Regulation of Notch signaling and endocytosis by the Lgl neoplastic tumor suppressor

References

• Brumby AM, Richardson HE. Using Drosophila melanogaster to map human cancer pathways. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5:626-39; PMID:16034367; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez C. Drosophila melanogaster: a model and a tool to investigate malignancy and identify new therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 2013; 13:172-83; PMID:23388617; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrapatna VA, Cagan RL, Das TK. Drosophila cancer models. Dev Dyn 2012; 241:107-18; PMID:22038952; https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22771
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng L, Parsons LM, Richardson HE. Modelling cancer in Drosophila – The next generation. (version 2.0). Encyclopedia Life Sci (eLS Wiley) 2013; https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0020862.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Elsum I, Yates L, Humbert PO, Richardson HE. The Scribble-Dlg-Lgl polarity module in development and cancer: from flies to man. Essays Biochem 2012; 53:141-68; PMID:22928514; https://doi.org/10.1042/bse0530141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilder D, Schober M, Perrimon N. Integrated activity of PDZ protein complexes regulates epithelial polarity. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:53-8; PMID:12510194; https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilder D, Li M, Perrimon N. Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science 2000; 289:113-6; PMID:10884224; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5476.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanentzapf G, Tepass U. Interactions between the crumbs, lethal giant larvae and bazooka pathways in epithelial polarization. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:46-52; PMID:12510193; https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzeschik NA, Parsons LM, Allott ML, Harvey KF, Richardson HE. Lgl, aPKC, and Crumbs regulate the Salvador/Warts/Hippo pathway through two distinct mechanisms. Curr Biol 2010; 20:573-81; PMID:20362447; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzeschik NA, Amin N, Secombe J, Brumby AM, Richardson HE. Abnormalities in cell proliferation and apico-basal cell polarity are separable in Drosophila lgl mutant clones in the developing eye. Dev Biol 2007; 311:106-23; PMID:17870065; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson BJ. Cell polarity: models and mechanisms from yeast, worms and flies. Development 2013; 140:13-21; PMID:23222437; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.083634
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen J, Zhang M. The Par3/Par6/aPKC complex and epithelial cell polarity. Exp Cell Res 2013; 319:1357-64; PMID:23535009; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher GC, Lucas EP, Brain R, Tournier A, Thompson BJ. Positive feedback and mutual antagonism combine to polarize Crumbs in the Drosophila follicle cell epithelium. Curr Biol 2012; 22:1116-22; PMID:22658591; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genevet A, Tapon N. The Hippo pathway and apico-basal cell polarity. Biochem J 2011; 436:213-24; PMID:21568941; https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20110217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzeschik NA, Parsons LM, Richardson HE. Lgl, the SWH pathway and tumorigenesis: it's a matter of context & competition! Cell Cycle 2010; 9:3202-12; PMID:20724829; https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.16.12633
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons LM, Grzeschik NA, Allott ML, Richardson HE. Lgl/aPKC and Crb regulate the Salvador/Warts/Hippo pathway. Fly (Austin) 2010; 4:288-93; PMID:20798605; https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.4.4.13116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling C, Zheng Y, Yin F, Yu J, Huang J, Hong Y, Wu S, Pan D. The apical transmembrane protein Crumbs functions as a tumor suppressor that regulates Hippo signaling by binding to Expanded. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:10532-7; PMID:20498073; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004279107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CL, Gajewski KM, Hamaratoglu F, Bossuyt W, Sansores-Garcia L, Tao C, Halder G. The apical-basal cell polarity determinant Crumbs regulates Hippo signaling in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:15810-5; PMID:20798049; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004060107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson BS, Huang J, Hong Y, Moberg KH. Crumbs regulates Salvador/Warts/Hippo signaling in Drosophila via the FERM-domain protein Expanded. Curr Biol 2010; 20:582-90; PMID:20362445; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro P, Holder M, Frith D, Snijders AP, Tapon N. Crumbs promotes expanded recognition and degradation by the SCF(Slimb/beta-TrCP) ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:E1980-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons LM, Grzeschik NA, Richardson HE. lgl regulates the hippo pathway independently of Fat/Dachs, Kibra/Expanded/Merlin and dRASSF/dSTRIPAK. Cancers (Basel) 2014; 6:879-96; PMID:24743776; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers6020879
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doggett K, Grusche FA, Richardson HE, Brumby AM. Loss of the Drosophila cell polarity regulator Scribbled promotes epithelial tissue overgrowth and cooperation with oncogenic Ras-Raf through impaired Hippo pathway signaling. BMC Dev Biol 2011; 11:57; PMID:21955824; https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-11-57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leong GR, Goulding KR, Amin N, Richardson HE, Brumby AM. scribble mutants promote aPKC and JNK-dependent epithelial neoplasia independently of Crumbs. BMC Biol 2009; 7:62; PMID:19778415; https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons LM, Portela M, Grzeschik NA, Richardson HE. Lgl regulates Notch signaling via endocytosis, independently of the apical aPKC-Par6-Baz polarity complex. Curr Biol 2014; 24:2073-84; PMID:25220057; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.075
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy M, Pear WS, Aster JC. The multifaceted role of Notch in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2007; 17:52-9; PMID:17178457; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2006.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louvi A, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Notch and disease: a growing field. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012; 23:473-80; PMID:22373641; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Muskavitch MA. Notch: the past, the present, and the future. Curr Top Dev Biol 2010; 92:1-29; PMID:20816391; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(10)92001-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntziachristos P, Lim JS, Sage J, Aifantis I. From fly wings to targeted cancer therapies: a centennial for notch signaling. Cancer Cell 2014; 25:318-34; PMID:24651013; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musse AA, Meloty-Kapella L, Weinmaster G. Notch ligand endocytosis: mechanistic basis of signaling activity. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012; 23:429-36; PMID:22306180; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.01.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kandachar V, Roegiers F. Endocytosis and control of Notch signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012; 24:534-40; PMID:22818956; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.06.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto S, Charng WL, Bellen HJ. Endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of Notch and its ligands. Curr Top Dev Biol 2010; 92:165-200; PMID:20816395; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(10)92005-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furthauer M, Gonzalez-Gaitan M. Endocytic regulation of notch signalling during development. Traffic 2009; 10:792-802; PMID:19416471; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00914.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortini ME, Bilder D. Endocytic regulation of Notch signaling. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19:323-8; PMID:19447603; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari T, Rusten TE, Menut L, Nezis IP, Brech A, Stenmark H, Bilder D. Comparative analysis of ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II and ESCRT-III function in Drosophila by efficient isolation of ESCRT mutants. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:2413-23; PMID:19571114; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.046391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari T, Bilder D. The Drosophila tumor suppressor vps25 prevents nonautonomous overproliferation by regulating notch trafficking. Dev Cell 2005; 9:687-98; PMID:16256743; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari T, Lu H, Kanwar R, Fortini ME, Bilder D. Endosomal entry regulates Notch receptor activation in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol 2008; 180:755-62; PMID:18299346; https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200708127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzoldt AG, Gleixner EM, Fumagalli A, Vaccari T, Simons M. Elevated expression of the V-ATPase C subunit triggers JNK-dependent cell invasion and overgrowth in a Drosophila epithelium. Dis Model Mech 2013; 6:689-700; PMID:23335205; https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.010660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari T, Duchi S, Cortese K, Tacchetti C, Bilder D. The vacuolar ATPase is required for physiological as well as pathological activation of the Notch receptor. Development 2010; 137:1825-32; PMID:20460366; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.045484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram V, Krishnan KS, Mayor S. Deep-orange and carnation define distinct stages in late endosomal biogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol 2003; 161:593-607; PMID:12743107; https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200210166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann I, Munro S. An N-terminally acetylated Arf-like GTPase is localised to lysosomes and affects their motility. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:1494-503; PMID:16537643; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coumailleau F, Furthauer M, Knoblich JA, Gonzalez-Gaitan M. Directional Delta and Notch trafficking in Sara endosomes during asymmetric cell division. Nature 2009; 458:1051-5; PMID:19295516; https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagne C, Gonzalez-Gaitan M. Sara endosomes and the asymmetric division of intestinal stem cells. Development 2014; 141:2014-23; PMID:24803650; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.104240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bokel C, Schwabedissen A, Entchev E, Renaud O, Gonzalez-Gaitan M. Sara endosomes and the maintenance of Dpp signaling levels across mitosis. Science 2006; 314:1135-9; PMID:17110576; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafar-Nejad H, Andrews HK, Acar M, Bayat V, Wirtz-Peitz F, Mehta SQ, Knoblich JA, Bellen HJ. Sec15, a component of the exocyst, promotes notch signaling during the asymmetric division of Drosophila sensory organ precursors. Dev Cell 2005; 9:351-63; PMID:16137928; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beronja S, Laprise P, Papoulas O, Pellikka M, Sisson J, Tepass U. Essential function of Drosophila Sec6 in apical exocytosis of epithelial photoreceptor cells. J Cell Biol 2005; 169:635-46; PMID:15897260; https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200410081
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu S, Mehta SQ, Pichaud F, Bellen HJ, Quiocho FA. Sec15 interacts with Rab11 via a novel domain and affects Rab11 localization in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12:879-85; PMID:16155582; https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy M, Ranjan R, Denef N, Higashi ME, Schupbach T, Schwarz TL. Sec6 mutations and the Drosophila exocyst complex. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:1139-50; PMID:15728258; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langevin J, Morgan MJ, Sibarita JB, Aresta S, Murthy M, Schwarz T, Camonis J, Bellaiche Y. Drosophila exocyst components Sec5, Sec6, and Sec15 regulate DE-Cadherin trafficking from recycling endosomes to the plasma membrane. Dev Cell 2005; 9:355-76; PMID:16224820; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson BJ, Mathieu J, Sung HH, Loeser E, Rorth P, Cohen SM. Tumor suppressor properties of the ESCRT-II complex component Vps25 in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2005; 9:711-20; PMID:16256745; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz HM, Chen Z, Scherr H, Lackey M, Bolduc C, Bergmann A. vps25 mosaics display non-autonomous cell survival and overgrowth, and autonomous apoptosis. Development 2006; 133:1871-80; PMID:16611691; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry S, Jin EJ, Ozel MN, Lu Z, Agi E, Wang D, Jung WH, Epstein D, Meinertzhagen IA, Chan CC, Hiesinger PR. Charcot-Marie-Tooth 2B mutations in rab7 cause dosage-dependent neurodegeneration due to partial loss of function. eLIFE 2013; 2:1-22; ; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Liu Y, Xu XH, Deng CY, Wu KY, Zhu J, Fu XQ, He M, Luo ZG. Lgl1 activation of rab10 promotes axonal membrane trafficking underlying neuronal polarization. Dev Cell 2011; 21:431-44; PMID:21856246; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Denef N, Schupbach T. The vacuolar proton pump, V-ATPase, is required for notch signaling and endosomal trafficking in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2009; 17:387-402; PMID:19758563; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homewood CA, Warhurst DC, Peters W, Baggaley VC. Lysosomes, pH and the anti-malarial action of chloroquine. Nature 1972; 235:50-2; PMID:4550396; https://doi.org/10.1038/235050a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobia F, Duchi S, Deflorian G, Vaccari T. Pharmacologic inhibition of vacuolar H+ ATPase reduces physiologic and oncogenic Notch signaling. Mol Oncol 2014; 8:207-20; PMID:24309677; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2013.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thome R, Lopes SC, Costa FT, Verinaud L. Chloroquine: modes of action of an undervalued drug. Immunol Lett 2013; 153:50-7; PMID:23891850; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2013.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rives AF, Rochlin KM, Wehrli M, Schwartz SL, DiNardo S. Endocytic trafficking of Wingless and its receptors, Arrow and DFrizzled-2, in the Drosophila wing. Dev Biol 2006; 293:268-83; PMID:16530179; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim JH, Park JW, Kim MS, Park SK, Johnson RS, Chun YS. Bafilomycin induces the p21-mediated growth inhibition of cancer cells under hypoxic conditions by expressing hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Mol Pharmacol 2006; 70:1856-65; PMID:16940187; https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.106.028076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cruciat CM, Ohkawara B, Acebron SP, Karaulanov E, Reinhard C, Ingelfinger D, Boutros M, Niehrs C. Requirement of prorenin receptor and vacuolar H+-ATPase-mediated acidification for Wnt signaling. Science 2010; 327:459-63; PMID:20093472; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1179802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermle T, Saltukoglu D, Grunewald J, Walz G, Simons M. Regulation of Frizzled-dependent planar polarity signaling by a V-ATPase subunit. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1269-76; PMID:20579879; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechling T, Bartscherer K, Ohkawara B, Chaudhary V, Spirohn K, Niehrs C, Boutros M. Wnt/Frizzled signaling requires dPRR, the Drosophila homolog of the prorenin receptor. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1263-8; PMID:20579883; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Peled L, Schweitzer LD, Zoncu R, Sabatini DM. Ragulator is a GEF for the rag GTPases that signal amino acid levels to mTORC1. Cell 2012; 150:1196-208; PMID:22980980; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoncu R, Bar-Peled L, Efeyan A, Wang S, Sancak Y, Sabatini DM. mTORC1 senses lysosomal amino acids through an inside-out mechanism that requires the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase. Science 2011; 334:678-83; PMID:22053050; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Isaka Y. Chloroquine in cancer therapy: a double-edged sword of autophagy. Cancer Res 2013; 73:3-7; PMID:23288916; https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsztein DC, Codogno P, Levine B. Autophagy modulation as a potential therapeutic target for diverse diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012; 11:709-30; PMID:22935804; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boya P, Reggiori F, Codogno P. Emerging regulation and functions of autophagy. Nat Cell Biol 2013; 15:713-20; PMID:23817233; https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo JY, Xia B, White E. Autophagy-mediated tumor promotion. Cell 2013; 155:1216-9; PMID:24315093; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVorkin L, Gorski SM. Monitoring autophagic flux using Ref(2)P, the Drosophila p62 ortholog. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2014; 2014:959-66; PMID:25183816
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon Y, Vinayagam A, Sun X, Dephoure N, Gygi SP, Hong P, Perrimon N. The Hippo signaling pathway interactome. Science 2013; 342:737-40; PMID:24114784; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson BS, Moberg KH. Drosophila endocytic neoplastic tumor suppressor genes regulate Sav/Wts/Hpo signaling and the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:4110-8; PMID:22101275; https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.23.18243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice N, Roegiers F, Jan LY, Jan YN. Lethal giant larvae acts together with numb in notch inhibition and cell fate specification in the Drosophila adult sensory organ precursor lineage. Curr Biol 2003; 13:778-83; PMID:12725738; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00288-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohshiro T, Yagami T, Zhang C, Matsuzaki F. Role of cortical tumour-suppressor proteins in asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblast. Nature 2000; 408:593-6; PMID:11117747; https://doi.org/10.1038/35046087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langevin J, Le Borgne R, Rosenfeld F, Gho M, Schweisguth F, Bellaiche Y. Lethal giant larvae controls the localization of notch-signaling regulators numb, neuralized, and Sanpodo in Drosophila sensory-organ precursor cells. Curr Biol 2005; 15:955-62; PMID:15916953; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roegiers F, Jan LY, Jan YN. Regulation of membrane localization of Sanpodo by lethal giant larvae and neuralized in asymmetrically dividing cells of Drosophila sensory organs. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:3480-7; PMID:15901829; https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirtz-Peitz F, Nishimura T, Knoblich JA. Linking cell cycle to asymmetric division: aurora-A phosphorylates the Par complex to regulate Numb localization. Cell 2008; 135:161-73; PMID:18854163; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenfler JM, Kuang C, Lee CY. Cortical aPKC kinase activity distinguishes neural stem cells from progenitor cells by ensuring asymmetric segregation of Numb. Dev Biol 2012; 365:219-28; PMID:22394487; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.02.027
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tian AG, Deng WM. Lgl and its phosphorylation by aPKC regulate oocyte polarity formation in Drosophila. Development 2008; 135:463-71; PMID:18094021; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.016253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klezovitch O, Fernandez TE, Tapscott SJ, Vasioukhin V. Loss of cell polarity causes severe brain dysplasia in Lgl1 knockout mice. Genes Dev 2004; 18:559-71; PMID:15037549; https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1178004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoqvist M, Antfolk D, Ferraris S, Rraklli V, Haga C, Antila C, Mutvei A, Imanishi SY, Holmberg J, Jin S, et al. PKCzeta regulates Notch receptor routing and activity in a Notch signaling-dependent manner. Cell Res 2014; 24:433-50; PMID:24662486; https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark BS, Cui S, Miesfeld JB, Klezovitch O, Vasioukhin V, Link BA. Loss of Llgl1 in retinal neuroepithelia reveals links between apical domain size, Notch activity and neurogenesis. Development 2012; 139:1599-610; PMID:22492354; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.078097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Vreede G, Schoenfeld JD, Windler SL, Morrison H, Lu H, Bilder D. The Scribble module regulates retromer-dependent endocytic trafficking during epithelial polarization. Development 2014; 141:2796-802; PMID:25005475; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.105403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohia M, Qin Y, Macara IG. The Scribble polarity protein stabilizes E-cadherin/p120-catenin binding and blocks retrieval of E-cadherin to the Golgi. PLoS One 2012; 7:e51130; PMID:23226478; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson EC, Pichaud F. Crumbs is required to achieve proper organ size control during Drosophila head development. Development 2010; 137:641-50; PMID:20110329; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.041913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnie G, Clarke RB. Mammary stem cells and breast cancer–role of Notch signalling. Stem Cell Rev 2007; 3:169-75; PMID:17873349; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-007-0023-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez A, Serrano-Bueno G, Perez-Castineira JR, Serrano A. Intracellular proton pumps as targets in chemotherapy: V-ATPases and cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 18:1383-94; PMID:22360554; https://doi.org/10.2174/138161212799504821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero-Rey EM, Somoza-Martin M, Barros-Angueira F, Garcia-Garcia A. Intracellular pH regulation in oral squamous cell carcinoma is mediated by increased V-ATPase activity via over-expression of the ATP6V1C1 gene. Oral Oncol 2008; 44:193-9; PMID:17467328; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Qin W, Li J, Tan N, Pan D, Zhang H, Xie L, Yao G, Shu H, Yao M, et al. The growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts are inhibited by small interfering RNA targeting to the subunit ATP6L of proton pump. Cancer Res 2005; 65:6843-9; PMID:16061667; https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishisho T, Hata K, Nakanishi M, Morita Y, Sun-Wada GH, Wada Y, Yasui N, Yoneda T. The a3 isoform vacuolar type H(+)-ATPase promotes distant metastasis in the mouse B16 melanoma cells. Mol Cancer Res 2011; 9:845-55; PMID:21669964; https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey IF, Baggett BK, Kirkpatrick ND, Roe DJ, Dosescu J, Sloane BF, Hashim AI, Morse DL, Raghunand N, Gatenby RA, et al. Bicarbonate increases tumor pH and inhibits spontaneous metastases. Cancer Res 2009; 69:2260-8; PMID:19276390; https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb BA, Chimenti M, Jacobson MP, Barber DL. Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2011; 11:671-7; PMID:21833026; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maycotte P, Gearheart CM, Barnard R, Aryal S, Mulcahy Levy JM, Fosmire SP, Hansen RJ, Morgan MJ, Porter CC, Gustafson DL, et al. STAT3-mediated autophagy dependence identifies subtypes of breast cancer where autophagy inhibition can be efficacious. Cancer Res 2014; 74:2579-90; PMID:24590058; https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maycotte P, Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5:224-40; PMID:25114840; https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan MJ, Gamez G, Menke C, Hernandez A, Thorburn J, Gidan F, Staskiewicz L, Morgan S, Cummings C, Maycotte P, et al. Regulation of autophagy and chloroquine sensitivity by oncogenic RAS in vitro is context-dependent. Autophagy 2014; 10:1814-26; PMID:25136801; https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.32135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White E. Exploiting the bad eating habits of Ras-driven cancers. Genes Dev 2013; 27:2065-71; PMID:24115766; https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.228122.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar