Parental gatekeeping forensic model and child custody evaluation: Social capital and application to relocation disputes

References

• Allen, S. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mother’s beliefs and behavior that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 199–212. doi:10.2307/353894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650–666. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, P. R., & Sobolewski, J. M. (2001). The effects of divorce and marital discord on adult children’s psychological well being. American Sociological Review, 66, 900–921. doi:10.2307/3088878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, P. R., & Sobolewski, J. M. (2004). The effects of divorce on fathers and children. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 341–367). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. (2010). The law of relocation of children. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 563–579. doi:10.1002/bsl.944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2000a). A forensic psychology model of risk assessment for child custody relocation law. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 186–201.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2000b). Relocation law and the threshold of harm: Integrating legal and behavioral perspectives. Family Law Quarterly, 34, 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2005). The child and family investigator’s evaluation for the relocation case. In R. M. Smith (Ed.), The role of the child and family investigator and the child’s legal representative in Colorado (pp. C9–1–C9–28). Denver, CO: Colorado Bar Association. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2008a). Relocation, research, and forensic evaluation: Part II: Research support for the relocation risk assessment model. Family Court Review, 46(2), 347–365. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00205.x
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2008b). Relocation, research, and forensic evaluation: Part I: Effects of residential mobility on children of divorce. Family Court Review, 46(1), 136–149. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00188.x
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2010). Relocation and forensic mental health evaluation in Colorado: Issues involving very young children.In R. M. Smith (Ed.), The role of the child and family investigator and the child’s legal representative in Colorado(pp. C1–C23). Denver, CO: Colorado Bar Association. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2011). Parental gatekeeping in custody disputes. American Journal of Family Law, 25(4), 148–153. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2012). Relocation, research, and child custody disputes. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 540–559). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2015a). Child custody evaluation and relocation: Part I of III: Forensic guideposts for the evaluator and court. American Journal of Family Law, 29, 156–170. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2015b). Child custody evaluation and relocation: Part II of III: Options for a systematic approach to forensic evaluation. American Journal of Family Law, 29, 207–223. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2016). Comment on Parkinson and Cashmore’s (2015) research and proposal for reforming child custody relocation law: Child custody evaluator and psychological perspective. Family Court Review, 54(2), 620–631. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com. doi:10.1111/fcre.12247
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G. (2018, in press). Parental gatekeeping and child custody evaluation: Part II: Justification analysis: Suggested forensic protocol for protective gatekeeping. Family Court Review, 56, xxx.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G., & Drozd, L. M. (2006). Custody Evaluation and Parenting Plans for Relocation: Risk Assessment for High Conflict or Partner Violence. Workshop presented at Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, 43rd Annual Conference. June 1, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G., Fieldstone, L. M., & Pruett, M. K. (2013). Bench book for assessing gatekeeping in parenting disputes: Understanding the dynamics of gate-closing and opening for the best interests of children. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practice, 10(1), 1–16. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com. doi:10.1080/15379418.2013.778693
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. G., Pruett, M. K., Kirkpatrick, H. D., Flens, J. R., & Gould, J. W. (2013). Parental gatekeeping and child custody/child access evaluations: Part I: Conceptual framework, research, and application. Family Court Review, 51(3), 485–501. Retrieved from www.child-custody-services.com. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12045
   Google Scholar
• Australian Family Law Act. (1975). Sect 60CC, How a court determines what is in a child’s best interests.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Family Law Act. (2015). 1975, Compilation No. 75, October 14, 2015, 1975 Part VII, Subdivision BA – Best Interests, § 60CC (1–3) (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Baures v. Lewis. (2001) N.J. 770 A.2d 214.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmeyer, J. J., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (2014). Postdivorce coparenting typologies and children’s adjustment. Family Relations, 63, 526–537. doi:10.1111/fare.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbing v. Bisbing. (2017). New Jersey Supreme Court, A-2 September term 2016, 077553, decided August 8, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.22.6.723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, E. A., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Mangelsdorf, S. C., Brown, G. L., & Sobolewski, M. S. (2008). Parent characteristics as antecedents of maternal gatekeeping and father behavior. Family Process, 47, 501–519. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00268.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciesluk. (2005, Colo.). In re Marriage of, 113 P.3d 135.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collingbourne. (2003, IL). In re Marriage of, 204 Ill.2d 498, 791 N.E.2d 532 .
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 387–411. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.116.3.387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuccie, M. F. (1995). Mothers as gatekeepers: A model of maternal mediators of father involvement. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore, M. K. (2004). The “friendly parent” concept: A flawed factor for child custody. Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 6, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, J., & Barnett, M. (2003). The relationship between maternal gatekeeping, paternal competence, mothers’ attitudes about the father role, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 1020–1043. doi:10.1177/0192513x03256397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler, B. J., Bala, N., & Saini, M. A. (2013). Children who resist postseparation parental contact: A differential approach for legal and mental health professionals. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2003). Social capital. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ganong, L., Coleman, M., & Chapman, A. (2016). Gatekeeping after separation and divorce. In L. Drozd, M. Saini, & N. W. Olesen (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 308–345). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, E. M. (1999). Social capital and the development of youth from nondivorced, divorced, and remarried families. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts: The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 177–210). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, E. K., Dunn, K. C., Harper, J., Dyer, W. J., & Day, R. D. (2013). Mother knows best? Inhibitory maternal gatekeeping, psychological control and the mother-adolescent relationship. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 91–101. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E. (2016). Critical analysis of research on parenting plans and children’s well-being. In L. Drozd, M. Saini, & N. Olesen (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court(sec. ed., pp. 170–204). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., (Ed.). (2010). The role of the father in child development (5th ed.). Hoboden, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• LaMusga. (2004). Cal. In re the Marriage of, 88 P. 3d 81.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council, 107, 35–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Channels of group life; Social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1, 143–153. doi:10.1177/001872674700100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludolph, P. S., & Dale, M. S. (2012). Attachment in child custody: An additive factor, not a determinative one. Family Law Quarterly, 46(1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden-Derdich, D. A., & Leonard, S. A. (2002). Shared experiences, unique realities: Formerly married mothers’ and fathers’ perceptons of parenting and custody after divorce. Family Relations, 51(1), 37–45. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, D. A. (2005). Confirmatory bias and confirmatory distortion. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices, 2, 33–50. doi:10.1300/j190v02n01_03
   Google Scholar
• McBride, B. A., Brown, G. L., Bost, K. K., Shin, N., Vaughn, B., & Korth, B. (2005). Paternal identity, maternal gatekeeping, and father involvements. Family Relations, 54, 360–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. (2014). Woozles: Their role in custody law reform, parenting plans, and family court. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, P., & Cashmore, J. (2015). Reforming relocation law: An evidence-based approach. Family Court Review, 53(1), 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, P., Cashmore, J., Taylor, N., Austin, W. G. (2016). Relocation, research, and child custody disputes. In L. Drozd & M. Saini (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (2nd ed., pp. 431–459). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, F. (1981). Father influences in a family context. In M. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (2nd ed., pp. 295–317). New York, NY: Wiley. York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H. (2010). Paternal involvement: Revised conceptualization and theoretical linkages with child outcomes. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 58–93). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pruett, M. K., Arthur, L. A., & Ebling, R. (2007). The hand that rocks the cradle: Maternal gatekeeping after divorce. Pace Law Review, 27(4), 709–739.
   Google Scholar
• Pruett, M. K., Williams, T. Y., Insabella, G., & Little, T. D. (2003). Family and legal indicators of child adjustment to divorce among families with young children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 169–180. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhlman, D. J., & Pasley, K. (2013, September). Rethinking maternal gatekeeping. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 5, 176–193. doi:10.1111/jftr.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, L. T., Beckmeyer, J. J., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. (2016). Perceived barriers to postdivorce coparenting: Differences between men and women and associations with coparenting behaviors. Family Relations, 65, 450–461. doi:10.1111/fare.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, M., Drozd, L. M., & Olesen, N. W. (2017). Adapative and maladaptive gatekeeping attitudes and behaviors: Implications for child outcomes following separation and divorce. Family Court Review, 55(2), 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, M., Johnston, J. R., Fidler, B. J., & Bala, N., (2012). Empirical studies of alienation. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 399–441). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sano, Y., Richards, L. N., & Zvonkovic, A. M. (2008). Are mothers really “gatekeepers” of children? Rural mothers’ perceptions of nonresident fathers’ involvement in low-income families. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1701–1723. doi:10.1177/0192513x08321543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shear, L. A. (1996). Life stories, doctrines, and decision making: Three high courts confront the move-away dilemma. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 34, 439–458. doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.1996.tb00435.x
   Google Scholar
• Sobolewski, J. M. & King, V. (2005). The importance of the coparental relationship for nonresident fathers’ ties to children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1196–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00210.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, P. M. (2006). Avoiding bias in relocation cases. Journal of Child Custody, 3, 111–126. doi:10.1300/j190v03n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, P. M. (2013). Emerging issues in relocation cases. Journal of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 25, 425–451.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L. (2008). Maternal gate closing and gate opening in postdivorce families. Journal of Family Issues, 29(10), 1298–1324. doi:10.1177/0192513x08315362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropea v. Tropea. (1996) N.Y. 665 N.E.2d 145.
   Google Scholar
• Warshak, R. A. (2014). Social science and parenting plans for young children: A consensus report. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 46–67. doi:10.1037/law0000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, M. F. (1998). The parental alliance following divorce: An overview. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24(1), 3–24. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1998.tb01060.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, M. F., & Becker, B. F. (2000). Parental factors and the young child’s post-divorce adjustment: A meta-analysis with implications for Parenting Arrangements. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 5–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar