References
- A. Artemev, Y. Jin, and A. Khachaturyan, Three-dimensional phase field model of proper martensitic transformation, Acta Mater. , vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1165–1177, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00021-0.
- L.-Q. Chen, Phase-Field Models for Microstructure Evolution, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 113–140, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041.
- D. J. Seol, S. Y. Hu, Y. L. Li, L. Q. Chen, and K. H. Oh, Cubic to tetragonal martensitic transformation in a thin film elastically constrained by a substrate, Met. Mater. Int., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0302703.
- V. I. Levitas, D.-W. Lee, and D. L. Preston, Interface propagation and microstructure evolution in phase field models of stress-induced martensitic phase transformations, Int. J. Plast., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 395–422, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.003.
- A. M. Roy, Effects of interfacial stress in phase field approach for martensitic phase transformation in NiAl shape memory alloys, Appl. Phys. A., vol. 126, no. 7, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03742-9.
- M. Mamivand, M. A. Zaeem, and H. E. Kadiri, A review on phase field modeling of martensitic phase transformation, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 77, pp. 304–311, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.059.
- J. Clayton, and J. Knap, A phase field model of deformation twinning: Nonlinear theory and numerical simulations, Physica D., vol. 240, no. 9-10, pp. 841–858, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2010.12.012.
- K. Tůma, and S. Stupkiewicz, Phase-field study of size-dependent morphology of austenite–twinned martensite interface in CuAlNi, Int. J. Solids Struct.., vol. 97-98, pp. 89–100, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.07.040.
- Y. U. Wang, Y. M. Jin, and A. G. Khachaturyan, Phase field microelasticity modeling of dislocation dynamics near free surface and in heteroepitaxial thin films, Acta Mater., vol. 51, no. 14, pp. 4209–4223, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00238-6.
- S. Hu, Y. Li, Y. Zheng, and L. Chen, Effect of solutes on dislocation motion —a phase-field simulation, Int. J. Plast., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 403–425, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00094-9.
- D. Rodney, Y. L. Bouar, and A. Finel, Phase field methods and dislocations, Acta Mater., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00379-2.
- J. Slutsker, K. Thornton, A. L. Roytburd, J. A. Warren, and G. B. Mcfadden, Phase field modeling of solidification under stress, Phys. Rev. B., vol. 74, no. 1, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.014103.
- G.H. Farrahi, M. Javanbakht, H. Jafarzadeh, On the phase field modeling of crack growth and analytical treatment on the parameters, Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics. 32 (2020) 913–925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-019-00775-1
- V. I. Levitas, H. Jafarzadeh, G. H. Farrahi, and M. Javanbakht, On the phase field modeling of crack growth and analytical treatment on the parameters, Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics. Int. J. Plast., vol. 111, pp. 1–35, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.07.005.
- H. Jafarzadeh, G. H. Farrahi, and M. Javanbakht, Phase field modeling of crack growth with double-well potential including surface effects, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 913–925, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-019-00775-1.
- H. Jafarzadeh, V. I. Levitas, G. H. Farrahi, and M. Javanbakht, Phase field approach for nanoscale interactions between crack propagation and phase transformation, Nanoscale., vol. 11, no. 46, pp. 22243–22247, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr05960a.
- T. Guillén-Hernández, J. Reinoso, M. Paggi, Phase field model for fracture analysis of functionally graded power-based shell structures, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1751354.
- V. I. Levitas, and M. Javanbakht, Surface Tension and Energy in Multivariant Martensitic Transformations: Phase-Field Theory, Simulations, and Model of Coherent Interface, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105, no. 16, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.165701.
- V. I. Levitas, and M. Javanbakht, Surface-Induced Phase Transformations: Multiple Scale and Mechanics Effects and Morphological Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, no. 17, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.175701.
- M. Javanbakht, and E. Barati, Martensitic phase transformations in shape memory alloy: phase field modeling with surface tension effect, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 115, pp. 137–144, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.037.
- D. R. Mahapatra, and R. V. N. Melnik, Dynamics in Shape Memory Alloys with a Consistent Landau-Ginzburg Free Energy Model, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 443–455, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376490600862863.
- L.-P. He, and J. Zhang, A second-order conservational difference scheme for the one-dimensional model of martensitic transformations with nonlinear boundary conditions, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 3484–3494, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.01.007.
- M. Javanbakht, and M. S. Ghaedi, Nanovoid induced martensitic growth under uniaxial stress: Effect of misfit strain, temperature and nanovoid size on PT threshold stress and nanostructure in NiAl, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 184, pp. 109928, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109928.
- H. K. Yeddu, Phase field modeling of austenite grain size effect on martensitic transformation in stainless steels, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 154, pp. 75–83, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.040.
- M. Javanbakht, and M. S. Ghaedi, Nanovoid induced multivariant martensitic growth under negative pressure: Effect of misfit strain and temperature on PT threshold stress and phase evolution, Mech. Mater., vol. 151, pp. 103627, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103627.
- D. Wang, et al., Phase field simulation of martensitic transformation in pre-strained nanocomposite shape memory alloys, Acta Mater., vol. 164, pp. 99–109, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.030.
- K. J. Song, et al., Constitutive model coupled with mechanical effect of volume change and transformation induced plasticity during solid phase transformation for TA15 alloy welding, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 2064–2080, 2015., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.020.
- R. Dhote, K. Behdinan, and H. Gomez, Dynamic multiaxial behaviors of 3D shape memory alloy nanowires: A phase-field study, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1335–1342, 2016. doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2015.1082683.
- M. Javanbakht, and M. Adaei, Investigating the effect of elastic anisotropy on martensitic phase transformations at the nanoscale, Comput. Mater. Sci. ., vol. 167, pp. 168–182, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.05.047.
- M. Javanbakht, and M. Adaei, Formation of stress-and thermal-induced martensitic nanostructures in a single crystal with phase-dependent elastic properties, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2544–2563, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04067-6.
- M. Mamivand, M. A. Zaeem, H. E. Kadiri, and L.-Q. Chen, Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia, Acta Mater., vol. 61, no. 14, pp. 5223–5235, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.015.
- M. Mamivand, M. A. Zaeem, and H. E. Kadiri, Phase field modeling of stress-induced tetragonal-to-monoclinic transformation in zirconia and its effect on transformation toughening, Acta Mater., vol. 64, pp. 208–219, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.031.
- S. Cui, J. Wan, X. Zuo, N. Chen, and Y. Rong, Interface stress evolution of martensitic transformation in MnCu alloys: A phase-field study, Mater. Des., vol. 109, pp. 88–97, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.057.
- V. I. Levitas, and M. Javanbakht, Interaction between phase transformations and dislocations at the nanoscale. Part 1. General phase field approach, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., vol. 82, pp. 287–319, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.05.005.
- M. Javanbakht, and V. I. Levitas, Interaction between phase transformations and dislocations at the nanoscale. Part 2: Phase field simulation examples, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., vol. 82, pp. 164–185, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.05.006.
- M. Javanbakht, and V. I. Levitas, Phase field simulations of plastic strain-induced phase transformations under high pressure and large shear, Phys. Rev. B., vol. 94, no. 21, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.214104.
- M. Javanbakht, and M. S. Ghaedi, Thermal induced nanovoid evolution in the vicinity of an immobile austenite-martensite interface, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 172, pp. 109339, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109339.
- M. Javanbakht, and M. S. Ghaedi, Phase field approach for void dynamics with interface stresses at the nanoscale, Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 154, pp. 103279, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103279.
- M. Javanbakht, M. S. Ghaedi, E. Barchiesi, and A. Ciallella, The effect of a pre-existing nanovoid on martensite formation and interface propagation: a phase field study, Math Mech Solids., doi.org/10.1177%2F1081286520948118.
- Y. Ishiguro, Y. Tsukada, and T. Koyama, Phase-field simulation of spinodal decomposition and its effect on stress-induced martensitic transformation in Ti–Nb–O alloys, Comput. Mater. Sci. ., vol. 151, pp. 222–230, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.003.
- D. Varshney, N. Kaurav, and U. Sharma, Pressure induced B3-B1 structural phase transition and elastic properties of monopnictides InX(X = N, P, As, Phase Transitions ., vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 525–535, 2008. ), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411590801886277.
- M. Javanbakht, and V. I. Levitas, Nanoscale mechanisms for high-pressure mechanochemistry: a phase field study, J. Mater. Sci. ., vol. 53, no. 19, pp. 13343–13363, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2175-x.
- E. Schoof, D. Schneider, N. Streichhan, T. Mittnacht, M. Selzer, and B. Nestler, Multiphase-field modeling of martensitic phase transformation in a dual-phase microstructure, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 134, pp. 181–194, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.032.
- A. Yamanaka, T. Takaki, and Y. Tomita, Elastoplastic phase-field simulation of self- and plastic accommodations in Cubic → tetragonal martensitic transformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 378–384, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.035.
- A. Basak, and V. I. Levitas, Nanoscale multiphase phase field approach for stress- and temperature-induced martensitic phase transformations with interfacial stresses at finite strains, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., vol. 113, pp. 162–196, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.01.014.
- M. Javanbakht, H. Rahbar, and M. Ashourian, Finite element implementation based on explicit, Galerkin and Crank–Nicolson methods to phase field theory for thermal- and surface- induced martensitic phase transformations, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-019-00838-3.
- S. Govindjee, and C. Miehe, A multi-variant martensitic phase transformation model: formulation and numerical implementation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 191, no. 3-5, pp. 215–238, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00271-7.
- J. Y. Liu, H. Lu, J. M. Chen, and Z. Zhang, Finite element simulation of martensitic transition based on thermo-mechanical model, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., vol. 448, no. 1-2, pp. 204–209, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.053.
- K.-J. Bathe, E. Ramm, and E. L. Wilson, Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 353–386, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620090207.
- L. Luo, S. Liu, J. Li, and W. Jia, Numerical simulation of oblique and multidirectional wave propagation and breaking on steep slope based on FEM model of Boussinesq equations, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 71, pp. 632–655, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.03.006.
- S. Smith, and D. Stolle, A comparison of Eulerian and updated Lagrangian finite element algorithms for simulating film casting, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 401–415, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00078-6.
- J. N. Reddy, An Introduction to Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis, (2004). doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525295.001.0001. Publisher: Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online.
- H. K. Serroukh, M. Mabssout, and M. Herreros, Updated Lagrangian Taylor-SPH method for large deformation in dynamic problems, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 80, pp. 238–256, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.11.046.
- V. Vavourakis, D. Loukidis, D. Charmpis, and P. Papanastasiou, A robust finite element approach for large deformation elastoplastic plane-strain problems, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., vol. 77, pp. 1–15, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2013.08.003.
- M. Latorre, and F. J. Montáns, Stress and strain mapping tensors and general work-conjugacy in large strain continuum mechanics, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 40, no. 5-6, pp. 3938–3950, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.10.045.
- S. Mirzakhani, and M. Javanbakht, Phase field-elasticity analysis of austenite–martensite phase transformation at the nanoscale: Finite element modeling, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 154, pp. 41–52, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.034.
- V. I. Levitas, Phase-field theory for martensitic phase transformations at large strains, Int. J. Plast., vol. 49, pp. 85–118, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.002.
- V. A. Levin, V. I. Levitas, K. M. Zingerman, and E. I. Freiman, Phase-field simulation of stress-induced martensitic phase transformations at large strains, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 2914–2928, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.003.
- M. Javanbakht, H. Rahbar, and M. Ashourian, Explicit nonlinear finite element approach to the Lagrangian-based coupled phase field and elasticity equations for nanoscale thermal- and stress-induced martensitic transformations, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-020-00912-1.
- V. I. Levitas, Phase field approach for stress- and temperature-induced phase transformations that satisfies lattice instability conditions. Part I. General theory, Int. J. Plast., vol. 106, pp. 164–185, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.03.007.
- T. Zhang, Y. Pan, Y. Xiao, and A. Wang, Analytic solutions of a reducible strain gradient elasticity model for solid cylinder with a cavity and its application in zonal failure, Appl. Math. Modell., vol. 72, pp. 663–681, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.02.044.
- E. Barchiesi, M. Spagnuolo, and L. Placidi, Mechanical metamaterials: a state of the art, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 212–234, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286517735695.
- E. Turco, F. Dell’Isola, A. Cazzani, and N. L. Rizzi, Hencky-type discrete model for pantographic structures: numerical comparison with second gradient continuum models, Z Angew. Math. Phys., vol. 67, no. 4, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-016-0681-8.
- I. Giorgio, P. Harrison, F. Dell'Isola, J. Alsayednoor, and E. Turco, E. Wrinkling in engineering fabrics: a comparison between two different comprehensive modelling approaches, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 474, pp. 2216, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0063.
- L. Placidi, E. Barchiesi, E. Turco, and N. L. Rizzi, A review on 2D models for the description of pantographic fabrics, Z Angew. Math. Phys. ., vol. 67, no. 5, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-016-0716-1.
- L. Placidi, G. Rosi, I. Giorgio, and A. Madeo, Reflection and transmission of plane waves at surfaces carrying material properties and embedded in second-gradient materials, Math. Mech. Solids., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 555–578, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286512474016.
- L. Placidi, E. Barchiesi, and A. Misra, A strain gradient variational approach to damage: a comparison with damage gradient models and numerical results, Math. Mech. Compl. Sys., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 77–100, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2140/memocs.2018.6.77.
- V. I. Levitas, D. L. Preston, and D.-W. Lee, Three-dimensional Landau theory for multivariant stress-induced martensitic phase transformations. III. Alternative potentials, critical nuclei, kink solutions, and dislocation theory, Phys. Rev. B. ., vol. 68, no. 13, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.134201.
- Y. Wang, Z.-K. Liu, and L.-Q. Chen, Thermodynamic properties of Al, Ni, NiAl, and Ni3Al from first-principles calculations, Acta Mater., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2665–2671, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.014.
- T. J. R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Dover publication, Inc, New York, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1989.tb00025.x.