Coordination of DNA damage tolerance mechanisms with cell cycle progression in fission yeast

References

• Brash DE. UV signature mutations. Photochem Photobiol 2015; 91:15–26; PMID:25354245; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/php.12377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callegari AJ, Kelly TJ. Shedding light on the DNA damage checkpoint. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:660–6; PMID:17387276; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.6.3984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemontt JF. Genetic and physiological factors affecting repair and mutagenesis in yeast. Basic Life Sci 1980; 15:85–120; PMID:7011312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waters LS, Minesinger BK, Wiltrout ME, D'Souza S, Woodruff RV, Walker GC. Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009; 73:134–54; PMID:19258535; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00034-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale JE. Competition, collaboration and coordination–determining how cells bypass DNA damage. J Cell Sci 2012; 125:1633–43; PMID:22499669; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.094748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittschieben J, Shivji MK, Lalani E, Jacobs MA, Marini F, Gearhart PJ, Rosewell I, Stamp G, Wood RD. Disruption of the developmentally regulated Rev3l gene causes embryonic lethality. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1217–20; PMID:11050392; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00725-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bemark M, Khamlichi AA, Davies SL, Neuberger MS. Disruption of mouse polymerase zeta (Rev3) leads to embryonic lethality and impairs blastocyst development in vitro. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1213–6; PMID:11050391; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00724-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito G, Godindagger I, Klein U, Yaspo ML, Cumano A, Rajewsky K. Disruption of the Rev3l-encoded catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta in mice results in early embryonic lethality. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1221–4; PMID:11050393; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00726-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat A, Andersen PL, Qin Z, Xiao W. Rev3, the catalytic subunit of Polzeta, is required for maintaining fragile site stability in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:2328–39; PMID:23303771; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Adzhubei I, Thurman RE, Kryukov GV, Mirkin SM, Sunyaev SR. Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing. Nat Genet 2009; 41:393–5; PMID:19287383; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CL, Rappailles A, Duquenne L, Huvet M, Guilbaud G, Farinelli L, Audit B, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Arneodo A, Hyrien O, et al. Impact of replication timing on non-CpG and CpG substitution rates in mammalian genomes. Genome Res 2010; 20:447–57; PMID:20103589; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.098947.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang GI, Murray AW. Mutation rates across budding yeast chromosome VI are correlated with replication timing. Genome Biol Evolution 2011; 3:799–811; PMID:21666225; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evr054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Polak P, Kryukov GV, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A, Carter SL, Stewart C, Mermel CH, Roberts SA, et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 2013; 499:214–8; PMID:23770567; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito T, Yamasaki T, Domon M, Ishizaka S, Matsudai. Y. Ultraviolet-Induced Photoreversible Genetic Change Observed in Heterozygous Diploid System of Yeast - a Study of Uv Action Spectrum for Induction and of Photoreversion. Japanese J Genet 1964; 39:136; http://dx.doi.org/10.1266/jjg.39.136
   Google Scholar
• You YH, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Nakajima S, Yasui A, Pfeifer GP. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are responsible for the vast majority of mutations induced by UVB irradiation in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:44688–94; PMID:11572873; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M107696200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki T, Ito T, Matsudaira Y. Studies on the Genetic Multiplicity of a Gene in Yeast Cells. 2. Effects of Ultraviolet Light. J Radiat Res 1963; 4:85–90; PMID:14193265; http://dx.doi.org/10.1269/jrr.4.85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Zeeland AA, Simons JW. Linear dose–response relationships after prolonged expression times in V-79 Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res 1976; 35:129–37; PMID:178997; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(76)90175-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enninga IC, Groenendijk RT, van Zeeland AA, Simons JW. Differential response of human fibroblasts to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of UV radiation in different phases of the cell cycle. Mutat Res 1985; 148:119–28; PMID:3969076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(85)90215-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff RM, Sclafani RA. Cell cycle regulation of induced mutagenesis in yeast. Mutat Res 1995; 329:143–52; PMID:7603496; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(95)00030-M
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp WD, Howard-Flanders P. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol 1968; 31:291–304; PMID:4865486; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(68)90445-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann AR. Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 1972; 66:319–37; PMID:5037019; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(72)90418-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash L. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol Gen Genet 1981; 184:471–8; PMID:7038396; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00352525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• di Caprio L, Cox BS. DNA synthesis in UV-irradiated yeast. Mutat Res 1981; 82:69–85; PMID:7022172; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(81)90139-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 2006; 21:15–27; PMID:16387650; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Ramos CA, Prakash S, Prakash L. Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:2419–26; PMID:11884624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.7.2419-2426.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangavarapu V, Prakash S, Prakash L. Requirement of RAD52 group genes for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:7758–64; PMID:17785441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01331-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen PL, Xu F, Xiao W. Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA. Cell Res 2008; 18:162–73; PMID:18157158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Lawrence CW. The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:15954–9; PMID:16247017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504586102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann AR, Kirk-Bell S, Arlett CF, Paterson MC, Lohman PH, de Weerd-Kastelein EA, Bootsma D. Xeroderma pigmentosum cells with normal levels of excision repair have a defect in DNA synthesis after UV-irradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1975; 72:219–23; PMID:1054497; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.1.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita YM, Okada T, Matsusaka T, Sonoda E, Zhao GY, Araki K, Tateishi S, Yamaizumi M, Takeda S. RAD18 and RAD54 cooperatively contribute to maintenance of genomic stability in vertebrate cells. Embo J 2002; 21:5558–66; PMID:12374756; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateishi S, Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Fujimoto S, Inoue H, Yamaizumi M. Enhanced genomic instability and defective postreplication repair in RAD18 knockout mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:474–81; PMID:12509447; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.2.474-481.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds CE, Simpson LJ, Sale JE. PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 define temporally distinct mechanisms for controlling translesion synthesis in the avian cell line DT40. Mol Cell 2008; 30:519–29; PMID:18498753; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda E, Okada T, Zhao GY, Tateishi S, Araki K, Yamaizumi M, Yagi T, Verkaik NS, van Gent DC, Takata M, et al. Multiple roles of Rev3, the catalytic subunit of polzeta in maintaining genome stability in vertebrates. EMBO J 2003; 22:3188–97; PMID:12805232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters LS, Walker GC. The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:8971–6; PMID:16751278; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510167103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Piening BD, Paulovich AG. The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent. Mol Cell Biol 2013; 33:1515–27; PMID:23382077; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01392-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamant N, Hendel A, Vered I, Carell T, Reissner T, de Wind N, Geacinov N, Livneh Z. DNA damage bypass operates in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and exhibits differential mutagenicity. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:170–80; PMID:21908406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulovich AG, Armour CD, Hartwell LH. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. Genetics 1998; 150:75–93; PMID:9725831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kai M, Wang TS. Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev 2003; 17:64–76; PMID:12514100; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1043203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangavarapu V, Santa Maria SR, Prakash S, Prakash L. Requirement of replication checkpoint protein kinases Mec1/Rad53 for postreplication repair in yeast. Mbio 2011; 2:e00079-11; PMID:21586645; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00079-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neecke H, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint in budding yeast. Embo J 1999; 18:4485–97; PMID:10449414; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.16.4485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callegari AJ, Kelly TJ. UV irradiation induces a postreplication DNA damage checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:15877–82; PMID:17043220; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607343103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callegari AJ, Clark E, Pneuman A, Kelly TJ. Postreplication gaps at UV lesions are signals for checkpoint activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:8219–24; PMID:20404181; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003449107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karras GI, Jentsch S. The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 2010; 141:255–67; PMID:20403322; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigaku Y, Davies AA, Ulrich HD. Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature 2011; 465:951–5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40:179–204; PMID:20965415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobey RA. Different drugs arrest cells at a number of distinct stages in G2. Nature 1975; 254:245–7; PMID:46594; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/254245a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• al-Khodairy F, Carr AM. DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Embo J 1992; 11:1343–50; PMID:1563350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donzelli M, Draetta GF. Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation. EMBO Rep 2003; 4:671–7; PMID:12835754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.embor887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas J, Lukas C, Bartek J. Mammalian cell cycle checkpoints: signalling pathways and their organization in space and time. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004; 3:997–1007; PMID:15279786; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puck TT, Steffen J. Life Cycle Analysis of Mammalian Cells. I. A Method for Localizing Metabolic Events within the Life Cycle, and Its Application to the Action of Colcemide and Sublethal Doses of X-Irradiation. Biophys J 1963; 3:379–97; PMID:14062457; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(63)86828-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters RA, Petersen DF. Radiosensitivity of mammalian cells. II. Timing and dose-dependence of radiation-induced division delay. Biophys J 1968; 8:1475–86; PMID:5753223; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86567-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han A, Sinclair WK, Yu CK. Ultraviolet light-induced division delayed in synchronized Chinese hamster cells. Biophys J 1971; 11:540–9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(71)86233-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitson GL. Concepts in radiation cell biology. New York,: Academic Press, 1972
   Google Scholar
• Frampton J, Irmisch A, Green CM, Neiss A, Trickey M, Ulrich HD, Furuya K, Watts FZ, Carr AM, Lehmann AR. Postreplication repair and PCNA modification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:2976–85; PMID:16641370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulon S, Ramasubramanyan S, Alies C, Philippin G, Lehmann A, Fuchs RP. Rad8Rad5/Mms2-Ubc13 ubiquitin ligase complex controls translesion synthesis in fission yeast. EMBO J 2010; 29:2048–58; PMID:20453833; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding L, Forsburg SL. Essential domains of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad8 required for DNA damage response. G3 2014; 4:1373–84; PMID:24875629; http://dx.doi.org/full_text
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Shayeghi M, Nasim A, Watts FZ. Cloning and characterisation of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad32 gene: a gene required for repair of double strand breaks and recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 1995; 23:383–8; PMID:7885834; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.3.383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth K, Nurse P, Fraser RS. The effect of cell mass on the cell cycle timing and duration of S-phase in fission yeast. J Cell Sci 1979; 39:215–33; PMID:528581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sertic S, Pizzi S, Lazzaro F, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. NER and DDR: classical music with new instruments. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:668–74; PMID:22373527; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.11.4.19117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• al-Khodairy F, Fotou E, Sheldrick KS, Griffiths DJ, Lehmann AR, Carr AM. Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 1994; 5:147–60; PMID:8019001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.5.2.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr AM, Moudjou M, Bentley NJ, Hagan IM. The chk1 pathway is required to prevent mitosis following cell-cycle arrest at ‘start’. Curr Biol 1995; 5:1179–90; PMID:8548290; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00234-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonemasu R, McCready SJ, Murray JM, Osman F, Takao M, Yamamoto K, Lehmann AR, Yasui A. Characterization of the alternative excision repair pathway of UV-damaged DNA in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:1553–8; PMID:9092661; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.8.1553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prise KM, Ahnstrom G, Belli M, Carlsson J, Frankenberg D, Kiefer J, Löbrich M, Michael BD, Nygren J, Simone G, et al. A review of dsb induction data for varying quality radiations. Int J Radiat Biol 1998; 74:173–84; PMID:9712547; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095530098141564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly B, White CI, Haber JE. Physical monitoring of mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8:2342–9; PMID:2841579; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.8.6.2342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Hicks JK, Chute CL, Brennan JR, Ahn JY, Glover TW, Canman CE. REV1 and polymerase zeta facilitate homologous recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:682–91; PMID:21926160; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozmin SG, Jinks-Robertson S. The mechanism of nucleotide excision repair-mediated UV-induced mutagenesis in nonproliferating cells. Genetics 2013; 193:803–17; PMID:23307894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.147421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan K, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA. The choice of nucleotide inserted opposite abasic sites formed within chromosomal DNA reveals the polymerase activities participating in translesion DNA synthesis. DNA Repair (Amst) 2013; 12:878–89; PMID:23988736; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies AA, Huttner D, Daigaku Y, Chen S, Ulrich HD. Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein a. Mol Cell 2008; 29:625–36; PMID:18342608; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, Carotenuto W, Liberi G, Bressan D, Wan L, Hollingsworth NM, et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004; 431:1011–7; PMID:15496928; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trickey M, Grimaldi M, Yamano H. The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome controls repair and recombination by ubiquitylating Rhp54 in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:3905–16; PMID:18426916; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02116-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchiyama M, Terunuma J, Hanaoka F. The Protein Level of Rev1, a TLS Polymerase in Fission Yeast, Is Strictly Regulated during the Cell Cycle and after DNA Damage. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0130000; PMID:26147350; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannattasio M, Follonier C, Tourriere H, Puddu F, Lazzaro F, Pasero P, Lopes M, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. Exo1 competes with repair synthesis, converts NER intermediates to long ssDNA gaps, and promotes checkpoint activation. Mol Cell 2010; 40:50–62; PMID:20932474; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher VM, Dorney DJ, Mendrala AL, Konze-Thomas B, McCormick JJ. DNA excision-repair processes in human cells can eliminate the cytotoxic and mutagenic consequences of ultraviolet irradiation. Mutat Res 1979; 62:311–23; PMID:503098; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(79)90087-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleasance ED, Cheetham RK, Stephens PJ, McBride DJ, Humphray SJ, Greenman CD, Varela I, Lin ML, Ordóñez GR, Bignell GR, Ye K, et al. A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 2010; 463:191–6; PMID:20016485; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, De S, Michor F. DNA replication timing and higher-order nuclear organization determine single-nucleotide substitution patterns in cancer genomes. Nat Commun 2013; 4:1502; PMID:23422670; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PK, Arcangioli B, Baker SP, Bensimon A, Rhind N. DNA replication origins fire stochastically in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:308–16; PMID:16251353; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-07-0657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio OM. Location, location, location: it's all in the timing for replication origins. Genes Dev 2013; 27:117–28; PMID:23348837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.209999.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankouri HW, Huttner D, Hickson ID. How unfinished business from S-phase affects mitosis and beyond. EMBO J 2013; 32:2661–71; PMID:24065128; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasinghe CM, Arzouk H, Frey A, Maiter A, Sale JE. Contributions of the specialised DNA polymerases to replication of structured DNA. DNA Repair (Amst) 2015; 29:83–90; PMID:25704659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suski C, Marians KJ. Resolution of converging replication forks by RecQ and topoisomerase III. Mol Cell 2008; 30:779–89; PMID:18570879; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar