Effects of a Word Boxes Electronic App on Improving Letter-Sound Correspondences of Learners of English as an Additional Language

References

• Alber-Morgan, S. R., Joseph, L. M., Kanotz, B., Rouse, C. A., & Sawyer, M. R. (2016). The effects of word box instruction on acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of decoding and spelling skills for first graders. Education & Treatment of Children, 39(1), 21–43. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AtReks. (2017). Build a Word-Easy Spelling with Phonics (Version 5.0) [Mobile application software]. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/build-a-word-easy-spelling-with-phonics/id436102581?mt=8.
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. A., Tangel, D. M., Ball, E. W., Black, R., & McGRaw, C. K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two–year intervention with low-income, inner city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 239–273. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ587488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 101–130. doi:10.3102/00346543072001101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301(5899), 419–421. doi:10.1038/301419a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. L., Helf, S., & Cooke, N. L. (2008). Effects of adding multisensory components to a supplemental reading program on the decoding skills of treatment resisters. Education & Treatment of Children, 31(3), 267–295. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899979.
   Google Scholar
• Campuzano, L., Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., & Rall, K. (2009). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from two student cohorts (NCEE 2009‐4041). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C., & Smith, L. L. (2004). The impact of a reading-focused integrated learning system on phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(4), 947–964. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C., & Smith, L. L. (2005). The impact of a structured integrated learning system on first-grade students’ reading gains. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(4), 361–376. doi:10.1080/10573560591002277
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C., Smith, L. L., & Thomas, C. L. (2018). Supporting emergent literacy for English language learners with computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 350–369. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277–299. doi:10.1002/rrq.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. (1993). Reading recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T., McWilliam, R., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. doi:10.1177/0741932514557271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, T. M., & Draper Rodriguez, C. D. (2013). Integrating the iPad into language arts instruction for students with disabilities: Engagement and perspectives. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(4), 43–52. doi:10.1177/016264341302800404
   Google Scholar
• Durst, E., & Joseph, L. M. (2016). Scaffolding preschoolers’ acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of phoneme segmentation skills using sound boxes. Dialog, 19(3), 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dynamic Measurement Group. (2011). DIBELS Next assessment manual. Dibels.uoregon.edu. Retrieved from http://www.d11.org/edss/assessment/DIBELS%20NextAmplify%20Resources/DIBELSNext_AssessmentManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dynamic Measurement Group. (2016). DIBELS Next benchmark goals and composite score. Dibels.uoregon.edu. Retrieved from https://dibels.org/papers/DIBELSNextBenchmarkGoals.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., … Sussex, W. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort (NCEE 2007‐4005). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 19–36. doi:10.1097/00011363-200020030-00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkonin, D. B. (1963). The psychology of mastery elements of reading. In B. Simon & J. Simon (Eds.), Educational psychology in the USSR (pp. 165–179London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2010). Fountas & Pinnell benchmark assessment system 1. Grades K-2, levels A-N. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Al Otaiba, S., Thompson, A., Yen, L., McMaster, K. N., … Yang, N. J. (2001). K-PALS helping kindergartners with reading readiness: Teachers and researchers in partnerships. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 76–80. doi:10.1177/004005990103300411
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Using CBM for progress monitoring in written expression and spelling. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519251.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. L., & Fienup, D. M. (2018). A preliminary analysis of mastery criterion level: Effects on response maintenance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11(1), 1–8. 10.1007/s40617-017-0201-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, L., & Yale, I. (2011). A logical letter-sound system in five phonic generalizations. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 330–339. doi:10.1598/RT.64.5.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Landerl, K., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., de Jong, P. F., & Parrila, R. (2020). Reading and spelling development across languages varying in orthographic consistency: Do their paths cross? Child Development, 91(2), 266–279. doi:10.1111/cdev.13218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, C., & O’Hanlon, R. (2014). A process-driven approach for identifying Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander learners of English as an additional language or dialect (EAL/D). Practically Primary, 19(3), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Steinle, P. K., & Vaughn, S. (2019). Reading instruction for English learners with learning disabilities: What do we already know, and what do we still need to learn?. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 2019(166), 145–189. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/10.1002/cad.20302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins, R. O., Collins, T., Hernan, C., & Flowers, E. (2017). Using computer-assisted instruction to build math fact fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(3), 141–147. doi:10.1177/1053451216644827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A Practical Guide to Curriculum-based Measurement. NewYork, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M. (1998). Word boxes help children with learning disabilities identify and spell words. Reading Teacher, 52(4), 348–356. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20202075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M. (2000). Developing first graders' phonemic awareness, word identification and spelling: A comparison of two contemporary phonic instructional approaches. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(2), 160–169. doi:10.1080/19388070009558318
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M. (2002). Facilitating word recognition and spelling using word boxes and word sort phonic procedures. School Psychology Review, 31(1), 122–129. doi:10.1080/02796015.2002.12086146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., Dahlgren, M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2002). Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory teaching approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 229–242. doi:10.1007/s11881-002-0014-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamps, D., Abbott, M., Greenwood, C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Wills, H., Lonstaff, J., … Walton, C. (2007). Use of evidence-based, small-group reading instruction for English Language Learners in elementary grades: Secondary-tier intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 153–168. doi:10.2307/30035561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keesey, S., Konrad, M., & Joseph, L. M. (2015). Word boxes improve phonemic awareness, letter–sound correspondences, and spelling skills of at-risk kindergartners. Remedial and Special Education, 36(3), 167–180. doi:10.1177/0741932514543927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case design technical documentation. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, J. (1993). The ESL/ELL teacher’s book of lists. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lance, D. M., Beverly, B. L., Evans, L. H., & McCullough, K. C. (2003). Addressing literacy: Effective methods for reading instruction. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25(1), 5–11. doi:10.1177/15257401030250010201
   Google Scholar
• Larabee, K., Burns, M., & McComas, J. (2014). Effects of an iPad-supported phonics intervention on decoding performance and time on-task. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(4), 449–469. doi:10.1007/s10864-014-9214-8
   Google Scholar
• Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Measuring procedural fidelity in behavioural research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3-4), 332–348. 10.1080/09602011.2013.861352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linan-Thompson, S., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based methods of reading instruction for English Language Learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mathes, P. G., Pollard-Durodola, S. D., Cardenas-Hagan, E., Linan-Thompson, S., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Teaching struggling readers who are native Spanish speakers: What do we know? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(3), 260–271. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2007/027)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTigue, E. M., Solheim, O. J., Zimmer, W. K., & Uppstad, P. H. (2020). Critically reviewing GraphoGame across the world: Recommendations and cautions for research and implementation of computer‐assisted instruction for word‐reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 45–73. doi:10.1002/rrq.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitenberger, R. A. (2015). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Mize, M., Park, Y., Schramm-Possinger, M., & Coleman, M. B. (2020). Developing a rubric for evaluating reading applications for learners with reading difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(3), 145–153. doi:10.1177/1053451219842237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. J., & Bryan, A. J. (2016). Multiple-baseline and multiple-probe designs: Practical alternatives for special education assessment and evaluation. The Journal of Special Education, 14(3), 325–335. doi:10.1177/002246698001400306
   Google Scholar
• Musti-Rao, S., Lo, Y., & Plati, E. (2015). Using an iPad® app to improve sight word reading fluency for at-risk first graders. Remedial and Special Education, 36(3), 154–166. doi:10.1177/0741932514541485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K., & Manis, F. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English Language Learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K., & Manis, F. (2012). Development of reading skills from K-3 in Spanish-speaking English Language Learners following three programs of instruction. Reading & Writing, 25(2), 537–567. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9285-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2019). National achievement-level results. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading/nation/achievement?grade=4.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2019). English Language Learner (ELL) students enrolled in public elementary and secondary schools, by state: Selected years, fall 2000 through fall 2016. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_204.20.asp.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (NRP). (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B. (2006). Early literacy: Making letter-sound correspondence. Early Childhood Today, 20(6), 20–21. http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/ect.
   Google Scholar
• Office of English Language Acquisition. (2018). Fast facts: English learners (ELs) who are Hispanic/Latino. Retrieved from https://ncela.ed.gov/files/fast_facts/FastFacts-HispanicELs-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single-subject experimental research: Description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 11–33. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reading, S., & Van Deuren, D. (2007). Phonemic awareness: When and how much to teach? Reading Research and Instruction, 46(3), 267–286. doi:10.1080/19388070709558471.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S., & Vaughn, S. (2010). Reading achievement across three language groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 668–686. doi:10.1037/a0018983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. M., & Joseph, L. M. (2019). Effects of word boxes on improving students’ basic literacy skills: A literature review. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 63(1), 43–51. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2018.1480006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, L. E., Coyne, M. D., & Simmons, D. C. (2006). The Reading–spelling connection: Developing and evaluating a beginning spelling intervention for children at risk of reading disability. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(2), 122–133. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00212.x
   Google Scholar
• Satterfield, B., & Anderson, A. (2009). In support of single-subject research for evidence-based practice and AAC research. Retrieved from http://www.gatfl.gatech.edu/tflwiki/images/f/f4/EBP-AAC-ssrd-rubrics-101011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E., & Evers, T. (2009). Linguistic intervention techniques for at-risk English Language Learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(1), 55–76. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, E., Witmer, S. E., & Schmitt, H. (2017). English Language Learners and reading instruction: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 136–145. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2016.1219301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solari, E. J., Aceves, T. C., Higareda, I., Richards, T. C., Filippini, A. L., Gerber, M. M., & Leafstedt, J. (2014). Longitudinal prediction of 1st and 2nd grade English oral reading fluency in English Language Learners: Which early reading and language skills are better predictors? Psychology in the Schools, 51(2), 126–142. doi:10.1002/pits.21743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, M. (2004). Getting ready for reading: A follow-up study of inner city second language learners at the end of Key Stage 1. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(Pt 1), 15–36. 10.1348/000709904322848806.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2012). Two-year follow-up of a kindergarten phonics intervention for English learners and native English speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 987–1005. doi:10.1037/a0028163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K.J., Parker, R.I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Retrieved from singlecaseresearch.org.
   Google Scholar