Publication Cover
Journal of Child Custody
Applying Research to Parenting and Assessment Practice and Policies
Volume 14, 2017 - Issue 4
348
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Child Custody Decisions and Evaluations

Misogyny in New York custody decisions with parental alienation and child sexual abuse allegations

References

  • American Prosecutors Research Institute/APRI. (2003). Finding words: Half a nation by 2010 – interviewing children and preparing for court. Arlington, VA: National District Attorneys Association.
  • American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. Retrieved September 19, 2017, from http://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/child-custody.aspx
  • Anthony v. Jacquelyn, 91 A.D. 3d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012).
  • Beard v. Bailor, 84 A.D.3d 1429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).
  • Blue Angel Association. (n.d.). Who are Pedophiles? Retrieved October 8, 2017, from http://ange-bleu.com/en/who-are-pedophiles.
  • Brendan v. Tina Marie, 2006 WL 1222606; 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50819 (Fam. Ct., Suffolk Co. May 4, 2006).
  • Charles v. Heather, 52 A.D.3d 1279 (N.Y. App. Div., 2008).
  • Chase v. Chase, 34 A.D.3d 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006).
  • Ciannamea v. McCoy, 306 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003).
  • Courtois, C. A. (1988). Healing the incest wound: Adult survivors in therapy. New York, NY: WW Norton.
  • Daniel v. Diana, 127 A.D.3d 1514 (N.Y, App. Div. 2015).
  • Dezil v. Garlick, 114 A.D.3d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014).
  • Diane v. Richard, 119 A.D.3d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014).
  • Drozd, L. M., Olesen, N. W., & Saini, M. A. (2013). Parenting plan& child custody evaluations: Using decision trees to increase evaluator competence & avoid preventable errors. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
  • Eck v. Eck, 57 A.D.3d 1243 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008).
  • Fargasch v. Alves, 116 A.D.3d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014).
  • Friedrich, B. (2005). Correlates of sexual behavior in young children. Child custody litigation: Allegations of child sexual abuse. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
  • Friedrich, W. N. (1997). CSBI: Child sexual behavior inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Gardner, R. A. (1987). Sex abuse legitimacy scale (SAL scale): An instrument for differentiating between bona fide and fabricated Sex-abuse allegations of children. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
  • Goldfarb v. Szabo, 130 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015).
  • Gould, J. W., & Martindale, D. A. (2007). The art and science of child custody evaluations. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Gribeluk v. Gribeluk, 120 A.D. 3d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014).
  • Guillermo v. Agramonte, 137 A.D.3d 1767 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016).
  • Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Herman, J. L. (1981). Father–daughter incest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.
  • Honeywell v. Honeywell, 39 A.D.3d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007).
  • Jeannemarie v. Richard P, 94 A.D.3d 1346 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012).
  • John v. Bridget, 16 A.D.3d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005).
  • Joseph v. Rosana, 34 A.D.3d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006).
  • Kuehnle, K., & Kirkpatrick, H. D. (2005). Evaluating allegations of child sexual abuse within complex child custody cases. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Child custody litigation: Allegations of child sexual abuse. (pp. 3–39). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
  • Kuehnle, K., Ludolph, P. S., & Brubacher, S. P. (2016). Allegations of child sexual abuse in parenting plan evaluations. In L. Drozd, M. Saini, & N. Olesen (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations, second edition: Applied research for the family court. (pp. 279–307). New York, NY: Oxford U.P.
  • Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231.
  • Lorandos, D. (2013). Parental alienation and North American law. In D. Lorandos, W. Bernet, & S. R. Sauber (Eds.), Parental alienation: The handbook for mental health and legal professionals. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Martinez v. Hyatt, 86 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).
  • MatLaw Systems Corp. (n.d.). Library of annotations, section 17.2.1.31 alienation and false allegations. Retrieved April 25, 2017, from http://www.matlaw.com.
  • Matthew v. Beth, 130 A.D.3d 1272 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015).
  • Melissa v. Conley, 88 A.D.3d 1199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).
  • Mertz, E., & Lonsway, K. A. (1998). The power of denial: Individual and cultural constructions of child sexual abuse. Northwestern University Law Review, 92, 1415–1458.
  • Milchman, M. S. (2015). The complementary roles of scientific and clinical thinking in child custody evaluations. Journal of Child Custody, 12, 97–128.
  • Milchman, M. S. (2017). Misogynistic cultural argument in parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Custody (this issue).
  • Olufsen v. Plummer, 105 A.D.3d 1418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013).
  • Oscar v. Joyesha, 149 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017).
  • Patton, M. Q. (1991). Patterns, themes, and lessons. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Family sexual abuse: Frontline research and evaluation. pp. 223–242. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Penny v. Gary, 61 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009).
  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. In N T. Schick (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Rothenberg, B. (Mar. 2002). The success of the battered woman syndrome: An analysis of how cultural arguments succeed. Sociological Forum, 17(1), 81–103.
  • Russell, D. (1986). The secret trauma of incest in the lives of girls. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Sachsenmaier, S. J. (2005). Complex child custody evaluations: Evaluating the alleged incestuous parent. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Child custody litigation: Allegations of child sexual abuse. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
  • Sales, B. D., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Experts in court: Reconciling law, science, and professional knowledge. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Saunders, D. G., Faller, K. C., & Tolman, R. M. (2012). Child custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations: Their relationship to evaluator demographics, background, domestic violence knowledge and custody-visitation recommendations. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice.
  • Shaffer v. Winslow, 17 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005).
  • Shuman, D. W., & Zervopoulos, J. A. (2010). Empathy or objectivity: The forensic examiner’s dilemma? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28(5), 585–602. Retrieved January 1, 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20821814.
  • SickKids. (n.d.). What is Vulvovaginitis? Retrieved October 9, 2017, from http://www.aboutkidshealth.ca/En/HealthAZ/ConditionsandDiseases/GenitalandReproductiveDisorders/Pages/vulvovaginitis.aspx
  • Simons, D. A. (n.d.). Sex offender typologies. In Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative (chap. 3). Retrieved October 8, 2017, from https://www.smart.gov/SOMAPI/sec1/ch3_typology.html
  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford U.P.
  • Tippins, T. M. (2004). Matrimonial Practice, Custody Evaluations – Part IX: Babies, Bathwater and “Daubert,” NYLJ, as cited in John A. v. Bridget M., 16 A.D.3d 324 (First Dept. 2005) 3.
  • Tippins, T. M. (2005). Matrimonial Practice, Custody Evaluations – Part X: “Daubert’ and its Progeny Parsed, NYLJ, as cited in John A. v. Bridget M., 16 A.D.3d 324 (First Dept. 2005) 3.
  • Webster v. Webster, 283 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.