986
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using the Good Behavior Game with High School Special Education Students: Comparing Student- and Teacher-Selected Reinforcers

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 105-121 | Received 26 Feb 2018, Accepted 06 Aug 2018, Published online: 21 Sep 2018

References

  • Algozzine, B., Wang, C. & Violette, A. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between academic achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 3–16.
  • Barrish, H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.
  • Bowman-Perrot, L., Burke, M. D., Zaini, S., Zhang, N., & Vannest, K. (2016). Promoting positive behavior using the Good Behavior Game: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 180–190.
  • Bryant, B. R., Kim, M. K., Ok, M. W., Kang, E. Y., Bryant, D. P., Lang, R., & Son, S. H. (2015). A comparison of the effects of reading intervention on engagement and performance for fourth-grade student with learning disabilities. Behavior Modification 39(1), 167–190.
  • Chafouleas, S. M., Briesch, A. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & McCoach, D. B. (2009). Moving beyond assessment of treatment acceptability: An examination of the factor structure of the Usage Rating Profile – Intervention (URP-I). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 36–47.
  • Cohen-Almeida, D., Graff, R. B., & Ahearn, W. H. (2000). A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(3), 329–334.
  • Darch, C. B., & Thorpe, H. W. (1977). The principal game: A group consequence procedure to increase classroom on-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 341–347.
  • Darveaux, D. (1984). The Good Behavior Game plus merit: Controlling disruptive behavior and improving student motivation. School Psychology Review, 13(4), 510–514.
  • Davies, S., & White, R. (2000). Self-management and peer-monitoring within a group contingency to decrease uncontrolled verbalizations of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 135–147.
  • Elliott, S. N., Turco, T. L., & Gresham, F. M. (1987). Consumers’ and clients’ pretreatment acceptability ratings of classroom group contingencies. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 145–153.
  • Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95(5), 421–434.
  • Fishbein, J., & Wasik, B. (1981). Effect of good behavior game on disruptive library behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 89–93.
  • Flannery, K. B., Fenning, P., Kato, M. M., & Bohanon, H. (2011). A descriptive study of office disciplinary referrals in high schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21, 138–149.
  • Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., Bunuan, R. L., Muething, C. S., & Vega, R. J. (2014). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on challenging behaviors in school settings. Review Of Educational Research, 84(4), 546–571.
  • Flower, A., McKenna, J. Muething, C. S., Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. (2014). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on off-task behavior in a high school basic algebra resource classroom. Behavior Modification, 40, 396–413.
  • Gresham, F. N., & Gresham, G. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. Journal of Special Education, 16(1), 101–110.
  • Hawkins, R. P., & Dotson, V. A. (1975). Reliability scores that delude: An “Alice in Wonderland” trip through the misleading characteristics of interobserver agreement scores in interval recording. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kleinman, K., & Saigh, P. (2011). The effects of the Good Behavior Game on the conduct of regular education New York City high school students. Behavior Modification, 35, 95–105.
  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M. & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
  • Landon, T. & Mesinger, J. F. (1989). Teacher tolerance ratings on problem behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 236–249.
  • Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 8, 341–347.
  • Luiselli, J. K., Putnam, R. F., & Sunderland (2002). Longitudinal evaluation of behavior support intervention in a public middle school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(3), 182–188.
  • Mitchell, R. R., Tingstrom, D. H., Dufrene, B. A., Ford, W. B., & Sterling, H. E. (2015). The effects of the Good Behavior Game with general-education high school students. School Psychology Review, 44(2), 191–207.
  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2014). Indicators of school crime and safety. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015072.pdf
  • Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy 40. 357–367.
  • Popkin, J., & Skinner, C. H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32(2), 282–295.
  • Robertshaw, C. S., & Hiebert, H. D. (1973). The astronaut game: A group contingency applied to a first grade classroom. School Applications of Learning Theory, 6, 28–33.
  • Safran, S. P. & Safran, J. S. (1984). Teachers’ tolerance of problem behaviors. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 236–243.
  • Salend, S., Reynolds, C., & Coyle, E. (1989). Individualizing the Good Behavior Game across type and frequency of behavior with emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Modification, 13, 108–126.
  • Skiba, R. J., Peterson, R. L., & Williams, T. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–316.
  • Skiba, R., & Rausch, M. K. (2006). School disciplinary systems: Alternatives to suspension and expulsion. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 87–102). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Sran, S. K. & Borrero, J. C. (2010). Assessing the value of choice in a token system. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(3): 553–557.
  • Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
  • Swiezy, N. B., Matson, J. L., & Box, P. (1992). The good behavior game: A token reinforcement system for preschoolers. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 14, 21–32.
  • Sy, J., Gratz, O., & Donaldson, J. (2016). The Good Behavior Game with students in alternative educational environments: Interactions between reinforcement criteria and scoring accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 455–477.
  • Tiger J. H, Hanley G. P., Hernandez, E. (2006). An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 1–16.
  • Tingstrom, D. H., Sterling-Turner, H. E., & Wilczynski, S. M. (2006). The good behavior game: 1969-2002. Behavior Modification 30(2), 225–253.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.