Experimental and numerical analysis of impact on curved nanocomposite panels

References

• S. A. Tekalur, A. Shukla, and K. Shivakumar, “Blast resistance of polyurea based layered composite materials,” Composite Structures, vol. 84, pp. 271–281, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Xue, W. Mock, and T. Belytschko, “Penetration of DH-36 steel plates with and without polyurea coating,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 981–1003, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. M. Roland, D. Fragiadakis, and R. M. Gamache, “Elastomer–steel laminate armor,” Composite Structures, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1059–1064, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. B. Bogoslovov, C. M. Roland, and R. M. Gamache, “Impact-induced glass transition in elastomeric coatings,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, pp. 221910, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. S. Stargel, “Experimental and numerical investigation into the effects of panel curvature on the high velocity ballistic impact response of aluminum and composite panels,” PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, USA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• P. Kumar, J. LeBlanc, D. S. Stargel, and A. Shukla, “Effect of plate curvature on blast response of aluminum panels,” International Journal of impact engineering, vol. 46, pp. 74–85, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Bidi, G. H. Liaghat, and G. H. Rahimi, “Experimental and numerical analysis of impact on steel curved panels,” Journal of Modares Mechanical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 281–288, 2016. (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• D. R. Ambur, and J. H. Starnes Jr, “Effect of curvature on the impact damage characteristic and residual strength of composite plates. NASA Langley Research Center. AIAA Paper No. 98–1881,” Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980058813.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• G. J. McShane, C. Stewart, M. T. Aronson, H. N. G. Wadley, N. A. Fleck, and V. S. Deshpande, “Dynamic rupture of polymer–metal bi-layer plates,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 45, no. 16, pp. 4407–4426, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Irshidat, A. Al-Ostaz, and A. H. D. Cheng, Predicting the response of polyurea coated high hard steel plates to ballistic impact by fragment simulating projectiles. USA: Ole Miss Project, Nano Infrastructure Research Group, University of Mississippi, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M. R. Amini, J. Isaacs, and S. Nemat-Nasser, “Investigation of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulsive loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 628–639, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. Amini, J. Simon, and S. Nemat-Nasser, “Numerical modeling of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulsive loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 615–627, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Samiee, A. V. Amirkhizi, and S. Nemat-Nasser, “Numerical study of the effect of polyurea on the performance of steel plates under blast loads,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 64, pp. 1–10, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Domun, H. Hadavinia, T. Zhang, T. Sainsbury, G. H. Liaghat, and S. Vahid, “Improving fracture toughness and strength of epoxy using nanomaterials – A review of current status,” Nanoscale, vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 10294–10329, 2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Olad, Polymer/clay nanocomposites. In: Advances in Diverse Industrial Applications of Nanocomposites, edited by Dr. Boreddy Reddy, In Tech, India, pp. 113–138, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• C. GunaSingh, S. Soundararajan, and K. Palanivelu, “Studies on Mechanical, Thermal properties and Characterization of Nanocomposites of Nylon-6 –Thermoplastics Poly Urethane Rubber [TPUR]blend,” IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• D. Cai, and M. Song, “High mechanical performance polyurea/organoclay nanocomposites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 103, no. 28, pp. 44–48, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• R. Casalini, R. Bogoslovov, S. B. Qadri, and C. M. Roland, “Nanofiller reinforcement of elastomeric polyurea,” Polymer, vol. 53, pp. 1282–1287, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Isik, U. Yilmazer, and G. Bayram, “Impact modified epoxy/montmorillonite nanocomposites: synthesis and characterization,” Polymer, vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 6371–6377, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bidi, G. H. Liaghat, and G. H. Rahimi, “Experimental and numerical analysis of impact on steel curved panels,” Modares Mechanical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 281–288, 2016. (in Persian)
   Google Scholar
• BS ISO 37:2011, Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic. Determination of tensile stress-strain properties. London, UK. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:37:ed-6:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• BS EN ISO 6892-1:2016, Metallic materials. Tensile testing. Method of test at ambient temperature. London, UK, BSI Standards Limited, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D7137 / D7137M-05, Standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite plates. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• H. Ying, Y. Zhang, and J. Cheng, “Dynamic urea bond for the design of reversible and self-healing polymers,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, pp. 3218, 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Dogan, H. Hadavinia, T. Donchev, and P. S. Bhonge, “Delamination of impacted composite structures by cohesive zone interface elements and tiebreak contact,” Central European Journal of Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 612–626, 2012.
   Google Scholar