The Effects of Men’s and Women’s Voices in Political Advertising

REFERENCES

• Alreck, P. L., R. B. Settle, and M. A. Belch. 1982. “Who Responds to ‘Gendered’ Ads, and How? Masculine Brands versus Feminine Brands.” Journal of Advertising Research 22 (2):25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althaus, S. L., A. M. Cizmar, and J. G. Gimpel. 2009. “Media Supply, Audience Demand, and the Geography of News Consumption in the United States.” Political Communication 26 (3):249–77. doi:10.1080/10584600903053361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., and S. Iyengar. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58 (3):335–57. doi:10.1086/269431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., and B. F. Schaffner. 2010. “Residential Mobility, Family Structure, and the Cell-Only Population.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (2):244–59. doi:10.1093/poq/nfq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. L., and M. J. McAdams. 2009. “Blogs of Information: How Gender Cues and Individual Motivations Influence Perceptions of Credibility.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (3):435–56. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N., A. C. Beall, J. Loomis, J. Blascovich, and M. Turk. 2004. “Transformed Social Interaction: Decoupling Representation from Behavior and Form in Collaborative Virtual Environments.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13 (4):428–41. doi:10.1162/1054746041944803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch, R. A., T. Burnett, T. R. Diller, and E. Rankin-Williams. 2000. “Gender Representation in Television Commercials: Updating an Update.” Sex Roles 43 (9):735–43. doi:10.1023/A:1007112826569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlo, D. K., J. B. Lemert, and R. J. Mertz. 1969. “Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources.” Public Opinion Quarterly 33 (4):563–76. doi:10.1086/267745
   Google Scholar
• Brackett, L. K., and B. N. Carr. 2001. “Cyberspace Advertising vs. Other Media: Consumer vs. Mature Student Attitudes.” Journal of Advertising Research 41 (5):23–33. doi:10.2501/jar-41-5-23-32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretl, D. J., and J. Cantor. 1988. “The Portrayal of Men and Women in U.S. Television Commercials: A Recent Content Analysis and Trends over 15 Years.” Sex Roles 18 (9–10):595–609. doi:10.1007/BF00287963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. 2001. “The Impacts of Emotion Elicited By Print Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluation.” Media Psychology 3 (2):91–118. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0302_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, C. K., R. M. Alvarez, and J. Nagler. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (2):311–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyde, W., L. Hewitt, and D. Allsop. 1996. “The Gender Gap in Attitudes toward the Gulf War: A Cross-National Perspective.” Journal of Peace Research 33 (1):67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K. 1985. “Sex and Gender.” Annual Review of Psychology 36 (1):49–81. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.000405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debevec, K., and E. Iyer. 1986. “The Influence of Spokespersons in Altering a Product’s Gender Image: Implications for Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Advertising 15 (4):12–20. doi:10.1080/00913367.1986.10673033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia, R. R., and B. Sternthal. 1977. “Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities?” Journal of Consumer Research 3 (4):223–32. doi:10.2307/2489608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditonto, T. M., A. J. Hamilton, and D. P. Redlawsk. 2013. “Gender Stereotypes, Information Search, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 36 (2):335–58. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9232-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, K. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., and M. C. Anderson. 2004. “Message Tailoring in Spanish: Courting Latino Voters in the 2000 Presidential Advertising Campaign,” in Lights, Camera, Campaign: Media, Politics, and Political Advertising, edited by D. Schultz 121–48. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, K. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (1):31–44. doi:10.1177/106591290505800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, K. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominick, J. R., and G. E. Rauch. 1972. “The Image of Women in Network TV Commercials.” Journal of Broadcasting 16 (3):259–65. doi:10.1080/08838157209386349
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. 2001. “Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing Effects.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (1):62–82. doi:10.1093/jleo/17.1.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducoffe, R. H. 1995. “How Consumers Assess the Value of Advertising.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 17:1–18. doi:10.1080/10641734.1995.10505022
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., M. M. Franz, and T. N. Ridout. 2017. “Presidential Political Advertising in the 2012 cycle” Version 1.0 [dataset]. Middletown, CT: The Wesleyan Media Project, Department of Government at Wesleyan University.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, P., M. M. Franz, and K. Goldstein. 2004. “Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science 48:723–41. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, J. 2011. “Twelve Recent Brain Research Discoveries Having Relevance to Successful Communications.” http://www.comingofage.com/uncategorized/twelve-recent-brain-research-discoveries-having-relevance-to-successful-communications
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, K., and P. Freedman. 2000. “New Evidence for New Arguments: Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections.” The Journal of Politics 62 (04):1087–1108. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00047
   Google Scholar
• Grau, S. L., and Y. C. Zotos. 2016. “Gender Stereotypes in Advertising: A Review of Current Research.” International Journal of Advertising 35 (5):761–70. doi:10.1080/02650487.2016.1203556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K. 1999. “Content Class as a Contextual Cue in the Cognitive Processing of Publicity versus Advertising.” Journal of Public Relations Research 11 (4):293–320. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1104_02
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2):133–65. doi:10.1017/S1743923X11000055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., and J. L. Lawless. 2016. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfrich, H., and P. Weidenbecher. 2011. “Impact of Voice Pitch on Text Memory.” Swiss Journal of Psychology 70 (2):85–93. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrnson, P. S., J. C. Lay, and A. K. Stokes. 2003. “Women Running ‘as Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” The Journal of Politics 65 (1):244–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., I. L. Janis, and H. H. Kelley. 1953. Communications and Persuasion: Psychological Studies in Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., and W. Weiss. 1951. “The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 15 (4):635–50. doi:10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., and N. Terkildsen. 1993a. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1):119–47. doi:10.2307/2111526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., and N. Terkildsen. 1993b. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3):503–25. doi:10.1177/106591299304600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., N. A. Valentino, S. Ansolabehere, and A. F. Simon. 1997. “Running as a Woman: Gender Stereotyping in Political Campaigns.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, R., and M. Shephard. 2007. “Gender, Candidate Image and Electoral Preference.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 9 (3):434–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., M. G. Hagen, and K. H. Jamieson. 2004. The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahle, L. R., and P. M. Homer. 1985. “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Research 11 (4):954–61. doi:10.1086/209029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanungo, R. N., and S. Pang. 1973. “Effects of Human Models on Perceived Product Quality.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (2):172–78. doi:10.1037/h0037042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, K. M., and J. R. Petrocik. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3):864–87. doi:10.2307/2991838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenton, S. B. 1989. “Speaker Credibility in Persuasive Business Communication A Model Which Explains Gender Differences 1.” Journal of Business Communication 26 (2):143–57. doi:10.1177/002194368902600204
   Google Scholar
• King, D. C., and R. E. Matland. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party an Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6):595–612. doi:10.1177/1532673X03255286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klofstad, C. A., R. C. Anderson, and S. Peters. 2012. “Sounds like a Winner: Voice Pitch Influences Perception of Leadership Capacity in Both Men and Women.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 279 (March):2698–2704. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, J. W. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impressions of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2):453–62. doi:10.2307/3088388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y., and N. M. Bauer. 2014. “The Relationship between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior 36 (1):167–88. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9221-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3):479–90. doi:10.1177/106591290405700312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz, G. S., and C. Lawson. 2011. “Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizens to Vote Based on Candidates’ Appearance.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3):574–89. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. C., R. P. Burriss, B. C. Jones, and S. C. Roberts. 2007. “Facial Appearance Affects Voting Decisions.” Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (1):18–27. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86 (02):390–403. doi:10.2307/1964228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” The American Political Science Review 88 (1):63. doi:10.2307/2944882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. 2013. “Communicating Science in Politicized Environments.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (3):14048–54. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212726110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. 2015. Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It, New York: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=q4GhCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=lupia+2015+uninformed&ots=jYLI9_DfXT&sig=MWe8w5LQPmfTCjgg_fNMVC5BeaE.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, A., and M. D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marecek, J., J. A. Piliavin, E. Fitzsimmons, E. C. Krogh, E. Leader, and B. Trudell. 1978. “Women as TV Experts: The Voice of Authority?” Journal of Communication 28 (1):159–68. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marecek, J., J. A. Piliavin, E. Fitzsimmons, E. C. Krogh, E. Leader, and B. Trudell. 1978. “Women as TV experts: The Voice of Authority?” Journal of Communication 28:159–68. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., and D. C. King. 2002. “Women as Candidates in Congressional Elections.” In Women Transforming Congress, 119–45. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press Norman.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., P. R. Hamilton, and A. N. Weiner. 1974. “The Effect of Interaction Behavior on Source Credibility, Homophily, and Interpersonal Attraction.” Human Communication Research 1 (1):42–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1974.tb00252.x
   Google Scholar
• Misra, S., and S. E. Beatty. 1990. “Celebrity Spokesperson and Brand Congruence: An Assessment of Recall and Affect.” Journal of Business Research 21 (2):159–73. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(90)90050-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C., I.-M. Jonsson, H. Harris, B. Reaves, J. Endo, S. Brave, and L. Takayama. 2005. “Improving Automotive Safety by Pairing Driver Emotion and Car Voice Emotion”. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 2005, USA, 1973–76.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. 1990. Persuasion: Theory and Research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Olivola, C. Y., and A. Todorov. 2010. “Elected in 100 Milliseconds: Appearance-Based Trait Inferences and Voting.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 34 (2):83–110. doi:10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathé, S. 2016. “Campaign Ads No Longer Rely on ‘Mansplaining.’” http://www.cqpolitics.com/news/politics/campaign-ads-no-longer-rely-mansplaining
   Google Scholar
• Pedelty, M., and M. Kuecker. 2014. “Seen to Be Heard? Gender, Voice, and Body in Television Advertisements.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 11 (3):250–69. doi:10.1080/14791420.2014.926015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. 1989. “An Expected Party Vote: New Data for an Old Concept.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (1):44–66. doi:10.2307/2111253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. 2004. “The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades’ Evidence.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34 (2):243–81. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, E., and T. J. Wood. 2016. “Race, Interracial Families, and Political Advertising in the Obama Era: Experimental Evidence.” Political Communication 33 (3):481–582. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1106625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, B., and M. Swers. 2011. “An Endogenous Approach to Women’s Interests: When Interests Are Interesting in and of Themselves.” Politics & Gender 7 (3):429–35. doi:10.1017/S1743923X11000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, D. 2015. “Deadline Survey: Women Shut Out of Voicing Ads & Promos For Films and TV Shows.” http://deadline.com/2015/12/voiceover-industry-gender-bias-film-tv-promos-1201647993/
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., and L. Z. McArthur. 1982. “Impact of Salient Vocal Qualities on Causal Attribution for a Speaker’s Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (2):236–47. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, K. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):20–34. doi:10.2307/3088412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapiro, V. 1981. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were A Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 3 (1–2):61–83. doi:10.2307/3791285
   Google Scholar
• Sapiro, V., K. C. Walsh, P. Strach, and V. Hennings. 2009. “Gender, Context, and Television Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis of 2000 and 2002 House Races.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1):107–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffner, B. F. 2005. “Priming Gender: Campaigning on Women’s Issues in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 49:803–17. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, R. Y., and H. Mahajan. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1):42–61. doi:10.1086/268958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.” American Political Science Review 93 (2):345–61. doi:10.2307/2585400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. R. 2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2008. Campain Voices: A Small Group of Actors Provide the Voice-Over for Most Political Advertisements. Who they are and How they’re Chosen. Newsweek. Available from http://www.newsweek.com/2008/09/25/campaign-voices.html, accessed 24 June 2013
   Google Scholar
• Strach, P., and V. Sapiro. 2011. “Campaigning for Congress in the ‘9/11’ Era: Considerations of Gender and Party in Response to an Exogenous Shock.” American Politics Research 39 (2):264–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strach, P., K. Zuber, E. F. Fowler, T. N. Ridout, and K. Searles. 2015. “In a Different Voice? Explaining the Use of Men and Women as Voice-Over Announcers in Political Advertising.” Political Communication 32 (2):183–205. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.914614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swers, M. L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3):435–48. doi:10.2307/440362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swers, M. L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swers, M. L. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policymaking in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tigue, C. C., D. J. Borak, J. J. M. O’Connor, C. Schandl, and D. R. Feinberg. 2012. “Voice Pitch Influences Voting Behavior.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33 (3):210–16. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., V. L. Hutchings, and D. Williams. 2004. “The Impact of Political Advertising on Knowledge, Internet Information Seeking, and Candidate Preference.” Journal of Communication 54 (2):337–54. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallston, B. S., and V. E. O’Leary. 1981. “Sex Makes a Difference: Differential Perceptions of Women and Men.” Review of Personality and Social Psychology 2:9–41.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, W. A., and W. J. McGuire. 1964. “Persistence of Induced Opinion Change and Retention of the Inducing Message Contents.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68 (3):233–41. doi:10.1037/h0041081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R. 1974. “The Relationship of Attitude and Credibility to Comprehension and Selective Exposure.” Western Speech 38 (2):88–97. doi:10.1080/10570317409373815
   Google Scholar