Misogynistic cultural argument in parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases

References

• ACSBlog/ACS – American Constitution Society. (2010). Male judges far outnumber women judges, federal court graph shows. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from https://www.acslaw.org/acsblog.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. A. (2006). Framing contests in child custody disputes: Parental alienation syndrome, child abuse, gender, and fathers’ rights. Family Law Quarterly, 40(2), 315–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence. (2006). 10 myths about custody and domestic violence and how to counter them. Retrieved October 27, 2017, from https://leadershipcouncil.org/docs/ABA_custody_myths.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American Bar Association. (2015). Lawyer demographics. National lawyer population survey. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Bench. (2016). Representation of United States State Court women judges. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from http://forster-long.com/americanbenchnawj.asp.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5 (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, E. J. (1970). The influence of maternal psychosis on children – folie a deux. In E. J. Anthony & T. Benedek (Eds.), Parenthood: Its psychology and psychopathology (pp. 571–595). London, UK: Little, Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2013). Parental alienation research and the Daubert standards. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 322–347). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. J. L., Burkhard, B., & Albertson-Kelly, J. (2012). Differentiating alienated from not alienated children: A pilot study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 178–193.
   Google Scholar
• Bala, N., Hunt, S., & McCarney, C. (2010). Parental alienation in Canadian court cases: 1989–2008. Family Court Review, 48(1), 164–179. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x
   Google Scholar
• Bancroft, L., Silverman, J., & Richie, D. (2011). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barden, C. (2013). Protecting the integrity of the family law system: Multidisciplinary processes and family law reform. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental Alienation: The Handbook for Mental Health and Legal Professionals (pp. 263–288). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Bernet, W. (2010). Parental alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., & Bala, N. (2010). Toward the differentiation of high-conflict families: An analysis of social science research and Canadian case law. Family Court Review, 48(3), 403–416.
   Google Scholar
• Bow, J. N., Gould, J. W., & Flens, J. R. (2009). Examining parental alienation in child custody cases: A survey of mental health and legal professionals. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 127–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhausen, T. (2013). Parental alienation and the new Brazilian law. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental Alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 463–484). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2003). Fathers and child abuse allegations in the context of parental separation and divorce. Family Court Review, 41(3), 367–380.
   Google Scholar
• Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bruch, C. S. (2001). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly, 35, 527–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, P. (2000). Symposium on unfinished feminist business: Reasking the woman question at divorce. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 75, 713–768.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. (2013). Sexual abuse allegations in the context of custody and visitation disputes. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 163–189). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Clawar, S. S., & Rivlin, B. V. (2013). Children held hostage, second edition: Identifying brainwashed children, presenting a case, and crafting solutions. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dallam. S. (n.d.). Are “good enough” parents losing custody to abusive ex-partners? Retrieved March 31, 2017, from http://leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/dv.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dallam, S. J. (1999). Parental alienation syndrome: is it scientific? In E. S. Charles & L. Crook (Eds.), Expose: The failure of family courts to protect children from abuse in custody disputes. Los Gatos, CA: Our Children Our Children Charitable Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/3.html
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, C., Drozd, L., & Wong, F. (2006). Navigating custody and visitation evaluations in cases with domestic violence: A judge’s guide. Reno, NV: National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, G., & Welling, B. (Eds.). (1996). Achieving equal justice for women and men in the California courts: Final Report. Judicial Council of California Advisory Committee on Gender Bias in the Courts. Retrieved October 27, 2017, from www.courts.ca.gov/documents/f-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, R. M., & Pruett, M. K. (2009). Child adjustment and high-conflict divorce. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy, L. Kraus, & J. Galatzer-Levey (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions (2nd ed.) (pp. 353–373). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd, L. M. (2009). Rejection in cases of abuse or alienation in divorcing families. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy, L. Kraus, & J. Galatzer-Levey (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd, L., & Olesen, N. (2004). Is it abuse, alienation, and or estrangement? A decision tree. Journal of Child Custody, 1(3), 65–106.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd, L. M., Olesen, N. W., & Saini, M. A. (2013). Parenting plan & child custody evaluations: Using decision trees to increase evaluator competence & avoid preventable errors. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dum, C. T. (2013). Parental alienation initiatives around the world. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 425–462). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Equal Pay Act. (1963). 29 U.S. Code Chapter 8 Section 206(d). Retrieved January 1, 2018 from https://finduslaw.com/equal-pay-act-1963-epa-29-us-code-chapter-8-206d.
   Google Scholar
• Fahn, M. S. (1991). Allegations of child sexual abuse in custody disputes: Getting to the truth of the matter. Family Law Quarterly, 25(2), 193–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C. (1998). The parental alienation syndrome: What is it and what data support it? Child Maltreatment, 3(2), 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C., & DeVoe, E. (1995). Allegations of sexual abuse in divorce. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 4(4), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, W. (2001). Father and child reunion. New York, NY: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Fidler, B. J., & Bala, N. (2010). Children resisting postseparation contact with a parent: Concepts, controversies, and conundrums. Family Court Review, 48(1), 10–47.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2010). “Fathers’ Rights” and the defense of paternal authority in Australia. Violence Against Women, 16(3), 328–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida Supreme Court, Report of the Gender Bias Study Commission Executive Summary. (1990). Retrieved March 31, 2017, from http://www.flcourts.org/sct/sctdocs/bin/bias.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, B. (2005). Correlates of sexual behavior in young children. Child Custody Litigation: Allegations of child sexual abuse. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Futter, S., & Mebane, Jr. W. R. (2001). The effects of rape law reform on rape case processing. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 16, 72–140.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J., Vintiloiu, A., & McDuff, P. (2016). Do splitting and identity diffusion have respective contributions to borderline impulsive behaviors? Input from Kernberg’s model of personality. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(3), 420–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber, B. D. (2011). Parental alienation and the dynamics of the enmeshed parent-child dyad: Adultification, Parentification, and Infantilization. Family Court Review, 49(2), 322–335. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01374.x
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (1982). Family evaluation in child custody litigation. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (1986). Child Custody Litigation: A Guide for Parents and Mental Health Professionals. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (1987a). The parental alienation syndrome and the differentiation between fabricated and genuine child sex abuse. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (1987b). Sex abuse legitimacy scale (Sal scale): An instrument for differentiating between bona fide and fabricated sex-abuse allegations of children. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (1992). True and false accusations of child sex abuse. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A. (2001). Should courts order PAS children to visit/reside with the alienated parent: A follow-up study. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19(3), 61–106.
   Google Scholar
• Geffner, R., Conradi, L., Geis, K., & Aranda, M. G. (2009). Conducting child custody evaluations in the context of family violence allegations: Practical techniques and suggestions for ethical practice. Journal of Child custody, 6(3–4), 189–218.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. M., Stoffey, R., & Bottinelli, J. (2008). MMPI-2 findings of primitive defenses in alienating parents. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. W., & Martindale, D. A. (2007). The art and science of child custody evaluations. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, E. (1993). Unequal justice: The prosecution of child sexual abuse. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, G. (1970). The Female Eunuch. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hanisch, C. (2000). The personal is political. In B. A. Crow (Ed.), Radical feminism: A documentary reader (pp. 113–116). New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, J. L., Biringen, Z., Ratajack, E. M., Outland, P. L., & Kraus, A. (2016). Parents behaving badly: Gender biases in the perception of parental alienating behaviors. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(7), 866–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L. (1981). Father-Daughter Incest. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2017). Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science. American Psychologist, 72(5), 459–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoult, J. J. (2006). The evidentiary admissibility of parental alienation syndrome: Science, law, and policy. Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 26(1), 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Tribunal on Domestic Violence and Child Custody. (2002). Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project, Wellesley Centers for Women in Massachusetts. Retrieved March 31, 2017 from http://leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/dv.html
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, C. (1997). Child sexual abuse allegations in the context of divorce: Issues for mothers. British Journal of Social Work, 27(4), 529–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P. G., Crooks, C. V., & Bala, N. (2009). A framework for addressing allegations of domestic violence in child custody disputes. Journal of Child custody, 6(3–4), 169–188.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. R. (2003). Parental alignments and rejection: An empirical study of alienation in children of divorce. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 158–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. R., Walters, M. G., & Olesen, N. W. (2005). Is it alienating parenting, role reversal or child abuse? A study of children’s rejection of a parent in child custody disputes. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 5(4), 191–218.
   Google Scholar
• Journal of Child Custody. (2015). Special issue on intimate partner violence and abuse. Journal of Child Custody, 12, 3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaganas, F., & Day Sclater, S. (2004). Contact disputes: Narrative constructions of “good” parents. Feminist Legal Studies, 12(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantry, S. (Summer 2012). Women in Robes, Americas quarterly. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2539&context=facpub
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., & Johnston, J. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of Parental Alienation Syndrome. Family Court Review, 39(3), 249–266.
   Google Scholar
• Kempe, C. H., & Helfer, R. E. (Eds.). (1968). The Battered Child. 1st edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehnle, K., & Connell, M. (2009). The evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehnle, K., & Kirkpatrick, H. D. (2005). Evaluating allegations of child sexual abuse within complex child custody cases. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Child custody litigation: Allegations of child sexual abuse (pp. 3–39). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehnle, K., Ludolph, P. S., & Brubacher, S. P. (2016). Allegations of child sexual abuse in parenting plan evaluations. In L. Drozd, M. Saini, & N. Olesen (Eds.), Parenting Plan Evaluations, second edition: Applied Research for the Family Court (pp. 279–307). New York, NY: Oxford U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, M. A. (2006). Is “best interests” a solution to filling potholes in child custody planning? Journal of Child Custody, 3(2), 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Momentum. (2013). State and federal court task forces on gender bias in the courts. Retrieved September 9, 2017, from http://www.legalmomentum.org/national-judicial-education-program.
   Google Scholar
• Lorandos, D. (2013). Parental alienation and North American law. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 348–424). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Lorandos, D., Bernet, W., & Sauber, S. R. (2013). Overview of parental alienation. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 5–46). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Marriages and Divorces, 1900–2012. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved July 18, 2016, from http:www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005044.html
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. S. (2009a). A historical perspective on parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation. Journal of Child Custody, 6(3–4), 232–257.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. S. (2009b). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Research reviews. VAWnet. Retrieved September 11, 2107, from http://www.vawnet.org.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. S. (2013). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: A research review. VAWnet. Retrieved September 11, 2017, from http://www.vawnet.org.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C., (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz, E., & Lonsway, K. A. (1998). The power of denial: Individual and cultural constructions of child sexual abuse. Northwestern University Law Review, 92, 1415–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milchman, M. S. (2015). The complementary roles of scientific and clinical thinking in child custody evaluations. Journal of Child Custody, 12, 97–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milchman, M. S. (2018). Misogynistic decisions in NY State parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Custody, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Millett, K. (1970). Sexual Politics. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Mone, J. G., & Biringen, Z. (2006). Perceived parent-child alienation: Empirical assessment of parent-child relationships within divorced and intact families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 45(3–4), 131–156.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. E. B. (1997). A Mother’s nightmare – Incest: A practical legal guide for parents and professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ). (2006). Navigating custody & visitation evaluation in cases with domestic violence: A judge’s guide (2nd ed.). Reno, NV: NCJFCJ. Retrieved April 16, 2017, from http://leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/judges.html.
   Google Scholar
• Penfold, P. S. (1995). Mendacious moms or devious dads? Some perplexing issues in child custody/sexual abuse allegation disputes. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 40(6), 337–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfold, P. S. (1997). Questionable beliefs about child sexual abuse allegations during custody disputes. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 14, 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pepiton, M. B., Zelgowsky, B. R., Geffner, R., & Pegolo de Albuquerque, P. (2009). Ethical violations: What can and does go wrong in child custody evaluations? Journal of Child Custody, 6(3–4), 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. N T. Schick (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of science. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pruett, M. K., Deutsch, R. M., & Drozd, L. (2016). Considerations for step-up planning: When and how to determine the “right” time. In L. Drozd, M. Saini, & N. Olesen (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court. (2nd ed.) (pp. 535–554). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rand, D. C. (2013). The history of parental alienation from early days to modern times. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 291–321). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Roe v. Wade. (1973). 410 U.S. 113. Retrieved January 1, 2018 from https://supreme.justia.com/us/410/113/case.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, B. (2002). The success of the Battered Woman Syndrome: An analysis of how cultural arguments succeed. Sociological Forum, 17(1), 81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, M., Johnston, J. R., Fidler, B. J., & Bala, N. (2016). Empirical studies of alienation. In L. Drozd, M. Saini, & N. Olesen (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (2nd ed.) (pp. 374–430). New York, NY: Oxford U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Sales, B. D., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Experts in court: Reconciling law, science, and professional knowledge. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, V. (2001). First wave feminism. In S. Gamble (Ed.), The Routledge companion to feminism and postfeminism (pp. 16–28). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. G., Faller, K. C., & Tolman, R. M. (2012). Child custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations: Their relationship to evaluator demographics, background, domestic violence knowledge and custody-visitation recommendations. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2006). Research methods in psychology (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shuman, D. W., & Zervopoulos, J. A. (2010). Empathy or objectivity: The forensic examiner’s dilemma? Behavioral Sciences and the Law. Retrieved on January 1, 2018 from https://www.ncbi/nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20821814.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J. C., & Langford, S. J. (1998). MMPI-2 validity scales and suspected parental alienation syndrome. (1998). American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16(4), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2009). Rethinking custody evaluation in cases involving domestic violence. Journal of Child Custody, 6(3–4), 287–321.
   Google Scholar
• Stelloh, T. (2014). Do courts use a controversial theory to punish mothers who allege abuse? “Parental alienation” is sometimes used in family court to wrest custody from a parent who alleges abuse. Retrieved from http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/1/24/does-a-controversialdiagnosishelpfathersdod.
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Supreme Court. (1997). Report of the commission on gender fairness. Nashville, TN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Thornham, S. (2001). Second wave feminism. In S. Gamble (Ed.), The Routledge companion to feminism and postfeminism (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, C., Fromson, T., & Hiller, D. (2003). Justice in the Domestic Relations Division of Philadelphia Family Court: A report to the Community, Domestic Violence Report, 8(6).
   Google Scholar
• Turkat, I. (2002). Parental alienation syndrome: A review of critical issues. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 18, 131–176.
   Google Scholar
• Voices of Women Organizing Project (VOW). (2008). Justice denied: how family courts in nyc endanger battered women and children. Brooklyn, NY: Battered Women’s Resource Center. Retrieved March 31, 2017, from http://leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/dv.html.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. E. (1989). Terrifying love: Why battered women kill and how society responds. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. E., Brantley, K. L., & Rigsbee, J. A. (2005). A critical analysis of Parental Alienation Syndrome and its admissibility in the family court. Journal of Child Custody, 1(2), 47–74.
   Google Scholar
• Warshak, R. A. (2011). Parenting by the clock: The best-interest-of-the-child standard, judicial discretion, and the American law Institute’s “approximation rule.” University of Baltimore Law Review, 41, 83–163.
   Google Scholar
• Warshak, R. A. (2015). Ten parental alienation fallacies that compromise decisions in court and in therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 46(4), 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2015). Causality in psychiatry: A hybrid symptom network construct model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2017). PTSD in court III: Malingering, assessment, and the law. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 52, 81–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., & Dror, I. E. (2017). Understanding and mitigating bias in forensic evaluation: Lessons from forensic science. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16, 227–238. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1317302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar