Automated irreversible electroporated region prediction using deep neural network, a preliminary study for treatment planning

References

• Adeyanju, O. O., H. M. Al-Angari, and A. V. Sahakian. 2012. The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol. Oncol 46:126–35. doi:10.2478/v10019-012-0026-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnass, P., K. P. van Lienden, T. M. van Gulik, M. G. Besselink, J. Crezee, H. P. Kok, et al. 2022. Improving prediction of the potential distribution induced by cylindrical electrodes within a homogeneous rectangular grid during irreversible electroporation. Appl. Sci 12:1471. doi:10.3390/app12031471.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., et al. 2018. S3D-UNet: Separable 3D U-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentation. International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, Springer, 358–68. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_32#citeas. doi: 10.978/3-030-11726-9-32.
   Google Scholar
• Cima, L. F., and L. M. Mir. 2004. Macroscopic characterization of cell electroporation in biological tissue based on electrical measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85:4520–22. doi:10.1063/1.1818728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corovic, S., I. Lackovic, P. Sustaric, T. Sustar, T. Rodic, D. Miklavcic, et al. 2013. Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation. Biomed. Eng. Online 12:1–27. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-12-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, G., X. Cao, J. Liang, X. Chen, Y. Zhan, et al. 2020. Medical image segmentation based on u-net: A review. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 64:20501–08. doi:10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2020.64.2.020508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edd, J. F., and R. V. Davalos. 2007. Mathematical modeling of irreversible electroporation for treatment planning. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 6:275–86. doi:10.1177/153303460700600403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firoozabadi, S. M. 2017. Finite element analysis of tissue conductivity during high-frequency and low-voltage irreversible electroporation. Iran. J. Med. Phys 14:135–40.
   Google Scholar
• Golberg, A., and B. Rubinsky. 2010. A statistical model for multidimensional irreversible electroporation cell death in tissue. Biomed. Eng. Online 9:1–13. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-9-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudvangen, E., V. Kim, V. Novickij, F. Battista, A. G. Pakhomov, et al. 2022. Electroporation and cell killing by milli-to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation. Sci. Rep 12:1–15. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-04868-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermi, A., I. Mahmoudi, and M. T. Khadir. 2018. Deep convolutional neural networks using U-Net for automatic brain tumor segmentation in multimodal MRI volumes. In, Alessandro, Crimi, Spyridon, Bakas, Hugo, Kuijf, Farahani, Keyvan, Mauricio, Reyes, Theo van, Walsum (eds.), International MICCAI Brainlesion workshop, Springer, 37–48. 978-3-030-11726-9. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_4. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9-4.
   Google Scholar
• Khorasani, A. 2020a. A numerical study on the effect of conductivity change in cell kill distribution in irreversible electroporation. Polish J. Medical Phys. Eng 26:69–76. doi:10.2478/pjmpe-2020-0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorasani, A. 2020b. The effect of conductivity changes on temperature rise during irreversible electroporation. Front. Biomed. Technol 7:178–85.
   Google Scholar
• Khorasani, A. 2021a. Clinical usage of tissue electrical conductivity during the electroporation: An essential and useful factor. Front. Biomed. Technol 8:61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Khorasani, A. 2021b. Finite element analysis of cell killing probability in electroporation with single bipolar electrode. Front. Biomed. Technol 8:20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Khorasani, A., S. M. Firoozabadi, and Z. Shankayi. 2018. Conductivity changes of liver tissue during irreversible electroporation and calculation of the electric field distribution. Modares. J. Biotechnol 9:227–32.
   Google Scholar
• Khorasani, A., S. M. Firoozabadi, and Z. Shankayi. 2019. Conductivity change with needle electrode during high frequency irreversible electroporation: A finite element study. Polish J. Medical Phys. Eng 25:237–42. doi:10.2478/pjmpe-2019-0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnič-Kalamiza, S., T. Kotnik, and D. Miklavčič. 2012. Educational application for visualization and analysis of electric field strength in multiple electrode electroporation. BMC Med. Educ 12:1–13. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-12-102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merola, G. Design and characterization of aminimally invasive bipolar electrode for electroporation. Biology, 2020. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/9/9/303. doi:10.3390/biology9090303.
   Google Scholar
• Miklavčič, D., K. Beravs, D. Šemrov, M. Čemažar, F. Demšar, G. Serša, et al. 1998. The importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues. Biophys. J. 74:2152–58. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77924-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavliha, D., B. Kos, M. Marčan, A. Županič, G. Serša, D. Miklavčič, et al. 2013. Planning of electroporation-based treatments using web-based treatment-planning software. J. Membr. Biol. 246:833–42. doi:10.1007/s00232-013-9567-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg, M. 1995. A model of microbial survival after exposure to pulsed electric fields. J. Sci. Food Agric. 67:93–99. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740670115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, M. U., S. Cho, J. H. Kim, K. T. Chong, et al. 2020. Bu-net: Brain tumor segmentation using modified u-net architecture. Electronics 9:2203. doi:10.3390/electronics9122203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger, O., P. Fischer, and T. Brox (2015) ‘U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation’, in International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, October 5-9, Germany. Springer, pp. 234–41.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, B. 2007. Irreversible electroporation in medicine. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 6:255–59. doi:10.1177/153303460700600401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, B., G. Onik, and P. Mikus. 2007. Irreversible electroporation: A new ablation modality—clinical implications. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 6:37–48. doi:10.1177/153303460700600106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano, M. B., R. E. Neal, P. A. Garcia, D. Gerber, J. Robertson, R. V. Davalos, et al. 2010. Towards the creation of decellularized organ constructs using irreversible electroporation and active mechanical perfusion. Biomed. Eng. Online 9:1–16. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-9-83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer, H. J., K. Nielsen, M. C. de Jong, A. A. J. M. van Tilborg, J. M. Vieveen, A. (R.A.) Bouwman, S. Meijer, C. van Kuijk, P. (M.P.) van den Tol, M. R. Meijerink, et al. 2014. Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in the clinical setting: A systematic review of safety and efficacy. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol 25:997–1011. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankayi, Z., S. M. P. Firoozabadi, and Z. S. Hassan. 2014. Optimization of electric pulse amplitude and frequency in vitro for low voltage and high frequency electrochemotherapy. J. Membr. Biol. 247:147–54. doi:10.1007/s00232-013-9617-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.-D., Z. Dong, X. Chen, W. Jia, S. Du, K. Muhammad, S.-H. Wang, et al. 2019. Image based fruit category classification by 13-layer deep convolutional neural network and data augmentation. Multimed. Tools. Appl 78:3613–32. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-5243-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., S. Bhonsle, S. Dong, Y. Lv, H. Liu, A. Safaai-Jazi, R. V. Davalos, C. Yao, et al. 2017. Characterization of conductivity changes during high-frequency irreversible electroporation for treatment planning. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65:1810–19. doi:10.1109/TBME.2017.2778101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X.-Y., et al. (2020) Acnn: A full resolution dcnn for medical image segmentation. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 31 to June 4, France. IEEE. pp. 8455–61. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9197328. doi:10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197328.
   Google Scholar