Experimental, regression learner, numerical, and artificial neural network analyses on a complex composite structure subjected to compression loading

References

• H. Rahmanpanah, S. Mouloodi, C. Burvill, S. Gohari, and H. M. Davies, Prediction of load-displacement curve in a complex structure using artificial neural networks: A study on a long bone, Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 154, pp. 103319, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103319.
   Google Scholar
• N. R. Council, Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace: low Back and Upper Extremities, National Academies Press, Washington (DC), 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/10032.
   Google Scholar
• J. Currey, Measurement of the mechanical properties of bone: A recent history, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., vol. 467, no. 8, pp. 1948–1954, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0784-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Bembey, A. Bushby, A. Boyde, V. Ferguson, and M. Oyen, Hydration effects on the micro-mechanical properties of bone, J. Mater. Res., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1962–1968, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2006.0237.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. Currey, Mechanical properties and adaptations of some less familiar bony tissues, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 357–372, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.03.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. Mouloodi, H. Rahmanpanah, C. Burvill, and H. M. Davies, Prediction of load in a long bone using an artificial neural network prediction algorithm, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 102, pp. 103527, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103527.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. R. Carter, and W. C. Hayes, The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure, JBJS., vol. 59, pp. 954–962, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. M. Keaveny, E. F. Morgan, G. L. Niebur, and O. C. Yeh, Biomechanics of trabecular bone, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 3, pp. 307–333, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Fradinho, A. C. Vale, N. Bernardes, R. M. Caldeira, M. F. Vaz, and G. Ferreira-Dias, Biomechanical properties of the equine third metacarpal bone: In vivo quantitative ultrasonography versus ex vivo compression and bending techniques, J Equine Vet. Sci., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 198–205, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2014.12.016.
   Google Scholar
• T. M. Keaveny, R. E. Borchers, L. J. Gibson, and W. C. Hayes, Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry, J Biomech., vol. 26, pp. 991–995, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. C. Rice, S. C. Cowin, and J. A. Bowman, On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density, J. Biomech., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155–168, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90008-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt Helgason, Egon Perilli, Enrico Schileo, Fulvia Taddei, Sigurdur Brynjólfsson, and Marco Viceconti, Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review, Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. D. Stemper, D. Board, N. Yoganandan, and C. E. Wolfla, Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments, J. Craniovert. Jun. Spine., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.65477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R. G. Budynas, J. K. Nisbett, and J. E. Shigley, Shigley's mechanical engineering design, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rostedt, L. Ekström, H. Broman, and T. Hansson, Axial stiffness of human lumbar motion segments, force dependence, J. Biomech., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 503–509, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00037-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. L. Logan, A First Course in the Finite Element Method, Cengage Learning, Thomson Publication, 2011. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/517316.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mouloodi, H. Rahmanpanah, C. Burvill, and H. M. Davies, Prediction of displacement in the equine third metacarpal bone using a neural network prediction algorithm, Biocyber. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 849–863, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2019.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• A. A. Abdel-Wahab, K. Alam, and V. V. Silberschmidt, Analysis of anisotropic viscoelastoplastic properties of cortical bone tissues, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 807–820, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T. D. Brown, and A. B. Ferguson, Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur, Acta Orthop Scand., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 429–437, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678008990819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Currey, Effects of differences in mineralization on the mechanical properties of bone, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B., vol. 304, pp. 509–518, 1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. S. Keller, T. H. Hansson, A. C. Abram, D. M. Spengler, and M. M. Panjabi , Regional variations in the compressive properties of lumbar vertebral trabeculae: Effects of disc degeneration, Spine (Phila Pa 1976)., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1012–1019, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198909000-00016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Rice, S. Cowin, and J. Bowman, On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density, J. Biomech., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155–168, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90008-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Williams, and J. Lewis, Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis, J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Nobakhti, O. L. Katsamenis, N. Zaarour, G. Limbert, and P. J. Thurner , Elastic modulus varies along the bovine femur, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 71, pp. 279–285, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. K. Biswas, et al., Design factors of lumbar pedicle screws under bending load: A finite element analysis, Biocyber. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2018.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• L. Jeffcott, S. Buckingham, R. McCarthy, J. Cleeland, E. Scotti, and R. McCartney, Non‐invasive measurement of bone: A review of clinical and research applications in the horse, Equine Vet. J., vol. 20, pp. 71–79, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04651.x.
   Google Scholar
• H. Liley, J. Zhang, E. Firth, J. Fernandez, and T. Besier, Using partial least squares regression as a predictive tool in describing equine third metacarpal bone shape, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin., vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 1609–1612, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2017.1393806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Sun, and P. Lal, Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering — a review, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 85–103, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00116-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Rathnayaka, et al., Quantification of the accuracy of MRI generated 3D models of long bones compared to CT generated 3D models, Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 357–363, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Koivisto, T. Kiljunen, N. Kadesjö, X.-Q. Shi, and J. Wolff, Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region, J Foot Ankle Res., vol. 8, pp. 8 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0067-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R. C. Semelka, D. M. Armao, J. Elias, and W. Huda, Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging ., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 900–909, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20895.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H. Fujita, and Y. Hatanaka, Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Retinal Fundus Images, Medical Image Analysis and Informatics: CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017. pp. 59–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351228343.
   Google Scholar
• S. Nobakhti, and S. J. Shefelbine, On the relation of bone mineral density and the elastic modulus in healthy and pathologic bone, Curr. Osteoporos. Rep., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 404–410, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0449-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Buehler, Atomistic and continuum modeling of mechanical properties of collagen: elasticity, fracture, and self-assembly, J. Mater. Res., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1947–1961, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2006.0236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. T. Edwards, W. C. Hayes, I. Posner, I. A. A. White, and R. W. Mann, Variation of lumbar spine stiffness with load, J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Brown, J. Bray, and F. Santarelli, Influence of stress-dependent elastic moduli on stresses and strains around axisymmetric boreholes, Rock Mech. Rock Engng., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 189–203, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01470986.
   Google Scholar
• G. Mader, H. Meixner, and P. Kleinschmidt, Temperature and stress dependence of Young’s modulus in semiconducting barium titanate ceramics, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 702–704, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Datta, J. Atulasimha, C. Mudivarthi, and A. Flatau, Stress and magnetic field-dependent Young's modulus in single crystal iron–gallium alloys, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 322, no. 15, pp. 2135–2144, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.01.046.
   Google Scholar
• M. Gardel, F. Nakamura, J. Hartwig, J. C. Crocker, T. Stossel, and D. Weitz, Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 088102, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.088102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biot MAJTL, Edinburgh, Magazine DP, Science Jo. XLIII, Non-Linear Theory of Elasticity and the Linearized Case for a Body under Initial Stress., vol. 27, pp. 468–489, 1939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443908562246.
   Google Scholar
• L. N. Virgin, Vibration of Axially-Loaded Structures, Cambridge University Press, Duke University, North Carolina, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619236.
   Google Scholar
• A. Pagani, R. Augello, and E. Carrera, Frequency and mode change in the large deflection and post-buckling of compact and thin-walled beams, J. Sound Vib., vol. 432, pp. 88–104, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Xie, K. Manda, R. J. Wallace, F. Levrero-Florencio, A. H. R. W. Simpson, and P. Pankaj, Time dependent behaviour of trabecular bone at multiple load levels, Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1219–1226, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-017-1800-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• K. Manda, R. J. Wallace, S. Xie, F. Levrero-Florencio, and P. Pankaj, Nonlinear viscoelastic characterization of bovine trabecular bone, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 173–189, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0809-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. M. Panjabi, et al., Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves, Spine (Phila Pa 1976)., vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 2692–2700, 2001., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112150-00012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mouloodi, S. Mohebbi, J. Khojasteh, and M. Salehi, Size-dependent static characteristics of multicrystalline nanoplates by considering surface effects, Int J Mech Sci., vol. 79, pp. 162–167, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.12.011.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gohari, S. Sharifi, C. Burvill, S. Mouloodi, M. Izadifar, and P. Thissen, Localized failure analysis of internally pressurized laminated ellipsoidal woven GFRP composite domes: Analytical, numerical, and experimental studies, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1235–1250, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2019.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• J. Merritt, C. Burvill, M. Pandy, and H. Davies, Determination of mechanical loading components of the equine metacarpus from measurements of strain during walking, Equine Vet. J., vol. 38,  S36, pp. 440–444, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05584.x.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mouloodi, H. Rahmanpanah, C. Burvill, and H. M. Davies, Accuracy quantification of the reverse engineering and high-order finite element analysis of equine MC3 forelimb, J. Equine Vet. Sci., vol. 78, pp. 94–106, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2019.04.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R. Ramanauskas, G. Kaklauskas, and A. Sokolov, Estimating the primary crack spacing of reinforced concrete structures: Predictions by neural network versus the innovative strain compliance approach, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., pp. 1–17, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1751352.
   Google Scholar
• F. Akhavan, S. Watkins, and K. Chandrashekhara, Prediction of impact contact forces of composite plates using fiber optic sensors and neural networks, Mech. of Adv. Mat. & Structures., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 195–205, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/107594100305375.
   Google Scholar
• J. S. Merritt, et al., Mechanical loading of the distal end of the third metacarpal bone in horses during walking and trotting, Am. J. Vet. Res., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 508–514, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.71.5.508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. A. McCarty, J. J. Thomason, K. D. Gordon, T. A. Burkhart, J. S. Milner, and D. W. Holdsworth, Finite-element analysis of bone stresses on primary impact in a large-animal model: The distal end of the equine third metacarpal, Plos One., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. e0159541 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Kulin, F. Jiang, and K. S. Vecchio, Effects of age and loading rate on equine cortical bone failure, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 57–75, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.09.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C. T. Rubin, H. Seeherman, Y.-X. Qin, and T. S. Gross, The mechanical consequences of load bearing in the equine third metacarpal across speed and gait: the nonuniform distributions of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density. FASEB J., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1887–1894, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.12-216804.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C. E. Quenneville, “High-speed impact testing and injury assessment of whole bones,” in Experimental Methods in Orthopaedic Biomechanics. 2016. pp. 1. pp. 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803802-4.00001-9.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. Currey, Bones: Structure and Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 2002.
   Google Scholar
• E. Firth, Problems in quantifying bone response to exercise in horses: a review, N Z Vet J., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 216–229, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2004.36432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bolotin, and H. Sievänen , Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility , J Bone Miner Res., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 799–805, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.799.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L. Melton, Epidemiology of hip fractures: implications of the exponential increase with age, Bone., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. S121–S5, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(95)00492-0.
   Google Scholar
• H. Yang, Development of image-based beam model for assessment of osteoporotic hip fracture risk., MSc thesis. University of Manitoba, Canada, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/32168.
   Google Scholar
• T. A. Burkhart, D. M. Andrews, and C. E. Dunning, Finite element modeling mesh quality, energy balance and validation methods: A review with recommendations associated with the modeling of bone tissue, J. Biomech., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1477–1488, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mouloodi, H. Rahmanpanah, C. Burvill, and H. Davies, Converging-diverging shape configuration of the diaphysis of equine third metacarpal bone through computer-aided design, Comparative Exercise Physiology., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 349–358, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP190010.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Mustansar, A. Shaukat, and L. Margetts, Effect of using different types of methods for the derivation of elastic modulus of bone - A critical survey, MATEC Web Conf., vol. 108, pp. 13002, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710813002.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mouloodi, J. Khojasteh, M. Salehi, and S. Mohebbi, Size dependent free vibration analysis of multicrystalline nanoplates by considering surface effects as well as interface region, Int J Mech Sci., vol. 85, pp. 160–167, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pawlikowski, K. Skalski, J. Bańczerowski, A. Makuch, and K. Jankowski, Stress–strain characteristic of human trabecular bone based on depth sensing indentation measurements, Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 272–280, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. U. R. Tahir, and P. Mandal, Artificial neural network prediction of buckling load of thin cylindrical shells under axial compression, Eng. Struct., vol. 152, pp. 843–855, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Peterson, J. Skraba, J. Moran, and A. Greenwald, Fracture of long bones: rate effects under singular and combined loading states, J. Orthop. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 244–250, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100010303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H. Cohen, et al., The influence of impact direction and axial loading on the bone fracture pattern, Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 277, pp. 197–206, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ghanbari, and R. Naghdabadi, Nonlinear hierarchical multiscale modeling of cortical bone considering its nanoscale microstructure, J. Biomech., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1560–1565, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Frame, M. Wheel, and P. Riches, A numerical investigation and experimental verification of size effects in loaded bovine cortical bone, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Engng., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. e2903, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2903.
   Google Scholar