Differentiating Academic Behaviors from Academic Skills to Inform Interventions

References

• Baker, D. L., Biancarosa, G., Park, B. J., Bousselot, T., Smith, J.-L., Baker, S. K., Kame’enui, E. J., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2015). Validity of CBM measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in grades 7 and 8. Reading and Writing, 28(1), 57–104. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9505-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009). Increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency with small-group interventions: A comparison of repeated reading, listening passage preview, and listening only strategies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 211–228. doi:10.1007/s10864-009-9090-9
   Google Scholar
• Brann, K. L., Daniels, B., Chafouleas, S. M., & DiOrio, C. A. (2022). Usability of social, emotional, and behavioral assessment in schools: A systematic review from 2009 to 2019. School Psychology Review, 51(1), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.18
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, A. L., & McDaniel, S. C. (2021). Tier 2: Critical issues in systems, practices, and data. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 29(1), 34–43. doi:10.1177/1063426620949859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn, A. L., Woods-Groves, S., & Huddle, S. (2014). A preliminary investigation of emotional and behavioral screening practices in k–12 schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 611–634. doi:10.1353/etc.2014.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K. (2011). Matching math interventions to students’ skill deficits. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(4), 210–218. doi:10.1177/1534508411413255
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L., Tolan, K., Butler Smith, E., Ochs, M., Steinberg, J. L., Chough, G Ehrenworth, M., & Marron, A. (2015). Units of study for teaching reading, grade 4: A workshop curriculum. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chafouleas, S., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Sugai, G. (2007). School-based behavioral assessment: Informing intervention and instruction. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chafouleas, S. M., Volpe, R. J., Gresham, F. M., & Cook, C. (2010). School-based behavioral assessment within problem-solving models: Current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 34, 343–349. doi:10.1080/02796015.2010.12087756
   Google Scholar
• Cook, C. R., Volpe, R., & Livanis, A. (2010). Constructing a roadmap for future universal screening research beyond academics. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(4), 197–205. doi:10.1177/1534508410379842
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, E. L., Pederson, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L. D., & Trost, M. A. (1973). Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41(3), 438–446. 10.1037/h0035373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPerna, J. C. (2006). Academic enablers and student achievement: Implications for assessment and intervention services in the schools. Psychology in the Schools, 43(1), 7–17. doi:10.1002/pits.20125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the miniseries. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 293–297. doi:10.1080/02796015.2002.12086156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., DiPerna, J. C., & Shapiro, E. S. (2001). Academic intervention monitoring system. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Gresham, F. M., Frank, J. L., & Beddow, P. A. (2008). Intervention validity of social behavior rating scales. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(1), 15–24. doi:10.1177/1534508408314111
   Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., Wallace, T., Lembke, E., Campbell, H., & Long, J. D. (2010). Creating a progress measurement system in reading for middle-school students: Monitoring progress towards meeting high stakes standards. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(2), 60–75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00304.x
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RtI: A next generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 263–279. 10.1177/001440291207800301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gickling, E. E., & Armstrong, D. L. (1978). Levels of instructional difficulty as related to on-task behavior, task completion, and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(9), 559–566. doi:10.1177/002221947801100905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, T. A., & Albers, C. A. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 117–135. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H. & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.) (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy (6th ed.). Institute for the Development of Education Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Nelson, R. O., & Jarrett, R. B. (1987). The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality. American Psychologist, 42(11), 963.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M. (2009). Conceptual and empirical issues related to developing a response-to-intervention framework. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 9, 128–147.
   Google Scholar
• Hosp, J. L., Hosp, M. A., & Dol, J. K. (2011). Potential bias in predictive validity of universal screening measures across disaggregation subgroups. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 108–131. doi:10.1080/02796015.2011.12087731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalberg, J. R., Lane, K. L., & Menzies, H. M. (2010). Using systematic screening procedures to identify students who are nonresponsive to primary prevention efforts: Integrating academic and behavioral measures. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(4), 561–584. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42900570
   Google Scholar
• Kamphaus, R. W., DiStefano, C., Dowdy, E., Eklund, K., & Dunn, A. R. (2010). Determining the presence of a problem: Comparing two approaches for detecting youth behavioral risk. School Psychology Review, 39(3), 395–407. doi:10.1080/02796015.2010.12087760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., Eklund, K., von der Embse, N. P., Peet, C., Izumi, J., Shim, H., & Meyer, L. N. (2020). Development and validation of the intervention skills profile-skills: A brief measure of student social-emotional and academic enabling skills. Journal of School Psychology, 83, 66–88. 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., Chafouleas, S. M., & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2013). Development and initial validation of the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener for elementary grades. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 28(3), 210–226. doi:10.1037/spq0000024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & von der Embse, N. P. (2014). Social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener (SAEBRS). Theodore J. Christ & Colleagues.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., Eklund, K., von der Embse, N. P., Taylor, C. N., & Sims, W. A. (2016). Psychometric defensibility of the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener (SAEBRS) teacher rating scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples. Journal of School Psychology, 58, 21–39. 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., Methe, S. A., Maggin, D. M., & Tomasula, J. L. (2014). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (R-CBM): A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of evidence supporting use in universal screening. Journal of School Psychology, 52(4), 377–405. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., Sims, W. A., von der Embse, N. P., & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2015). Confirmation of models for interpretation and use of the social and academic behavior risk screener (SAEBRS). School Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 335–352. doi:10.1037/spq0000087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Document/229.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L. (2007). Identifying and supporting students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders within multi-level models: Data-driven approaches to conducting secondary interventions with an academic emphasis. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(4), 135–164. doi:10.1353/etc.2007.0026
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Ennis, R. P., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). Identifying students for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students have tier 2 and tier 3 needs? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(3), 171–182. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.895573
   Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., & Eckert, T. L. (2007). The instructional hierarchy as a model of stimulus control over student and teacher behavior: We’re close but are we close enough? Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 82–90. (doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9026-6
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Tufis, P. A., & Sperling, R. A. (2008). Are reading and behavior problems risk factors for each other? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 417–436. 10.1177/00222219408321123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. R., Benner, G. J., Lane, K., & Smith, B. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 59–73. doi:10.1177/001440280407100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2003). Treatment utility of psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 521–531. 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367. 10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson Education. (2012). AIMSweb technical manual. Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com/wp-content/uploads/aimsweb-Technical-Manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A. L., Busch, T. W., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–469. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Burns, M. K. (2010). Evaluating educational interventions: Single-case design for measuring response to intervention. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20194790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J., & McMaster, K. (2019). Relations between CBM (oral reading and maze) and reading comprehension on state achievement tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 73, 131–149. 10.1016/j.jsp/2019.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(3), 128–134. doi:10.1207/SLDRP1503_2
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, N. A. (2017). Comparing curriculum-based measures and extant datasets for universal screening in middle school reading. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(4), 195–208. doi:10.1177/1534508417690399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2019). Ready, set, go, review: Screening for behavioral health risk in schools. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/ready_set_go_review_mh_screening_in_schools_508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. N., Kilgus, S. P., & Huang, F. (2018). Treatment utility of universal screening for behavioral risk: A manipulated assessment study. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 34(3), 242–258. doi:10.1080/15377903.2017.1394949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treptow, M. A., Burns, M. K., & McComas, J. J. (2007). Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effects on students’ reading comprehension and time on task. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 159–166. doi:10.1080/02796015.2007.12087958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe, R. J., & Briesch, A. M. (2018). Establishing evidence-based behavioral screening practices in U.S. schools. School Psychology Review, 47(4), 396–402. doi:10.17105/SPR-2018-0047.V47-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von der Embse, N. P., Kilgus, S. P., Eklund, K., Zahn, M., Peet, C., & Durango, S. (2021). Promoting effective decision making: Training educators to collect and use social-emotional skill assessment data to inform tier 2 interventions. School Psychology Review, 1–15. doi:10.1080/2372966X.2020.1827689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar