Rescue from replication stress during mitosis

References

• Sirbu BM, Cortez D. DNA damage response: three levels of DNA repair regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5(8):a012724; PMID:23813586; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012724
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeman MK, Cimprich KA. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2014; 16(1):2-9; PMID:24366029; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300(5625):1542-8; PMID:12791985; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1083430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8(9):1038-46; PMID:19482564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jossen R, Bermejo R. The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A Game of Forks. Front Genet 2013; 4, 26; PMID:23493417; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00026
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergoglio V, Boyer AS, Walsh E, Naim V, Legube G, Lee MY, Rey L, Rosselli F, Cazaux C, Eckert KA, et al. DNA synthesis by Pol eta promotes fragile site stability by preventing under-replicated DNA in mitosis. J Cell Biol 2013; 201(3):395-408; PMID:23609533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201207066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Beau MM, Rassool FV, Neilly ME, Espinosa R 3rd, Glover TW, Smith DI, McKeithan TW. Replication of a common fragile site, FRA3B, occurs late in S phase and is delayed further upon induction: implications for the mechanism of fragile site induction. Hum Mol Genet 1998; 7(4):755-61; PMID:9499431; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/7.4.755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widrow RJ, Hansen RS, Kawame H, Gartler SM, Laird CD. Very late DNA replication in the human cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95(19):11246-50; PMID:9736721; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.19.11246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano T. Chromosome Dynamics during Mitosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2015; 7(6):1–14; PMID:25722466; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a015792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Hirota T. Chromosomal instability: A common feature and a therapeutic target of cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016; 1866(1):64-75; PMID:27345585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhoum SF, Silkworth WT, Nardi IK, Nicholson JM, Compton DA, Cimini D. The mitotic origin of chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 2014; 24(4):R148-9; PMID:24556433; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naim V, Rosselli F. The FANC pathway and BLM collaborate during mitosis to prevent micro-nucleation and chromosome abnormalities. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11(6):761-8; PMID:19465921; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KL, Palmai-Pallag T, Ying S, Hickson ID. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11(6):753-60; PMID:19465922; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell RA, McClelland SE, Endesfelder D, Groth P, Weller MC, Shaikh N, Domingo E, Kanu N, Dewhurst SM, Gronroos E, et al. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 2013; 494(7438):492-6; PMID:23446422; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naim V, Rosselli F. The FANC pathway and mitosis: a replication legacy. Cell Cycle 2009; 8(18):2907-11; PMID:19729998; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.18.9538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KL, North PS, Hickson ID. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J 2007; 26(14):3397-409; PMID:17599064; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas C, Savic V, Bekker-Jensen S, Doil C, Neumann B, Pedersen RS, Grøfte M, Chan KL, Hickson ID, Bartek J, et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13(3):243-53; PMID:21317883; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrigan JA, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Dimitrova DS, Polo SE, Bradshaw CR, Fraser P, Jackson SP. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J Cell Biol 2011; 193(1):97-108; PMID:21444690; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann C, Körner R, Hofmann K, Nigg EA. PICH, a centromere-associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 2007; 128(1):101-14; PMID:17218258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naim V, Wilhelm T, Debatisse M, Rosselli F. ERCC1 and MUS81-EME1 promote sister chromatid separation by processing late replication intermediates at common fragile sites during mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2013; 15(8):1008-15; PMID:23811686; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying S, Minocherhomji S, Chan KL, Palmai-Pallag T, Chu WK, Wass T, Mankouri HW, Liu Y, Hickson ID. MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression. Nat Cell Biol 2013; 15(8):1001-7; PMID:23811685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minocherhomji S, Ying S, Bjerregaard VA, Bursomanno S, Aleliunaite A, Wu W, Mankouri HW, Shen H, Liu Y, Hickson ID. Replication stress activates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis. Nature 2015; 528(7581):286-90; PMID:26633632; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature16139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen RT, Kruse T, Nilsson J, Oestergaard VH, Lisby M. TopBP1 is required at mitosis to reduce transmission of DNA damage to G1 daughter cells. J Cell Biol 2015; 210(4):565-82; PMID:26283799; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201502107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild P, Matos J. Cell cycle control of DNA joint molecule resolution. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2016; 40, 74-80; PMID:26970388; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2016.02.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragkos M, Ganier O, Coulombe P, Méchali M. DNA replication origin activation in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015; 16(6):360-74; PMID:25999062; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm4002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shima N, Alcaraz A, Liachko I, Buske TR, Andrews CA, Munroe RJ, Hartford SA, Tye BK, Schimenti JC. A viable allele of Mcm4 causes chromosome instability and mammary adenocarcinomas in mice. Nat Genet 2007; 39(1):93-8; PMID:17143284; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata T, Luebben SW, Yamaguchi S, Ilves I, Matise I, Buske T, Botchan MR, Shima N. Stalled fork rescue via dormant replication origins in unchallenged S phase promotes proper chromosome segregation and tumor suppression. Mol Cell 2011; 41(5):543-53; PMID:21362550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letessier A, Millot GA, Koundrioukoff S, Lachagès AM, Vogt N, Hansen RS, Malfoy B, Brison O, Debatisse M. Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site. Nature 2011; 470(7332):120-3; PMID:21258320; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozeri-Galai E, Lebofsky R, Rahat A, Bester AC, Bensimon A, Kerem B. Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites. Mol Cell 2011; 43(1):122-31; PMID:21726815; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio OM. Location, location, location: it's all in the timing for replication origins. Genes Dev 2013; 27(2):117-28; PMID:23348837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.209999.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo LI, Altmeyer M, Rask MB, Lukas C, Larsen DH, Povlsen LK, Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N, Bartek J, Lukas J. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell 2013; 155(5):1088-103; PMID:24267891; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdalou I, Lopez BS, Pasero P, Lambert SA. The causes of replication stress and their consequences on genome stability and cell fate. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2014; 30, 154-64; PMID:24818779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.04.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blow JJ, Ge XQ, Jackson DA. How dormant origins promote complete genome replication. Trends Biochem Sci 2011; 36(8):405-14; PMID:21641805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2011.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge XQ, Jackson DA, Blow JJ. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev 2007; 21(24):3331-41; PMID:18079179; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.457807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward AM, Göhler T, Luciani MG, Oehlmann M, Ge X, Gartner A, Jackson DA, Blow JJ. Excess Mcm2-7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress. J Cell Biol 2006; 173(5):673-83; PMID:16754955; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200602108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra A, Schwob E, Méndez J. Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105(26):8956-61; PMID:18579778; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803978105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglana M, Apiou F, Bensimon A, Debatisse M. Dynamics of DNA replication in mammalian somatic cells: nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing. Cell 2003; 114(3):385-94; PMID:12914702; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00569-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybak P, Waligórska A, Bujnowicz Ł, Hoang A, Dobrucki JW. Activation of new replication foci under conditions of replication stress. Cell Cycle 2015; 14(16):2634-47; PMID:26212617; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2015.1064566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortez D. Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2015; 32, 149-57; PMID:25957489; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6(7):994-1003; PMID:17382606; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen RD, Cimprich KA. The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6(7):953-66; PMID:17531546; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti M, Vindigni A. Replication stress: getting back on track. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2016; 23(2):103-9; PMID:26840898; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann AR. Replication of UV-damaged DNA: new insights into links between DNA polymerases, mutagenesis and human disease. Gene 2000; 253(1):1-12; PMID:10925197; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00250-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward IM, Minn K, Chen J. UV-induced ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) activation requires replication stress. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(11):9677-80; PMID:14742437; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C300554200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover TW, Berger C, Coyle J, Echo B. DNA polymerase alpha inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes. Hum Genet 1984; 67(2):136-42; PMID:6430783; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00272988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes JJ. Structural and functional properties of DNA polymerase delta from rabbit bone marrow. Mol Cell Biochem 1984; 62(1):13-24; PMID:6330522; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00230073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CH, Kuchta RD. DNA polymerase epsilon: aphidicolin inhibition and the relationship between polymerase and exonuclease activity. Biochemistry 1993; 32(33):8568-74; PMID:8395209; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00084a025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi R, Oshige M, Uchida M, Ishikawa G, Takata K, Shimanouchi K, Kanai Y, Ruike T, Morioka H, Sakaguchi K. Purification of Drosophila DNA polymerase zeta by REV1 protein-affinity chromatography. Biochem J 2004; 382(Pt 2):535-43; PMID:15175013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20031833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli J, Tsaponina O, Crabbé L, Keszthelyi A, Pantesco V, Chabes A, Lengronne A, Pasero P. dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J 2012; 31(4):883-94; PMID:22234185; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell 2010; 37(4):492-502; PMID:20188668; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio JG, Viggiani CJ, Gibson DG, Aparicio OM. The Rpd3-Sin3 histone deacetylase regulates replication timing and enables intra-S origin control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24(11):4769-80; PMID:15143171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.11.4769-4780.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickmore WA, Carothers AD. Factors affecting the timing and imprinting of replication on a mammalian chromosome. J Cell Sci 1995; 108 ( Pt 8):2801-9; PMID:7593321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommier Y. Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6(10):789-802; PMID:16990856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert S, Carr AM. Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability. Chromosoma 2013; 122(1-2):33-45; PMID:23446515; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-013-0398-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarsounas M, Tijsterman M. Genomes and G-quadruplexes: for better or for worse. J Mol Biol 2013; 425(23):4782-9; PMID:24076189; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.09.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza O, Bourdoncle A, Boulé JB, Brosh RM Jr, Mergny JL. G-quadruplexes and helicases. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44(5):1989-2006; PMID:26883636; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11(3):208-19; PMID:20177396; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez P, Blasco MA. Replicating through telomeres: a means to an end. Trends Biochem Sci 2015; 40(9):504-15; PMID:26188776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer J, Tacconi EM, Folio C, Badie S, Porru M, Klare K, Tumiati M, Markkanen E, Halder S, Ryan A, et al. Targeting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Deficiencies with G-Quadruplex-Interacting Compounds. Mol Cell 2016; 61(3):449-60; PMID:26748828; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfeir A, Kosiyatrakul ST, Hockemeyer D, MacRae SL, Karlseder J, Schildkraut CL, de Lange T. Mammalian telomeres resemble fragile sites and require TRF1 for efficient replication. Cell 2009; 138(1):90-103; PMID:19596237; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannier JB, Pavicic-Kaltenbrunner V, Petalcorin MI, Ding H, Boulton SJ. RTEL1 dismantles T loops and counteracts telomeric G4-DNA to maintain telomere integrity. Cell 2012; 149(4):795-806; PMID:22579284; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera A, Garcia-Muse T. Causes of genome instability. Annu Rev Genet 2013; 47, 1-32; PMID:23909437; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebofsky R, Bensimon A. DNA replication origin plasticity and perturbed fork progression in human inverted repeats. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25(15):6789-97; PMID:16024811; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.15.6789-6797.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi T. The Human RNA Polymerase I Transcription Terminator Complex Acts as a Replication Fork Barrier That Coordinates the Progress of Replication with rRNA Transcription Activity. Mol Cell Biol 2015; 35(10):1871-81; PMID:25776556; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01521-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer BJ, Fangman WL. A replication fork barrier at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 1988; 55(4):637-43; PMID:3052854; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90222-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T, Horiuchi T. A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1996; 1(5):465-74; PMID:9078378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.d01-256.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linskens MH, Huberman JA. Organization of replication of ribosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8(11):4927-35; PMID:3062373; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.8.11.4927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-estrano C, Schvartzman JB, Krimer DB, Hernández P. Co-localization of polar replication fork barriers and rRNA transcription terminators in mouse rDNA. J Mol Biol 1998; 277(2):249-56; PMID:9514756; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber JK, Gögel E, Berger C, Wallisch M, Müller F, Grummt I, Grummt F. Termination of mammalian rDNA replication: polar arrest of replication fork movement by transcription termination factor TTF-I. Cell 1997; 90(3):559-67; PMID:9267035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80515-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst AV, Almouzni G. Pericentric heterochromatin: dynamic organization during early development in mammals. Differentiation 2008; 76(1):15-23; PMID:17825083; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.2007.00220.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter AC, Farr CJ. Topoisomerase II: untangling its contribution at the centromere. Chromosome Res 2004; 12(6):569-83; PMID:15289664; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000036608.91085.d1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouzeau S, Cordelières FP, Buhagiar-Labarchède G, Hurbain I, Onclercq-Delic R, Gemble S, Magnaghi-Jaulin L, Jaulin C, Amor-Guéret M. Bloom's syndrome and PICH helicases cooperate with topoisomerase IIalpha in centromere disjunction before anaphase. PLoS One 2012; 7(4):e33905; PMID:22563370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033905
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azvolinsky A, Dunaway S, Torres JZ, Bessler JB, Zakian VA. The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev 2006; 20(22):3104-16; PMID:17114583; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1478906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgoulis VG, Vassiliou LV, Karakaidos P, Zacharatos P, Kotsinas A, Liloglou T, Venere M, Ditullio RA Jr, Kastrinakis NG, Levy B, et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 2005; 434(7035):907-13; PMID:15829965; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG, Bartek J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 2008; 319(5868):1352-5; PMID:18323444; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maya-Mendoza A, Ostrakova J, Kosar M, Hall A, Duskova P, Mistrik M, Merchut-Maya JM, Hodny Z, Bartkova J, Christensen C, et al. Myc and Ras oncogenes engage different energy metabolism programs and evoke distinct patterns of oxidative and DNA replication stress. Mol Oncol 2015; 9(3):601-16; PMID:25435281; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2014.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsantoulis PK, Kotsinas A, Sfikakis PP, Evangelou K, Sideridou M, Levy B, Mo L, Kittas C, Wu XR, Papavassiliou AG, et al. Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study. Oncogene 2008; 27(23):3256-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartkova J, Horejsí Z, Koed K, Krämer A, Tort F, Zieger K, Guldberg P, Sehested M, Nesland JM, Lukas C. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 2005; 434(7035):864-70; PMID:15829956; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartkova J, Rezaei N, Liontos M, Karakaidos P, Kletsas D, Issaeva N, Vassiliou LV, Kolettas E, Niforou K, Zoumpourlis VC, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature 2006; 444(7119):633-7; PMID:17136093; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suram A, Kaplunov J, Patel PL, Ruan H, Cerutti A, Boccardi V, Fumagalli M, Di Micco R, Mirani N, Gurung RL. Oncogene-induced telomere dysfunction enforces cellular senescence in human cancer precursor lesions. EMBO J 2012; 31(13):2839-51; PMID:22569128; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Micco R, Fumagalli M, Cicalese A, Piccinin S, Gasparini P, Luise C, Schurra C, Garre′ M, Nuciforo PG, Bensimon A, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 2006; 444(7119):638-42; PMID:17136094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills SA, Diffley JF. DNA replication and oncogene-induced replicative stress. Curr Biol 2014; 24(10):R435-44; PMID:24845676; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm-Reed S, Méndez J, Tedesco D, Zetterberg A, Stillman B, Reed SI. Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly. J Cell Biol 2004; 165(6):789-800; PMID:15197178; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200404092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RM, Mortusewicz O, Afzal I, Lorvellec M, García P, Helleday T, Petermann E. Increased replication initiation and conflicts with transcription underlie Cyclin E-induced replication stress. Oncogene 2013; 32(32):3744-53; PMID:22945645; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bester AC, Roniger M, Oren YS, Im MM, Sarni D, Chaoat M, Bensimon A, Zamir G, Shewach DS, Kerem B. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 2011; 145(3):435-46; PMID:21529715; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie M, Yen Y, Owonikoko TK, Ramalingam SS, Khuri FR, Curran WJ, Doetsch PW, Deng X. Bcl2 induces DNA replication stress by inhibiting ribonucleotide reductase. Cancer Res 2014; 74(1):212-23; PMID:24197132; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1536-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burhans WC, Weinberger M. DNA replication stress, genome instability and aging. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35(22):7545-56; PMID:18055498; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogrunc M, Di Micco R, Liontos M, Bombardelli L, Mione M, Fumagalli M, Gorgoulis VG, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Oncogene-induced reactive oxygen species fuel hyperproliferation and DNA damage response activation. Cell Death Differ 2014; 21(6):998-1012; PMID:24583638; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2014.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm T, Ragu S, Magdalou I, Machon C, Dardillac E, Técher H, Guitton J, Debatisse M, Lopez BS. Slow Replication Fork Velocity of Homologous Recombination-Defective Cells Results from Endogenous Oxidative Stress. PLoS Genet 2016; 12(5):e1006007; PMID:27135742; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi Y, Lan F, Matson C, Mulligan P, Whetstine JR, Cole PA, Casero RA, Shi Y. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 2004; 119(7):941-53; PMID:15620353; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks PJ, Theruvathu JA. DNA adducts from acetaldehyde: implications for alcohol-related carcinogenesis. Alcohol 2005; 35(3):187-93; PMID:16054980; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2005.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaycoechea JI, Patel KJ. Why does the bone marrow fail in Fanconi anemia? Blood 2014; 123(1):26-34; PMID:24200684; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-09-427740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClendon AK, Rodriguez AC, Osheroff N. Human topoisomerase IIalpha rapidly relaxes positively supercoiled DNA: implications for enzyme action ahead of replication forks. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(47):39337-45; PMID:16188892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M503320200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth A, Rocha W, Verreault A, Almouzni G. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 2007; 128(4):721-33; PMID:17320509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente-Ruiz M, Prado F. Chromatin assembly controls replication fork stability. EMBO Rep 2009; 10(7):790-6; PMID:19465889; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejlvang J, et al. New histone supply regulates replication fork speed and PCNA unloading. J Cell Biol 2014; 204(1):29-43; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201305017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolov I, Taddei A. Linking replication stress with heterochromatin formation. Chromosoma 2016; 125(3):523-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-015-0545-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabancay AP, Jr., Forsburg SL. Eukaryotic DNA replication in a chromatin context. Curr Top Dev Biol 76, 129-84; PMID:17118266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Samarabandu J, Devdhar RS, Siegel AJ, Acharya R, Berezney R. (1998) Segregation of transcription and replication sites into higher order domains. Science 2006; 281(5382):1502-6; PMID:9727975; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5382.1502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottipati P, Cassel TN, Savolainen L, Helleday T. Transcription-associated recombination is dependent on replication in Mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28(1):154-64; PMID:17967877; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00816-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli J, Gerhold CB, Tosi A, Hustedt N, Seeber A, Sack R, Herzog F, Pasero P, Shimada K, Hopfner KP, et al. Mec1, INO80, and the PAF1 complex cooperate to limit transcription replication conflicts through RNAPII removal during replication stress. Genes Dev 2016; 30(3):337-54; PMID:26798134; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.273813.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafon A, Taranum S, Pietrocola F, Dingli F, Loew D, Brahma S, Bartholomew B, Papamichos-Chronakis M. INO80 Chromatin Remodeler Facilitates Release of RNA Polymerase II from Chromatin for Ubiquitin-Mediated Proteasomal Degradation. Mol Cell 2015; 60(5):784-96; PMID:26656161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poveda AM, Le Clech M, Pasero P. Transcription and replication: breaking the rules of the road causes genomic instability. Transcription 2010; 1(2):99-102; PMID:21326900; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/trns.1.2.12665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos-Pereira JM, Aguilera A. R loops: new modulators of genome dynamics and function. Nat Rev Genet 2015; 16(10):583-97; PMID:26370899; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollier J, Stork CT, García-Rubio ML, Paulsen RD, Aguilera A, Cimprich KA. Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair factors promote R-loop-induced genome instability. Mol Cell 2014; 56(6):777-85; PMID:25435140; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzu A, Bermejo R, Begnis M, Lucca C, Piccini D, Carotenuto W, Saponaro M, Brambati A, Cocito A, Foiani M, et al. Senataxin associates with replication forks to protect fork integrity across RNA-polymerase-II-transcribed genes. Cell 2012; 151(4):835-46; PMID:23141540; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Manley JL. Cotranscriptional processes and their influence on genome stability. Genes Dev 2006; 20(14):1838-47; PMID:16847344; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1438306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Gonzalez B, García-Rubio M, Bermejo R, Gaillard H, Shirahige K, Marín A, Foiani M, Aguilera A. Genome-wide function of THO/TREX in active genes prevents R-loop-dependent replication obstacles. EMBO J 2011; 30(15):3106-19; PMID:21701562; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling PC, Chan YA, Minaker SW, Aristizabal MJ, Barrett I, Sipahimalani P, Kobor MS, Hieter P. R-loop-mediated genome instability in mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation mutants. Genes Dev 2012; 26(2):163-75; PMID:22279048; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.179721.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahba L, Gore SK, Koshland D. The homologous recombination machinery modulates the formation of RNA-DNA hybrids and associated chromosome instability. Elife 2, e00505; PMID:23795288; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ginno PA, Lim YW, Lott PL, Korf I, Chédin F. ( 2013) GC skew at the 5′ and 3′ ends of human genes links R-loop formation to epigenetic regulation and transcription termination. Genome Res 2013; 23(10):1590-600; PMID:23868195; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.158436.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera A, Garcia-Muse T. R loops: from transcription byproducts to threats to genome stability. Mol Cell 2012; 46(2):115-24; PMID:22541554; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuduri S, Crabbé L, Conti C, Tourrière H, Holtgreve-Grez H, Jauch A, Pantesco V, De Vos J, Thomas A, Theillet C, et al. Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11(11):1315-24; PMID:19838172; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo R, Capra T, Gonzalez-Huici V, Fachinetti D, Cocito A, Natoli G, Katou Y, Mori H, Kurokawa K, Shirahige K, et al. Genome-organizing factors Top2 and Hmo1 prevent chromosome fragility at sites of S phase transcription. Cell 2009; 138(5):870-84; PMID:19737516; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo R, Capra T, Jossen R, Colosio A, Frattini C, Carotenuto W, Cocito A, Doksani Y, Klein H, Gómez-González B, et al. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 2011; 146(2):233-46; PMID:21784245; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin SG, Glover TW. Chromosome fragile sites. Annu Rev Genet 41, 169-92; PMID:17608616; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.165900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland GR ( 1977) Fragile sites on human chromosomes: demonstration of their dependence on the type of tissue culture medium. Science 2007; 197(4300):265-6; PMID:877551; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.877551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland GR. The role of nucleotides in human fragile site expression. Mutat Res 1988; 200(1-2):207-13; PMID:3292907; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(88)90084-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Lucas I, Young DJ, Davis EM, Karrison T, Rest JS, Le Beau MM. Common fragile sites are characterized by histone hypoacetylation. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18(23):4501-12; PMID:19717471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker NA, Thorland EC, Denison SR, Phillips LA, Smith DI. Evidence that instability within the FRA3B region extends four megabases. Oncogene 2002; 21(57):8713-22; PMID:12483524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DI, Zhu Y, McAvoy S, Kuhn R. Common fragile sites, extremely large genes, neural development and cancer. Cancer Lett 2006; 232(1):48-57; PMID:16221525; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2005.06.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debatisse M, Le Tallec B, Letessier A, Dutrillaux B, Brison O. Common fragile sites: mechanisms of instability revisited. Trends Genet 2012; 28(1):22-32; PMID:22094264; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Tallec B, Koundrioukoff S, Wilhelm T, Letessier A, Brison O, Debatisse M. Updating the mechanisms of common fragile site instability: how to reconcile the different views? Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71(23):4489-94; PMID:25248392; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1720-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozeri-Galai E, Tur-Sinai M, Bester AC, Kerem B. Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71(23):4495-506; PMID:25297918; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1719-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarni D, Kerem B. The complex nature of fragile site plasticity and its importance in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol 40, 131-6; PMID:27062332; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miotto B, Ji Z, Struhl K. ( 2016) Selectivity of ORC binding sites and the relation to replication timing, fragile sites, and deletions in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113(33):E4810-9; PMID:27436900; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609060113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helmrich A, Ballarino M, Tora L. Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes. Mol Cell 2011; 44(6):966-77; PMID:22195969; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson TE, Arlt MF, Park SH, Rajendran S, Paulsen M, Ljungman M, Glover TW. Large transcription units unify copy number variants and common fragile sites arising under replication stress. Genome Res 2015; 25(2):189-200; PMID:25373142; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.177121.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros J, Kumar C, Lynch G, Yadav T, Whitehouse I, Remus D. Post-licensing Specification of Eukaryotic Replication Origins by Facilitated Mcm2-7 Sliding along DNA. Mol Cell 2015; 60(5):797-807; PMID:26656162; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder M, Sapolsky RJ, Davis RW. Transcription interferes with elements important for chromosome maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8(5):2184-94; PMID:3290652; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.8.5.2184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looke M, Reimand J, Sedman T, Sedman J, Järvinen L, Värv S, Peil K, Kristjuhan K, Vilo J, Kristjuhan A. Relicensing of transcriptionally inactivated replication origins in budding yeast. J Biol Chem 2010; 285(51):40004-11; PMID:20962350; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.148924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron K, Golan-Lev T, Dvir R, Ben-David E, Kerem B. Oncogenes create a unique landscape of fragile sites. Nat Commun 2015; 6, 7094; PMID:25959793; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron K, Kerem B. To break or not to break - context matters. Mol Cell Oncol 2016; 3(1):e1072657; PMID:27308576; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23723556.2015.1072657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barlow JH, Faryabi RB, Callén E, Wong N, Malhowski A, Chen HT, Gutierrez-Cruz G, Sun HW, McKinnon P, Wright G, et al. Identification of early replicating fragile sites that contribute to genome instability. Cell 2013; 152(3):620-32; PMID:23352430; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koundrioukoff S, Carignon S, Técher H, Letessier A, Brison O, Debatisse M. Stepwise activation of the ATR signaling pathway upon increasing replication stress impacts fragile site integrity. PLoS Genet 2013; 9(7):e1003643; PMID:23874235; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magiera MM, Gueydon E, Schwob E. DNA replication and spindle checkpoints cooperate during S phase to delay mitosis and preserve genome integrity. J Cell Biol 2014; 204(2):165-75; PMID:24421333; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201306023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankouri HW, Huttner D, Hickson ID. How unfinished business from S-phase affects mitosis and beyond. EMBO J 2013; 32(20):2661-71; PMID:24065128; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain M, Stillman B. Meier-Gorlin syndrome mutations disrupt an Orc1 CDK inhibitory domain and cause centrosome reduplication. Genes Dev 2012; 26(16):1797-810; PMID:22855792; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.197178.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laulier C, Cheng A, Stark JM. The relative efficiency of homology-directed repair has distinct effects on proper anaphase chromosome separation. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39(14):5935-44; PMID:21459848; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm T, Magdalou I, Barascu A, Técher H, Debatisse M, Lopez BS. Spontaneous slow replication fork progression elicits mitosis alterations in homologous recombination-deficient mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111(2):763-8; PMID:24347643; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311520111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelot C, Magdalou I, Lopez BS. Replication stress in Mammalian cells and its consequences for mitosis. Genes (Basel) 2015; 6(2):267-98; PMID:26010955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer A, Mailand N, Lukas C, Syljuåsen RG, Wilkinson CJ, Nigg EA, Bartek J, Lukas J. Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B-Cdk1 kinase. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6(9):884-91; PMID:15311285; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KL, Hickson ID. New insights into the formation and resolution of ultra-fine anaphase bridges. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011; 22(8):906-12; PMID:21782962; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biebricher A, Hirano S, Enzlin JH, Wiechens N, Streicher WW, Huttner D, Wang LH, Nigg EA, Owen-Hughes T, Liu Y, et al. PICH: a DNA translocase specially adapted for processing anaphase bridge DNA. Mol Cell 2013; 51(5):691-701; PMID:23973328; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann SM, Schramke V, Pedersen RT, Gallina I, Eckert-Boulet N, Oestergaard VH, Lisby M. TopBP1/Dpb11 binds DNA anaphase bridges to prevent genome instability. J Cell Biol 2014; 204(1):45-59; PMID:24379413; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201305157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Nielsen CF, Yao Q, Hickson ID. The origins and processing of ultra fine anaphase DNA bridges. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2014; 26, 1-5; PMID:24795279; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2014.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth K, Haering CH. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 2009; 43, 525-58; PMID:19886810; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LH, Schwarzbraun T, Speicher MR, Nigg EA. Persistence of DNA threads in human anaphase cells suggests late completion of sister chromatid decatenation. Chromosoma 2008; 117(2):123-35; PMID:17989990; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-007-0131-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LH, Mayer B, Stemmann O, Nigg EA. Centromere DNA decatenation depends on cohesin removal and is required for mammalian cell division. J Cell Sci 2010; 123(Pt 5):806-13; PMID:20144989; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.058255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barefield C, Karlseder J. The BLM helicase contributes to telomere maintenance through processing of late-replicating intermediate structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40(15):7358-67; PMID:22576367; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d'Alcontres MS, Palacios JA, Mejias D, Blasco MA. TopoIIalpha prevents telomere fragility and formation of ultra thin DNA bridges during mitosis through TRF1-dependent binding to telomeres. Cell Cycle 2014; 13(9):1463-81; PMID:24626180; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.28419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nera B, Huang HS, Lai T, Xu L. Elevated levels of TRF2 induce telomeric ultrafine anaphase bridges and rapid telomere deletions. Nat Commun 2015; 6, 10132; PMID:26640040; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaaijer S, Shaikh N, Nageshan RK, Cooper JP. Rif1 Regulates the Fate of DNA Entanglements during Mitosis. Cell Rep 2016; 16(1):148-60; PMID:27320927; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofueva S, Osman F, Lorenz A, Steinacher R, Castagnetti S, Ledesma J, Whitby MC. Ultrafine anaphase bridges, broken DNA and illegitimate recombination induced by a replication fork barrier. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39(15):6568-84; PMID:21576223; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez P, Thanasoula M, Muñoz P, Liao C, Tejera A, McNees C, Flores JM, Fernández-Capetillo O, Tarsounas M, Blasco MA. Increased telomere fragility and fusions resulting from TRF1 deficiency lead to degenerative pathologies and increased cancer in mice. Genes Dev 2009; 23(17):2060-75; PMID:19679647; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.543509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Huh JW, Warrington R, Li B, Wu N, Leng M, Zhang J, Ball HL, Li B, Yu H. PICH and BLM limit histone association with anaphase centromeric DNA threads and promote their resolution. EMBO J 2011; 30(16):3309-21; PMID:21743438; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaulich M, Cubizolles F, Nigg EA. On the regulation, function, and localization of the DNA-dependent ATPase PICH. Chromosoma 2012; 121(4):395-408; PMID:22527115; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-012-0370-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen CF, Huttner D, Bizard AH, Hirano S, Li TN, Palmai-Pallag T, Bjerregaard VA, Liu Y, Nigg EA, Wang LH. PICH promotes sister chromatid disjunction and co-operates with topoisomerase II in mitosis. Nat Commun 2015; 6, 8962; PMID:26643143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen CF, Hickson ID. PICH promotes mitotic chromosome segregation: Identification of a novel role in rDNA disjunction. Cell Cycle 2016; 15(20):2704-11; PMID:27565185; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2016.1222336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick R, Nieminuszczy J, Blackford AN, Winczura A, Niedzwiedz W. TOPBP1 recruits TOP2A to ultra-fine anaphase bridges to aid in their resolution. Nat Commun 2015; 6, 6572; PMID:25762097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Godinho SA, Parmar K, Pellman D, D'Andrea AD. Cytokinesis failure occurs in Fanconi anemia pathway-deficient murine and human bone marrow hematopoietic cells. J Clin Invest 2010; 120(11):3834-42; PMID:20921626; http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI43391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattarocci S, Hafner L, Lezaja A, Shyian M, Shore D. Rif1: A Conserved Regulator of DNA Replication and Repair Hijacked by Telomeres in Yeasts. Front Genet 2016; 7, 45; PMID:27066066; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengeveld RC, de Boer HR, Schoonen PM, de Vries EG, Lens SM, van Vugt MA. Rif1 Is Required for Resolution of Ultrafine DNA Bridges in Anaphase to Ensure Genomic Stability. Dev Cell 2015; 34(4):466-74; PMID:26256213; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue A, Coulombe Y, Jacquet K, Gagné JP, Roques C, Gobeil S, Poirier G, Masson JY. The RAD51 paralogs ensure cellular protection against mitotic defects and aneuploidy. J Cell Sci 2013; 126(Pt 1):348-59; PMID:23108668; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.114595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galgoczy DJ, Toczyski DP. Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21(5):1710-8; PMID:11238908; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.5.1710-1718.2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syljuasen RG, Jensen S, Bartek J, Lukas J. Adaptation to the ionizing radiation-induced G2 checkpoint occurs in human cells and depends on checkpoint kinase 1 and Polo-like kinase 1 kinases. Cancer Res 2006; 66(21):10253-7; PMID:17079442; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo HY, Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG. Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase. Cell 2004; 117(5):575-88; PMID:15163406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00417-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eykelenboom JK, Harte EC, Canavan L, Pastor-Peidro A, Calvo-Asensio I, Llorens-Agost M, Lowndes NF. ATR activates the S-M checkpoint during unperturbed growth to ensure sufficient replication prior to mitotic onset. Cell Rep 2013; 5(4):1095-107; PMID:24268773; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Rosell J, De Piccoli G, Cordon-Preciado V, Farmer S, Jarmuz A, Machin F, Pasero P, Lisby M, Haber JE, Aragón L. Anaphase onset before complete DNA replication with intact checkpoint responses. Science 2007; 315(5817):1411-5; PMID:17347440; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogliolo M, Surralles J. Fanconi anemia: a model disease for studies on human genetics and advanced therapeutics. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2015; 33, 32-40; PMID:26254775; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccaldi R, Sarangi P, D'Andrea AD. The Fanconi anaemia pathway: new players and new functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2016; 17(6):337-49; PMID:27145721; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluteau D, Masliah-Planchon J, Clairmont C, Rousseau A, Ceccaldi R, Dubois d'Enghien C, Bluteau O, Cuccuini W, Gachet S, Peffault de Latour R, et al. Biallelic inactivation of REV7 is associated with Fanconi anemia. J Clin Invest 2016; 126(9):3580-4; PMID:27500492; http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI88010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlacher K, Wu H, Jasin M. A distinct replication fork protection pathway connects Fanconi anemia tumor suppressors to RAD51-BRCA1/2. Cancer Cell 2012; 22(1):106-16; PMID:22789542; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lossaint G, Larroque M, Ribeyre C, Bec N, Larroque C, Décaillet C, Gari K, Constantinou A. FANCD2 binds MCM proteins and controls replisome function upon activation of s phase checkpoint signaling. Mol Cell 2013; 51(5):678-90; PMID:23993743; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirbu BM, McDonald WH, Dungrawala H, Badu-Nkansah A, Kavanaugh GM, Chen Y, Tabb DL, Cortez D. Identification of proteins at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND) coupled with mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem 2013; 288(44):31458-67; PMID:24047897; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.511337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YH, Jones MJ, Yin Y, Crist SB, Colnaghi L, Sims RJ 3rd, Rothenberg E, Jallepalli PV, Huang TT. ATR-mediated phosphorylation of FANCI regulates dormant origin firing in response to replication stress. Mol Cell 2015; 58(2):323-38; PMID:25843623; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigechi T, Tomida J, Sato K, Kobayashi M, Eykelenboom JK, Pessina F, Zhang Y, Uchida E, Ishiai M, Lowndes NF, et al. ATR-ATRIP kinase complex triggers activation of the Fanconi anemia DNA repair pathway. Cancer Res 2012; 72(5):1149-56; PMID:22258451; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomida J, Itaya A, Shigechi T, Unno J, Uchida E, Ikura M, Masuda Y, Matsuda S, Adachi J, Kobayashi M, et al. A novel interplay between the Fanconi anemia core complex and ATR-ATRIP kinase during DNA cross-link repair. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41(14):6930-41; PMID:23723247; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling PC, Hieter P. Canonical DNA Repair Pathways Influence R-Loop-Driven Genome Instability. J Mol Biol 2016; in press; PMID:27452366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatchi E, Skourti-Stathaki K, Ventz S, Pinello L, Yen A, Kamieniarz-Gdula K, Dimitrov S, Pathania S, McKinney KM, Eaton ML, et al. BRCA1 recruitment to transcriptional pause sites is required for R-loop-driven DNA damage repair. Mol Cell 2015; 57(4):636-47; PMID:25699710; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia V, Barroso SI, García-Rubio ML, Tumini E, Herrera-Moyano E, Aguilera A. BRCA2 prevents R-loop accumulation and associates with TREX-2 mRNA export factor PCID2. Nature 2014; 511(7509):362-5; PMID:24896180; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Rubio ML, Pérez-Calero C, Barroso SI, Tumini E, Herrera-Moyano E, Rosado IV, Aguilera A. The Fanconi Anemia Pathway Protects Genome Integrity from R-loops. PLoS Genet 2015; 11(11):e1005674; PMID:26584049; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab RA, Nieminuszczy J, Shah F, Langton J, Lopez Martinez D, Liang CC, Cohn MA, Gibbons RJ, Deans AJ, Niedzwiedz W. The Fanconi Anemia Pathway Maintains Genome Stability by Coordinating Replication and Transcription. Mol Cell 2015; 60(3):351-61; PMID:26593718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett NG, Taniguchi T, Durkin SG, D'Andrea AD, Glover TW. The Fanconi anemia pathway is required for the DNA replication stress response and for the regulation of common fragile site stability. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14(5):693-701; PMID:15661754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madireddy A, Kosiyatrakul ST, Boisvert RA, Herrera-Moyano E, García-Rubio ML, Gerhardt J, Vuono EA, Owen N, Yan Z, Olson S, et al. FANCD2 Facilitates Replication through Common Fragile Sites. Mol Cell 2016; 64(2):388-404; PMID:27768874; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichierri P, Franchitto A, Rosselli F. BLM and the FANC proteins collaborate in a common pathway in response to stalled replication forks. EMBO J 2004; 23(15):3154-63; PMID:15257300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhury I, Sareen A, Raghunandan M, Sobeck A. FANCD2 regulates BLM complex functions independently of FANCI to promote replication fork recovery. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41(13):6444-59; PMID:23658231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deans AJ, West SC. FANCM connects the genome instability disorders Bloom's Syndrome and Fanconi Anemia. Mol Cell 2009; 36(6):943-53; PMID:20064461; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccia A, McDonald N, West SC. Structural and functional relationships of the XPF/MUS81 family of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 2008; 77, 259-87; PMID:18518821; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.070306.102408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanada K, Budzowska M, Davies SL, van Drunen E, Onizawa H, Beverloo HB, Maas A, Essers J, Hickson ID, Kanaar R. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14(11):1096-104; PMID:17934473; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guervilly JH, Takedachi A, Naim V, Scaglione S, Chawhan C, Lovera Y, Despras E, Kuraoka I, Kannouche P, Rosselli F, et al. The SLX4 complex is a SUMO E3 ligase that impacts on replication stress outcome and genome stability. Mol Cell 2015; 57(1):123-37; PMID:25533188; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang J, Garner E, Hallet A, Nguyen HD, Rickman KA, Gill G, Smogorzewska A, Zou L. Noncovalent interactions with SUMO and ubiquitin orchestrate distinct functions of the SLX4 complex in genome maintenance. Mol Cell 2015; 57(1):108-22; PMID:25533185; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y. Nuclease delivery: versatile functions of SLX4/FANCP in genome maintenance. Mol Cells 2014; 37(8):569-74; http://dx.doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2014.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat A, et al. Rev3, the catalytic subunit of Polzeta, is required for maintaining fragile site stability in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41(4):2328-39; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luebben SW, Kawabata T, Johnson CS, O'Sullivan MG, Shima N. A concomitant loss of dormant origins and FANCC exacerbates genome instability by impairing DNA replication fork progression. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42(9):5605-15; PMID:24589582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemble S, Ahuja A, Buhagiar-Labarchède G, Onclercq-Delic R, Dairou J, Biard DS, Lambert S, Lopes M, Amor-Guéret M. Pyrimidine Pool Disequilibrium Induced by a Cytidine Deaminase Deficiency Inhibits PARP-1 Activity, Leading to the Under Replication of DNA. PLoS Genet 2015; 11(7):e1005384; PMID:26181065; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malkova A, Ira G. Break-induced replication: functions and molecular mechanism. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23(3):271-9; PMID:23790415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2013.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand RP, Lovett ST, Haber JE. Break-induced DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5(12):a010397; PMID:23881940; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a010397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lydeard JR, Jain S, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 2007; 448(7155):820-3; PMID:17671506; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantino L, Sotiriou SK, Rantala JK, Magin S, Mladenov E, Helleday T, Haber JE, Iliakis G, Kallioniemi OP, Halazonetis TD. Break-induced replication repair of damaged forks induces genomic duplications in human cells. Science 2014; 343(6166):88-91; PMID:24310611; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1243211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahkim Bennani-Belhaj K, Rouzeau S, Buhagiar-Labarchède G, Chabosseau P, Onclercq-Delic R, Bayart E, Cordelières F, Couturier J, Amor-Guéret M. The Bloom syndrome protein limits the lethality associated with RAD51 deficiency. Mol Cancer Res 2010; 8(3):385-94; PMID:20215422; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijink AM, Krajewska M, van Vugt MA. The DNA damage response during mitosis. Mutat Res 2013; 750(1-2):45-55; PMID:23880065; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giunta S, Belotserkovskaya R, Jackson SP. DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis. J Cell Biol 2010; 190(2):197-207; PMID:20660628; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200911156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, Noordermeer SM, Canny MD, Brun CM, Strecker J, Escribano-Diaz C, Durocher D. Mitosis inhibits DNA double-strand break repair to guard against telomere fusions. Science 2014; 344(6180):189-93; PMID:24652939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1248024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriel-Carretero M, Aguilera A. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51- or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms. Mol Cell 2010; 37(5):690-701; PMID:20227372; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos J, West SC. Holliday junction resolution: regulation in space and time. DNA Repair (Amst) 2014; 19, 176-81; PMID:24767945; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neelsen KJ, Zanini IM, Herrador R, Lopes M. Oncogenes induce genotoxic stress by mitotic processing of unusual replication intermediates. J Cell Biol 2013; 200(6):699-708; PMID:23479741; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201212058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo B, Aguilera A. Complex chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replication involve structure-selective endonucleases. PLoS Genet 2012; 8(9):e1002979; PMID:23071463; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002979
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho CK, Mazón G, Lam AF, Symington LS. Mus81 and Yen1 promote reciprocal exchange during mitotic recombination to maintain genome integrity in budding yeast. Mol Cell 2010; 40(6):988-1000; PMID:21172663; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayle R, et al. DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage. Science 2015; 349(6249):742-7
   Google Scholar
• Guervilly JH, Gaillard PH. SLX4 gains weight with SUMO in genome maintenance. Mol Cell Oncol 2016; 3(2):e1008297; PMID:27308578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23723556.2015.1008297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knipscheer P, Räschle M, Smogorzewska A, Enoiu M, Ho TV, Schärer OD, Elledge SJ, Walter JC. The Fanconi anemia pathway promotes replication-dependent DNA interstrand cross-link repair. Science 2009; 326(5960):1698-701; PMID:19965384; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1182372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters LS, Minesinger BK, Wiltrout ME, D'Souza S, Woodruff RV, Walker GC. Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009; 73(1):134-54; PMID:19258535; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00034-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg EC. Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6(12):943-53; PMID:16341080; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Szakal B. DNA damage tolerance by recombination: Molecular pathways and DNA structures. DNA Repair (Amst) 2016; 44, 68-75; PMID:27236213; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman MF, Woodgate R. Translesion DNA polymerases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5(10):a010363; PMID:23838442; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a010363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannouche PL, Wing J, Lehmann AR. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2004; 14(4):491-500; PMID:15149598; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00259-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Bosques L, Sung P, Kupfer GM. A novel role for non-ubiquitinated FANCD2 in response to hydroxyurea-induced DNA damage. Oncogene 2016; 35(1):22-34; PMID:25893307; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallina I, Christiansen SK, Pedersen RT, Lisby M, Oestergaard VH. TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis. Cell Cycle 2016; 15(2):176-83; PMID:26701150; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2015.1128595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer AS, Grgurevic S, Cazaux C, Hoffmann JS. The human specialized DNA polymerases and non-B DNA: vital relationships to preserve genome integrity. J Mol Biol 2013; 425(23):4767-81; PMID:24095858; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.09.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranovskiy AG, Lada AG, Siebler HM, Zhang Y, Pavlov YI, Tahirov TH. DNA polymerase delta and zeta switch by sharing accessory subunits of DNA polymerase delta. J Biol Chem 2012; 287(21):17281-7; PMID:22465957; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.351122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S. Pol31 and Pol32 subunits of yeast DNA polymerase delta are also essential subunits of DNA polymerase zeta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109(31):12455-60; PMID:22711820; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206052109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova AV, Stodola JL, Burgers PM. A four-subunit DNA polymerase zeta complex containing Pol delta accessory subunits is essential for PCNA-mediated mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40(22):11618-26; PMID:23066099; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakofsky CJ, Ayyar S, Deem AK, Chung WH, Ira G, Malkova A. Translesion Polymerases Drive Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication Leading to Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements. Mol Cell 2015; 60(6):860-72; PMID:26669261; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper AM, Nghiem P, Arlt MF, Glover TW. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 2002; 111(6):779-89; PMID:12526805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01113-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu CM, Chang ZF. Mitotic control of dTTP pool: a necessity or coincidence? J Biomed Sci 2007; 14(4):491-7; PMID:17525869; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11373-007-9175-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris SL, Levine AJ. The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops. Oncogene 2005; 24(17):2899-908; PMID:15838523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaswen P, Campisi J. Oncogene-induced senescence pathways weave an intricate tapestry. Cell 2007; 128(2):233-4; PMID:17254959; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale I, Galluzzi L, Castedo M, Kroemer G. Mitotic catastrophe: a mechanism for avoiding genomic instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12(6):385-92; PMID:21527953; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukasawa K. Oncogenes and tumour suppressors take on centrosomes. Nat Rev Cancer 2007; 7(12):911-24; PMID:18004399; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragkos M, Beard P. Mitotic catastrophe occurs in the absence of apoptosis in p53-null cells with a defective G1 checkpoint. PLoS One 2011; 6(8):e22946; PMID:21853057; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022946
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moreno A, Carrington JT, Albergante L, Al Mamun M, Haagensen EJ, Komseli ES, Gorgoulis VG, Newman TJ, Blow JJ. Unreplicated DNA remaining from unperturbed S phases passes through mitosis for resolution in daughter cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113(39):E5757-64; PMID:27516545; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603252113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganem NJ, Pellman D. Linking abnormal mitosis to the acquisition of DNA damage. J Cell Biol 2012; 199(6):871-81; PMID:23229895; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann M, de Lange T. 53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair. Trends Cell Biol 2014; 24(2):108-17; PMID:24094932; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2013.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen A, van der Burg M, Szuhai K, Kops GJ, Medema RH. Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations. Science 2011; 333(6051):1895-8; PMID:21960636; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passerini V, Ozeri-Galai E, de Pagter MS, Donnelly N, Schmalbrock S, Kloosterman WP, Kerem B, Storchová Z. The presence of extra chromosomes leads to genomic instability. Nat Commun 2016; 7, 10754; PMID:26876972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohashi A, Ohori M, Iwai K, Nakayama Y, Nambu T, Morishita D, Kawamoto T, Miyamoto M, Hirayama T, Okaniwa M, et al. Aneuploidy generates proteotoxic stress and DNA damage concurrently with p53-mediated post-mitotic apoptosis in SAC-impaired cells. Nat Commun 2015; 6, 7668; PMID:26144554; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly N, Storchova Z. Aneuploidy and proteotoxic stress in cancer. Mol Cell Oncol 2015; 2(2):e976491; PMID:27308438; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/23723556.2014.976491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson JM, Cimini D. Link between aneuploidy and chromosome instability. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2015; 315, 299-317; PMID:25708466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenech M. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 2000; 455(1-2):81-95; PMID:11113469; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00065-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crasta K, Ganem NJ, Dagher R, Lantermann AB, Ivanova EV, Pan Y, Nezi L, Protopopov A, Chowdhury D, Pellman D. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 2012; 482(7383):53-8; PMID:22258507; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norden C, Mendoza M, Dobbelaere J, Kotwaliwale CV, Biggins S, Barral Y. The NoCut pathway links completion of cytokinesis to spindle midzone function to prevent chromosome breakage. Cell 2006; 125(1):85-98; PMID:16615892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza M, Norden C, Durrer K, Rauter H, Uhlmann F, Barral Y. A mechanism for chromosome segregation sensing by the NoCut checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11(4):477-83; PMID:19270692; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steigemann P, Wurzenberger C, Schmitz MH, Held M, Guizetti J, Maar S, Gerlich DW. Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell 2009; 136(3):473-84; PMID:19203582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral N, Vendrell A, Funaya C, Idrissi FZ, Maier M, Kumar A, Neurohr G, Colomina N, Torres-Rosell J, Geli MI, et al. The Aurora-B-dependent NoCut checkpoint prevents damage of anaphase bridges after DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2016; 18(5):516-26; PMID:27111841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb3343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral N, et al. DNA Replication Stress: NoCut to the rescue. Cell Cycle 2017; 16(3):233-234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampalona J, Roscioli E, Silkworth WT, Bowden B, Genescà A, Tusell L, Cimini D. Chromosome Bridges Maintain Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment throughout Mitosis and Rarely Break during Anaphase. PLoS One 2016; 11(1):e0147420; PMID:26784746; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu N, Shingaki K, Kaneko-Sasaguri Y, Hashizume T, Kanda T. When, where and how the bridge breaks: anaphase bridge breakage plays a crucial role in gene amplification and HSR generation. Exp Cell Res 2005; 302(2):233-43; PMID:15561104; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay DR, Ullman KS. ATR and a Chk1-Aurora B pathway coordinate postmitotic genome surveillance with cytokinetic abscission. Mol Biol Cell 2015; 26(12):2217-26; PMID:25904336; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-11-1563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasencakova Z, Groth A. Replication stress, a source of epigenetic aberrations in cancer? Bioessays 2010; 32(10):847-55; PMID:20726011; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201000055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasencakova Z, Groth A. Restoring chromatin after replication: how new and old histone marks come together. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2010; 21(2):231-7; PMID:19815085; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabin J, Fortuny A, Polo SE. Epigenome Maintenance in Response to DNA Damage. Mol Cell 2016; 62(5):712-27; PMID:27259203; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabert C, Groth A. Chromatin replication and epigenome maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13(3):153-67; PMID:22358331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana S, Oberdoerffer P. Replication Stress: A Lifetime of Epigenetic Change. Genes (Basel) 2015; 6(3):858-77; PMID:26378584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkies P, Reams C, Simpson LJ, Sale JE. Epigenetic instability due to defective replication of structured DNA. Mol Cell 2010; 40(5):703-13; PMID:21145480; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasencakova Z, Scharf AN, Ask K, Corpet A, Imhof A, Almouzni G, Groth A. Replication stress interferes with histone recycling and predeposition marking of new histones. Mol Cell 2010; 37(5):736-43; PMID:20227376; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saveliev A, Everett C, Sharpe T, Webster Z, Festenstein R. DNA triplet repeats mediate heterochromatin-protein-1-sensitive variegated gene silencing. Nature 2003; 422(6934):909-13; PMID:12712207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyce J, Liu L, Jones PA. Variable effects of DNA-synthesis inhibitors upon DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1986; 14(10):4353-67; PMID:3086840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/14.10.4353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran V, Lim C, Xie J, Chen X, et al. Asymmetric division of Drosophila male germline stem cell shows asymmetric histone distribution. Science 2012; 338(6107):679-82; PMID:23118191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1226028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillard H, García-Muse T, Aguilera A, et al. Replication stress and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2015; 15(5):276-89; PMID:25907220; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc3916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow AA, Williams LE, Pierce LC, Wang YH, et al. Over half of breakpoints in gene pairs involved in cancer-specific recurrent translocations are mapped to human chromosomal fragile sites. BMC Genomics 2009; 10, 59; PMID:19183484; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bignell GR, Greenman CD, Davies H, Butler AP, Edkins S, Andrews JM, Buck G, Chen L, Beare D, Latimer C, et al. Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature 2010; 463(7283):893-8; PMID:20164919; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Tallec B, Millot GA, Blin ME, Brison O, Dutrillaux B, Debatisse M. Common fragile site profiling in epithelial and erythroid cells reveals that most recurrent cancer deletions lie in fragile sites hosting large genes. Cell Rep 2013; 4(3):420-8; PMID:23911288; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macheret M, Halazonetis TD. DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 2015; 10, 425-48; PMID:25621662; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma K, Qiu L, Mrasek K, Zhang J, Liehr T, Quintana LG, Li Z. Common fragile sites: genomic hotspots of DNA damage and carcinogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2012; 13(9):11974-99; PMID:23109895; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao G, Smith DI. Very large common fragile site genes and their potential role in cancer development. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71(23):4601-15; PMID:25300511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1753-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohta M, Inoue H, Cotticelli MG, Kastury K, Baffa R, Palazzo J, Siprashvili Z, Mori M, McCue P, Druck T, et al. The FHIT gene, spanning the chromosome 3p14.2 fragile site and renal carcinoma-associated t(3;8) breakpoint, is abnormal in digestive tract cancers. Cell 1996; 84(4):587-97; PMID:8598045; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81034-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters CE, Saldivar JC, Hosseini SA, Huebner K. The FHIT gene product: tumor suppressor and genome “caretaker.” Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71(23):4577-87; PMID:25283145; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1722-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek AK, Keck-Waggoner CL, Daniel RL, Laflin KJ, Bergsagel PL, Kiguchi K, Brenner AJ, Aldaz CM. WWOX, the FRA16D gene, behaves as a suppressor of tumor growth. Cancer Res 2001; 61(22):8068-73; PMID:11719429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqeilan RI, Croce CM. WWOX in biological control and tumorigenesis. J Cell Physiol 2007; 212(2):307-10; PMID:17458891; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesari R, Martin ES, Calin GA, Pentimalli F, Bichi R, McAdams H, Trapasso F, Drusco A, Shimizu M, Masciullo V, et al. Parkin, a gene implicated in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 6q25-q27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100(10):5956-61; PMID:12719539; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0931262100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Zack TI, Morris LG, Lin K, Hukkelhoven E, Raheja R, Tan IL, Turcan S, Veeriah S, Meng S, et al. Pan-cancer genetic analysis identifies PARK2 as a master regulator of G1/S cyclins. Nat Genet 2014; 46(6):588-94; PMID:24793136; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coquelle A, Pipiras E, Toledo F, Buttin G, Debatisse M. Expression of fragile sites triggers intrachromosomal mammalian gene amplification and sets boundaries to early amplicons. Cell 1997; 89(2):215-25; PMID:9108477; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80201-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciullo M, Debily MA, Rozier L, Autiero M, Billault A, Mayau V, El Marhomy S, Guardiola J, Bernheim A, Coullin P, et al. Initiation of the breakage-fusion-bridge mechanism through common fragile site activation in human breast cancer cells: the model of PIP gene duplication from a break at FRA7I. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11(23):2887-94; PMID:12393800; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.23.2887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman A, Zlotorynski E, Scherer SW, Cheung J, Vincent JB, Smith DI, Trakhtenbrot L, Kerem B. A role for common fragile site induction in amplification of human oncogenes. Cancer Cell 2002; 1(1):89-97; PMID:12086891; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00017-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazouzi A, Velimezi G, Loizou JI. DNA replication stress: causes, resolution and disease. Exp Cell Res 2014; 329(1):85-93; PMID:25281304; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou A. Rescue of replication failure by Fanconi anaemia proteins. Chromosoma 2012; 121(1):21-36; PMID:22057367; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-011-0349-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porfirio B, Smeets D, Beckers L, Caporossi D, Tedeschi B, Vernole P, Joenje H, Nicoletti B, Dallapiccola B. Fragile sites and chromosome instability: the distribution of breaks induced by cis-diamine-dichloro-platinum (II) in Fanconi anemia lymphocyte cultures. Hum Genet 1991; 86(3):256-60; PMID:1997377; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00202404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundia A, Gorla N, Larripa I. Spontaneous chromosome aberrations in Fanconi's anemia patients are located at fragile sites and acute myeloid leukemia breakpoints. Hereditas 1994; 120(1):47-50; PMID:8206783; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1994.00047.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoder C, Liehr T, Velleuer E, Wilhelm K, Blaurock N, Weise A, Mrasek K. New aspects on chromosomal instability: chromosomal break-points in Fanconi anemia patients co-localize on the molecular level with fragile sites. Int J Oncol 2010; 36(2):307-12; PMID:20043063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipovic J, Joksić G, Vujić D, Joksić I, Mrasek K, Weise A, Liehr T. First molecular-cytogenetic characterization of Fanconi anemia fragile sites in primary lymphocytes of FA-D2 patients in different stages of the disease. Mol Cytogenet 2016; 9(1):70; PMID:27625703; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0280-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlikowska P, Fouchet P, Vainchenker W, Rosselli F, Naim V. Defective endomitosis during megakaryopoiesis leads to thrombocytopenia in Fanca-/- mice. Blood 2014; 124(24):3613-23; PMID:25261197; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-01-551457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohaghegh P, Hickson ID. DNA helicase deficiencies associated with cancer predisposition and premature ageing disorders. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10(7):741-6; PMID:11257107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.7.741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirzio LM, Pichierri P, Bignami M, Franchitto A. Werner syndrome helicase activity is essential in maintaining fragile site stability. J Cell Biol 2008; 180(2):305-14; PMID:18209099; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200705126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei PC, Chang AN, Kao J, Du Z, Meyers RM, Alt FW, Schwer B. Long Neural Genes Harbor Recurrent DNA Break Clusters in Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells. Cell 2016; 164(4):644-55; PMID:26871630; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuce O, West SC. Senataxin, defective in the neurodegenerative disorder ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 2, lies at the interface of transcription and the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 2013; 33(2):406-17; PMID:23149945; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01195-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriani GA, Vijg J, Montagna C. Mechanisms and consequences of aneuploidy and chromosome instability in the aging brain. Mech Ageing Dev 2016; in press; PMID:27013377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar