Training preservice general education teachers in response to intervention: A survey of teacher educators throughout the United States

References

• Al Otaiba, S., Wanzek, J., & Yovanoff, P. (2015). Response to intervention. European Scientific Journal, 1, 260–264.
   Google Scholar
• Allsopp, D. H., Farmer, J. L., & Hoppey, D. (2016). Preservice teacher education and response to intervention within multi-tiered systems of support: What can we learn from research and practice? In S. Jimerson, M. Burns, & A. VanDerHeyden, (Eds). Handbook of response to intervention. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 5–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. K., & Burchard, M. S. (2011). Quality and utility of the multi-tiered instruction self efficacy scale. Research and Practice in Assessment, 5, 22–42.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, A. C., & Harlacher, J. E. (2008). Clearing the confusion: Response-to-intervention as a set of principles. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 417–431.
   Google Scholar
• Barrio, B. L., & Combes, B. H. (2015). General education pre-service teachers’ levels of concern on response to intervention (RTI) Implementation. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 38(2), 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Barrio, B. L., Lindo, E. J., Combes, B. H., & Hovey, K. A. (2015). Ten years of response to intervention: Implications for general education teacher preparation programs. Action in Teacher Education, 37, 190–204.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, C. N., & Cramer, E. C. (1989). Hypothesis testing in multivariate linear models with randomly missing data. Communications in Statistics–Simulation and Computation, 18, 875–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., … Tilly, W. D. (2006). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Easton, J. E., Upright, J. J., Tunstall, K. R., & Ehrenbock, C. A. (2014). The reliability and user-feasibility of materials and procedures for monitoring the implementation integrity of a reading intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 51(5), 517–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ training in empirically validated behavioral instruction practices. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(3), 262–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Schulte, A. C., & Johnson, K. (2012). Enhancing instructional problem solving: An efficient system for assisting struggling learners. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. C., Daley, T., Levin, M., O’Reilly, R., Parsad, A., Robertson, A., & Werner, A. (2011). IDEA national assessment implementation study (NCEE 2011-4027). Washington, DC: National center for education evaluation and regional assistance, Institute of education sciences, U.S. Department of education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey, R. (2005). Training educators to use RTI methods. In R. Brown-Chidsey & M. W. Steege (Eds.), Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice (pp. 139–156). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Egan, A. M., Kunkel, A. K., McComas, J., Peterson, M. M., Rahn, N. L., & Wilson, J. (2013). Training for generalization and maintenance in RTI implementation: Front-loading for sustainability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, W. S., & Laux, J. M. (2008). A survey investigating school psychologists’ measurement of treatment integrity in school-based interventions and their beliefs about its importance. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., & Johnston-Rodriguez, S. (2009). Beginning teachers’ views of their collaborative roles. Preventing School Failure, 44, 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Creative Research Systems (2007). Sample size calculator. Retrieved from http://www.surveysystem.com/sscal.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Duhon, G. J., Mesmer, E. M., Gregerson, L., & Witt, J. C. (2009). Effects of public feedback during RTI team meetings on teacher implementation integrity and student academic performance. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida Problem-Solving/Response to Intervention Project. (2008). Perception of RtI skills survey. Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/images/content/downloads/get%20started/perceptionsofrtiskills.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 263–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Hope, S. K., Hollenbeck, K. N., Capizzi, A. M., … Brothers, R. L. (2006). Extending responsiveness-to-intervention to math problem-solving at third grade. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fugate, M., & O’Connell, L. (2010). Teacher individual evaluation of response to intervention skills (TIERS). Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/conventions/handouts2010/posters/TIERS%202010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. A., & DiPerna, J. C. (2007). Service delivery for response to intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36, 526–540.
   Google Scholar
• Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445–459.
   Google Scholar
• Harn, B. A., Chard, D. J., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2011). Meeting societies’ increased expectations through responsive instruction: The power and potential of systemwide approaches. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55, 232–239.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M. W., Yssel, N., Bauserman, A. D., & Merbler, J. B. (2010). Preservice teacher preparation for inclusion: An exploration of higher education teacher-training institutions. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlbut, A. R., & Tunks, J. (2016). Elementary pre-service teachers’ experiences with Response to Intervention. Teacher Education Quarterly, 43(3), 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Iris Center. (2007). Two approaches to response to intervention. U.S. Department of education [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/images/stories/two_approaches_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Response to intervention at school: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 3–9). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A. (2012). Fidelity of implementation framework: A critical need for response to intervention models. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 342–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovaleski, J. F., Gickling, E. E., Morrow, H., & Swank, P. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial and Special Education, 20(3), 170–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Clements, M. A., & Kalymon, K. M. (2007). Response to intervention: Conceptual and methodological issues in implementation. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 25–52). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Volpiansky, P., Clements, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 618–631.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D., Lau, M., Muyskens, P., & Wilson, J. (2016). Data-based decision-making, the problem-solving model, and response to intervention in the Minneapolis public schools. In S. Jimerson, M. Burns, A. VanDerHeyden (Eds) Handbook of response to intervention. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• McCombes-Tolis, J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (2011). The preparation of preservice elementary educators in understanding and applying the terms, concepts, and practices associated with response to intervention in early reading contexts. The Journal of School Leadership, 21, 360–389.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. S., Woodruff, A. L., & Vaughn, S. (2010). First-grade student retention within a 3-tier reading framework. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26, 26–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI). (2010). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of education, office of special education programs, national center on response to intervention.
   Google Scholar
• National Education Association. (2006). The role of general education teachers in the RTI process. [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from http://www.sswaa.org/userfiles/file/NewRolesinRTI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, A. (2013). Training pre-service teachers in response to intervention: A survey of teacher candidates (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Noltemeyer, A. L., Boone, W. J., & Sansosti, F. J. (2014). Assessing systems level RTI implementation for reading: Development and validation of the RTIS-R. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40, 40–52.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E. P., & Freeman, E. W. (2012). District level considerations in supporting and sustaining RTI implementation. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigott, T. D. (2001). A review of methods for missing data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(4), 353–383.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. J., & Bergstrom, M. K. (2009). Response to intervention. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 434–460). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C., Pavri, S., Golez, F., Canges, R., & Murphy, J. (2007). Response to intervention: Building the capacity of teachers to serve students with learning difficulties. Issues in Teacher Education, 16, 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. W., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (2015). Multi-tiered systems of support preservice residency: A pilot undergraduate teacher preparation model. Journal of the National Association for Alternative Certification, 10, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, P. L. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47, 537–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, E. S., Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2003). Training in evidence-based interventions (EBI’s): What are school psychology programs teaching? Journal of School Psychology, 41(6), 467–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sornson, R., Frost, F., & Burns, M. K. (2005). Instructional support teams in Michigan: Data from Northville public schools. Communiqué, 33(5), 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L., & Cheesman, E. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(7), 1691–1723. Retrieved from http://www.uccs.edu/Documents/coe/people/faculty/cheesmane/SpearSwerlingCheesmanRW2011.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L. (2008). Response to intervention and teacher preparation. In E.L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Educating individuals with disabilities: IDEIA 2004 and beyond (pp. 273–293). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Spectrum K12 Solutions (2010). Response to intervention adoption survey 2010. Towson, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.spectrumk12.com/rti/the_rti_corner/rti_adoption_report.
   Google Scholar
• Tillery, A. D., Varjas, K., Meyers, K., & Collins, A. S. (2010). General education teachers’ perceptions of behavior management and intervention strategies. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 86–102.
   Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 225–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Ende, C. N. (2001). Repeated-measures analysis: Growth and other time-dependent measures. In S. M. Scheiner & J. Gurevitch (Eds.), Design and analysis of ecological experiments (pp. 134–157). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vujnovic, R. K., Fabiano, G. A., Morris, K. L., Norman, K., Hallmark, C., & Hartley, C. (2014). Examining school psychologists' and teachers' application of approaches within a response to intervention framework. Exceptionality, 22(3), 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L. & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar