Experimental and numerical study of the effect of micro-structure on the rate-sensitivity of cellular foam

References

• L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• J.E. Field, S.M. Walley, W.G. Proud, H.T. Goldrein, and C.R. Siviour, Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 725–775, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mahfuz, M. Uddin, V. Rangari, M. Saha, S. Zainuddin, and S. Jeelani, High strain rate response of sandwich composites with nanophased cores, Appl. Compos. Mater., vol. 12, no. 3–4, pp. 193–211, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Mukai, H. Kanahashi, Y. Yamada, K. Shimojima, M. Mabuchi, T.G. Nieh, et al., Dynamic compressive behavior of an ultra-lightweight magnesium foam, Scripta Mater., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 365–371, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.A. Dannemann and J. Lankford Jr., High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminum foams, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. 157–164, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kanahashi, T. Mukai, Y. Yamada, K. Shimojima, M. Mabuchi, T.G. Nieh, et al., Dynamic compression of an ultra-low density aluminium foam, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 280, no. 2, pp. 349–353, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Lankford Jr, and K.A. Dannemann, Strain rate effects in porous materials, Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Symposium, vol. 521, pp. 103–108, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• V.S. Deshpande and N.A. Fleck, High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminum alloy foams, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 277–298, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Yu, X. Wang, Z.G. Wei, and E.H. Wang, Deformation and failure mechanism of dynamically loaded sandwich beams with aluminum-foam core, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 331–347, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Tan, J.J. Harrigan, and S.R. Reid, Inertia effects in uniaxial dynamic compression of a closed cell aluminium alloy foam, Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 480–488, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wang, S. Xu, Z. Li, J. Yang, C. Zhang, and S. Hu, Experimental investigation on the strain-rate effect and inertia effect of closed-cell aluminum foam subjected to dynamic loading, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 620, pp. 253–261, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kolsky, An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading, Proc. Phys. Soc. B, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 676–700, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• W. Chen and B. Song, Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, Boston, MA, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sun and J.A. Packer, High strain rate behaviour of cold-formed rectangular hollow sections, Eng. Struct., vol. 62–63, pp. 181–192, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.W. Reinhardt, H.A. Körmeling, and A.J. Zielinski, The split Hopkinson bar, a versatile tool for the impact testing of concrete, Mater. Struct., vol. 19, no. 109, pp. 55–63, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• B. Song, dynamic stress equilibration in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests on soft materials, Exp. Mech., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 300–312, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lee, F. Barthelat, N. Moldovan, H.D. Espinosa, and H.N.G. Wadley, Deformation rate effects on failure modes of open-cell Al foams and textile cellular materials, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 53–73, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.R. Calladine and R.W. English, Strain-rate and inertia effects in the collapse of two types of energy-absorbing structure, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 26, no. 11–12, pp. 689–701, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.Y. Su, T.X. Yu, and S.R. Reid, Inertia-sensitive impact energy-absorbing structures, Part I: Effects of inertia and elasticity, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 651–672, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.Y. Su, T.X. Yu, and S.R. Reid, Inertia-sensitive impact energy-absorbing structures, Part II: Effect of strain rate,Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 673–689, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhao and G. Gary, Crushing behaviour of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 827–836, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Chen, T.J. Lu, and N.A. Fleck, Effect of imperfections on the yielding of two-dimensional foams, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2235–2272, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Grenestedt, On interactions between imperfections in cellular solids, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 40, no. 22, pp. 5853–5857, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wang, S. Xu, Z. Li, J. Yang, H. Zheng, and S. Hu, Temperature effects on the mechanical behavior of aluminum foam under dynamic loading, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 599, pp. 174–179, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Lesuer, Experimental investigations of material models for Ti-6AL4V and 2024-T3, US Department of Energy, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Meyers, Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Wiley, NewYork, 1994.
   Google Scholar