Effect of mechanical properties and geometric dimensions on electromechanical impedance signatures for adhesive joint integrity monitoring

References

• Lucas F. M. da Silva, Andreas Öchsner, and Robert D. Adams, Handbook of Adhesion Technology, Springer International Publishing AG, New York, NY, United States, 2nd ed., 2018.
   Google Scholar
• J. J. M. Machado, E. A. S. Marques, and Lucas F. M. da Silva, Adhesives and adhesive joints under impact loadings: an overview, J. Adhes., vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 421–452, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2017.1282349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. M. Machado, E. A. S. Marques, and Lucas F. M. da Silva, Influence of low and high temperature on mixed adhesive joints under quasi-static and impact conditions, Compos. Struct., vol. 194, pp. 68–79, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. M. Machado, E. A. S. Marques, A. Q. Barbosa, and Lucas F. M. da Silva, Effect of hygrothermal aging on the quasi-static behaviour of CFRP joints varying the overlap length, Compos. Struct., vol. 214, pp. 451–462, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. S. P. Borges, et al., Influence of mode mixity and loading rate on the fracture behaviour of crash resistant adhesives, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., vol. 107, p. 102508, 2020. 102508. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria Lißner, Enrique Alabort, Borja Erice, Hao Cui, and Nik Petrinic, A rate dependent experimental and numerical analysis of adhesive joints under different loading directions, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., vol. 227, no. 1–2, pp. 85–97, 2018. DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2018-00070-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. C. Sousa, A. Akhavan-Safar, R. Goyal, and L. F. M. da Silva, Fatigue life estimation of adhesive joints at different mode mixities, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., vol. 0, pp. 1–23, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2020.1804376.Article in Press.
   Google Scholar
• C. S. P. Borges, E. A. S. Marques, R. J. C. Carbas, C. Ueffing, P. Weißgraeber, and L. F. M. da Silva, Review on the effect of moisture and contamination on the interfacial properties of adhesive joints, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 527–549, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0954406220944208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. C. H. Guyott, P. Cawley, and R. D. Adams, The non-destructive testing of adhesively bonded structure: a review, J. Adhes., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 129–159, 1986. DOI: 10.1080/00218468608074943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. D. Adams, and B. W. Drinkwater, Nondestructive testing of adhesively-bonded joints, NDT&E Int., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 93–98, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0963-8695(96)00050-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. Brotherhood, B. W. Drinkwater, and S. Dixon, The detectability of kissing bonds in adhesive joints using ultrasonic techniques, Ultrasonics, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 521–529, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0041-624X(03)00156-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. L. Vijaya Kumar, M. R. Bhat, and C. R. L. Murthy, Evaluation of kissing bond in composite adhesive lap joints using digital image correlation: preliminary studies, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 42, pp. 60–68, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damira Smagulova, Liudas Mazeika, and Elena Jasiuniene, Novel processing algorithm to improve detectability of disbonds in adhesive dissimilar material joints, Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 3048, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/s21093048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfredo Güemes, Antonio Fernandez-Lopez, Angel Renato Pozo, and Julián Sierra-Pérez, Structural health monitoring for advanced composite structures: a review, J. Compos. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 13, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/jcs4010013.
   Google Scholar
• Keith Worden, Charles R. Farrar, Graeme Manson, and Gyuhae Park, The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring, Proc. R Soc. A, vol. 463, no. 2082, pp. 1639–1664, 2007. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2007.1834.
   Google Scholar
• Charles R. Farrar, and Keith Worden, An introduction to structural health monitoring, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 365, no. 1851, pp. 303–315, 2007. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Francisco G. Tenreiro, António M. Lopes, and Lucas F. M. da Silva, A review of structural health monitoring of bonded structures using electromechanical impedance spectroscopy, Struct. Health Monit., pp. 1–22, 2021. Article In Press. DOI: 10.1177/1475921721993419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wongi Na, and Jongdae Baek, A review of the piezoelectric electromechanical impedance based structural health monitoring technique for engineering structures, Sensors, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 1307, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/s18051307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venu Gopal Madhav Annamdas, and CheeKiong Soh, Application of electromechanical impedance technique for engineering structures: review and future issues, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41–59, 2010. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X09352816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndreiN. Zagrai, and Victor Giurgiutiu, Electro-mechanical impedance method for crack detection in thin plates, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 709–718, 2001. DOI: 10.1177/104538901320560355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You-Di Kuang, Guo-Qing Li, and Chuan-Yao Chen, An admittance function of active piezoelectric elements bonded on a cracked beam, J. Sound Vib., vol. 298, no. 1–2, pp. 393–403, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venu Gopal Madhav Annamdas, and Chee Kiong Soh, Three-dimensional electromechanical impedance model for multiple piezoceramic transducers–structure interaction, J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2008. 0893-1321(2008)21:1(35). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh Bhalla, Praveen Kumar, Ashok Gupta, and Tushar K. Datta, Simplified impedance model for adhesively bonded piezo-impedance transducers, J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 373–382, 2009. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:4(373).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dansheng Wang, Hongyuan Song, and Hongping Zhu, Embedded 3D electromechanical impedance model for strength monitoring of concrete using a PZT transducer, Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 23, no. 11, p. 115019, 2014. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/11/115019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Liang, F. P. Sun, and C. A. Rogers, Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems-determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 335–343, 1997. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X9700800406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh Bhalla, Akshay Surendra, and CheeKiong Soh, Influence of structure-actuator interactions and temperature on piezoelectric mechatronic signatures for NDE, In Proceedings Volume 5062, Smart Materials, Structures, and Systems, volume 5062, Bangalore, India, 2002. SPIE. doi: 0.1117/12.514762. DOI: 10.1117/12.514762.
   Google Scholar
• Sam Na, Rudy Tawie, and Haeng-Ki Lee, Electromechanical impedance method of fiber-reinforced plastic adhesive joints in corrosive environment using a reusable piezoelectric device, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 737–747, 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X12440754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawel Malinowski, Tomasz Wandowski, and Wieslaw Ostachowicz, The use of electromechanical impedance conductance signatures for detection of weak adhesive bonds of carbon fibre–reinforced polymer, Struct. Health Monit., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 332–344, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1475921715586625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yitao Zhuang, Fotis Kopsaftopoulos, Roberto Dugnani, and Fu-Kuo Chang, Integrity monitoring of adhesively bonded joints via an electromechanical impedance-based approach, Struct. Health Monit., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1031–1045, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1475921717732331.
   Google Scholar
• William Roth, and Victor Giurgiutiu, Structural health monitoring of an adhesive disbond through electromechanical impedance spectroscopy, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 73, pp. 109–117, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paweł Malinowski, Konstantinos Tserpes, Romain Ecault, and Wiesław Ostachowicz, Mechanical and non-destructive study of cfrp adhesive bonds subjected to pre-bond thermal treatment and de-icing fluid contamination, Aerospace, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 36, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/aerospace5020036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyed Reza Hamzeloo, Mahnaz Shamshirsaz, and Seyed Mehdi Rezaei, Damage detection on hollow cylinders by electro-mechanical impedance method: experiments and finite element modeling, C. R. Mécanique, vol. 340, no. 9, pp. 668–677, 2012. 2012.07.001. DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Medeiros, G. S. C. Souza, D. E. T. Marques, F. R. Flor, and V. Tita, Vibration-based structural monitoring of bi-clamped metal-composite bonded joint: experimental and numerical analyses, J. Adhes., vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 891–917, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2020.1711742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. S. P. Borges, et al., Influence of water and surfactant contamination on the mechanical and chemical properties of a silicone adhesive, before and after curing. Paper under submission, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• NF T 76-142. NF T 76-142 – Méthode de préparation de plaques d’adhésifs structuraux pour la réalisation d’éprovettes d’essai de caractérisation. Standard, Association Française de Normalisation, Saint-Denis, France, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• BS 2782. BS 2782: Methods of testing plastics: Part 1. Standard, British Standard Institution, London, United Kingdom, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D 3933-98. ASTM D 3933-98 – Standard Guide for Preparation of Aluminum Surfaces for Structural Adhesives Bonding (Phosphoric Acid Anodizing). Standard, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E 756-05. ASTM E 756-05 – Standard Test Method for Measuring Vibration-Damping Properties of Materials. Standard, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Singiresu S. Rao, Mechanical Vibrations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, United States, 5th ed., 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Y. G. Xu, and G. R. Liu, A modified electro-mechanical impedance model of piezoelectric actuator-sensors for debonding detection of composite patches, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 389–396, 2002. DOI: 10.1177/104538902761696733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael Krommer, Pelin Berik, Yury Vetyukov, and Ayech Benjeddou, Piezoelectric d15 shear-response-based torsion actuation mechanism: an exact 3D Saint-Venant type solution, Int. J. Smart Nano Mater., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 82–102, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/19475411.2011.649807.
   Google Scholar