Identifying Effective Spelling Interventions Using a Brief Experimental Analysis and Extended Analysis

References

• Andersen, M. N., Daly, E. J., & Young, N. D. (2013). Examination of a one-trial brief experimental analysis to identify reading fluency interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 403–414.
   Google Scholar
• Ardoin, S. P., & Daly III, E. J. (2007). Introduction to the special series: Close encounters of the instructional kind—how the Instructional Hierarchy is shaping instructional research 30 years later. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, K. (2007). Best practices in teaching writing. In L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 243–263). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., & Wagner, D. (2008). Determining an effective intervention within a brief experimental analysis for reading: A meta-analytic review. School Psychology Review, 37, 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cates, G. L., Dunne, M., Erkfritz, K., Kivisto, A., Lee, N., & Wierzbicki, J. (2007). Differential effects of two spelling procedures on acquisition, maintenance, and adaption to reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J. & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J., Murdoch, A., Lillenstein, L., Webber, L., & Lentz, F. E. (2002). An examination of methods for testing treatments: Conducting brief experimental analyses of the effects of instructional components on oral reading fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 288–316.
   Google Scholar
• Daly III, E. J., Lentz, F. E., & Boyer, J. (1996). The Instructional Hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., Lowry, L., & Kuehnle, K. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of spelling and performance on standardized tests (Research report 21). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., & Gilbertson, D. N. (2004). Identifying academic skill and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33, 429–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erion, J., Davenport, C., Rodax, N., Scholl, B., & Hardy, J. (2009). Cover-copy-compare and spelling: One versus three repetitions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Using CBM for progress monitoring in written expression and spelling. Student Progress Monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.studentprogress.org/summer_institute/2007/Written/Writing_Materials_2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, M. M. (1986). Generalization of spelling strategies by learning disabled students as a result of contingent imitation/modeling and mastery criteria. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 530–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettinger, M., Bryant, N. D., & Fayne, H. R. (1982). Designing spelling instruction for learning disabled students: An emphasis on unit size, distributed practice, and training for transfer. Journal of Special Education, 16, 439–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, Y. L., & Heron, T. E. (1998). Pleaze, teacher, help me learn to spell better: Teach me self-correction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30, 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1993). Spelling interventions: A review of literature and implications for instruction for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Gortmaker, V., Daly, E. J., McCurdy, M., Persampieri, M., & Hergenrader, M. (2007). Improving reading outcomes for children with learning disabilities: Using brief experimental analysis to develop parent-tutoring interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 203–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Freeman, S. (1986). Strategy training and teacher-vs.-student-controlled study conditions: Effects on LD students' spelling performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink Chorzempa, B. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haring, N. G., Lovitt, T. C., Eaton, M. D., & Hansen, C. L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. M., & Wickstrom, K. F. (2002). Done in 60 seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems. School Psychology Review, 31, 554–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, D., & Deno, S. (1981). The reliability of simple, direct measures of written expression (Research report 50). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D. B. (1982). The technical adequacy of direct, repeated measurement of academic skills in low achieving elementary students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International, 43 (AAT 8301966).
   Google Scholar
• Maughan, B. B., Messer, J. J., Collishaw, S. S., Pickles, A. A., Snowling, M. M., Yule, W. W., & Rutter, M. M. (2009). Persistence of literacy problems: spelling in adolescence and at mid-life. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 50, 893–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, K. H., Glenn, I. M., & Vollmer, T. R. (2008). Teaching spelling through prompting and review procedures using computer-based instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, J. J., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., Asmus, J. M., Richman, D., & Stoner, B. (1996). Brief experimental analysis of stimulus prompts for accurate responding on academic tasks in an outpatient clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 397–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, J. J., Wagner, D., Coolong Chaffin, M., Holton, E., McDonnell, M., & Monn, E. (2009). Prescriptive analysis: Further individualization of hypothesis testing in brief experimental analysis of reading fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 56–70.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster, K., & Espin, C. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moats, L. (2006). How spelling supports reading. LD Online. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/8845
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing for America's Families, Schools, and Colleges. (2005). Writing: A powerful message from state government. New York, NY: College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ollendick, T. H., Matson, J. L., Esveldt-Dawson, K., & Shapiro, E. S. (1980). Increasing spelling achievement: An analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 645–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., Dickey, B. M., Burns, M. K., & McMaster, K. L. (2012). An application of brief experimental analysis with early writing. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 329–349.
   Google Scholar
• Rathvon, N. (2003). Effective school interventions: Strategies for enhancing academic achievement and social competence. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. M., & Shinn, N. R. (2002). AIMSweb® training workbook: Administration and scoring of spelling curriculum-based measurement (S-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (1982). A comparison of psychometric and functional differences between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Retrieved from Abstracts International, 42 (AAT 8275871).
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Ysseldyke, J. E., Deno, S. L., & Tindal, G. A. (1986). A comparison of differences between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving on measure so of classroom performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 545–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., McLaughlin, T. F., & Logan, P. (1997). Cover, copy, and compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 295–306.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., & Smith, E. S. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-management interventions for increasing academic performance. School Psychology Review, 21, 202–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (1997). Introduction to special issue on spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2009). Performance indicators in math: Implications for brief experimental analysis of academic performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Gordon, J. (1993). Which motoric condition is most effective for teaching spelling to students with and without learning disabilities?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 191–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Gordon, J. (1992). Early spelling acquisition: Does writing really beat the computer? Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 223–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Swanson, E. A., Edmonds, M., & Kim, A. (2006). A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 528–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar