Zooming in on chromosome dynamics

References

• Paweletz N. Walther Flemming: pioneer of mitosis research. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2(1):72–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder CL, Khodjakov A. Mitosis through the microscope: advances in seeing inside live dividing cells. Science. 2003;300(5616):91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer T, Cremer M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(3):a003889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton T, Cavalli G. The role of chromosome domains in shaping the functional genome. Cell. 2015;160(6):1049–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickmore WA, van Steensel B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell. 2013;152(6):1270–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009;326(5950):289–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159(7):1665–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokota H, van den Engh G, Hearst JE, et al. Evidence for the organization of chromatin in megabase pair-sized loops arranged along a random walk path in the human G0/G1 interphase nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1995;130(6):1239–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellaire G, Lemieux N, Belmaaza A, et al. Ectopic gene targeting exhibits a bimodal distribution of integration in murine cells, indicating that both intra- and interchromosomal sites are accessible to the targeting vector. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(9):5571–5580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, et al. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science. 2002;295(5558):1306–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies JOJ, Oudelaar AM, Higgs DR, et al. How best to identify chromosomal interactions: a comparison of approaches. Nat Methods. 2017;14(2):125–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt AD, Hu M, Ren B. Genome-wide mapping and analysis of chromosome architecture. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(12):743–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature. 2013;502(7469):59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano T, Lubling Y, Varnai C, et al. Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution. Nature. 2017;547(7661):61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani V, Deng X, Qiu R, et al. Massively multiplex single-cell Hi-C. Nat Methods. 2017;14(3):263–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens TJ, Lando D, Basu S, et al. 3D structures of individual mammalian genomes studied by single-cell Hi-C. Nature. 2017;544(7648):59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan L, Xing D, Chang C-H, et al. Three-dimensional genome structures of single diploid human cells. Science. 2018;361(6405):924–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardozo Gizzi AM, Cattoni DI, Fiche J-B, et al. Microscopy-based chromosome conformation capture enables simultaneous visualization of genome organization and transcription in intact organisms. Mol Cell. 2019;74(1):212–222.e215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn EH, Pegoraro G, Brandao HB, et al. Extensive heterogeneity and intrinsic variation in spatial genome organization. Cell. 2019;176(6):1502–1515.e1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb JR, Boyle S, Perry P, et al. Chromatin motion is constrained by association with nuclear compartments in human cells. Curr Biol. 2002;12(6):439–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heun P, Laroche T, Shimada K, et al. Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus. Science. 2001;294(5549):2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall WF, Straight A, Marko JF, et al. Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr Biol. 1997;7(12):930–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlich D, Hirota T, Koch B, et al. Condensin I stabilizes chromosomes mechanically through a dynamic interaction in live cells. Curr Biol. 2006;16(4):333–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlich D, Koch B, Dupeux F, et al. Live-cell imaging reveals a stable cohesin-chromatin interaction after but not before DNA replication. Curr Biol. 2006;16(15):1571–1578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson DF, Vagnarelli P, Gassmann R, et al. Condensin is required for nonhistone protein assembly and structural integrity of vertebrate mitotic chromosomes. Dev Cell. 2003;5(2):323–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Z, Zickler D, Prentiss M, et al. Chromosomes progress to metaphase in multiple discrete steps via global compaction/expansion cycles. Cell. 2015;161(5):1124–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasaka K, Hossain MJ, Roberti MJ, et al. Sister chromatid resolution is an intrinsic part of chromosome organization in prophase. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(6):692–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono T, Losada A, Hirano M, et al. Differential contributions of condensin I and condensin II to mitotic chromosome architecture in vertebrate cells. Cell. 2003;115(1):109–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther N, Hossain MJ, Politi AZ, et al. A quantitative map of human Condensins provides new insights into mitotic chromosome architecture. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(7):2309–2328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganji M, Shaltiel IA, Bisht S, et al. Real-time imaging of DNA loop extrusion by condensin. Science. 2018;360(6384):102–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintomi K, Takahashi TS, Hirano T. Reconstitution of mitotic chromatids with a minimum set of purified factors. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(8):1014–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibcus JH, Samejima K, Goloborodko A, et al. A pathway for mitotic chromosome formation. Science. 2018;359(6376):eaao6135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science. 2013;342(6161):948–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munkel C, Eils R, Dietzel S, et al. Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. J Mol Biol. 1999;285(3):1053–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle A, Brackley CA, Boyle S, et al. Polymer simulations of heteromorphic chromatin predict the 3d folding of complex genomic loci. Mol Cell. 2018;72(4):786–797 e711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudenberg G, Imakaev M, Lu C, et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Rep. 2016;15(9):2038–2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanborn AL, Rao SS, Huang SC, et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(47):E6456–6465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goloborodko A, Imakaev MV, Marko JF, et al. Compaction and segregation of sister chromatids via active loop extrusion. eLife. 2016;5:e14864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goloborodko A, Marko JF, Mirny LA. chromosome compaction by active loop extrusion. Biophys J. 2016;110(10):2162–2168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell. 1997;91(1):35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinett CC, Straight A, Li G, et al. In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition. J Cell Biol. 1996;135(6 Pt 2):1685–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339(6121):819–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337(6096):816–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339(6121):823–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau IF, Filipe SR, Soballe B, et al. Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49(3):731–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassadi I, Kamgoue A, Goiffon I, et al. Differential chromosome conformations as hallmarks of cellular identity revealed by mathematical polymer modeling. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(6):e1004306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germier T, Kocanova S, Walther N, et al. Real-Time Imaging of a Single Gene Reveals Transcription-Initiated Local Confinement. Biophys J. 2017;113(7):1383–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White MA, Eykelenboom JK, Lopez-Vernaza MA, et al. Non-random segregation of sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2008;455(7217):1248–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amarh V, White MA, Leach DRF. Dynamics of RecA-mediated repair of replication-dependent DNA breaks. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(7):2299–2307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion V, Kalck V, Horigome C, et al. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14(5):502–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura E, Blow JJ, Tanaka TU. Live-cell imaging reveals replication of individual replicons in eukaryotic replication factories. Cell. 2006;125(7):1297–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mine-Hattab J, Rothstein R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14(5):510–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saner N, Karschau J, Natsume T, et al. Stochastic association of neighboring replicons creates replication factories in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 2013;202(7):1001–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straight AF, Belmont AS, Robinett CC, et al. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr Biol. 1996;6(12):1599–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar H, Tanaka K, Nasmyth K, et al. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature. 2004;428(6978):93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura E, Tanaka K, Kitamura Y, et al. Kinetochore microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2007;21(24):3319–3330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Mukae N, Dewar H, et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature. 2005;434(7036):987–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka TU, Rachidi N, Janke C, et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell. 2002;108(3):317–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Yue Z, Tanaka TU. Smc3 deacetylation by Hos1 facilitates efficient dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion during early anaphase. Mol Cell. 2017;68(3):605–614 e604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw MJ, Ward JJ, Kanemaki M, et al. Condensins promote chromosome recoiling during early anaphase to complete sister chromatid separation. Dev Cell. 2010;19(2):232–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang C-H, Carpenter AE, Fuchsova B, et al. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr Biol. 2006;16(8):825–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Sudlow G, Belmont AS. Interphase cell cycle dynamics of a late-replicating, heterochromatic homogeneously staining region: precise choreography of condensation/decondensation and nuclear positioning. J Cell Biol. 1998;140(5):975–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto T, Hashiguchi N, Janicki SM, et al. Visualization of gene activity in living cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(12):871–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez J, Belmont AS, Sedat JW. Multiple regimes of constrained chromosome motion are regulated in the interphase Drosophila nucleus. Curr Biol. 2001;11(16):1227–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez J, Belmont AS, Sedat JW. The dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during male Drosophila meiosis. Curr Biol. 2002;12(17):1473–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson I, Gilchrist S, Bickmore WA, et al. The radial positioning of chromatin is not inherited through mitosis but is established de novo in early G1. Curr Biol. 2004;14(2):166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro SA, Gatlin JC, Dong Y, et al. Condensin regulates the stiffness of vertebrate centromeres. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(9):2371–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roukos V, Voss TC, Schmidt CK, et al. Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells. Science. 2013;341(6146):660–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutoglou E, Dorn JF, Sengupta K, et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(6):675–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manders EM, Kimura H, Cook PR. Direct imaging of DNA in living cells reveals the dynamics of chromosome formation. J Cell Biol. 1999;144(5):813–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind J, Pagie L, Ortabozkoyun H, et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell. 2013;153(1):178–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eykelenboom JK, Gierlinski M, Yue Z, et al. Live imaging of marked chromosome regions reveals their dynamic resolution and compaction in mitosis. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(5):1531–1552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan I, Sustackova G, Zhang L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in of an optimized TetO repeat for live cell imaging of endogenous loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(17):e100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitter M, Gasser C, Takacs Z, et al. Sister-chromatid-sensitive Hi-C reveals the conformation of replicated human chromosomes.”. bioRxiv. 2020;(2020(3):10.978148.
   Google Scholar
• Chen B, Gilbert LA, Cimini BA, et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell. 2013;155(7):1479–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Naseri A, Reyes-Gutierrez P, et al. Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(10):3002–3007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shechner DM, Hacisuleyman E, Younger ST, et al. Multiplexable, locus-specific targeting of long RNAs with CRISPR-Display. Nat Methods. 2015;12(7):664–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neguembor MV, Sebastian-Perez R, Aulicino F, et al. (Po)STAC (Polycistronic SunTAg modified CRISPR) enables live-cell and fixed-cell super-resolution imaging of multiple genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(5):e30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyte R, Nuebler J, Blaukopf C, et al. Dynamics of sister chromatid resolution during cell cycle progression. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(6):1985–2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Tu L-C, Naseri A, et al. CRISPR-Sirius: RNA scaffolds for signal amplification in genome imaging. Nat Methods. 2018;15(11):928–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Tu L-C, Chung Y-C, et al. Cell cycle- and genomic distance-dependent dynamics of a discrete chromosomal region. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(5):1467–1477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Reyes-Gutierrez P, Pederson T. Visualization of repetitive DNA sequences in human chromosomes with transcription activator-like effectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(52):21048–21053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyanari Y, Ziegler-Birling C, Torres-Padilla ME. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(11):1321–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley MP, Bocek M, Cimprich KA. R-loops as cellular regulators and genomic threats. Mol Cell. 2019;73(3):398–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughery MF, Mayes HC, Pedroza IK, et al. R-loop formation by dCas9 is mutagenic in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(5):2389–2401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Tu L-C, Naseri A, et al. Multiplexed labeling of genomic loci with dCas9 and engineered sgRNAs using CRISPRainbow. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(5):528–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass PG, Barutcu AR, Shechner DM, et al. Spatiotemporal allele organization by allele-specific CRISPR live-cell imaging (SNP-CLING). Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018;25(2):176–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass PG, Barutcu AR, Weiner CL, et al. Inter-chromosomal contact properties in live-cell imaging and in Hi-C. Mol Cell. 2018;69(6):1039–1045.e1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin P, Parlak M, Kuscu C, et al. Live cell imaging of low- and non-repetitive chromosome loci using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Nakamura M, Abbott TR, et al. CRISPR-mediated live imaging of genome editing and transcription. Science. 2019;365(6459):1301–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature. 2015;523(7561):481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm JB, Muthusamy AK, Liang Y, et al. A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging. Nat Methods. 2017;14(10):987–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENCODE Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Z, Zheng H, Huang B, et al. Allelic reprogramming of 3D chromatin architecture during early mammalian development. Nature. 2017;547(7662):232–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyamer IM, Gassler J, Imakaev M, et al. Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition. Nature. 2017;544(7648):110–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Xu Y, Chen X, et al. 3D chromatin structures of mature gametes and structural reprogramming during mammalian embryogenesis. Cell. 2017;170(2):367–381.e320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Xu X, Nguyen CM, et al. CRISPR-mediated programmable 3D genome positioning and nuclear organization. Cell. 2018;175(5):1405–1417.e1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell. 2013;154(2):442–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell. 2013;152(5):1173–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar