Control of meiotic double-strand-break formation by ATM: local and global views

References

• Hunter N. Meiotic recombination: the essence of heredity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7. PMID:26511629. DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a016618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szekvolgyi L, Ohta K, Nicolas A. Initiation of meiotic homologous recombination: flexibility, impact of histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a016527. PMID:25934010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker D, Keeney S. Homologous recombination during meiosis. DNA replication, recombination, and repair: molecular mechanisms and pathology. Tokyo: Springer; 2016. p. 131–151.
   Google Scholar
• Lam I, Keeney S. Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombination initiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;7:a016634. PMID:25324213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert T, Vrielynck N, Mezard C, et al. A new light on the meiotic DSB catalytic complex. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;54:165–176. PMID:26995551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Massy B. Initiation of meiotic recombination: how and where? Conservation and specificities among eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet. 2013;47:563–599. PMID:24050176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Peterson SE, Jasin M, et al. Mechanisms of germ line genome instability. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;54:177–187. PMID:26880205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki M, Lange J, Keeney S. Genome destabilization by homologous recombination in the germ line. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:182–195. PMID:20164840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochwagen A, Amon A. Checking your breaks: surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr Biol. 2006;16:R217–28. PMID:16546077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, Lange J, Mohibullah N. Self-organization of meiotic recombination initiation: general principles and molecular pathways. Annu Rev Genet. 2014;48:187–214. PMID:25421598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami H, Keeney S. Temporospatial coordination of meiotic DNA replication and recombination via DDK recruitment to replisomes. Cell. 2014;158:861–873. PMID:25126790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper TJ, Garcia V, Neale MJ. Meiotic DSB patterning: A multifaceted process. Cell Cycle. 2016;15:13–21. PMID:26730703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi L, Jeffreys AJ, Keeney S. Where the crossovers are: recombination distributions in mammals. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:413–424. PMID:15153994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petes TD. Meiotic recombination hot spots and cold spots. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:360–369. PMID:11331902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, Imai Y, de Massy B. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:794–806. PMID:24136506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan J, Sasaki M, Kniewel R, et al. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell. 2011;144:719–731. PMID:21376234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange J, Yamada S, Tischfield SE, et al. The landscape of mouse meiotic double-strand break formation, processing, and repair. Cell. 2016;167:695–708e16. PMID:27745971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tischfield SE, Keeney S. Scale matters: the spatial correlation of yeast meiotic DNA breaks with histone H3 trimethylation is driven largely by independent colocalization at promoters. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:1496–1503. PMID:22433953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambiar M, Smith GR. Repression of harmful meiotic recombination in centromeric regions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;54:188–197. PMID:26849908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia V, Gray S, Allison RM, et al. Tel1(ATM)-mediated interference suppresses clustered meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature. 2015;520:114–118. PMID:25539084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce EF, Pedersen M, Tiong S, et al. Drosophila ATM and ATR have distinct activities in the regulation of meiotic DNA damage and repair. J Cell Biol. 2011;195:359–367. PMID:22024169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange J, Pan J, Cole F, et al. ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature. 2011;479:237–240. PMID:22002603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohibullah N, Keeney S. Numerical and spatial patterning of yeast meiotic DNA breaks by Tel1. Genome Res. 2017;27:278–288. PMID:27923845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CM, Oke A, Yam P, et al. Reduced crossover interference and increased ZMM-independent recombination in the absence of Tel1/ATM. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005478. PMID:26305689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Kim KP, Kleckner NE, et al. Meiotic double-strand breaks occur once per pair of (sister) chromatids and, via Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM, once per quartet of chromatids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:20036–20041. PMID:22123968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carballo JA, Panizza S, Serrentino ME, et al. Budding yeast ATM/ATR control meiotic double-strand break (DSB) levels by down-regulating Rec114, an essential component of the DSB-machinery. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003545. PMID:23825959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7203–7215. PMID:16055729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow C, Liyanage M, Moens PB, et al. Atm deficiency results in severe meiotic disruption as early as leptonema of prophase I. Development. 1998;125:4007–4017. PMID:9735362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Ashley T, Brainerd EE, et al. Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes Dev. 1996;10:2411–2422. PMID:8843194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellani MA, Romanienko PJ, Cairatti DA, et al. SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm-/- spermatocytes. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3233–3245. PMID:15998665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper TJ, Wardell K, Garcia V, et al. Homeostatic regulation of meiotic DSB formation by ATM/ATR. Exp Cell Res. 2014;329:124–131. PMID:25116420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole F, Kauppi L, Lange J, et al. Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:424–430. PMID:22388890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, de Massy B. Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosome Res. 2007;15:565–577. PMID:17674146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhler C, Borde V, Lichten M. Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e324. PMID:18076285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loidl J, Lorenz A. DNA double-strand break formation and repair in Tetrahymena meiosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;54:126–134. PMID:26899715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlinger B, Schlogelhofer P. Have a break: determinants of meiotic DNA double strand break (DSB) formation and processing in plants. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:1545–1563. PMID:21220780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi L, Jasin M, Keeney S. How much is enough? Control of DNA double-strand break numbers in mouse meiosis. Cell Cycle. 2013;12:2719–2720. PMID:23966150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Tsubouchi T, Rockmill B, et al. Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev Cell. 2008;15:401–415. PMID:18691940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitsky K, Bar-Shira A, Gilad S, et al. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science. 1995;268:1749–1753. PMID:7792600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull TT. Mechanisms of ATM Activation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:711–738. PMID:25580527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derheimer FA, Kastan MB. Multiple roles of ATM in monitoring and maintaining DNA integrity. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:3675–3681. PMID:20580718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavin MF, Kozlov S. ATM activation and DNA damage response. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:931–942. PMID:17457059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiloh Y. The ATM-mediated DNA-damage response: taking shape. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006;31:402–410. PMID:16774833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Domenico EG, Romano E, Del Porto P, et al. Multifunctional role of ATM/Tel1 kinase in genome stability: from the DNA damage response to telomere maintenance. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:787404. PMID:25247188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow C, Hirotsune S, Paylor R, et al. Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell. 1996;86:159–171. PMID:8689683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elson A, Wang Y, Daugherty CJ, et al. Pleiotropic defects in ataxia-telangiectasia protein-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13084–13089. PMID:8917548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgewick R, Boder E. Ataxia-telangiectasia. Handbook of clinical neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishers; 1991. p. 347–423.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, et al. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:737–742. PMID:15640358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco S, Marcet-Ortega M, Lange J, et al. The ATM signaling cascade promotes recombination-dependent pachytene arrest in mouse spermatocytes. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005017. PMID:25768017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellani MA, Boateng KA, McLeod D, et al. The expression profile of the major mouse SPO11 isoforms indicates that SPO11beta introduces double strand breaks and suggests that SPO11alpha has an additional role in prophase in both spermatocytes and oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:4391–4403. PMID:20647542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barchi M, Roig I, Di Giacomo M, et al. ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000076. PMID:18497861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan JP, Chotkowski HL, Glaser RL. DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3698–3705. PMID:12202754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carballo JA, Johnson AL, Sedgwick SG, et al. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell. 2008;132:758–770. PMID:18329363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argunhan B, Farmer S, Leung WK, et al. Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65875. PMID:23762445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blitzblau HG, Hochwagen A. ATR/Mec1 prevents lethal meiotic recombination initiation on partially replicated chromosomes in budding yeast. Elife. 2013;2:e00844. PMID:24137535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker D, Mohibullah N, Zhu X, et al. Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution. Nature. 2014;510:241–246. PMID:24717437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva E, Tiong S, Pedersen M, et al. ATM is required for telomere maintenance and chromosome stability during Drosophila development. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1341–1347. PMID:15296750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKim KS, Green-Marroquin BL, Sekelsky JJ, et al. Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination. Science. 1998;279:876–878. PMID:9452390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra S, McKim KS. Temporal analysis of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and repair in Drosophila females. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e200. PMID:17166055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerton JL, Hawley RS. Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:477–487. PMID:15931171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TC, Lichten M. Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995;140:55–66. PMID:7635308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CL, Walker M, Kajita S, et al. PRDM9 binding organizes hotspot nucleosomes and limits Holliday junction migration. Genome Res. 2014;24:724–732. PMID:24604780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada S, Kim S, Tischfield SE, et al. Genomic and chromatin features shaping meiotic double-strand break formation and repair in mice. Cell Cycle. 2017;1–15. PMID:28820351. DOI:10.1080/15384101.2017.1361065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler KR, Sasaki M, Milman N, et al. Evolutionarily diverse determinants of meiotic DNA break and recombination landscapes across the genome. Genome Res. 2014;24:1650–1664. PMID:25024163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichten M, de Massy B. The impressionistic landscape of meiotic recombination. Cell. 2011;147:267–270. PMID:22000007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto F, Brick K, Khil P, et al. DNA recombination. Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes. Science. 2014;346:1256442. PMID:25395542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagulova F, Gregoretti IV, Brick K, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature. 2011;472:375–378. PMID:21460839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blitzblau HG, Bell GW, Rodriguez J, et al. Mapping of meiotic single-stranded DNA reveals double-stranded-break hotspots near centromeres and telomeres. Curr Biol. 2007;17:2003–2012. PMID:18060788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, et al. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature. 2012;485:642–645. PMID:22660327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey C, Clement JA, Buard J, et al. In vivo binding of PRDM9 reveals interactions with noncanonical genomic sites. Genome Res. 2017;27:580–590. PMID:28336543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerton JL, DeRisi J, Shroff R, et al. Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:11383–11390. PMID:11027339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Yoshida K, Matsui Y. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature. 2005;438:374–378. PMID:16292313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, et al. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science. 2009;323:373–375. PMID:19074312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, et al. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science. 2010;327:876–879. PMID:20044541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science. 2010;327:835. PMID:20044538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science. 2010;327:836–840. PMID:20044539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buard J, Barthes P, Grey C, et al. Distinct histone modifications define initiation and repair of meiotic recombination in the mouse. EMBO J. 2009;28:2616–2624. PMID:19644444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey C, Barthes P, Chauveau-Le Friec G, et al. Mouse PRDM9 DNA-binding specificity determines sites of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation for initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001176. PMID:22028627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers NR, Parvanov ED, Baker CL, et al. The Meiotic Recombination Activator PRDM9 Trimethylates Both H3K36 and H3K4 at Recombination Hotspots In Vivo. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006146. PMID:27362481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Mathioudakis N, Diagouraga B, et al. Molecular basis for the regulation of the H3K4 methyltransferase activity of PRDM9. Cell Rep. 2013;5:13–20. PMID:24095733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eram MS, Bustos SP, Lima-Fernandes E, et al. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 36 by human methyltransferase PRDM9 protein. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:12177–12188. PMID:24634223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe FS, Fischl H, Murray SC, et al. Is H3K4me3 instructive for transcription activation? Bioessays. 2017;39:1–12. PMID:28004446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Wysocka J. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3: intricacy of writing and reading a single epigenetic mark. Mol Cell. 2007;25:15–30. PMID:17218268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson E, Webster MT, Ratnakumar A, et al. Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Res. 2012;22:51–63. PMID:22006216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver PL, Goodstadt L, Bayes JJ, et al. Accelerated evolution of the Prdm9 speciation gene across diverse metazoan taxa. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000753. PMID:19997497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auton A, Rui Li Y, Kidd J, et al. Genetic recombination is targeted towards gene promoter regions in dogs. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003984. PMID:24348265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CL, Bherer C, Morrow BE, et al. A pedigree-based map of recombination in the domestic dog genome. G3 (Bethesda). 2016. PMID:27591755. DOI:10.1534/g3.116.034678
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munoz-Fuentes V, Di Rienzo A, Vila C. Prdm9, a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots, is not functional in dogs and their wild relatives, wolves and coyotes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25498. PMID:22102853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal S, Leffler EM, Sannareddy K, et al. Stable recombination hotspots in birds. Science. 2015;350:928–932. PMID:26586757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, Nicolas A. Clustering of meiotic double-strand breaks on yeast chromosome III. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5213–5218. PMID:9144217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borde V, Robine N, Lin W, et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites. EMBO J. 2009;28:99–111. PMID:19078966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acquaviva L, Szekvolgyi L, Dichtl B, et al. The COMPASS subunit Spp1 links histone methylation to initiation of meiotic recombination. Science. 2013;339:215–218. PMID:23160953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommermeyer V, Beneut C, Chaplais E, et al. Spp1, a member of the Set1 Complex, promotes meiotic DSB formation in promoters by tethering histone H3K4 methylation sites to chromosome axes. Mol Cell. 2013;49:43–54. PMID:23246437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvanov ED, Tian H, Billings T, et al. PRDM9 interactions with other proteins provide a link between recombination hotspots and the chromosomal axis in meiosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:488–499. PMID:27932493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai Y, Baudat F, Taillepierre M, et al. The PRDM9 KRAB domain is required for meiosis and involved in protein interactions. Chromosoma. 2017;126:681–695. PMID:28527011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Keeney S. High-resolution global analysis of the influences of Bas1 and Ino4 transcription factors on meiotic DNA break distributions in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2015;201:525–542. PMID:26245832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartagena-Lirola H, Guerini I, Viscardi V, et al. Budding yeast Sae2 is an in vivo target of the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases during meiosis. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1549–1559. PMID:16861895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terasawa M, Ogawa T, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Sae2p phosphorylation is crucial for cooperation with Mre11p for resection of DNA double-strand break ends during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Genet Syst. 2008;83:209–217. PMID:18670132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia V, Phelps SE, Gray S, et al. Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature. 2011;479:241–244. PMID:22002605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature. 2005;436:1053–1057. PMID:16107854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannavo E, Cejka P. Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks. Nature. 2014;514:122–125. PMID:25231868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:556–566. PMID:9858579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell. 1997;88:375–384. PMID:9039264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimitou EP, Yamada S, Keeney S. A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection. Science. 2017;355:40–45. PMID:28059759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi N, Brown MS, Bishop DK, et al. Gradual implementation of the meiotic recombination program via checkpoint pathways controlled by global DSB levels. Mol Cell. 2015;57:797–811. PMID:25661491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagulova F, Brick K, Pu Y, et al. The evolutionary turnover of recombination hot spots contributes to speciation in mice. Genes Dev. 2016;30:266–280. PMID:26833728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borde V, Wu TC, Lichten M. Use of a recombination reporter insert to define meiotic recombination domains on chromosome III of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:4832–4842. PMID:10373533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi L, Barchi M, Lange J, et al. Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev. 2013;27:873–886. PMID:23599345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, et al. Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000702. PMID:19851446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn A, Soucek R, Borner GV. ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res. 2007;15:591–605. PMID:17674148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widger A, Mahadevaiah SK, Lange J, et al. ATR is a multifunctional regulator of male mouse meiosis. bioRxiv. 2017. DOI:10.1101/172106
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco S, Maldonado-Linares A, Marcet-Ortega M, et al. ATR is required to complete meiotic recombination in mice. bioRxiv. 2017. DOI:10.1101/133744
   Google Scholar
• Royo H, Prosser H, Ruzankina Y, et al. ATR acts stage specifically to regulate multiple aspects of mammalian meiotic silencing. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1484–1494. PMID:23824539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JM. Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Development. 2007;134:1823–1831. PMID:17329371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K, Wang Y, Jiang W, et al. Kinase-dead ATM protein causes genomic instability and early embryonic lethality in mice. J Cell Biol. 2012;198:305–313. PMID:22869596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel JA, Pellegrini M, Lee BS, et al. Loss of ATM kinase activity leads to embryonic lethality in mice. J Cell Biol. 2012;198:295–304. PMID:22869595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesse S, Bourbon HM, Debuchy R, et al. Asy2/Mer2: an evolutionarily conserved mediator of meiotic recombination, pairing, and global chromosome compaction. Genes Dev. 2017;31:1880–1893. PMID:29021238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanzione M, Baumann M, Papanikos F, et al. Meiotic DNA break formation requires the unsynapsed chromosome axis-binding protein IHO1 (CCDC36) in mice. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18:1208–1220. PMID:27723721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Lange J, Hached K, et al. Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:599–610. PMID:21478856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Bourbon HM, de Massy B. Functional conservation of Mei4 for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation from yeasts to mice. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1266–1280. PMID:20551173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Ghyselinck N, Ishiguro K, et al. MEI4 - a central player in the regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in the mouse. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:1800–1811. PMID:25795304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YH, Choi Y, Erdin SU, et al. Hormad1 mutation disrupts synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and chromosome segregation in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001190. PMID:21079677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu H, Wan L, Baumgartner B, et al. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:5804–5818. PMID:16221890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda T, Pratto F, Schimenti JC, et al. Phosphorylation of chromosome core components may serve as axis marks for the status of chromosomal events during mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002485. PMID:22346761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blat Y, Protacio RU, Hunter N, et al. Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell. 2002;111:791–802. PMID:12526806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panizza S, Mendoza MA, Berlinger M, et al. Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell. 2011;146:372–383. PMID:21816273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleckner N. Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma. 2006;115:175–194. PMID:16555016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, et al. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:5858–5868. PMID:9488723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, et al. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet. 2001;27:271–276. PMID:11242108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, et al. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:905–916. PMID:10477747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shroff R, Arbel-Eden A, Pilch D, et al. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1703–1711. PMID:15458641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Capetillo O, Mahadevaiah SK, Celeste A, et al. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev Cell. 2003;4:497–508. PMID:12689589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeste A, Petersen S, Romanienko PJ, et al. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science. 2002;296:922–927. PMID:11934988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CS, Lee K, Legube G, et al. Dynamics of yeast histone H2A and H2B phosphorylation in response to a double-strand break. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:103–109. PMID:24336221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Shi LZ, Wong CC, et al. The interaction of CtIP and Nbs1 connects CDK and ATM to regulate HR-mediated double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003277. PMID:23468639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, et al. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:37–45. PMID:16327781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Kass EM, Yen WF, et al. ATM loss leads to synthetic lethality in BRCA1 BRCT mutant mice associated with exacerbated defects in homology-directed repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:7665–7670. PMID:28659469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouaire T, Legube G. DNA double strand break repair pathway choice: a chromatin based decision? Nucleus. 2015;6:107–113. PMID:25675367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medhi D, Goldman AS, Lichten M. Local chromosome context is a major determinant of crossover pathway biochemistry during budding yeast meiosis. Elife. 2016;5. PMID:27855779. DOI:10.7554/eLife.19669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrentino ME, Chaplais E, Sommermeyer V, et al. Differential association of the conserved SUMO ligase Zip3 with meiotic double-strand break sites reveals regional variations in the outcome of meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003416. PMID:23593021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froenicke L, Anderson LK, Wienberg J, et al. Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:1353–1368. PMID:12432495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora C, Kee K, Maleki S, et al. Antiviral protein Ski8 is a direct partner of Spo11 in meiotic DNA break formation, independent of its cytoplasmic role in RNA metabolism. Mol Cell. 2004;13:549–559. PMID:14992724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee K, Protacio RU, Arora C, et al. Spatial organization and dynamics of the association of Rec102 and Rec104 with meiotic chromosomes. EMBO J. 2004;23:1815–1824. PMID:15044957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Hooker GW, Roeder GS. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer2, Mei4 and Rec114 form a complex required for meiotic double-strand break formation. Genetics. 2006;173:1969–1981. PMID:16783010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki S, Neale MJ, Arora C, et al. Interactions between Mei4, Rec114, and other proteins required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma. 2007;116:471–486. PMID:17558514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner S, Kohli J, Ludin K. Functional interactions among members of the meiotic initiation complex in fission yeast. Curr Genet. 2010;56:237–249. PMID:20364342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyoshi T, Ito M, Kugou K, et al. A central coupler for recombination initiation linking chromosome architecture to S phase checkpoint. Mol Cell. 2012;47:722–733. PMID:22841486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar