Sumoylation regulates EXO1 stability and processing of DNA damage

References

• Curtin NJ. DNA repair dysregulation from cancer driver to therapeutic target. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12:801-17; PMID:23175119; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc3399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitby MC. Making crossovers during meiosis. Biochem Soc Trans 2005; 33:1451-5; PMID:16246144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST20051451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassing CH, Swat W, Alt FW. The mechanism and regulation of chromosomal V(D)J recombination. Cell 2002; 109:S45-55; PMID:11983152; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00675-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errico A, Costanzo V. Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability. Critical Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2012; 47:222-35; PMID:22324461; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2012.655374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid W, Steger M, El-Shemerly M, Ferretti LP, Pena-Diaz J, Konig C, Valtorta E, Sartori AA, Ferrari S. DNA end resection by CtIP and exonuclease 1 prevents genomic instability. EMBO Rep 2010; 11:962-8; PMID:21052091; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson LH. Recognition, signaling, and repair of DNA double-strand breaks produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: the molecular choreography. Mutation Res 2012; 751:158-246; PMID:22743550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimonkar AV, Genschel J, Kinoshita E, Polaczek P, Campbell JL, Wyman C, Modrich P, Kowalczykowski SC. BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes Devel 2011; 25:350-62; PMID:21325134; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2003811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanja KK, Cox SW, Duxin JP, Stewart SA, Campbell JL. DNA2 and EXO1 in replication-coupled, homology-directed repair and in the interplay between HDR and the FA/BRCA network. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:3983-96; PMID:22987153; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.22215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szankasi P, Smith GR. A DNA exonuclease induced during meiosis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:3014-23; PMID:1737756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishkoff DX, Amin NS, Viars CS, Arden KC, Kolodner RD. Identification of a human gene encoding a homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, an exonuclease implicated in mismatch repair and recombination. Cancer Res 1998; 58:5027-31; PMID:9823303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BI, Wilson DM 3rd. The RAD2 domain of human exonuclease 1 exhibits 5′ to 3′ exonuclease and flap structure-specific endonuclease activities. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:37763-9; PMID:10608837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.53.37763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szankasi P, Smith GR. A role for exonuclease I from S. pombe in mutation avoidance and mismatch correction. Science 1995; 267:1166-9; PMID:7855597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7855597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentini P, Huang KN, Tishkoff DX, Kolodner RD, Symington LS. Exonuclease I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae functions in mitotic recombination in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2764-73; PMID:9111347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DT, Ferguson JR, Petes TD, Symington LS. Decreased meiotic intergenic recombination and increased meiosis I nondisjunction in exo1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2000; 156:1549-57; PMID:11102356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubouchi H, Ogawa H. Exo1 roles for repair of DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic crossing over in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11:2221-33; PMID:10888664; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.7.2221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Symington LS. DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:983-95; PMID:19473888; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Qian Y, Chen V, Guan MX, Shen B. Human exonuclease 1 functionally complements its yeast homologues in DNA recombination, RNA primer removal, and mutation avoidance. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:17893-900; PMID:10364235; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.25.17893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotta-Ramusino C, Fachinetti D, Lucca C, Doksani Y, Lopes M, Sogo J, Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol Cell 2005; 17:153-9; PMID:15629726; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bologna S, Ferrari S. It takes two to tango: Ubiquitin and SUMO in the DNA damage response. Front Genet 2013; 4:106; PMID:23781231; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennetzen MV, Larsen DH, Dinant C, Watanabe S, Bartek J, Lukas J, Andersen JS. Acetylation dynamics of human nuclear proteins during the ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage response. Cell Cycle 2013; 12:1688-95; PMID:23656789; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.24758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SP, Durocher D. Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol Cell 2013; 49:795-807; PMID:23416108; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels K, Giannattasio M, Muzi-Falconi M, Lopes M, Ferrari S. Fourteen-3-3 proteins regulate exonuclease 1-dependent processing of stalled replication forks. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1001367; PMID:21533173; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shemerly M, Janscak P, Hess D, Jiricny J, Ferrari S. Degradation of human exonuclease 1b upon DNA synthesis inhibition. Cancer Res 2005; 65:3604-9; PMID:15867354; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shemerly M, Hess D, Pyakurel AK, Moselhy S, Ferrari S. ATR-dependent pathways control hEXO1 stability in response to stalled forks. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:511-9; PMID:18048416; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolderson E, Tomimatsu N, Richard DJ, Boucher D, Kumar R, Pandita TK, Burma S, Khanna KK. Phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:1821-31; PMID:20019063; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko MK, Morrice N, Lydall D. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J 2008; 27:2400-10; PMID:18756267; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, Catherine Hardebeck M, Ilcheva M, Vanessa Camacho C, Louise Harris J, Porteus M, Llorente B, Khanna KK, Burma S. Phosphorylation of EXO1 by CDKs 1 and 2 regulates DNA end resection and repair pathway choice. Nature Commun 2014; 5:3561; PMID:24705021; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmannova V, Eckert-Boulet N, Arneric M, Kolesar P, Chaloupkova R, Damborsky J, Sung P, Zhao X, Lisby M, Krejci L. Rad52 SUMOylation affects the efficiency of the DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:4708-21; PMID:20371517; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Polo S, Miller KM, Jackson SP. Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2009; 462:935-9; PMID:20016603; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forment JV, Walker RV, Jackson SP. A high-throughput, flow cytometry-based method to quantify DNA-end resection in mammalian cells. Cytometry Part A 2012; 81:922-8; PMID:22893507; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits VA, Gillespie DA. Cancer therapy. Targeting the poison within. Cell Cycle 2014; 13:2330-3; PMID:25483183; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.29756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144:646-74; PMID:21376230; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber MR. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 2010; 79:181-211; PMID:20192759; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wogan GN, Hecht SS, Felton JS, Conney AH, Loeb LA. Environmental and chemical carcinogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol 2004; 14:473-86; PMID:15489140; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2004.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmannova V, Kolesar P, Krejci L. SUMO Wrestles with Recombination. Biomolecules 2012; 2:350-75; PMID:24970142; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom2030350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genschel J, Modrich P. Mechanism of 5′-directed excision in human mismatch repair. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1077-86; PMID:14636568; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00428-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 2008; 134:981-94; PMID:18805091; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008; 455:770-4; PMID:18806779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2767-72; PMID:18923075; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.503108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sertic S, Pizzi S, Cloney R, Lehmann AR, Marini F, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. Human exonuclease 1 connects nucleotide excision repair (NER) processing with checkpoint activation in response to UV irradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:13647-52; PMID:21808022; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108547108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham MH, Matic I, Mann M, Hay RT. Comparative proteomic analysis identifies a role for SUMO in protein quality control. Science Signal 2011; 4:rs4; PMID:21693764; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks IA, D'Souza RC, Yang B, Verlaan-de Vries M, Mann M, Vertegaal AC. Uncovering global SUMOylation signaling networks in a site-specific manner. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2014; 21:927-36; PMID:25218447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Jackson SP. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 2012; 26:1179-95; PMID:22661229; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.188284.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Seifert A, Chua JS, Maure JF, Golebiowski F, Hay RT. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev 2012; 26:1196-208; PMID:22661230; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.189274.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Kanjanapangka J, Liu N, Liu S, Liu C, Wu Z, Wang Y, Loh T, Kowolik C, Jamsen J, et al. Sequential posttranslational modifications program FEN1 degradation during cell-cycle progression. Molecular cell 2012; 47:444-56; PMID:22749529; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfler Z, Schmidt KH. Exo1 phosphorylation status controls the hydroxyurea sensitivity of cells lacking the Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerases delta and zeta. DNA Repair (Amst) 2014; 24:26-36; PMID:25457771; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthuswami M, Ramesh V, Banerjee S, Viveka Thangaraj S, Periasamy J, Bhaskar Rao D, Barnabas GD, Raghavan S, Ganesan K. Breast tumors with elevated expression of 1q candidate genes confer poor clinical outcome and sensitivity to Ras/PI3K inhibition. PloS one 2013; 8:e77553; PMID:24147022; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, Clarke C, Kang IH, Friman O, Guertin DA, Chang JH, Lindquist RA, Moffat J, et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 2006; 7:R100; PMID:17076895; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberali P, Snijder B, Pelkmans L. A hierarchical map of regulatory genetic interactions in membrane trafficking. Cell 2014; 157:1473-87; PMID:24906158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar