The Complementary Roles of Scientific and Clinical Thinking in Child Custody Evaluations

REFERENCES

• American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry [AACAP]. (1988). Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of child and adolescent sexual abuse by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry's Committee on Rights and Legal Matters. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry [AACAP]. (1997). Practice parameters for child custody evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Supplement, 36(10). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law [AAPL]. (1995). Ethical guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.aapl.org
   Google Scholar
• American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children [APSAC]. (1995a). Practice guidelines: Psychosocial evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in young children. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children [APSAC]. (1995b). Practice guidelines: Psychosocial evaluation of suspectedpsychological maltreatment in children and adolescents. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder – Text revision (4th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association [APA]. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association [APA/APLS]. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. American Psychology Law Society News, 11(1), 8–11. doi:10.1037/e409392005-007
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association [APA/PD]. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49(7), 677–680. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.49.7.677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association [APA]. (2010). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. American Psychologist, 65(9), 863–867. doi:10.1037/a0021250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Association of Family & Conciliation Courts [AFCC]. (2006). Model standards of practice for child custody dvaluation. Madison, WI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G., & Gould, J. W. (2006). Exploring three functions in child custody evaluation for the relocation case: Prediction, investigation, and making recommendations for a long-distance parenting plan. In P. M. Stahl & L. M. Drozd (Eds.), Relocation issues in child custody cases (pp. 65–110). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruch, C. S. (2001). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly, 35, 527–552. doi:10.2139/ssrn.298110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, M., & Gould, J. W. (2014). Commentary on “analyzing child sexual abuse allegations”: Will a new untested criterion-based content analysis model be helpful? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14, 169–182. doi:10.1080/15228932.2014.897540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalenberg, C. J. (1996). Fantastic elements in child disclosure of abuse. APSAC Advisor, 9(2), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dalenberg, C. J., Hyland, K. Z., & Cuevas, C. A. (2002). Sources of fantastic elements in allegations of abuse by adults and children. In M. L. Eisen J. A. Quas & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 185–204). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S. Ct. 2786.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd, L. M. (2009). Rejection in cases of abuse or alienation in divorcing families. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy L. Kraus & J. Galatzer-Levy (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions (2nd ed., pp. 403–416). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd, L. M., Olesen, N. W., & Saini, M. A. (2013). Parenting plan & child custody evaluations: Using decision trees to increase evaluator competence and avoid preventable errors. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, J., & O'Donohue, W. (2012). Pathways to false allegations of sexual assault. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12, 97–123. doi:10.1080/15228932.2012.650071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everson, M. D., & Faller, K. C. (2012). Base rates, multiple indicators, and comprehensive forensic evaluations: Why sexualized behavior still counts in assessments of child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21, 45–71. doi:10.1080/10538712.2012.642470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everson, M. D., Sandoval, J. M., Berson, N., Crowson, M., & Robinson, H. (2012). Reliability of professional judgments in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: Unsettled or unsettling science? Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21, 72–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanetti, M., & Boles, R. (2004). Forensic interviewing and assessment issues with children. In W. O'Donohue & E. Levensky (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 246–265). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N., & Grove, W. M. (2005). On the merits of clinical judgment: Comment. American Psychologist, 60(6), 658–659. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (1986). Child custody litigation: A guide for parents and mental health professionals. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Hirschman, J. E., Hepps, D., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's memory for stressful events. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 109–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. W., & Martindale, D. A. (2007). The art and science of child custody evaluations. New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. S., Goodman, G. S., Augusti, E. M., Chae, Y., & Alley, D. (2009). Children's resistance to suggestion. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), Evaluations of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony (pp. 181–202). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K. (2014, June). Forensic mental health assessment: A principles-based model. Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Forensic Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 753–769. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoult, J. (2006). The evidentiary admissibility of parental alienation syndrome: Science, law, and policy. Children's Legal Rights Journal, 26(1), 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, A. W. (2007). Conducting a psychological assessment. In G. Young A. W. Kane & K. Nicholson (Eds.), Causality of psychological injury (pp. 293–323). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B. (2003). Parents with enduring child disputes: Focused interventions with parents in enduring disputes. Journal of Family Studies, 9, 51–62. doi:10.5172/jfs.9.1.51
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B., & Johnston, J. R. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family Court Review, 39, 249–266. doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00609.x
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, H. D. (2014). A commentary on O'Donohue et al.'s “analyzing child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14, 183–191. doi:10.1080/15228932.2014.897541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehnle, K., & Connell, M. (2009). Evaluating child sexual abuse allegations. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy L. Kraus & J. Galatzer-Levy (Eds.) The scientific basis of child custody decisions (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehnle, K., & Connell, M. (2010). Child sexual abuse suspicions: Treatment considerations during investigation. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 554–571. doi:10.1080/10538712.2010.512554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehnle, K., & Kirkpatrick, H. D. (2005). Evaluating allegations of child sexual abuse within complex child custody cases. Journal of Child Custody, 2(3), 3–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludolph, P. S., & Dale, J. D. (2012). Attachment in child custody: An additive factor, not a determinative one. Family Law Quarterly, 46(1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, L. C., & Quas, J. A. (2009). Children's suggestibility: Areas of consensus and controversy. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), Evaluations of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony (pp. 267–297). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mart, E. G. (2010). Common errors in the assessment of allegations of child sexual abuse. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38, 325–343. doi:10.1177/009318531003800306
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical vs. statistical prediction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milchman, M. S. (2011). The roles of scientific and clinical epistemologies in forensic mental health assessments. Psychological Injury and Law, 4(2), 127–139. doi:10.1007/s12207-011-9104-5
   Google Scholar
• NJ Custody Parenting Time Evaluations. (2013). NJ Administrative Code, Title 13, Law and Public Safety, Chapter 42, Board of Psychological Examiners, Subchapter 12, 13:42–12.1–12.7.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donohue, W., Benuto, L. T., & Cirlugea, O. (2013). Analyzing child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 13, 296–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donohue, W., Benuto, L. T., Fondren, R. N., Tolle, L., Vijay, A., & Fanetti, M. (2013). Dimensions of child sexual abuse allegations: What is unusual and what is not? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 13, 456–475. doi:10.1080/15228932.2013.838103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, R. K. (2014, June). Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic psychological evaluations. Paper presented at the American Academy of Forensic Psychology, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K., & Taylor, J. (2002). Memory for traumatic events in children and adults. In M. L. Eisen J. A. Quas & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 165–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips. V. Gelpke. 382 N.J. Super 505 (App. Div. 2006), Syllabus A-1–2006; overturned 187 N.J. 79.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Quas, J. A., Goodman, G. S., Ghetti, S., & Redlich, A. D. (2000). Questioning the child witness: What can we conclude from the research thus far? Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1, 223–249. doi:10.1177/1524838000001003002
   Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J. (2003). Holistic judgment in clinical practice: Utility or futility? The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 2(1), 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, M., Johnston, J. R., Fidler, B. J., & Bala, N. (2012). Empirical studies of alienation. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the Family Court (pp. 399–441). New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Saywitz, K. J., & Lyon, T. D. (2002). Coming to grips with children's suggestibility. In M. L. Eisen J. A. Quas & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 85–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1992). Retelling a life: Narration and dialogue in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2006). Research methods in psychology (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shedler, J., Mayman, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117–1131. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.11.1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoda, Y., Cervone, D., & Downey, G. (2007). Persons in context: Building a science of the individual. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. A., & Stahl, P. M. (2014). Analysis in child-custody-evaluation reports: A crucial component. Family Law Quarterly, 48(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sines, L. K. (1959). The relative contribution of four kinds of data to accuracy in personality assessment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 483–492. doi:10.1037/h0046083
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, P. M. (2006). Avoiding bias in relocation cases. In P. M. Stahl & L. M. Drozd (Eds.), Relocation issues in child custody cases (pp. 109–124). New York, NY: Haworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. J., & Kelly, J. B. (2001). Legal and psychological management of cases with an alienated child. Family Court Review, 39, 299–315. doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00612.x
   Google Scholar
• Tippins, T. (2014, June). Evidence for forensic psychologists. Presented at the American Academy of Forensic Psychology, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Tippins, T. M. (2008, May 2). Custody guidelines: We're off to see the wizard! Custody evaluation standards and guidelines: Setting the frame. Presented at Reconceptualizing child custody: Past, present, and future – Lawyers and psychologists working together. Joint conference of the ABA Section of Family Law and the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Treadwell, K., & Foa, E. (2004). Assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder. In W. O'Donohue & E. Levensky (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 347–362). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. L., & Peterson, C. (2014). Exploring parent-child discussions of crime and their influence on children's memory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32, 686–701. doi:10.1002/bsl.2144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. J. (1989). Willful and nonwillful determinants of memory. In H. L. Roediger III, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 59–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Webster's new collegiate dictionary (7th ed.). Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59, 595–613. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.7.595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, N., & Hoffman, P. J. (1968). Three models of clinical judgment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73(1), 70–77. doi:10.1037/h0025445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2007). Causality: Concepts, issues, and recommendations. In G. Young A. W. Kane & K. Nicholson (Eds.), Causality of psychological injury: Presenting evidence in court (pp. 49–86). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar