Cdk3, a conjugation-specific cyclin-dependent kinase, is essential for the initiation of meiosis in Tetrahymena thermophila

References

• Pawlowski WP, Sheehan MJ, Ronceret A. In the beginning: the initiation of meiosis. Bio Essays 2007; 29:511-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CJ, Tseng CC. Recent advances in understanding of meiosis initiation and the apomictic pathway in plants. Front Plant Sci 2014; 5:497; PMID:25295051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu S, DeRisi J, Eisen M, Mulholland J, Botstein D, Brown PO, Herskowitz I. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 1998; 282:699-705; PMID:9784122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5389.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford DM, Stark KE, Gardner KE, Hoffmann-Benning S, Brush GS. Mechanistic insight into the Cdc28-related protein kinase Ime2 through analysis of replication protein A phosphorylation. Cell Cycle 2014; 4:1826-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.12.2214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foiani M, Nadjar-Boger E, Capone R, Sagee S, Hashimshoni T, Kassir Y. A meiosis-specific protein kinase, Ime2, is required for the correct timing of DNA replication and for spore formation in yeast meiosis. Mol Gen Genet 1996; 253:278-88; PMID:9003314; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004380050323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirick L, Goetsch L, Ammerer G, Byers B. Regulation of meiotic S phase by Ime2 and a Clb5,6-associated kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1998; 281:1854-7; PMID:9743499; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5384.1854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart D, Wittenberg C. CLB5 and CLB6 are required for premeiotic DNA replication and activation of the meiotic S/M checkpoint. Genes Dev 1998; 12:2698-710; PMID:9732268; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.17.2698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgne A, Murakami H, Ayte J, Nurse P. The G1/S cyclin Cig2p during meiosis in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:2080-90; PMID:12058071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harigaya Y, Tanaka H, Yamanaka S, Tanaka K, Watanabe Y, Tsutsumi C, Chikashige Y, Hiraoka Y, Yamashita A, Yamamoto M. Selective elimination of messenger RNA prevents an incidence of untimely meiosis. Nature 2006; 442:45-50; PMID:16823445; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura K, Katayama S, Dhut S, Sato M, Watanabe Y, Yamamoto M, Toda T. Phosphorylation of Mei2 and Ste11 by Pat1 kinase inhibits sexual differentiation via ubiquitin proteolysis and 14-3-3 protein in fission yeast. Dev Cell 2001; 1:389-99; PMID:11702950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00037-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto A, Iino Y, Maeda T, Watanabe Y, Yamamoto M. Schizosaccharomyces pombe ste11+ encodes a transcription factor with an HMG motif that is a critical regulator of sexual development. Genes Dev 1991; 5:1990-9; PMID:1657709; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.5.11.1990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malumbres M, Harlow E, Hunt T, Hunter T, Lahti JM, Manning G, Morgan DO, Tsai LH, Wolgemuth DJ. Cyclin-dependent kinases: a family portrait. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:1275-6; PMID:19884882; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1109-1275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development 2013; 140:3079-93; PMID:23861057; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.091744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malumbres M, Barbacid M. Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer 2009; 9:153-66; PMID:19238148; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malumbres M. Cyclin-dependent kinases. Genome Biol 2014; 15:122; PMID:25180339; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb4184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DO. Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1997; 13:261-91; PMID:9442875; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DO. The cell cycle: Principles of control. London: New Science Press Ltd, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Berthet C, Aleem E, Coppola V, Tessarollo L, Kaldis P. Cdk2 Knockout Mice Are Viable. Curr Biol 2003; 13:1775-85; PMID:14561402; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega S, Prieto I, Odajima J, Martin A, Dubus P, Sotillo R, Barbero JL, Malumbres M, Barbacid M. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is essential for meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice. Nat Genet 2003; 35:25-31; PMID:12923533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SG, Dubus P, Mettus RV, Galbreath EJ, Boden G, Reddy EP, Barbacid M. Loss of Cdk4 expression causes insulin-deficient diabetes and Cdk4 activation results in β-islet cell hyperplasia. Nat Genet 1999; 22:44-52; PMID:10319860; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/8751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsui T, Hesabi B, Moons DS, Pandolfi PP, Hansel KS, Koff A, Kiyokawa H. Targeted disruption of CDK4 delays cell cycle entry with enhanced p27(Kip1) activity. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:7011-9; PMID:10490638; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.10.7011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orias E, Cervantes MD, Hamilton EP. Tetrahymena thermophila, a unicellular eukaryote with separate germline and somatic genomes. Res Microbiol 2011; 162:578-86; PMID:21624459; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2011.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale DW, Allis CD, Bruns PJ. Conjugation in Tetrahymena thermophila: A temporal analysis of cytological stages. Exp Cell Res 1982; 140:227-36; PMID:7106201; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(82)90172-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki K, Novatchkova M, Loidl J. DNA double-strand breaks, but not crossovers, are required for the reorganization of meiotic nuclei in Tetrahymena. J Cell Sci 2008; 121:2148-58; PMID:18522989; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.031799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loidl J, Scherthan H. Organization and pairing of meiotic chromosomes in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:5791-801; PMID:15522890; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orias E, Hamilton EP, Orias JD. Tetrahymena as a laboratory organism: Useful strains, cell culture, and cell line maintenance. Methods Cell Biol 2000; 62:189-211; PMID:10503191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61530-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan GX, Dang H, Tian M, Zhang J, Shodhan A, Ning YZ, Xiong J, Miao W. Cyc17, a meiosis-specific cyclin, is essential for anaphase initiation and chromosome segregation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Cell Cycle 2016; 14:1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Miao W, Xiong J, Bowen J, Wang W, Liu Y, Braguinets O, Grigull J, Pearlman RE, Orias E, Gorovsky MA. Microarray analyses of gene expression during the Tetrahymena thermophila life cycle. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4429; PMID:19204800; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Lu X, Lu Y, Zeng H, Yuan D, Feng L, Chang Y, Bowen J, Gorovsky M, Fu C, et al. Tetrahymena Gene Expression Database (TGED): a resource of microarray data and co-expression analyses for Tetrahymena. Sci China Life Sci 2011; 54:65-7; PMID:21253873; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11427-010-4114-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukaszewicz A, Howard-Till RA, Novatchkova M, Mochizuki K, Loidl J. MRE11 and COM1/SAE2 are required for double-strand break repair and efficient chromosome pairing during meiosis of the protist Tetrahymena. Chromosoma 2010; 119:505-18; PMID:20422424; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-010-0274-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shodhan A, Lukaszewicz A, Novatchkova M, Loidl J. Msh4 and Msh5 function in SC-independent chiasma formation during the streamlined meiosis of Tetrahymena. Genetics 2014; 198:983-93; PMID:25217051; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.169698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Till RA, Lukaszewicz A, Loidl J. The recombinases Rad51 and Dmc1 play distinct roles in DNA break repair and recombination partner choice in the meiosis of Tetrahymena. PLoS Genetics 2011; 7:193-202; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubersax JA, Woodbury EL, Quang PN, Paraz M, Blethrow JD, Shah K, Shokat KM, Morgan DO. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 2003; 425:859-64; PMID:14574415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Wang R, Ghanam AR, Yan G, Miao W, Song X. The key role of CYC2 during meiosis in Tetrahymena thermophila. Protein Cell 2016; 7(4):236-49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl JA, Zindy F, Sherr CJ. Inhibition of cyclin D1 phosphorylation on threonine-286 prevents its rapid degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Genes Dev 1997; 11:957-72; PMID:9136925; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.8.957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koepp DM, Schaefer LK, Ye X, Keyomarsi K, Chu C, Harper JW, Elledge SJ. Phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination of cyclin E by the SCFFbw7 ubiquitin ligase. Science 2001; 294:173-7; PMID:11533444; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1065203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:1017-8; PMID:21330290; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell A, Chang HY, Daugherty L, Fraser M, Hunter S, Lopez R, McAnulla C, McMenamin C, Nuka G, Pesseat S, et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:D213-21; PMID:25428371; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947-8; PMID:17846036; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725-9; PMID:24132122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert X, Gouet P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:W320-4; PMID:24753421; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki K. High efficiency transformation of Tetrahymena using a codon-optimized neomycin resistance gene. Gene 2008; 425:79-83; PMID:18775482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2008.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuitschick JD, Gershan JA, Lochowicz AJ, Li S, Karrer KM. A novel family of mobile genetic elements is limited to the germline genome in Tetrahymena thermophila. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:2524-37; PMID:12034842; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.11.2524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Lu X, Zhou Z, Chang Y, Yuan D, Tian M, Zhou Z, Wang L, Fu C, Orias E, et al. Transcriptome analysis of the model protozoan, Tetrahymena thermophila, using Deep RNA Sequencing. PLoS One 2012; 7:e30630; PMID:22347391; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Wang X, Zhang X. Using non-uniform read distribution models to improve isoform expression inference in RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:502-8; PMID:21169371; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Salzberg SL. TopHat-Fusion: An algorithm for discovery of novel fusion transcripts. Genome Biol 2011; 12:R72; PMID:21835007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 2012; 7:562-78; PMID:22383036; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M. BiNGO: A Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:3448-9; PMID:15972284; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-9; PMID:10802651; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Liu Y, Andrews PC. Quantification of histone modifications using 15N metabolic labeling. Methods 2013; 61:236-43; PMID:23454290; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.02.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014; 15:550; PMID:25516281; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar