Influence of pore sizes in 3D-scaffolds on mechanical properties of scaffolds and survival, distribution, and proliferation of human chondrocytes

References

• S. Asadpour, H. Yeganeh, F. Khademi, H. Ghanbari, and J. Ai, Resveratrol-loaded polyurethane nanofibrous scaffold: viability of endothelial and smooth muscle cells, Biomed. Mater., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 015001, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab4e23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kargozar, F. Baino, S.J. Hoseini, J. Verdi, S. Asadpour, and M. Mozafari, Curcumin: footprints on cardiac tissue engineering, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1199–1205, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1650912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Asadpour, J. Ai, P. Davoudi, M. Ghorbani, M.J. Monfared, and H. Ghanbari, In vitro physical and biological characterization of biodegradable elastic polyurethane containing ferulic acid for small-caliber vascular grafts, Biomed. Mater., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 035007, 2018. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aaa8b6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Nosrati, et al., Corneal epithelium tissue engineering: recent advances in regeneration and replacement of corneal surface, Regen. Med., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2029–2044, 2020. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2019-0055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Shafiee, Design and fabrication of three-dimensional printed scaffolds for cancer precision medicine, Tissue Eng. Part A, vol. 26, no. 5-6, pp. 305–317, 2020. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A. Lahr, et al., A 3D-printed biomaterials-based platform to advance established therapy avenues against primary bone cancers, Acta Biomater., vol. 118, pp. 69–82, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.P. Dang, A. Shafiee, C.A. Lahr, T.R. Dargaville, and P.A. Tran, Local doxorubicin delivery via 3D‐printed porous scaffolds reduces systemic cytotoxicity and breast cancer recurrence in mice, Adv. Therap., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2000056, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/adtp.202000056.
   Google Scholar
• A. Salerno, E. Di Maio, S. Iannace, and P. Netti, Tailoring the pore structure of PCL scaffolds for tissue engineering prepared via gas foaming of multi-phase blends, J. Porous Mater., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 181–188, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s10934-011-9458-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.J. Hollister, Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering, Nat. Mater., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 518–524, 2005. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Chevalier, D. Chulia, C. Pouget, and M. Viana, Fabrication of porous substrates: a review of processes using pore forming agents in the biomaterial field, J. Pharm. Sci., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 1135–1154, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/jps.21059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Rashtbar, et al. , Critical-sized full-thickness skin defect regeneration using ovine small intestinal submucosa with or without mesenchymal stem cells in rat model, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 2177–2190, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Asadpour, H. Yeganeh, J. Ai, and H.A. Ghanbari, Novel polyurethane modified with biomacromolecules for small-diameter vascular graft applications, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 53, no. 14, pp. 9913–9927, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2321-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Karageorgiou, and D. Kaplan, Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis, Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 27, pp. 5474–5491, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-J. Sung, C. Meredith, C. Johnson, and Z.S. Galis, The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis, Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 26, pp. 5735–5742, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Jalali Monfared, et al. , Transplantation of miR-219 overexpressed human endometrial stem cells encapsulated in fibrin hydrogel in spinal cord injury, J. Cell. Physiol., vol. 234, no. 10, pp. 18887–18896, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Asadpour, et al., Polyurethane-polycaprolactone blend patches: scaffold characterization and cardiomyoblast adhesion, proliferation, and function, ACS Biomater. Sci Eng., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 4299–4310, 2018. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Murphy, M.G. Haugh, and F.J. O'brien , The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 461–466, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Van Bael, et al., The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds, Acta Biomater., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 2824–2834, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Yannas, Tissue regeneration by use of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers, Clin. Mater., vol. 9, no. 3–4, pp. 179–187, 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90098-E.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Heino, The collagen receptor integrins have distinct ligand recognition and signaling functions, Matrix Biol., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 319–323, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00076-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.P. Palecek, J.C. Loftus, M.H. Ginsberg, D.A. Lauffenburger, and A.F. Horwitz, Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness, Nature, vol. 385, no. 6616, pp. 537–540, 1997. DOI: 10.1038/385537a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rezania, and K.E. Healy, Integrin subunits responsible for adhesion of human osteoblast‐like cells to biomimetic peptide surfaces, J. Orthop. Res., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 615–623, 1999. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100170423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Anselme, Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials, Biomaterials, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 667–681, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.D. Boyan, T.W. Hummert, D.D. Dean, and Z. Schwartz, Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response, Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 1996. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.A. Harley, H.-D. Kim, M.H. Zaman, I.V. Yannas, D.A. Lauffenburger, and L.J. Gibson, Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions, Biophys. J., vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 4013–4024, 2008. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.122598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.-S. Han, et al., Effect of pore sizes of silk scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering, Macromol. Res., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1091–1097, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s13233-015-3156-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.J. Huang, J.C. Hu, and K.A. Athanasiou, Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage, Biomaterials, vol. 98, pp. 1–22, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, J. Yu, K. Ren, J. Zuo, J. Ding, and X. Chen, Thermosensitive hydrogels as scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering, Biomacromolecules, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1478–1492, 2019. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Woodfield, C.V. Blitterswijk, J.D. Wijn, T. Sims, A. Hollander, and J. Riesle, Polymer scaffolds fabricated with pore-size gradients as a model for studying the zonal organization within tissue-engineered cartilage constructs, Tissue Eng., vol. 11, no. 9-10, pp. 1297–1311, 2005. DOI: 10.1089/ten.2005.11.1297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• K. Ghosal, A. Manakhov, L. Zajíčková, and S. Thomas , Structural and surface compatibility study of modified electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) composites for skin tissue engineering, Aaps Pharmscitech., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 72–81, 2017. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-016-0500-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Boroumand, S. Asadpour, A. Akbarzadeh, R. Faridi-Majidi, and H. Ghanbari, Heart valve tissue engineering: an overview of heart valve decellularization processes, Regen. Med., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 41–54, 2018. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Matsiko, J.P. Gleeson, and F.J. O'Brien, Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition, Tissue Eng. Part A, vol. 21, no. 3–4, pp. 486–497, 2015. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Zhang, H. Lu, N. Kawazoe, and G. Chen, Pore size effect of collagen scaffolds on cartilage regeneration, Acta Biomater., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2005–2013, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Mao, H.F. Liu, Y.J. Yin, and K.D. Yao, The properties of chitosan–gelatin membranes and scaffolds modified with hyaluronic acid by different methods, Biomaterials, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1621–1629, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00549-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ghodrat, S.J. Hoseini, S. Asadpour, S. Nazarnezhad, E.F. Alizadeh, and S. Kargozar, Stem cell‐based therapies for cardiac diseases: The critical role of angiogenic exosomes, BioFactors. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/biof.1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.K. Tate, and U. Knothe, An ex vivo model to study transport processes and fluid flow in loaded bone, J. Biomech., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 247–254, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00143-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Mansour, and V.C. Mow, The permeability of articular cartilage under compressive strain and at high pressures. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 509–516, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Maroudas, P. Bullough, S. Swanson, and M. Freeman, The permeability of articular cartilage. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 166–177, 1968.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• K. Vadodaria, A. Kulkarni, E. Santhini, and P. Vasudevan, Materials and structures used in meniscus repair and regeneration: a review, Biomedicine (Taipei), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2, 2019. DOI: 10.1051/bmdcn/2019090102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Y. Chen, et al., Current advances in the development of natural meniscus scaffolds: innovative approaches to decellularization and recellularization, Cell Tissue Res., vol. 370, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-017-2605-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Abpeikar, et al., Macroporous scaffold surface modified with biological macromolecules and piroxicam-loaded gelatin nanofibers toward meniscus cartilage repair, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 183, pp. 1327–1345, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Maroudas, Physicochemical properties of cartilage in the light of ion exchange theory, Biophys. J., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 575–595, 1968. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86509-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Owan, et al., Mechanotransduction in bone: osteoblasts are more responsive to fluid forces than mechanical strain, Am. J. Physiol., vol. 273, no. 3 Pt 1, pp. C810–C5, 1997. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.3.C810.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Hillsley, and J. Frangos, Bone tissue engineering: the role of interstitial fluid flow, Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 573–581, 1994. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260430706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Prendergast, R. Huiskes, and K. Søballe, Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces, J. Biomech., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 539–548, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00140-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Agrawal, J. McKinney, D. Lanctot, and K. Athanasiou, Effects of fluid flow on the in vitro degradation kinetics of biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 2443–2452, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00112-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.J. O'Brien, B.A. Harley, M.A. Waller, I.V. Yannas, L.J. Gibson, and P.J. Prendergast, The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering, Technol. Health Care, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2007. DOI: 10.3233/THC-2007-15102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C.J. Little, N.K. Bawolin, and X. Chen, Mechanical properties of natural cartilage and tissue-engineered constructs, Tissue Eng. Part B Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 213–227, 2011. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2010.0572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Luan, et al., The effect of pore size and porosity of Ti6Al4V scaffolds on MC3T3-E1 cells and tissue in rabbits, Sci. China Technol. Sci., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1160–1168, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11431-018-9352-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Nashchekina, et al., Protein expression by bone mesenchymal stem cells cultivated in PLLA scaffolds with different pore geometry, Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 248–257, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/00914037.2018.1563081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.-Z. Zhang, et al., Role of scaffold mean pore size in meniscus regeneration, Acta Biomater., vol. 43, pp. 314–326, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Mygind, et al., Mesenchymal stem cell ingrowth and differentiation on coralline hydroxyapatite scaffolds, Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1036–1047, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Takahashi, and Y. Tabata, Effect of the fiber diameter and porosity of non-woven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–57, 2004. DOI: 10.1163/156856204322752228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.L. Holtorf, N. Datta, J.A. Jansen, and A.G. Mikos, Scaffold mesh size affects the osteoblastic differentiation of seeded marrow stromal cells cultured in a flow perfusion bioreactor, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2005. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M.M. Nava, L. Draghi, C. Giordano, and R. Pietrabissa, The effect of scaffold pore size in cartilage tissue engineering, J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. e223–e9, 2016. DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-M. Lien, L.-Y. Ko, and T.-J. Huang, Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering, Acta Biomater., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 670–679, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.C. Mow, and X.E. Guo, Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: their inhomogeneities and anisotropies, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 175–209, 2002. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.110701.120309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• V.C. Mow, M. Gibbs, W.M. Lai, W. Zhu, and K.A. Athanasiou, Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage—II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study, J. Biomech., vol. 22, no. 8-9, pp. 853–861, 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90069-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Jurvelin, M. Buschmann, and E. Hunziker, Optical and mechanical determination of Poisson's ratio of adult bovine humeral articular cartilage, J Biomech., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 235–241, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00133-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar