Lightweight sandwich structures for marine applications: a review

References

• SANDCORe Co-ordination Action, Best Practice Guide for Sandwich Structures in Marine Applications, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• P. Kujala, and A. Klanac, Steel sandwich panels in marine applications, Brodogradnja., vol. 56, pp. 305–314, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• F. J. Plantema, Sandwich Construction: The Bending and Buckling of Sandwich Beams, Plates, and Shells., 1966.
   Google Scholar
• H. G. Allen, Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels, Franklin Book Co, Pergamon Press, London, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• D. Zenkert, The Handbook of Sandwich Construction, Engineering Materials Advisory Services Ltd, London, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• J. M. Davies, Lighweight Sandwich Constructions, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• A. F. Johnson, and G. D. Sims, Mechanical properties and design of sandwich materials, Composites, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 321–328, 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0010-4361(86)90749-4.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. Vinson, Sandwich structures, Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 201–214, 2001. DOI: 10.1115/1.3097295.
   Google Scholar
• L. J. Gibson, and M. F. Ashby, Cellular Solids-Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• M. F. Ashby, A. G. Evans, N. A. Fleck, L. J. Gibson, and J. W. Hutchinson, Metal Foams: A Design Guide, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• V. S. Deshpande, M. F. Ashby, and N. A. Fleck, Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures, Acta Mater., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1035–1040, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Birman, and G. A. Kardomateas, Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 142, pp. 221–240, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Castanié, C. Bouvet, and M. Ginot, Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications, Compos. Part C Open Access., vol. 1, pp. 100004, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004.
   Google Scholar
• P. Noury, B. Hayman, D. McGeorge, and J. Weitzenböck, Lightweight construction for advanced shipbuilding-recent development, in Proceedings of the 37th WEGEMT Summer School, pp. 11–15, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL, Steel Sandwich Panel Construction, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL, Rules for Classification – Ships – Part 3 Hull – Chapter 3 Structural Design Principles, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL, Rules For Classification – Ships – Part 2 Materials and welding – Chapter 2 Metallic materials, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd’s Register, Rules for the Application of Sandwich Panel Construction to Ship Structure, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd’s Register, Rules for the Manufacture, Testing and Certification of Materials, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL, Rules For Classification – High Speed and Light Craft – Part 3 Structures, Equipment – Chapter 4 Hull Structural Design, Fibre Composite and Sandwich Constructions, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL, Rules For Classification – Ships – Part 2 Materials and Welding – Chapter 3 Non-Metallic Materials, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd’s Register, Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Special Service Craft, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• RINA, Rules for the Classification of Fast Patrol Vessels – Part B: Hull and Stability, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau Veritas, Hull in Composite Materials and Plywood, Material Approval, Design Principles, Construction and Survey, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Li, Z. Zheng, J. Yu, C. Qian, and F. Lu, Deformation and failure mechanisms of sandwich beams under three-point bending at elevated temperatures, Compos. Struct., vol. 111, pp. 285–290, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bart-Smith, J. W. Hutchinson, and A. G. Evans, Measurement and analysis of the structural performance of cellular metal sandwich construction, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1945–1963, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00070-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Kesler, and L. Gibson, Size effects in metallic foam core sandwich beams, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 228–234, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01487-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Crupi, and R. Montanini, Aluminium foam sandwiches collapse modes under static and dynamic three-point bending, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 509–521, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Crupi, G. Epasto, and E. Guglielmino, Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 43, pp. 6–15, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. M. McCormack, R. Miller, O. Kesler, and L. J. Gibson, Failure of sandwich beams with metallic foam cores, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 38, no. 28-29, pp. 4901–4920, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00327-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. C. Triantafillou, and L. J. Gibson, Failure mode maps for foam core sandwich beams, Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 95, pp. 37–53, 1987. DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(87)90496-4.
   Google Scholar
• A. Chen, and J. F. Davalos, Strength evaluations of sinusoidal core for FRP sandwich bridge deck panels, Compos. Struct., vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1561–1573, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-M. Jen, and H.-B. Lin, Temperature-dependent monotonic and fatigue bending strengths of adhesively bonded aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams, Mater. Des., vol. 45, pp. 393–406, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Labans, K. Kalnins, and C. Bisagni, Flexural behavior of sandwich panels with cellular wood, plywood stiffener/foam and thermoplastic composite core, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 784–805, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1099636217699587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Petras, and M. P. F. Sutcliffe, Failure mode maps for honeycomb sandwich panels, Compos. Struct., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 237–252, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Banghai, L. Zhibin, and L. Fangyun, Failure mechanism of sandwich beams subjected to three-point bending, Compos. Struct., vol. 133, pp. 739–745, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. F. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, 3rd ed. Elsevier, Oxford, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• G. Palomba, G. Epasto, V. Crupi, and E. Guglielmino, Single and double-layer honeycomb sandwich panels under impact loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 121, pp. 77–90, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Palomba, V. Crupi, and G. Epasto, Collapse modes of aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures under fatigue bending loading, Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 145, pp. 106363, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Crupi, G. Epasto, and E. Guglielmino, Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: Honeycomb vs Foam, Mar. Struct., vol. 30, pp. 74–96, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Abrate, G. Epasto, E. Kara, V. Crupi, E. Guglielmino, and H. Aykul, Computed tomography analysis of impact response of lightweight sandwich panels with micro lattice core, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 232, no. 8, pp. 1348–1362, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0954406218766383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. De Marco Muscat-Fenech, J. Cortis, and C. Cassar, Impact damage testing on composite marine sandwich panels, part 1: Quasi-static indentation, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 341–376, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1099636214529959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, and N. Yan, Investigation of elastic moduli of Kraft paper honeycomb core sandwich panels, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2107–2114, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Burman, and D. Zenkert, Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams—1: undamaged specimens, Int. J. Fatigue., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 551–561, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00069-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kanny, and H. Mahfuz, Flexural fatigue characteristics of sandwich structures at different loading frequencies, Compos. Struct., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 403–410, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.-M. Harte, N. Fleck, and M. Ashby, The fatigue strength of sandwich beams with an aluminium alloy foam core, Int. J. Fatigue., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 499–507, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00012-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Belouettar, A. Abbadi, Z. Azari, R. Belouettar, and P. Freres, Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four point bending tests, Compos. Struct., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 265–273, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rajaneesh, Y. Zhao, G. B. Chai, and I. Sridhar, Flexural fatigue life prediction of CFRP-Nomex honeycomb sandwich beams, Compos. Struct., vol. 192, pp. 225–231, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Burman, and D. Zenkert, Fatigue of Undamaged and damaged honeycomb sandwich beams, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 50–74, 2000. DOI: 10.1177/109963620000200103.
   Google Scholar
• G. Belingardi, P. Martella, and L. Peroni, Fatigue analysis of honeycomb-composite sandwich beams, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1183–1191, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-M. Jen, and L.-Y. Chang, Evaluating bending fatigue strength of aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams using local parameters, Int. J. Fatigue., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1103–1114, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Abbadi, Z. Azari, S. Belouettar, J. Gilgert, and P. Freres, Modelling the fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials (aluminium/aramide fibre core) using four-point bending tests, Int. J. Fatigue., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1739–1747, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-M. Jen, F.-L. Teng, and T.-C. Teng, Two-stage cumulative bending fatigue behavior for the adhesively bonded aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels, Mater. Des., vol. 54, pp. 805–813, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Boukharouba, A. Bezazi, and F. Scarpa, Identification and prediction of cyclic fatigue behaviour in sandwich panels, Measurement., vol. 53, pp. 161–170, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wu, H. Yu, L. Guo, L. Zhang, X. Sun, and Z. Chai, Experimental and numerical investigation of static and fatigue behaviors of composites honeycomb sandwich structure, Compos. Struct., vol. 213, pp. 165–172, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bezazi, S. G. Pierce, K. Worden, and E. H. Harkati, Fatigue life prediction of sandwich composite materials under flexural tests using a Bayesian trained artificial neural network, Int. J. Fatigue., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 738–747, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Sharma, R. F. Gibson, and E. O. Ayorinde, Fatigue of foam and honeycomb core composite sandwich structures: a tutorial, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 263–319, 2006. DOI: 10.1177/1099636206063337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. S. Sutherland, A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part I – Marine impacts on marine composites, Compos. Struct., vol. 188, pp. 197–208, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Liu, Y. Garbatov, L. Zhu, and C. Guedes Soares, Numerical assessment of the structural crashworthiness of corroded ship hulls in stranding, Ocean Eng., vol. 170, pp. 276–285, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.10.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Ringsberg, Characteristics of material, ship side structure response and ship survivability in ship collisions, Ships Offshore Struct., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 51–66, 2010. DOI: 10.1080/17445300903088707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. S. Sutherland, A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part II – Impact event and material parameters, Compos. Struct., vol. 188, pp. 503–511, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. S. Sutherland, A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part III – Damage tolerance and durability, Compos. Struct., vol. 188, pp. 512–518, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. S. Sutherland, A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part IV – Scaling, strain rate and marine-type laminates, Compos. Struct., vol. 200, pp. 929–938, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Garrido, R. Teixeira, J. Correia, and L. Sutherland, Quasi-static indentation and impact in glass-fibre reinforced polymer sandwich panels for civil and ocean engineering applications, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 23, pp. 109963621983013, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Castilho, L. S. Sutherland, and C. G. Soares, Impact resistance of marine sandwich composites, Marit. Technol. Eng., vol. 1, pp. 607–617, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• L. S. Sutherland, M. F. Sá, J. R. Correia, C. Guedes Soares, A. Gomes, and N. Silvestre, Impact response of pedestrian bridge multicellular pultruded GFRP deck panels, Compos. Struct., vol. 171, pp. 473–485, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, H. Mozafari, and S. Najafian, Computed tomography-based reconstruction and finite element modelling of honeycomb sandwiches under low-velocity impacts, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 377–397, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1099636214531515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. N. Shivakumar, W. Elber, and W. Illg, Prediction of impact force and duration due to low-velocity impact on circular composite laminates, J. Appl. Mech., vol. 52, pp. 674-680, 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Abrate, Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• C. C. Foo, G. B. Chai, and L. K. Seah, A model to predict low-velocity impact response and damage in sandwich composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1348–1356, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Crupi, E. Kara, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, and H. Aykul, Theoretical and experimental analysis for the impact response of glass fibre reinforced aluminium honeycomb sandwiches, J. Sandwich Struct. Mater., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 42–69, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1099636216629375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hazizan, and W. J. Cantwell, The low velocity impact response of an aluminium honeycomb sandwich structure, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 679–687, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00089-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Feli, and M. H. Namdari Pour, An analytical model for composite sandwich panels with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2439–2447, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hazizan, and W. J. Cantwell, The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 33, pp. 193–204, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. C. Foo, L. K. Seah, and G. B. Chai, A modified energy-balance model to predict low-velocity impact response for sandwich composites, Compos. Struct., vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 1385–1393, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Rupp, P. Elsner, and K. A. Weidenmann, Small object low-velocity impact damage on hybrid sandwich structures with CFRP face sheets and aluminum foam cores, Int. J. Crashworthiness., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 697–710, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2018.1489338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. Wen, T. Y. Reddy, S. R. Reid, and P. D. Soden, Indentation, penetration and perforation of composite laminates and sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading, Kem., vol. 141–143, pp. 501–552, 1997. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.501.
   Google Scholar
• R. Olsson, Engineering method for prediction of impact response and damage in sandwich panels, J. Sandwich Struct Mater., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–29, 2002. DOI: 10.1177/1099636202004001192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sun, D. Wowk, C. Mechefske, and I. Yong, An analytical study of the plasticity of sandwich honeycomb panels subjected to low-velocity impact, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 168, pp. 121–128, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, Z. Lu, H. Tian, S. Yao, and W. Zhou, Theoretical assessment methodology on axial compressed hexagonal honeycomb’ s energy absorption capability, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 503–512, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2014.994150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Castanié, C. Bouvet, Y. Aminanda, J. J. Barrau, and P. Thevenet, Modelling of low-energy/low-velocity impact on Nomex honeycomb sandwich structures with metallic skins, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 620–634, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Audibert, A. S. Andréani, É. Lainé, and J. C. Grandidier, Discrete modelling of low-velocity impact on Nomex® honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP skins, Compos. Struct., vol. 207, pp. 108–118, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Huo, H. Liu, Q. Luo, G. Sun, and Q. Li, On low-velocity impact response of foam-core sandwich panels, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 181, pp. 105681, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Galehdari, M. Kadkhodayan, and S. Hadidi-Moud, Analytical, experimental and numerical study of a graded honeycomb structure under in-plane impact load with low velocity, Int. J. Crashworthiness., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 387–400, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Abrate, B. Castanié, and Y. D. S. Rajapakse, Dynamic Failure of Composite and Sandwich Structures., Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, vol. 192, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• V. Lopresto, A. Langella, and S. Abrate, Dynamic Response and Failure of Composite Materials and Structures, Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. K. Faidzi, S. Abdullah, M. F. Abdullah, A. H. Azman, D. Hui, and S. S. K. Singh, Review of current trends for metal-based sandwich panel: Failure mechanisms and their contribution factors, Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 123, pp. 105302, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Thomas, and G. Tiwari, Crushing behavior of honeycomb structure: a review, Int. J. Crashworthiness., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 555–579, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2018.1480471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. S. Ha, and G. Lu, A review of recent research on bio-inspired structures and materials for energy absorption applications, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 181, pp. 107496, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. W. Mines, S. Tsopanos, Y. Shen, R. Hasan, and S. T. McKown, Drop weight impact behaviour of sandwich panels with metallic micro lattice cores, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 60, pp. 120–132, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Crupi, E. Kara, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, and H. Aykul, Prediction model for the impact response of glass fibre reinforced aluminium foam sandwiches, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 77, pp. 97–107, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Epasto, F. Distefano, H. Mozafari, E. Linul, and V. Crupi, Nondestructive evaluation of aluminium foam panels subjected to impact loading, Appl. Sci., vol. 11, pp. 1–18, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• G. Sun, D. Chen, X. Huo, G. Zheng, and Q. Li, Experimental and numerical studies on indentation and perforation characteristics of honeycomb sandwich panels, Compos. Struct., vol. 184, pp. 110–124, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. T. Cao, B. Hou, Y. L. Li, and H. Zhao, An experimental study on the impact behavior of multilayer sandwich with corrugated cores, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 109, pp. 33–45, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kiliçaslan, M. Güden, I. K. Odaci, and A. Taşdemirci, The impact responses and the finite element modeling of layered trapezoidal corrugated aluminum core and aluminum sheet interlayer sandwich structures, Mater. Des., vol. 46, pp. 121–133, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yinghan Wu, Qiang Liu, Jie Fu, Qing Li, and David Hui, Dynamic crash responses of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP panels, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 121, pp. 122–133, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Susainathan, F. Eyma, E. De Luycker, A. Cantarel, and B. Castanie, Experimental investigation of impact behavior of wood-based sandwich structures, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 109, pp. 10–19, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. M. Daniel, E. E. Gdoutos, and Y. D. S. Rajapakse, Major Accomplishments in Composite Materials and Sandwich Structures: An Anthology of ONR Sponsored Research, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gopalakrishnan, and Y. Rajapakse, Blast Mitigation Strategies in Marine Composite and Sandwich Structures, Springer Nature, Singapore, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Hoo Fatt, and D. Sirivolu, Marine composite sandwich plates under air and water blasts, Mar. Struct., vol. 56, pp. 163–185, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Hoo Fatt, and K. S. Park, Dynamic models for low-velocity impact damage of composite sandwich panels – Part A: Deformation, Compos. Struct., vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 335–351, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00026-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Hoo Fatt, and K. S. Park, Dynamic models for low-velocity impact damage of composite sandwich panels – Part B: Damage initiation, Compos. Struct., vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 353–364, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00045-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wanchoo, H. Matos, C. E. Rousseau, and A. Shukla, Investigations on air and underwater blast mitigation in polymeric composite structures – A review, Compos. Struct., vol. 263, pp. 113530, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Gupta, S. E. Zeltmann, D. D. Luong, and M. Doddamani, Core materials for marine sandwich structures. in Marine Composites: Design and Performance, Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, 2018. pp. 187.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. Vinson, Sandwich structures: Past, present, and future. in Sandwich Structures 7: Advancing with Sandwich Structures and Materials, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005. pp. 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• D. Zenkert, A. Shipsha, P. Bull, and B. Hayman, Damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich panels with localised damage, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 65, no. 15–16, pp. 2597–2611, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Calabrese, Di Bella G., and V. Fiore, Manufacture of marine composite sandwich structures. in Marine Applications of Advanced Fibre-Reinforced Composites, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, Elsevier, 2016. pp. 57–78.
   Google Scholar
• F. Evegren, T. Hertzberg, and M. Rahm, Fire Tests of FRP Composite Ship Structures, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Engineering, production and life-cycle management for the complete construction of large-length FIBRE-based SHIPs, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• C. Lothode, M. Durand, A. Leroyer, M. Visonneau, Y. Roux, and L. Dorez, Fluid structure interaction analysis of a hydrofoil, in MARINE V, Proceedings of the V International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, 2013. pp. 491–501.
   Google Scholar
• P. Davies, Marine composites, in Wiley Encyclopedia of Composites, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2012. pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• R. Stewart, At the core of lightweight composites, Reinf. Plast., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 30–35, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-3617(09)70112-2.
   Google Scholar
• J. Klimke, and D. Rothmann, Carbon composite materials in modern yacht building, Reinf. Plast., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 24–27, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-3617(10)70140-5.
   Google Scholar
• Di Bella G., G. Galtieri, and C. Borsellino, Three-point flexural properties of bonded reinforcement elements for pleasure craft decks, Appl. Compos. Mater., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10443-017-9605-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kharghani, and C. Guedes Soares, Experimental and numerical study of hybrid steel-FRP balcony overhang of ships under shear and bending, Mar. Struct., vol. 60, pp. 15–33, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cao, J. L. Grenestedt, and W. J. Maroun, Testing and analysis of a 6-m steel truss/composite skin hybrid ship hull model, Mar. Struct., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2006.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cao, J. L. Grenestedt, and W. J. Maroun, Steel truss/composite skin hybrid ship hull. Part I: Design and analysis, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1755–1762, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. J. Maroun, J. Cao, and J. L. Grenestedt, Steel truss/composite skin hybrid ship hull, Part II: Manufacturing and sagging testing, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1763–1772, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Shen, B. Luo, R. Yan, H. Zeng, and L. Xu, The mechanical behavior of sandwich composite joints for ship structures, Ocean Eng., vol. 144, pp. 78–89, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Zhang, D. Shi, W. Wang, and Q. Wang, Mechanical characterization of hybrid lattice-to-steel joint with pyramidal CFRP truss for marine application, Compos. Struct., vol. 160, pp. 1198–1204, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. P. Mouritz, E. Gellert, P. Burchill, and K. Challis, Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines, Compos. Struct., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Grabovac, and D. M. Turley, Present and future of composite materials for marine applications, ICCM/9, Met. Matrix Compos., vol. 1, pp. 89–96, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• D. Mathijsen, Now is the time to make the change from metal to composites in naval shipbuilding, Reinf. Plast., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 289–293, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.repl.2016.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• P. Tran, A. Ghazlan, T. P. Nguyen, and R. Gravina, Experimental and theoretical damage assessment in advanced marine composites. in Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering, R. Pemberton, J. Summerscales and J.B.T.-M.C. Graham-Jones, eds., Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, 2019. pp. 55–84
   Google Scholar
• S. Job, Why not composites in ships?, Reinf. Plast., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 90–93, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.repl.2014.12.047.
   Google Scholar
• N. Gupta, S. E. Zeltmann, V. C. Shunmugasamy, and D. Pinisetty, Applications of polymer matrix syntactic foams, JOM., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 245–254, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-013-0796-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hertzberg, LASS, Lightweight Construction Applications at Sea, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• V. Karatzas, N. Hjørnet, C. Berggreen, and J. J. Jensen, Retrofitting the superstructure of a large passenger ship using composites – A demonstration, in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM20), 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M. Gaiotti, E. Ravina, C. M. Rizzo, and A. Ungaro, Testing and simulation of a bolted and bonded joint between steel deck and composite side shell plating of a naval vessel, Eng. Struct., vol. 172, pp. 228–238, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. G. Gibson, The cost effective use of fibre reinforced composites offshore, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• J. Summerscales, M. M. Singh, and K. Wittamore, Disposal of composite boats and other marine composites. in Marine Applications of Advanced Fibre-Reinforced Composites, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 2016. pp. 185–213
   Google Scholar
• C. Nasso, U. la. Monaca, A. Marin, S. Bertagna, and V. Bucci, The strip planking: An eco-friendly solution for the end-of-life of ships, in Technology and Science for the Ships of the Future – Proceedings of NAV 2018: 19th International Conference on Ship and Maritime Research, 2018. pp. 444–451.
   Google Scholar
• AC75 Luna Rossa, the new flying monohull for the 36th America’s Cup presented by Prada. Available at https://www.lunarossachallenge.com/en/news/399_AC75-Luna-Rossa-the-new-flying-monohull-for-the-36th-Americas-Cup-presented-by-Prada.
   Google Scholar
• J. Romanoff, A. Laakso, and P. Varsta, Improving the shear properties of web-core sandwich structures using filling material. in Proceedings of MARSTRUCT 2009, the 2nd International Conference on Marine Structures, Lisbon, Portugal, 16–18March 2009.
   Google Scholar
• T. J. Grafton, and J. R. Weitzenböck, Steel-concrete-steel sandwich structures in ship and offshore engineering, in Advance Marine Structure – Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Marine Structures MARSTRUCT, 2011. pp. 549–558.
   Google Scholar
• K. M. A. Sohel, J. Y. Richard Liew, J. B. Yan, M. H. Zhang, and K. S. Chia, Behavior of Steel–Concrete–Steel sandwich structures with lightweight cement composite and novel shear connectors, Compos. Struct., vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 3500–3509, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. H. Sujiatanti, A. Zubaydi, and A. Budipriyanto, Finite element analysis of ship deck sandwich panel, AMM., vol. 874, pp. 134–139, 2018. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.874.134.
   Google Scholar
• K. Niklas, and J. Kozak, Experimental investigation of Steel–Concrete–Polymer composite barrier for the ship internal tank construction, Ocean Eng., vol. 111, pp. 449–460, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.11.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. H. Yu, B. G. Kim, and D. G. Lee, Cryogenic reliability of the sandwich insulation board for LNG ship, Compos. Struct., vol. 95, pp. 547–556, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kortenoeven, B. Boon, and A. de Bruijn, Application of sandwich panels in design and building of dredging ships, J. Sh. Prod., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 125–134, 2008. DOI: 10.5957/jsp.2008.24.3.125.
   Google Scholar
• J. Romanoff, H. Naar, and P. Varsta, Interaction between web-core sandwich deck and hull girder of passenger ship, Mar. Syst. Ocean Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/BF03449255.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mueller, and L. M. Volpone, Friction stir welding of steel/aluminium sandwich panels, Weld. Int., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 699–705, 2009. DOI: 10.1080/09507110902843222.
   Google Scholar
• T. Bitzer, Honeycomb marine applications, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 355–360, 1994. DOI: 10.1177/073168449401300406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Bitzer, Honeycomb Technology: Materials, Design, Manufacturing, Applications and Testing, 1st ed. Springer, Dordrecht, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• J. K. Paik, A. K. Thayamballi, and G. S. Kim, The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels, Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 205–231, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00026-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Chen, Z. P. Tong, H. X. Hua, Y. Wang, and H. Y. Gou, Experimental investigation on the dynamic response of scaled ship model with rubber sandwich coatings subjected to underwater explosion, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 318–328, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Tuswan, K. Abdullah, A. Zubaydi, and A. Budipriyanto, Finite-element analysis for structural strength assessment of marine sandwich material on ship side-shell structure, Mater. Today Proc., vol. 13, pp. 109–114, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.197.
   Google Scholar
• C. E. Duty, et al., Structure and mechanical behavior of Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) materials, Rapid Prototyp. J., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 181–189, 2017., DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. W. Williams, F. Martina, A. C. Addison, J. Ding, G. Pardal, and P. Colegrove, Wire + Arc additive manufacturing, Mater. Sci. Technol. (United Kingdom)., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 641–647, 2016. DOI: 10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Astarita, et al., Microstructure and mechanical properties of specimens produced using the wire-arc additive manufacturing process, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 0, pp. 1–11, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• T. Russell, B. Heller, D. Jack, and D. Smith, Prediction of the fiber orientation state and the resulting structural and thermal properties of fiber reinforced additive manufactured composites fabricated using the big area additive manufacturing process, J. Compos. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 26, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/jcs2020026.
   Google Scholar
• A. J. Turner, M. Al Rifaie, A. Mian, and R. Srinivasan, Low-velocity impact behavior of sandwich structures with additively manufactured polymer lattice cores, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2505–2512, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-018-3322-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. Andrew, J. Ubaid, F. Hafeez, A. Schiffer, and S. Kumar, Impact performance enhancement of honeycombs through additive manufacturing-enabled geometrical tailoring, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 134, pp. 103360, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Beharic, R. Rodriguez Egui, and L. Yang, Drop-weight impact characteristics of additively manufactured sandwich structures with different cellular designs, Mater. Des., vol. 145, pp. 122–134, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. A. Santos, et al., Low velocity impact response of 3D printed structures formed by cellular metamaterials and stiffening plates: PLA vs PETg, Compos. Struct., vol. 256, pp. 113–128, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kang, S. Park, Y. Son, S. Yeon, S. H. Kim, and I. Kim, Multi-lattice inner structures for high-strength and light-weight in metal selective laser melting process, Mater. Des., vol. 175, pp. 107786, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Orme, I. Madera, M. Gschweitl, and M. Ferrari, Topology optimization for additive manufacturing as an enabler for light weight flight hardware, Designs., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 51, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/designs2040051.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ceruti, R. Ferrari, and A. Liverani, Design for additive manufacturing using LSWM: A CAD tool for the modelling of lightweight and lattice structures, Smart Innov. Syst. Technol., vol. 68, pp. 756–765, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• D. A. Türk, et al., Additive manufacturing with composites for integrated aircraft structures, in International SAMPE Technical Conference, 2016-January, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• C. Ferro, et al., A robust multifunctional sandwich panel design with trabecular structures by the use of additive manufacturing technology for a new de-icing system, Technologies., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 35, 2017., DOI: 10.3390/technologies5020035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kong, Y. Zhang, and S. Liu, Convective heat transfer enhancement by novel honeycomb-core in sandwich panel exchanger fabricated by additive manufacturing, Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 163, pp. 114408, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. N. G. Wadley, Multifunctional periodic cellular metals, Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci., vol. 364, no. 1838, pp. 31–68, 2006. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2005.1697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Panesar, M. Abdi, D. Hickman, and I. Ashcroft, Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for additive manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., vol. 19, pp. 81–94, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. N. Hoang, P. Tran, V. T. Vu, and H. Nguyen-Xuan, Design of lattice structures with direct multiscale topology optimization, Compos. Struct., vol. 252, pp. 112718, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DNV GL, Class Guideline – Additive manufacturing – qualification and certification process for materials and components, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• G. Palomba, T. Hone, D. Taylor, and V. Crupi, Bio-inspired protective structures for marine applications, Bioinspir. Biomim., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 056016 2020. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/aba1d1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Tran, T. D. Ngo, and P. Mendis, Bio-inspired composite structures subjected to underwater impulsive loading, Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 82, pp. 134–139, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar