Symbolic Political Communication, and Trust: A Young Voters’ Perspective of the Indonesian Presidential Election

REFERENCES

• Alakali, T. T., S. S. Sambe, and A. W. Tondo. 2014. “Political Symbolism and Mass Mobilisation for Political Participation in Nigeria.” American International Journal of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences 6 (1):44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckman. 1966-91. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. London, UK: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T., M. A. Miller, N. A. Phelps, and J. Taylor. 2013. “Urban Development in a Decentralized Indonesia: Two Success Stories?” Pacific Affairs 86 (4):857–76. doi: 10.5509/2013864857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, N., D. Kinder, and W. Rahn. 2003. “Social Trust and Democratic Politics.” Annual Meeting of the Mid-West Political Science Association. Chicago, IL: Mid-West Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cassel, C. A., and C. C. Lo. 1997. “Theories of Political Literacy.” Political Behavior 19 (4):317–35. doi: 10.1023/A:1024895721905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and E. A. Syailendra. 2014. “Old Society, New Youths: An Overview of Youth and Popular Participation in Post-Reformasi Indonesia.” RSIS Working Paper Series No. 269, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. 2007. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., D. Sanders, M. C. Stewart, and P. Whiteley. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by D. Apter, 206–61. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. 2008. “Orientations to Social Constructionism: Relationally Responsive Social Constructionism and Its Implications for Knowledge and Learning.” Management Learning 39 (2):123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A., and C. Coupland. 2012. “From Hero to Villain to Hero: Making Experience Sensible Through Embodied Narrative Sensemaking.” Human Relations 65 (1):63–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., and B. Teng. 2004. “The Risk-Based View of Trust: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Business and Psychology 19 (1):85–116. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBU.0000040274.23551.1b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Chernatony, L. 2002. “Would a Brand Smell Any Sweeter by a Corporate Name?” Corporate Reputation Review 5 (2–3):114–32. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540169.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D. 2008. “The Lifeworld Mode Exploring the Vagaries in Political Consumption.” In Voters or Consumers: Imagining the Contemporary Electorate, edited by D. Lilleker and R. Scullion, 209–29. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D., and R. Croft. 2001. “Friends and Relations: Long-Term Approaches to Political Campaigning.” European Journal of Marketing 35 (11/12):1197–217. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006482.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., and S. Keeter. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4):1179–206. doi: 10.2307/2111549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermody, J., and S. Hanmer-Lloyd. 2004. “Segmenting Youth Voting Behaviour through Trusting-Distrusting Relationships: A Conceptual Approach.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 9 (3):202–17. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.248.
   Google Scholar
• Dermody, J., and S. Hanmer-Lloyd. 2005. “Promoting Distrust? A Chronicle of the 2005 British General Election Advertising Campaigns.” Journal of Marketing Management 21 (9–10):1021–47. doi: 10.1362/026725705775194210.
   Google Scholar
• Dermody, J., S. Hanmer-Lloyd, and R. Scullion. 2010. “Young People and Voting Behaviour: Alienated Youth and (or) an Interested and Critical Citizenry?” European Journal of Marketing 44 (3/4):421–35. doi: 10.1108/03090561011020507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., and L. Shen (eds). 2012. The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments of Theory and Practice. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duch, R. M. 2001. “A Development Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies.” American Political Science Review 95 (4):895–910. doi: 10.1017/S0003055400400080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., R. Thorpe, and P. R. Jackson. 2008. Management Research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Illinois: Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edvardsson, B., B. Tronvoll, and T. Gruber. 2011. “Expanding Understanding of Service Exchange and Value Co-creation: A Social Construction Approach.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39 (2):327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklof, S. 1999. Indonesian Politics in Crisis: The Long Fall of Suharto 1996-9. Copenhagen, Denmark: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossati, D., H. Yew-Foong, and S. D. Negara. 2017. The Indonesia National Survey Project: Economy, Society and Politics. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. 2004. Packaging Politics: Political Communications in Britain’s Media Democracy. 2nd ed. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 2014. Memoing: A Vital Grounded Theory Procedure. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, H. 2002. “Islam and Democracy.” The Political Quarterly 73 (1):3–9. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.00435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, C. 2002. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grynaviski, J. D. 2010. Partisan Bonds: Political Reputations and Legislative Accountability. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., D. M. Goldstein, and M. B. Ingram. 2016. “The Hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, Gesture, Spectacle.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (2):71–100. doi: 10.14318/hau6.2.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamayotsu, K. 2015. “Indonesia in 2014: The Year of Electing the ‘People’s President’. ” Asian Survey 55 (1):174–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., and A. Lock. 2010. “Mind the Gap”: The Rise of Political Marketing and Perspective on Its Future Agenda.” European Journal of Marketing 44 (3/4):297–307. doi: 10.1108/03090561011020435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A., and A. Park. 1997. “Thatcher’s Children?” In British Social Attitudes: The 14th Report, the End of Conservative Values?, edited by R. Jowell, 1–22. Aldershopt, UK: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V., and A. Kuncoro. 2011. “Corruption and Local Democratization in Indonesia: The Role of Islamic Parties.” Journal of Development Economics 94 (2):164–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. 2010. Cultural Strategy: Using Innovative Ideologies to Build Breakthrough Brands. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Indonesia Investments. 2017. Population of Indonesia. Accessed July 19, 2019. https://www.indonesia-investments.com/culture/population/item67?
   Google Scholar
• Jevons, C. 2005. “Names, Brands, Branding: Beyond the Signs, Symbols, Products and Services.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 14 (2):117–118. doi: 10.1108/10610420510592590.
   Google Scholar
• Kapferer, J. N. 2008. The New Strategic Brand Management. London, UK: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, S. 2004. “Positioning and Branding Your Organisation.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 13 (2):105–15. doi: 10.1108/10610420410529735.
   Google Scholar
• KPU. 2019. Stages of the Program and Schedule for the Implementation of General Elections in 2019 (Tahapan Program dan Jadwal Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019). Accessed July 14, 2019. https://infopemilu.kpu.go.id/pileg2019.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S. E. 2005. “Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primer.” The Qualitative Report 10 (4):758–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980/2003. Metaphors We Live By. London, UK: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddle, R. W. 2000. “Indonesia in 1999: Democracy Restored.” Asian Survey 40 (1):32–42. doi: 10.1525/as.2000.40.1.01p00462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowrie, A. 2007. “Branding Higher Education: Equivalence and Difference in Developing Identity.” Journal of Business Research 60 (9):990–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 2000. “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives.” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by D. Gambetta, 94–107. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., W. R. Neuman, and M. MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement. London, UK: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maulia, E. 2019. “Capital Flows into Indonesia Slow Over Election Concerns.” Nikkei Asian Review, April 12. Accessed July 14, 2019. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Indonesia-election/Capital-flows-into-Indonesia-slow-over-election-concerns
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (3):709–34. doi: 10.2307/258792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. 1997. The Stories We Live by: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. London, UK: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, M. 2014. “Indonesia’s 2014 Election: How Jokowi Won and Democracy Survived.” Journal of Democracy 25 (4):111–125. doi: 10.1353/jod.2014.0073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S. 2017. “This Election Is Vitally Important. So Why Is It So Deathly Boring?” The Guardian, May 3. Accessed May 25, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/03/election-brexit-vitally-important-why-so-deathly-boring
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D. 2000. “Heidegger's Critique of Husserl's and Brentano's Accounts of Intentionality.” Inquiry 43 (1):39–66.
   Google Scholar
• Morduchowicz, R., E. Catterberg, R. G. Niemi, and F. Bell. 1996. “Teaching Political Information and Democratic Values in a New Democracy: An Argentine Experiment.” Comparative Politics 28 (4):465–476. doi: 10.2307/422053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniz, A. M., and T. C. O’Guinn. 2001. “Brand Community.” The Journal of Consumer Research 27 (4):412–432. doi: 10.1086/319618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. 2001. “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy.” International Political Science Review 22 (2):201–214. doi: 10.1177/0192512101222004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 2001. “Political Liberalism, Group Right, and the Politics of Fear and Trust.” Studies in East European Thought 53 (3):167–182. doi: 10.1023/A:1011210918657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, K., and M. Bennett. 2017. “Relational Leadership, Storytelling and Narratives: Practices of Local Government.” Public Administration Review, 77 (4):515–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peñaloza, L., and A. Venkatesh. 2006. “Further Evolving the New Dominant Logic of Marketing: From Services to the Social Construction of Markets.” Marketing Theory 6 (3):299–316. doi: 10.1177/1470593106066789.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, N., and C. Hackley. 2009. “Are Voters, Consumers? A Qualitative Exploration of the Voter-Consumer Analogy in Political Marketing.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 12 (2):171–186. doi: 10.1108/13522750910948770.
   Google Scholar
• Pich, C., and D. Dean. 2015. “Political Branding: Sense of Identity or Identity Crisis? An Investigation of the Transfer Potential of the Brand Identity Prism to the UK Conservative Party.” Journal of Marketing Management 31 (11–12):1353–1378. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2015.1018307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potrafke, N. 2012. “Islam and Democracy.” Public Choice 151 (1–2):185–192. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9741-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. W., S. Kahn, and T. Tran. 1991. “Creating a Political Image: Shaping Appearance and Manipulating the Vote.” Political Behavior 13 (4):345–367. doi: 10.1007/BF00992868.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer. 1998. “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3):393–404. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmazdeh, J. K. 2012. “Islam and Democracy.” Journal of American Science 8 (1):591–595.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffman, L., S. T. Thelen, and E. Sherman. 2010. “Interpersonal and Political Trust: Modelling Levels of Citizens’ Trust.” European Journal of Marketing 44 (3/4):369–381. doi: 10.1108/03090561011020471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, L. C. 2004. “Indonesia's Historic First Presidential Elections.” UNISCI Discussion Papers. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/767/76711307006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Suryadinata, L. 2019. “Which Presidential Candidate Will Chinese Indonesians Vote for in 2019.” Perspectives, February 13, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Susila, I., D. Dean, and D. Harness. 2015. “Intergenerational Spaces: Citizens, Political Marketing and Conceptualising Trust in a Transitional Democracy.” Journal of Marketing Management 31 (9–10):970–995. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2015.1036768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, P. J. 2006. “Indonesia Seven Years after Soeharto: Party System Institutionalization in a New Democracy.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 28 (1):88–114. doi: 10.1355/CS28-1E.
   Google Scholar
• Tapsell, R. 2018. “The Smartphone as the “Weapon of the Weak”: Assessing the Role of Communication Technologies in Malaysia’s Regime Change.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 37 (3):9–29. doi: 10.1177/186810341803700302.
   Google Scholar
• Tessler, M. 2002. “Islam and Democracy in the Middle East: The Impact of Religious Orientations in Attitudes.” Comparative Politics 34 (3):337–54.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2019. “Indonesia Election: Presidential Rival Challenges Widodo in Court.” The Guardian, May 25. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/25/indonesia-election-presidential-rival-challenges-widodo-victory-in-court.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. 2001. “Whatever Happened to Asian Values?” Journal of Democracy 12 (4):154–65. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloutsou, C. 2008. “Branding: A Constantly Developing Concept.” Journal of Brand Management 15 (5):299–300.
   Google Scholar
• White, J., and L. de Chernatony. 2002. “New Labour: A Study of the Creation, Development and Demise of a Political Brand.” Journal of Political Marketing 1 (2/3):45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wira, N. N. 2017. “Rocking Low-Maintenance Fashion, Jokowi Style.” The Jakarta Post, January 11. Accessed December 16, 2018. https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2017/01/11/rocking-low-maintenance-fashion-jokowi-style.html.
   Google Scholar