Modeling of deformations of Roma Plastilina # 1 clay in column-drop tests by incorporating the coupled strain rate and temperature effects

References

• A.P. Green, The use of plasticine models to simulate the plastic flow of metals, Phil. Mag., vol. 42, no. 327, pp. 365–373, 1951. DOI: 10.1080/14786445108561061.
   Google Scholar
• T. Altan, H.J. Henning, and A.M. Sabroff, The use of model materials in predicting forming loads in metalworking, J. Eng. Ind., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 444–451, 1970. DOI: 10.1115/1.3427776.
   Google Scholar
• K. Eckerson, B. Liechty, and C.D. Sorensen, Thermomechanical similarity between Van Aken plasticine and metals in hot-forming processes, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 383–394, 2008. DOI: 10.1243/03093247JSA364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.F. Johnson and M. Holzapfel, Modelling soft body impact on composite structures, Compos. Struct., vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 103–113, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S-8223(03)00033-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.L. Azevedo and M. Alves, Numerical simulation of soft-body impact on GFRP laminate composites: mixed SPH-FE and pure SPH approaches. In Mechanics of Solids in Brazil 2009, H.S. da Costa Mattos and Marcílio Alves, Eds. Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, 2009, pp. 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Committee, Testing of Body Armor Materials: Phase III, Committee on Testing of Body Armor Materials for Use by the U.S. Army, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2012, pp. 46–91.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hernandez, M.F. Buchely, and A. Maranon, Dynamic characterization of Roma Plastilina No.1 from drop test and inverse analysis, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 100, pp. 158–168, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Prather, C. Swann, and C. Hawkins, 1977. Backface Signatures of Soft Body Armors and the Associated Trauma Effects. ARCSL-TR-77055, Edgewood Arsenal, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hanlon and P. Gillich, Origin of the 44-mm behind-armor blunt trauma standard, Mil. Med., vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 333–339, 2012. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-11-00303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIJ, 2008. Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor NIJ Standard-0101.06, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• J.E. Seppala, et al., Characterization of clay composite ballistic witness materials, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 7048–7057, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-015-9259-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Buchely, A. Maranon, and V.V. Silberschmidt, Material model for modeling clay at high strain rates, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 90, pp. 1–11, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Tao, K.D. Rice, and A.M. Forster, Rheology of ballistic clay: the effect of temperature and shear history. SPE ANTEC® 2017, The Plastics Technology Conference, 5 p., May 8–10, Anaheim, CA, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• H.A. Barnes, Thixotropy - a review, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., vol. 70, no. 1-2, pp. 1–33, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S-0257(97)00004-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.Q. Li, X.-L. Gao, V.A. Halls, and J.Q. Zheng, A new constitutive model for ballistic Roma Plastilina no. 1 clay, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 2019. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1538471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.E. Callahan, 2011. Analysis of composite helmet impact by the finite element method, Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, A constitutive model and data for materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, pp. 541–547, April 19–21, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• S.P. Mates, A.L. Forster, M. Riley, and K. Rice, Mechanical behavior of ballistic clay as a function of temperature, pressure and strain rate, Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2014, September 8–12, Robinson College, Cambridge, UK, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• M.F. Buchely and A. Maranon, An engineering model for the penetration of a rigid-rod into a Cowper–Symonds low-strength material, Acta Mech., vol. 226, no. 9, pp. 2999–3010, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00707-015--6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.G. Zhang, J. Ivancik, R.A. Mrozek, and S.S. Satapathy, Material characterization of Ballistic Roma Plastilina No. 1 clay, Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Ballistics, 17 p., September 11–15, Long Beach, CA, 2017. DOI: 10.12783/ballistics2017/17041.
   Google Scholar
• Y.Q. Li, X.-L. Gao, A.J. Fournier, and S.A. Sherman, Two new penetration models for ballistic clay incorporating strain-hardening, strain-rate and temperature effects, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 151, pp. 582–594, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Zukas, ed., 1990. High Velocity Impact Dynamics, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Meyers, 1994. Dynamic Behavior of Materials, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• D.E. Maxwell and J.E. Reaugh, 1972. Advanced Methods to Predict the Response of a Site under Nuclear Attack, Report # PIPR-388-1, Physics International Company, San Leandro, CA.
   Google Scholar
• D.M. Christensen, C.S. Godfrey, and D.E. Maxwell, 1968. Calculations and Model Experiments to Predict Crater Dimensions and Free-Field Motion, Physics International Company, San Leandro, CA.
   Google Scholar
• A.M. Stickle and P.H. Schultz, Subsurface damage from oblique impacts into low‐impedance layers, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 117, no. E7, pp. E07006-1–E07006-19, 2012. DOI: 10.1029/2011JE004043.
   Google Scholar
• M.G. Austin, J.M. Thomsen, S.F. Ruhl, D.L. Orphal, and P.H. Schultz, Calculational investigation of impact cratering dynamics-Material motions during the crater growth period. In: Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings, Vol. 11, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX, pp. 2325–2345, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• J.N. Reddy, 2018. Introduction to the Finite Element Method, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Adams, I. Aydin, B.J. Briscoe, and S.K. Sinha, A finite element analysis of the squeeze flow of an elasto-viscoplastic paste material, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 41–57, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S-0257(96)01546-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.P.F. Sutcliffe and P.J. Rayner, Experimental measurements of load and strip profile in thin strip rolling, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 887–899, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S-7403(97)00138-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Thomsen, M.G. Austin, S.F. Ruhl, P.H. Schultz, and D.L. Orphal, Calculational investigation of impact cratering dynamics: early time material motions. In: Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings, Vol. 10, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX, pp. 2741–2756, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• D.P. Bentz, A. Forster, K. Rice, and M. Riley, Thermal Properties and Thermal Modeling of Ballistic Clay Box, NIST Interagency/Internal Report # NISTIR-7840, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• LS-DYNA, LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Vol. II Material Models, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), Livermore, CA, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• N. Gebbeken, S. Greulich, and A. Pietzsch, Hugoniot properties for concrete determined by full-scale detonation experiments and flyer-plate-impact tests, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2017–2031, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Rinehart, Historical perspective: metallurgical effects of high strain-rate deformation and fabrication. In: Shock Waves and High-Strain-Rate Phenomena in Metals, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 3–20, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• D.B. Rahbek, Finite Element Simulations of Drop Indentations into Oily Clay, FFI-rapport 2014/02221, Norwegian Defense Research Establishment (FFI), Kjeller, Norway, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Simo and M. Ortiz, A unified approach to finite deformation elastoplastic analysis based on the use of hyperelastic constitutive equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 221–245, 1985. DOI: 10.1016/0045-(85)90061-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ortiz and J.C. Simo, An analysis of a new class of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 353–366, 1986. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620230303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Chung and O. Richmond, A deformation theory of plasticity based on minimum work paths, Int. J. Plast., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 907–920, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0749-(93)90057-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.W. Yoon, F. Barlat, R.E. Dick, K. Chung, and T.J. Kang, Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets - part II: FE formulation and its implementation, Int. J. Plast., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 495–522, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S-6419(03)00099-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Abedrabbo, F. Pourboghrat, and J. Carsley, Forming of aluminum alloys at elevated temperatures–Part 2: numerical modeling and experimental verification, Int. J. Plast., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 342–373, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.H. Dodds, Jr, Numerical techniques for plasticity computations in finite element analysis, Comput. Struct., vol. 26, pp. 767–779, 1987. DOI: 10.1016/0045-(87)90026-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Simo and T.J.R. Hughes, 1998. Computational Inelasticity, Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar