Quantitative assessment of chromosome instability induced through chemical disruption of mitotic progression

References

• Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 1997; 386:623-7; PMID:9121588; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/386623a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998; 396:643-9; PMID:9872311; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/25292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau SJ, Amon A. Chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in cancer: from yeast to man. EMBO Reports 2012; 13:515-27; PMID:22614003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Losing balance: the origin and impact of aneuploidy in cancer. EMBO Reports 2012; 13:501-14; PMID:22565320; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGranahan N, Burrell RA, Endesfelder D, Novelli MR, Swanton C. Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges. EMBO Reports 2012; 13:528-38; PMID:22595889; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver BA, Silk AD, Montagna C, Verdier-Pinard P, Cleveland DW. Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell 2007; 11:25-36; PMID:17189716; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanton C, Nicke B, Schuett M, Eklund AC, Ng C, Li Q, Hardcastle T, Lee A, Roy R, East P, et al. Chromosomal instability determines taxane response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:8671-6; PMID:19458043; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811835106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford WD, Saraf A, Florens L, Sanderson BW, Hattem GL, Li R. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 2010; 468:321-5; PMID:20962780; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariente N. A balancing act: focus on aneuploidy. EMBO Reports 2012; 13:472; PMID:22653484; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim S, Mitelman F. Cancer cytogenetics New York: Wiley-Liss, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen A, Kops GJ, Medema RH. Elevating the frequency of chromosome mis-segregation as a strategy to kill tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19108-13; PMID:19855003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904343106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen A, Kops GJ, Medema RH. Targeting the mitotic checkpoint to kill tumor cells. Hormones Cancer 2011; 2:113-6; PMID:21475725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-010-0059-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson SL, Bakhoum SF, Compton DA. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 2010; 20:R285-95; PMID:20334839; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon DJ, Resio B, Pellman D. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nat Rev Genetics 2012; 13:189-203; PMID:22269907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SL, Compton DA. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 2008; 180:665-72; PMID:18283116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200712029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker B, van den Bos H, Lansdorp PM, Foijer F. How to count chromosomes in a cell: An overview of current and novel technologies. Bio Essays 2015; 37(5):570-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SL, Compton DA. Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:17974-8; PMID:21997207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109720108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann JH, Martins NM, Larionov V, Masumoto H, Earnshaw WC. HACking the centromere chromatin code: insights from human artificial chromosomes. Chromosome Res 2012; 20:505-19; PMID:22825423; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-012-9293-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouprina N, Earnshaw WC, Masumoto H, Larionov V. A new generation of human artificial chromosomes for functional genomics and gene therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci 2013; 70:1135-48; PMID:22907415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1113-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano M, Cardinale S, Noskov VN, Gassmann R, Vagnarelli P, Kandels-Lewis S, Larionov V, Earnshaw WC, Masumoto H. Inactivation of a human kinetochore by specific targeting of chromatin modifiers. Dev Cell 2008; 14:507-22; PMID:18410728; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HS, Lee NC, Grimes BR, Samoshkin A, Kononenko AV, Bansal R, Masumoto H, Earnshaw WC, Kouprina N, Larionov V. A new assay for measuring chromosome instability (CIN) and identification of drugs that elevate CIN in cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:252; PMID:23694679; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HS, Lee NC, Kouprina N, Kim JH, Kagansky A, Bates S, Trepel JB, Pommier Y, Sackett D, Larionov V. Effects of Anticancer Drugs on Chromosome Instability and New Clinical Implications for Tumor-Suppressing Therapies. Cancer Res 2016; 76:902-11; PMID:26837770; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Lee HS, Lee NC, Goncharov NV, Kumeiko V, Masumoto H, Earnshaw WC, Kouprina N, Larionov V. Development of a novel HAC-based “gain of signal” quantitative assay for measuring chromosome instability (CIN) in cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016; 7(12):14841-14856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barford D. Structure, function and mechanism of the anaphase promoting complex (APC/C). Quarterly Rev Biophys 2011; 44:153-90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033583510000259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou H, McGarry TJ, Bernal T, Kirschner MW. Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 1999; 285:418-22; PMID:10411507; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5426.418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93; PMID:17426725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen A, Medema RH. Mitosis as an anti-cancer target. Oncogene 2011; 30:2799-809; PMID:21339734; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver BA. How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell 2014; 25:2677-81; PMID:25213191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito DA, Rieder CL. The ability to survive mitosis in the presence of microtubule poisons differs significantly between human nontransformed (RPE-1) and cancer (U2OS, HeLa) cells. Cell Motility Cytoskeleton 2009; 66:437-47; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cm.20316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikui AE, Yang CP, Matsumoto T, Horwitz SB. Low concentrations of taxol cause mitotic delay followed by premature dissociation of p55CDC from Mad2 and BubR1 and abrogation of the spindle checkpoint, leading to aneuploidy. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1385-8; PMID:16138009; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.10.2061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasadil LM, Andersen KA, Yeum D, Rocque GB, Wilke LG, Tevaarwerk AJ, Raines RT, Burkard ME, Weaver BA. Cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in breast cancer is due to chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles. Sci Translational Med 2014; 6:229ra43; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3007965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santaguida S, Tighe A, D'Alise AM, Taylor SS, Musacchio A. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J Cell Biol 2010; 190:73-87; PMID:20624901; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201001036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampson MA, Kapoor TM. Unraveling cell division mechanisms with small-molecule inhibitors. Nat Chem Biol 2006; 2:19-27; PMID:16408087; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell RA, McClelland SE, Endesfelder D, Groth P, Weller MC, Shaikh N, Domingo E, Kanu N, Dewhurst SM, Gronroos E, et al. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 2013; 494:492-6; PMID:23446422; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhoum SF, Kabeche L, Murnane JP, Zaki BI, Compton DA. DNA-damage response during mitosis induces whole-chromosome missegregation. Cancer Discov 2014; 4:1281-9; PMID:25107667; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida Y, Kim JH, Kazuki Y, Hoshiya H, Takiguchi M, Hayashi M, Erliandri I, Lee HS, Samoshkin A, Masumoto H, et al. Human artificial chromosome with a conditional centromere for gene delivery and gene expression. DNA Res 2010; 17:293-301; PMID:20798231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsq020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Ebersole T, Kouprina N, Noskov VN, Ohzeki J, Masumoto H, Mravinac B, Sullivan BA, Pavlicek A, Dovat S, et al. Human gamma-satellite DNA maintains open chromatin structure and protects a transgene from epigenetic silencing. Genome Res 2009; 19:533-44; PMID:19141594; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.086496.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Kononenko A, Erliandri I, Kim TA, Nakano M, Iida Y, Barrett JC, Oshimura M, Masumoto H, Earnshaw WC, et al. Human artificial chromosome (HAC) vector with a conditional centromere for correction of genetic deficiencies in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:20048-53; PMID:22123967; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114483108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomizuka K, Yoshida H, Uejima H, Kugoh H, Sato K, Ohguma A, Hayasaka M, Hanaoka K, Oshimura M, Ishida I. Functional expression and germline transmission of a human chromosome fragment in chimaeric mice. Nat Genetics 1997; 16:133-43; PMID:9171824; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng0697-133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar