variation of its dielectric properties at 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz with different antenna substrates. Prog. Electromagnet. Res. 138:367–88. doi:10.2528/PIER13021908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Agency For Research On Cancer (IARC). (2013). Non-ionizing radiation, part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. lyon, france. Retrieved from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Monographs-On-The-Identification-Of-Carcinogenic-Hazards-To-Humans/Non-ionizing-Radiation-Part-2-Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic-Fields-2013. [accesed 2021 Feb 12]
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2020. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics 118: 483–524. doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B. C., J. H. Nie, Z. Zhou, J. Zhang, J. Tong, Y. Cao. 2012. Adaptive response in mice exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields: primary DNA damage. Plos One 7:e32040. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahya, M. C., M. Nazıroğlu, and B. Çiğ. 2014. Selenium reduces mobile phone (900 MHz)-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 160:285–93. doi:10.1007/s12011-014-0032-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenbaum,, M. A., ., and K. O. Bowman,1970. Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 9:527–49. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(70)90038-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivrak, E. G., K. K. Yurt, A. A. Kaplan, I. Alkan, and G. Altun. 2017. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 5:167–76. doi:10.1016/j.jmau.2017.07.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kos, B., B. Valic, T. Kotnik, P. Gajšek. 2011. Exposure assessment in front of a multi-band base station antenna. Bioelectromagnetics 32:234–42. doi:10.1002/bem.20640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyu, A., F. Ozguner, H. R. Yilmaz, E. Uz, G. Cesur, N. Ozcelik. 2009. The protective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on oxidative stress in rat liver exposed to the 900 MHz electromagnetic field. Toxicology and Industrial Health 25:429–34. doi:10.1177/0748233709106821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyu, A., G. Cesur, F. Ozguner, M. Akdogan, H. Mollaoglu, S. Ozen. 2005. Effects of 900MHz electromagnetic field on TSH and thyroid hormones in rats. Toxicology Letters 157:257–62. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, H. 1996. Single-and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 69:513–21. doi:10.1080/095530096145814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lameth, J., A. Gervais, C. Colin, P. Lévêque, T. M. Jay, J.-M. Edeline, M. Mallat. 2017. Erratum to: acute neuroinflammation promotes cell responses to 1800 MHz GSM electromagnetic fields in the rat cerebral cortex. Neurotoxicity Research 32:530–31. doi:10.1007/s12640-017-9774-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. S., J. S. Choi, S. Y. Hong, T. H. Son, K. Yu. 2008. Mobile phone electromagnetic radiation activates MAPK signaling and regulates viability in Drosophila. Bioelectromagnetics 29:371–79. doi:10.1002/bem.20395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., W. X. Duan, S. C. Xu, C. Chen, M. He, L. Zhang, Z. Yu, Z. Zhou. 2013. Exposure to 1800MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation induces oxidative DNA base damage in a mouse spermatocyte-derived cell line. Toxicology Letters 218:2–9. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonn, S., A. Ahlbom, P. Hall, M. Feychting, Swedish Interphone Study Group. 2005. Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 161:526–35. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjanovic, A. M., I. Pavicic, and I. Trosic. 2012. Biological indicators in response to radiofrequency/microwave exposure. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology 63:407–16. doi:10.2478/10004-1254-63-2012-2215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masumnia-Bisheh, K., M. Ghaffari-Miab, and B. Zakeri. 2017. Evaluation of different approximations for correlation coefficients in stochastic FDTD to estimate SAR variance in a human head model. IEEE trans. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 59:509–17. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2016.2614128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, Y., and H. N. Ananthaswamy. 2004. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 195:298–308. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2003.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. L., A. B. Miller, A. Sasco, D. L. Davis. 2015. Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (review). Int. J. Oncol. 46:1865–71. doi:10.3892/ijo.2015.2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odemer, R., and F. Odemer. 2019. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMF) on honey bee queen development and mating success. Sci. Total Environ. 661:553–62. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okatan, D. O., A. E. Okatan, H. Hanci, S. Demir, S. O. Yaman, S. Colakoglu, E. Odaci. 2018. Effects of 900-MHz electromagnetic fields exposure throughout middle/late adolescence on the kidney morphology and biochemistry of the female rat. Toxicology and Industrial Health 34:693–702. doi:10.1177/0748233718781292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozmen, I., M. Naziroglu, H. A. Alici, F. Sahin, M. Cengiz, I. Eren. 2007. Spinal morphine administration reduces the fatty acid contents in spinal cord and brain by increasing oxidative stress. Neurotoxic. Res. 32:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ozawa, H., E. Abe, Y. Shibasaki, T. Fukuhara, T. Suda. 1989. Electric fields stimulate DNA synthesis of mouse osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) by a mechanism involving calcium ions. J. Cell. Physiol. 138:477–83. doi:10.1002/jcp.1041380306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozen, S. 2008b. Low-frequency transient electric and magnetic fields coupling to child body. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 128:162–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozen, S., S. Helhel, and S. Bilgin. 2011. Temperature and burn injury prediction of human skin exposed to microwaves: A model analysis. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 50:483–89. doi:10.1007/s00411-011-0364-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D. J., A. Karabarbounis, and L. H. Margaritis. 2004. Effect of GSM 900-MHz mobile phone radiation on the reproductive capacity of drosophila melanogaster. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 23:29–43. doi:10.1081/JBC-120039350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D. J., E. D. Chavdoula, A. Karabarbounis, L. H. Margaritis. 2007a. Comparison of bioactivity between GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz mobile telephony radiation. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 26:33–44. doi:10.1080/15368370701205644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D. J., E. D. Chavdoula, I. P. Nezis, L. H. Margaritis. 2007b. Cell death induced by GSM 900-MHz and DCS 1800-MHz mobile telephony radiation. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 626:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, N., and S. Giri. 2018. Melatonin attenuates radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz)-induced oxidative stress, DNA damage and cell cycle arrest in germ cells of male Swiss albino mice. Toxicology and Industrial Health 34:315–27. doi:10.1177/0748233718758092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. L., N. P. Singh, and H. Lai. 2009. Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage. Pathophysiology 16:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2008.11.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remondini, D., R. Nylund, J. Reivinen, F. Poulletier de Gannes, B. Veyret, I. Lagroye, E. Haro, M. A. Trillo, M. Capri, C. Franceschi, et al. 2006. Gene expression changes in human cells after exposure to mobile phone microwaves. Proteomics 6:4745–54. doi:10.1002/pmic.200500896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ozen. 2008a. Evaluation and measurement of magnetic field exposure at a typical high-voltage substation and its power lines. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 128:198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., M. Sarti, S. B. Reddy, T. J. Prihoda, M. R. Scarfì. 2009. Induction of adaptive response in human blood lymphocytes exposed to radiofrequency radiation. Radiat. Res. 171:735–42. doi:10.1667/RR1687.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfì, M. R., A. M. Fresegna, P. Villani, R. Pinto, C. Marino, M. Sarti, P. Altavista, A. Sannino, G. A. Lovisolo. 2006. Exposure to radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz, GSM signal) does not affect micronucleus frequency and cell proliferation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: An interlaboratory study. Radiat. Res. 165:655–63. doi:10.1667/RR3570.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seada, M. A., S. E. Elkholy, and W. S. Meshrif. 2016. Does the cellphone radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation during ringing or talking modes induce locomotor disturbance in Drosophila melanogaster ? African Zoology 51:53–60. doi:10.1080/15627020.2016.1151828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senavirathna, M. D. H. J., A. Takashi, and Y. Kimura. 2014. Short-duration exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation alters the chlorophyll fluorescence of duckweeds (lemna minor). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 33:327–34. doi:10.3109/15368378.2013.844705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi-Gahrouei, D., B. Hashemi-Beni, A. Moradi, M. Aliakbari, S. Shahbazi-Gahrouei. 2018. Exposure to global system for mobile communication 900 MHz cellular phone radiofrequency alters growth, proliferation and morphology of michigan cancer foundation-7 cells and mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Prev. Med. 9:51. doi:10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_75_17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, H. B., C. N. Coleman, M. S. Anscher, W. H. McBride. 2003. Effects of radiation on normal tissue: Consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol. 4:529–36. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(03)01191-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Vorst, A., A. Rosen, and Y. Kotsuka. 2006. RF/microwave interaction with biological tissues. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaeve,, L. 2014. Environmental impact of radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 44:1313–69. doi:10.1080/10643389.2013.781935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayalaxmi, and T. J. Prihoda. 2014. Mobile phones, non-ionizing radiofrequency fields and brain cancer: Is there an adaptive response? Dose-Response 12:509–14. doi:10.2203/dose-response.14-012.Vijayalaxmi.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijver, M. G., J. F. B. Bolte, T. R. Evans, W. L. M. Tamis, W. J. G. M. Peijnenburg, C. J. M. Musters, G. R. de Snoo. 2014. Investigating short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields on reproductive capacity of invertebrates in the field situation. Electromagnet Biol. Med. 33:21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila, J., M. C. Turner, E. Gracia-Lavedan, J. Figuerola, J. D. Bowman, L. Kincl, L. Richardson, G. Benke, M. Hours, D. Krewski, et al. 2018. INTEROCC study group. occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: an individualized assessment approach. Environ. Int. 119:353–65. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.038
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2010). WHO research agenda for radiofrequency fields. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44396.
   Google Scholar
• Yahya, S. I., W. G., Whittow, and Y. A. Khaleel. 2016. Numerical dosimetry of CDMA/GSM, DCS/PCS and 3G signal jammers. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 10:827–35. doi:10.1049/iet-map.2014.0713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar