The transcription factor Swi4 is target for PKA regulation of cell size at the G₁ to S transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

References

• Pringle JR, Hartwell LH. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. In: Strathern JN, Jones EW, Broach JR, editors. The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: life cycle and inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 1981; 97-142.
   Google Scholar
• Eser U, Falleur-Fettig M, Johnson A, Skotheim JM. Commitment to a Cellular Transition Precedes Genome-wide Transcriptional Change. Mol Cell 2011; 43: 515-27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner MV, Smolka MB, de Bruin RAM, Zhou H, Wittenberg C, Dowdy SF. Whi5 regulation by site specific CDK-phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4300; PMID:19172996; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan MM, Brocca S, Sacco E, Spinelli M, Papaleo E, Lambrughi M, Alberghina L, Vanoni M. A comparative study of Whi5 and retinoblastoma proteins: from sequence and structure analysis to intracellular networks. Front. Physiol. 2014; 4:315; PMID:24478706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Carey LB, Cai Y, Wijnen H, Futcher B. Recruitment of Cln3 cyclin to promoters controls cell cycle entry via histone deacetylase and other targets. PloS Biol 2009; 7:e1000189; PMID:19823669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin RAM, Kalashnikova TI, Chahwan C, McDonald HW, Wohlschlegel J, Yates J, Russel P, Wittenberg C. Constraining G1-specific transcription to late G1 phase: the MBF-associated corepressor Nrm1 acts via negative feedback. Mol Cell 2006; 23:483-96; PMID:16916637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrezuelo F, Colomina N, Futcher B, Aldea M. The transcriptional network activated by Cln3 cyclin at the G1-to-S transition of the yeast cell cycle. Genome Biol 2010; 11:R67; PMID:20573214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JJ, Ewald JC, Skotheim JM. Cell size control in yeast. Curr Biol 2012; 22:R350-R359; PMID:22575477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanoni M, Vai M, Popolo L, Alberghina L. Structural heterogeneity in populations of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1983; 156:1282-91; PMID:6358196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neufeld TP, Edgar BA. Connections between growth and the cell cycle. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1998; 10:784-90; PMID:9914170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupes I. Chacking cell size in yeast. Trends Genet 2002; 18:479-85; PMID:12175809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells WA. Does size matter? J Cell Biol 2002; 158:1156-59; PMID:12356860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni MD, Martegani E, Monti P, Alberghina L. Cell size modulation by CDC25 and RAS2 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1989; 9:2715-23; PMID:2548086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni MD, Monti P, Alberghina L. Repression of growth-regulated G1 cyclin expression by cyclic AMP in budding yeast. Nature 1994; 371:339-45; PMID:8090203; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/371339a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberghina L, Smeraldi C, Ranzi BM, Porro D. Control by nutrients of growth and cell cycle progression in budding yeast, analysed by double-tag flow cytometry. J Bacteriol 1998; 180:3864-72; PMID:9683483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni MD, Monti P, Marconi G, Alberghina L. cAMP-mediated increase in the critical cell size required for the G1 to S transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp Cell Res 1992; 201:299-306; PMID:1322313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghileri P, Branduardi P, Sternieri F, Monti P, Visintin R, Bevilacqua A, Alberghina L, Martegani E, Baroni MD. Chromosome separation and exit from mitosis in budding yeast: dependence on growth revealed by cAMP-mediated inhibition. Exp Cell Res 1999; 250(2):510-23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irniger S, Baumer M, Braus GH. Glucose and Ras activity influence the ubiquitin ligases APC/C and SCF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2000; 154:1509-21; PMID:10747049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolte M, Dieckhoff P, Krause C, Braus GH, Irniger S. Synergistic inhibition of APC/C by glucose and activated Ras proteins can be mediated by each of the Tpk1- 3 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 2003; 149:1205-16; PMID:12724382; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26062-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberghina L, Coccetti P, Orlandi I. Systems biology of the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: From network mining to system-level properties. Biotecnol Adv 2009; 27:960-78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda T, Cameron S, Sass P, Zoller M, Scott JD, McMullen B, Hurwitz M, Krebs EG, Wigler M. Cloning and characterization of BCY1, a locus encoding a regulatory subunit of the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1987; 7:1371-77; PMID:3037314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda T, Cameron S, Sass P, Zoller M, Wigler M. Three different genes in S. cerevisiae encode the catalytic subunits of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Cell 1987; 50:277-87; PMID:3036373; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90223-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet 2008; 42:27-81; PMID:18303986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets B, Ghillebert R, De Snijder P, Binda M, Swinnen E, De Virgilio C, Winderickx J. Life in the midst of scarcity: adaptations to nutrient availability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 2010; 56:1-32; PMID:20054690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass P, Field J, Nikawa J, Toda T, Wigler M. Cloning and characterization of the high-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83:9303-07; PMID:3025832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikawa J, Sass P, Wigler M. Cloning and charachterization of the low-affinity cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1987; 7:3629-36; PMID:2824992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RB, Renault G, Jacquet M, Tatchell K. The pde2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is allelic to rca1 and encodes a phosphodiesterase which protects the cell from extracellular cAMP. FEBS Lett 1993; 325:191-95; PMID:8391474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma P, Wera S, Van Dijck P, Thevelein JM. The PDE1-encoded low-affinity phosphodiesterase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a specific function in controlling agonist-induced cAMP signaling. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10:91-104; PMID:9880329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokiwa G, Tyers M, Volpe T, Futcher B. Inhibition of G1 cyclin activity by the Ras/cAMP pathway in yeast. Nature 1994; 371:342-45; PMID:8090204; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/371342a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DD, Markwardt DD, Parviz F, Heideman W. Regulation of the Cln3-Cdc28 kinase by cAMP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 1998; 17:4370-78; PMID:9687505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosen J, Engelen K, Marchal K, Mathys J, Griffioen G, Cameroni E, Thevelein JM, De Virgilio C, De Moor B, Winderickx J. PKA and Sch9 control a molecular switch important for the proper adaptation to nutrient availability. Mol Microbiol 2005; 55:862-80; PMID:15661010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martegani E, Vanoni M, Delia D. A computer algorithm for the analysis of protein distribution in budding yeast. Cytometry 1984; 5:81-5; PMID:6365484; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990050112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harashima T, Heitman J. The Galpha protein Gpa2 controls yeast differentiation by interacting with kelch repeat proteins that mimic Gbeta subunits. Mol Cell 2002; 10(1): 163-73; PMID:12150916; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00569-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versele M, de Winde JH, Thevelein JM. A novel regulator of G protein signalling in yeast, Rgs2, downregulates glucose-activation of the cAMP pathway through direct inhibition of Gpa2. EMBO J 1999; 18(20): 5577-91; PMID:10523302; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.20.5577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland F, de Winde JH, Lemaire K, Boles E, Thevelein JM, Winderickx J. Glucose-induced cAMP signalling in yeast requires both a G-protein coupled receptor system for extracellular glucose detection and a separable hexose kinase-dependent sensing process. Mol. Microbiol. 2000; 38:348-58; PMID:11069660; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02125.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo M, Nishikawa JL, Tang X, Millman JS, Schub O, Breitkreuz K, Dewar D, Rupes I, Andrews B, Tyers M. CDK activity antagonizes Whi5, an inhibitor of G1/S transcription in yeast. Cell 2004; 117:899-913; PMID:15210111; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin RA, McDonald WH, Kalashnikova TI, Yates J 3rd, Wittenberg C. Cln3 activates G1-specific transcription via phosphorylation of the SBF bound repressor Whi5. Cell 2004; 117:887-98; PMID:15210110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge JF, Mikesell GE, Breeden LL. Cell cycle-dependent transcription of CLN1 involves Swi4 binding to MCB-like elements. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:9071-7; PMID:9083033; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.14.9071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick K, Chapman-Shimshoni D, Stuart D, Guaderrama M, Wittenberg C. Regulation of cell size by glucose is exerted via repression of the CLN1 promoter. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:2492-501; PMID:9566870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drebot MA, Barnes CA, Singer RA, Johnston GC. Genetic assessment of stationary phase for cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1990; 172, 3584-89; PMID:2163381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevelein JM. The Ras-adenylate cyclase pathway and cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1992; 62, 109-130; PMID:1444331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00584466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuzawa H. Responsiveness to exogenous cAMP of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain conferred by naturally occurring alleles of PDE1 and PDE2. Genetics 1993; 135:321-26; PMID:8243997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belotti F, Tisi R, Martegani E. The N-terminal region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RasGEF Cdc25 is required for nutrient-dependent cell-size regulation. Microbiology 2006; 152:1231-46; PMID:16549685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.28683-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman D. Dancing the cell cycle two-step: regulation of yeast G1-cell-cycle genes by chromatin structure. Trends in Bioch. Sci. 2013; 38:467-475; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2013.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo S, Ma P, Cauwenberg L, Winderickx J, Crauwels M, Teunissen A, Nauwelaers D, de Winde JH, Gorwa MF, Colavizza D, Thevelein JM. Involvement of distinct G-proteins, Gpa2 and Ras, in glucose- and intracellular acidification- induced cAMP signalling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1998; 17:3326-41; PMID:9628870; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.12.3326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle JS, Schollaert KL, Wilkins BJ, Sanchez Y. The DNA damage checkpoint and PKA pathways converge on APC substrates and Cdc20 to regulate mitotic progression. Nature Cell Biol 2004; 6:138-145; PMID:14743219; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knop M, Siengers K, Pereira G, Zachariae W, Winson B, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 1999; 15:963-72; PMID:10407276; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199907)15:10B%3c963::AID-YEA399%3e3.0.CO;2-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraschini R, Formenti E, Lucchini G, Piatti S. Budding Yeast Bub2 Is Localized at Spindle Pole Bodies and Activates the Mitotic Checkpoint via a Different Pathway from Mad2. J Cell Biol 1999; 145:979-91; PMID:10352016; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.145.5.979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater ML, Sharrow SO, Gart JJ. Cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in population growing at different rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74:3850-56; PMID:333447; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.9.3850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani L, Martegani E, Alberghina L. Yeast population models for monitoring and control of biotechnical processes. IEE Proc. 1986; 133:PT-D, 210-216; http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-d.1986.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martegani E, Porro D, Ranzi BM, Alberghina L. Involvement of a cell size control mechanism in the induction and maintenance of oscillations in continuous cultures of budding yeast. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1990; 36:453-59; PMID:18595101; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260360504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman AW, Kim KY, Levin DE. Mechanism of Mpk1 mitogen-activated protein kinase binding to the Swi4 transcriptional factor and its regulation by a novel caffeine-induced phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:6449-61; PMID:19805511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00794-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelizzola M, Pavelka N, Foti M, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. AMDA: an R package for the automated microarray data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:335; PMID:16824223; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitling R, Armengaud P, Amtmann A, Herzyk P. Rank Products:A simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS Letter 2004; 57383-92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar