An Application of Psychological Reactance Theory to College Student Voter Registration and Mobilization

References

• Asch, Solomon E. 1951. “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments.” In Groups, Leadership, and Men, edited by Harold Guetzkow, 177–90. Oxford: Carnegie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennion, Elizabeth A., and David W. Nickerson. 2016. “I Will Register and Vote, If You Teach Me How: A Field Experiment Testing Voter Registration in College Classrooms.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4):867–71. doi: 10.1017/S1049096516001360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennion, Elizabeth, and David Nickerson. 2019. “What We Know about How to Mobilize College Students to Vote.” APSA Preprints. doi: 10.33774/apsa-2019-t0f6g.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Yosef, Jens Olav Dahlgaard, Jonas Hedegaard Hansen, and Kasper M. Hansen. 2017. “Moving the Campaign from the Front Door to the Front Pocket: Field Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Phrasing and Timing of Text Messages on Voter Turnout.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 27 (3):291–310. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2016.1270288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggers, Daniel R. 2021. “Can the Backlash against Voter ID Laws Activate Minority Voters? Experimental Evidence Examining Voter Mobilization through Psychological Reactance.” Political Behavior. 43:1161–1179. doi: 10.1007/s11109-019-09587-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, JackW 1966. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, SharonS, and JackW Brehm. 1981. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, Lisa A., Michael J. Hanmer, Alauna C. Safarpour, and Jared McDonald. 2022. “The Power of the State: How Postcards from the State Increased Registration and Turnout in Pennsylvania.” Political Behavior 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11109-020-09625-2.
   Google Scholar
• Burden, Barry C., David T. Canon, Kenneth R. Mayer, and Donald P. Moynihan. 2014. “Election Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (1):95–109. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, John T., Wendi L. Gardner, and Gary G. Berntson. 1997. “Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 1 (1):3–25. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campo, Shelly, Dominique Brossard, M. Somjen Frazer, Timothy Marchell, Deborah Lewis, and Janis Talbot. 2003. “Are Social Norms Campaigns Really Magic Bullets? Assessing the Effects of Students’ Misperceptions on Drinking Behavior.” Health Communication 15 (4) 481–97. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1504_06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Hyunyi, and Laura Sands. 2011. “Gain-And Loss-Frame Sun Safety Messages and Psychological Reactance of Adolescents.” Communication Research Reports: CRR 28 (4):308–17. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.616242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung, Adrienne, and Rajiv N. Rimal. 2016. “Social Norms: A Review.” Review of Communication Research 4:1–28. doi: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, Robert B., Raymond R. Reno, and Carl A. Kallgren. 1990. “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (6):1015–26. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, James Price, and Lijiang Shen. 2005. “On the Nature of Reactance and Its Role in Persuasive Health Communication.” Communication Monographs 72 (2):144–68. doi: 10.1080/03637750500111815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• File, Thom 2014. “Young-Adult Voting: An Analysis of Presidential Elections, 1964–2012.” United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2014/demo/p20-573.html.
   Google Scholar
• File, Thom 2018. “Characteristics of Voters in the Presidential Election of 2016.” United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/demo/p20-582.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S, and Todd Rogers. 2009. “Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody’s Voting and so Should You.” The Journal of Politics 71 (1):178–91. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608090117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Christopher W. Larimer. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 102 (1):33–48. doi: 10.1017/S000305540808009X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Christopher W. Larimer. 2010. “An Experiment Testing the Relative Effectiveness of Encouraging Voter Participation by Inducing Feelings of Pride or Shame.” Political Behavior 32 (3):409–22. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9110-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Gregory A. Huber, Albert H. Fang, and Andrew Gooch. 2017. “The Generalizability of Social Pressure Effects on Turnout across High-Salience Electoral Contexts: Field Experimental Evidence from 1.96 Million Citizens in 17 States.” American Politics Research 45 (4):533–59. doi: 10.1177/1532673X16686556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Gregory A. Huber, Albert H. Fang, and Catlan E. Reardon. 2018. “The Comparative Effectiveness on Turnout of Positively versus Negatively Framed Descriptive Norms in Mobilization Campaigns.” American Politics Research 46 (6):996–1011. doi: 10.1177/1532673X18772276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Donald P., Mary C. McGrath, and Peter M. Aronow. 2013. “Field Experiments and the Study of Voter Turnout.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23 (1):27–48. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2012.728223.
   Google Scholar
• Green, DonaldP, and AlanS Gerber. 2019. Get out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haenschen, Katherine, and Jay Jennings. 2019. “Mobilizing Millennial Voters with Targeted Internet Advertisements: A Field Experiment.” Political Communication 36 (3):357–75. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2018.1548530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell, Hans J. G, and Emily E. Wyler. 2019. “Negative Descriptive Social Norms and Political Action: People Aren’t Acting, so You Should.” Political Behavior 41 (1):231–56. doi: 10.1007/s11109-018-9450-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbert, RLance, and MichaelT Stephenson. 2008. “Commentary on the Uses and Misuses of Structural Equation Modeling in Communication Research.” In The SAGE Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Researchers, edited by R. Lance Holbert and Michael T. Stephenson, 185–218. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2):263–91. doi: 10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler. 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (6):1325–48. doi: 10.1086/261737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, Lauren Deschamps, and David W. Nickerson. 2015. “When Reports Depress Rather than Inspire: A Field Experiment Using Age Cohorts as Reference Groups.” Journal of Political Marketing 14 (4):381–90. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2015.1086129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, RexB 2016. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapinski, Maria Knight, and Rajiv N. Rimal. 2005. “An Explication of Social Norms.” Communication Theory 15 (2):127–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Hyunmin, and Glen T. Cameron. 2017. “Utilizing Audiovisual and Gain-Framed Messages to Attenuate Psychological Reactance toward Weight Management Health Messages.” Health Communication 32 (1):72–81. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1099506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, Christopher B, and Lisa A. Bryant. 2020. “If You Ask, They Will Come (to Register and Vote): Field Experiments with State Election Agencies on Encouraging Voter Registration.” Electoral Studies 63:102021. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, Christopher B. 2010. “Is There Backlash to Social Pressure? A Large-Scale Field Experiment on Voter Mobilization.” Political Behavior 32 (3):387–407. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9124-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, Christopher B., Kevin Arceneaux, and David W. Nickerson. 2020. “Do Negatively Framed Messages Motivate Political Participation? Evidence from Four Field Experiments.” American Politics Research 48 (1):3–21. doi: 10.1177/1532673X19840732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, Richard E, and Gregg R. Murray. 2013. “An Experimental Test for ‘Backlash’ against Social Pressure Techniques Used to Mobilize Voters.” American Politics Research 41 (3):359–85. doi: 10.1177/1532673X12463423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Dale T, and Deborah A. Prentice. 2016. “Changing Norms to Change Behavior.” Annual Review of Psychology 67:339–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Joanne M, and Jon A. Krosnick. 2004. “Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment.” Political Psychology 25 (4):507–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00384.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, Gregg R, and Richard E. Matland. 2014. “Mobilization Effects Using Mail: Social Pressure, Descriptive Norms, and Timing.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (2):304–19. doi: 10.1177/1065912913499234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, Xiaoli, Kelly Daily, and Yan Qin. 2018. “Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Vs. Loss-Framed Messages: A Review of Theoretical Perspectives and Developing an Integrative Framework.” Review of Communication 18 (4):370–90. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2018.1519845.
   Google Scholar
• Neiheisel, Jacob R, and Barry C. Burden. 2012. “The Impact of Election Day Registration on Voter Turnout and Election Outcomes.” American Politics Research 40 (4):636–64. doi: 10.1177/1532673X11432470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Daniel J, and Jakob D. Jensen. 2006. “The Advantages of Compliance or the Disadvantages of Noncompliance? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relative Persuasive Effectiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages.” Annals of the International Communication Association 30 (1):1–43. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2006.11679054.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Daniel J, and Jakob D. Jensen. 2007. “The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Health Communication 12 (7):623–44. doi: 10.1080/10810730701615198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, DanielJames 2012. “From Psychological Theory to Message Design: Lessons from the Story of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Persuasive Appeals.” In Health Communication Message Design: Theory and Practice, edited by Hyunyi Cho, 3–20. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Daniel J, and Jakob D. Jensen. 2009. “The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Detection Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Communication 59 (2):296–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, Costas 2010. “Affect, Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Field Experimental Evidence of the Mobilizing Effects of Pride, Shame and Publicizing Voting Behavior.” Political Behavior 32 (3):369–86. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9114-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, Costas, Christopher W. Larimer, and Meghan Condon. 2014. “Social Pressure, Descriptive Norms, and Voter Mobilization.” Political Behavior 36 (2):451–69. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9234-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H Wesley., and Alan D Berkowitz. 1986. Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International journal of the Addictions 21 (9–10):961–976. doi: 10.3109/10826088609077249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, Brian L, and Benjamin R. Bates. 2010. “The Use of Gain-Or Loss-Frame Messages and Efficacy Appeals to Dissuade Excessive Alcohol Consumption among College Students: A Test of Psychological Reactance Theory.” Journal of Health Communication 15 (6):603–28. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, Brian L, and Michael T. Stephenson. 2008. “Examining the Role of Trait Reactance and Sensation Seeking on Perceived Threat, State Reactance, and Reactance Restoration.” Human Communication Research 34 (3):448–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00328.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, Brian L., Jennifer A. Kam, Susan E. Morgan, Claudia A. Montero Liberona, and Rebecca A. Smith. 2015. “Prospect Theory, Discrete Emotions, and Freedom Threats: An Extension of Psychological Reactance Theory.” Journal of Communication 65 (1):40–61. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, BrianL, Lijiang Shen, and JamesPrice Dillard. 2013. “Reactance Theory and Persuasion.” In The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Advances in Theory and Research. 2nd ed., edited by James Price Dillard and Lijiang Shen, 167–83. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, C. L. 2021. “Characterizing Reactance in Communication Research: A Review of Conceptual and Operational Approaches.” Communication Research 48 (7):1033–1058. doi: 10.1177/0093650219872126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, Stephen A. 2013. “The Nature of Psychological Reactance Revisited: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Human Communication Research 39 (1):47–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Amber Marie, Heather M. Marshall, Thomas Hugh Feeley, and Frank Tutzauer. 2007. “The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing in Organ Donation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Reactance.” Communication Monographs 74 (2):229–55. doi: 10.1080/03637750701397098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus, Tobias 2019. “Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Review of the Literature.” Frontiers in Communication 4 (56). doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus, Tobias, Elisabeth Bigsby, and Brian L. Quick. 2021. “A Comparison of Three Approaches for Measuring Negative Cognitions for Psychological Reactance.” Communication Methods and Measures 15 (1):43–59. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1810647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Benjamin D, and Jason T. Siegel. 2018. “A 50-Year Review of Psychological Reactance Theory: Do Not Read This Article.” Motivation Science 4 (4):281–300. doi: 10.1037/mot0000091.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Lijiang 2015. “Antecedents to Psychological Reactance: The Impact of Threat, Message Frame, and Choice.” Health Communication 30 (10):975–85. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.910882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, Muzafer 1936. The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Shelley E. 1991. “Asymmetrical Effects of Positive and Negative Events: The Mobilization-Minimization Hypothesis.” Psychological Bulletin 110 (1):67–85. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Xiaoquan, and Xiaoli Nan. 2010. “Influence of Self-Affirmation on Responses to Gain-Versus Loss-Framed Antismoking Messages.” Human Communication Research 36 (4):493–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01385.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar