The relationship between DNA single-stranded damage response and double-stranded damage response

References

• Byun TS, Pacek, M, Yee MC, et al. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1040–1052. doi:10.1101/gad.1301205. PMID:15833913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo V, Shechter D, Lupardus PJ, et al. An ATR- and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell. 2003;11:203–213. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00799-2. PMID:12535533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science. 2003;300:1542–1548. doi:10.1126/science.1083430. PMID:12791985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiruvella KK, Liang Z, Wilson TE. Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a012757. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012757. PMID:23637284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanam, K, Kafri R, Loewer A, et al. Quantitative live cell imaging reveals a gradual shift between DNA repair mechanisms and a maximal use of HR in mid S phase. Mol Cell. 2012;47:320–329. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.052. PMID:22841003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takata M, Sasaki MS, Sonoda E, et al. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 1998;17(18):5497–5508. doi:10.1093/emboj/17.18.5497. PMID:9736627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer, WD, Ehmsen KT, Liu J. Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:113–139. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955. PMID:20690856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor E, Loewer A, Mock C, et al. Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):488. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.20. PMID:21556066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lahav G, Rosenfels N, Sigal A, et al. Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat Genet. 2004;36(2):147–150. doi:10.1038/ng1293. PMID:14730303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevazatorsky N, Rosenfeld N, Itzkovitz S, et al. Oscillations and variability in the p53 system. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2(1):2006.0033. doi:10.1038/msb4100068. PMID:16773083
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batchelor E, Mock C, Bhan I, et al. Recurrent initiation: a mechanism for triggering p53 pulses in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2008;30(3):277–289. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.016. PMID:18471974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta S, Harris CC. p53:traffic cop at crossroads of DNA repair and recombination. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:44–55. doi:10.1038/nrm1546. PMID:15688066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobrich M, Rydberg B, Cooper PK. Repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in specific not I restriction fragments in human fibroblasts: joining of correct and incorrect ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:12050–12054. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.26.12050. PMID:8618842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciliberto A, Novak B, Tyson JJ. Steady states and oscillations in the p53/mdm2 network. Cell Cycle. 2005;4(3):488–493. doi:10.4161/cc.4.3.1548. PMID:15725723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Brazhnik P, Tyson JJ. Exploring mechanisms of the dna-damage response: p53 pulses and their possible relevance to apoptosis. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(1):85–94. doi:10.4161/cc.6.1.3705. PMID:17245126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek AL, Liu JC, Loewer A, et al. Cell-to-cell variation in p53 dynamics leads to fractional killing. Cell. 2016;165(3):631. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.025. PMID:27062928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A, et al. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature. 1997;387(6630):296–299. doi:10.1038/387296a0. PMID:9153395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak Y, Juven T, Haffner R, et al. mdm2 expression isinduced by wild type p53 activity. EMBO J. 1993;12:461–468. PMID:8440237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A, et al. Mdm2 promotes the rapiddegradation of p53. Nature. 1997;387:296–299. doi:10.1038/387296a0. PMID:9153395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubbutat MH, Jones SN, Vousden KH. Regulation of p53stability by Mdm2. Nature. 1997;387:299–303. doi:10.1038/387299a0. PMID:9153396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Bayle JH, Olson D, et al. The p53-mdm-2 autoregulatory feedback loop. Genes Dev. 1993;7:1126–1132. doi:10.1101/gad.7.7a.1126. PMID:8319905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreeram S, Demidov ON, Hee WK, et al. Wip1 phosphatase modulates ATM dependent signaling pathways. Mol Cell. 2006;23:757–764. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.010. PMID:16949371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlov SV, Graham ME, Peng C, et al. Involvement of novel autophosphorylation sites in atm activation. Embo J. 2006;25(15):3504. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601231. PMID:16858402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature. 2003;421(6922):499–506. doi:10.1038/nature01368. PMID:12556884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiotani B, Zou L. Single-stranded dna orchestrates an atm-to-atr switch at dna breaks. Mol Cell. 2009;33(5):547. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.024. PMID:19285939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow JH, Faryabi RB, Callén E, et al. Identification of early replicating fragile sites that contribute to genome instability. Cell. 2013;152:620–632. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.006. PMID:23352430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown EJ, Baltimore D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 2000;14:397–402. PMID:10691732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murga M, Bunting S, Montaña MF, et al. A mouse model of atr-seckel shows embryonic replicative stress and accelerated aging. Nature Genetics. 2009;41(8):891. doi:10.1038/ng.420. PMID:19620979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo LI, Murga M, Zur R, et al. A cell-based screen identifies ATR inhibitors with synthetic lethal properties for cancer-associated mutations. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:721–727. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2076. PMID:21552262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortez KACD. Atr: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(8):616. doi:10.1038/nrm2450. PMID:18594563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Raj L, Zhao B, et al. Hzf Determines cell survival upon genotoxic stress by modulating p53 transactivation. Cell. 2007;130:624–637. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.013. PMID:17719541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels-Lev Y, O'Connor DJ, Bergamaschi D, et al. ASPP proteins specifically stimulate the apoptotic function of p53. Mol Cell. 2001;8:781–794. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00367-7. PMID:11684014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Luo J, Zhang W, et al. Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2006;24:827–839. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.021. PMID:17189186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XP, Liu F, Cheng Z, et al. Cell fate decision mediated by p53 pulses. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(30):12245–12250. doi:10.1073/pnas.0813088106. PMID:19617533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith W. Single-strand break repair and genetic disease. Nat Rev. 2008;1(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart RD. Two-lesion kinetic model of dsb rejoining and cell killing. Radiat Res. 2001;156(4):365–378. doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156%5b0365:TLKMOD%5d2.0.CO;2. PMID:11554848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Wagner J, Rice JJ, et al. A plausible model for the digital response of p53 to DNA damage[J]. Proc Natl Acad. Sci U S A. 2005;102(40):14266–14271. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501352102. PMID:16186499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Reynolds P, O'Neill P, et al. Modeling damage complexity-dependent non-homologous end-joining repair pathway. Plos One. 2014;9(2):e85816. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085816. PMID:24520318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccaldi R, Rondinelli B, D'Andrea AD. Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26(1):52–64. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009. PMID:26437586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbotts R. Coordination of DNA single strand break repair[J]. Free Radical Biol Med. 2017;107:228–224. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.039. PMID:27890643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccaldi R, Rondinelli B, D'Andrea AD. Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break[J]. Trends in Cell Biology, 2016;26(1):52–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar