Temporal gene regulation by p53 is associated with the rotational setting of its binding sites in nucleosomes

References

• Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. Surfing the p53 network. Nature. 2000;408(6810):307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Gish K, Murphy M, et al. Analysis of p53-regulated gene expression patterns using oligonucleotide arrays. Genes Dev. 2000;14(8):981–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szak ST, Mays D, Pietenpol JA. Kinetics of p53 binding to promoter sites in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(10):3375–3386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg RL, Veprintsev DB, Bycroft M, et al. Comparative binding of p53 to its promoter and DNA recognition elements. J Mol Biol. 2005;348(3):589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian H, Wang T, Naumovski L, et al. Groups of p53 target genes involved in specific p53 downstream effects cluster into different classes of DNA binding sites. Oncogene. 2002;21(51):7901–7911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracikova M, Akiri G, George A, et al. A threshold mechanism mediates p53 cell fate decision between growth arrest and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(4):576–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray-Zmijewski F, Slee EA, Lu X. A complex barcode underlies the heterogeneous response of p53 to stress. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:702–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ko LJ, Jayaraman L, et al. p53 levels, functional domains, and DNA damage determine the extent of the apoptotic response of tumor cells.. Genes Dev. 1996;10(19):2438–2451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores ER, Tsai KY, Crowley D, et al. p63 and p73 are required for p53-dependent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Nature. 2002;416(6880):560–564. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels-Lev Y, O’Connor DJ, Bergamaschi D, et al. ASPP proteins specifically stimulate the apoptotic function of p53. Mol Cell. 2001;8:781–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda K, Arakawa T, Tanaka T, et al. p53AIP1, a potential mediator of p53-dependent apoptosis, and its regulation by Ser-46-phosphorylated p53. Cell. 2000;102:849–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeenk L, Van Heeringen SJ, Koeppel M, et al. Role of p53 serine 46 in p53 target gene regulation. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17574. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes SM, Mellert HS, Holbert MA, et al. Acetylation of the p53 DNA-binding domain regulates apoptosis induction. Mol Cell. 2006;24:841–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa JM, Verdun RE, Emerson BM. p53 functions through stress- and promoter-specific recruitment of transcription initiation components before and after DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2003;12(4):1015–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KD, Galbraith MD, Andrysik Z, et al. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by p53. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(1):133–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis JE, Karhohs KW, Mock C, et al. p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science. 2012;336(6087):1440–1444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner A, Stewart-Ornstein J, Purvis JE, et al. p53 pulses lead to distinct patterns of gene expression albeit similar DNA-binding dynamics. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24(10):840–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine AJ. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell. 1997;88(3):323–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Deiry WS, Kern SE, Pietenpol JA, et al. Definition of a consensus binding site for p53. Nat Genet. 1992;1(45–9). DOI:10.1038/ng0492-45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley T, Sontag E, Chen P, et al. Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(5):402–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho WC, Fitzgerald MX, Marmorstein R. Structure of the p53 core domain dimer bound to DNA. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(29):20494–20502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Kessler N, et al. Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers. Mol Cell. 2006;22(6):741–753. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein C, Planker E, Diercks T, et al. NMR spectroscopy reveals the solution dimerization interface of p53 core domains bound to their consensus DNA. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(52):49020–49027. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippin TM, Freund SM, Veprintsev DB, et al. Recognition of DNA by p53 core domain and location of intermolecular contacts of cooperative binding. J Mol Biol. 2002;319:351–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman PN, Chen X, Bargonetti J, et al. The p53 protein is an unusually shaped tetramer that binds directly to DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:3319–3323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecka KA, Ho WC, Marmorstein R. Crystal structure of a p53 core tetramer bound to DNA. Oncogene. 2009;28:325–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaich AK, Appella E, Harrington RE. DNA bending is essential for the site-specific recognition of DNA response elements by the DNA binding domain of the tumor suppressor protein p53. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(23):14842–14849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaich AK, Zhurkin VB, Durell SR, et al. p53-induced DNA bending and twisting: p53 tetramer binds on the outer side of a DNA loop and increases DNA twisting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(5):1875–1880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Appella E, et al. DNA bending induced by tetrameric binding of the p53 tumor suppressor protein: steric constraints on conformation. In: Sarma RH, Sarma MH, editors. Structure, motion, interaction and expression of biological macromolecules. New York: Adenine Press; 1998. p. 277–296.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa JM, Emerson BM. Transcriptional regulation by p53 through intrinsic DNA/chromatin binding and site-directed cofactor recruitment. Mol Cell. 2001;8:57–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidor NE, Field Y, Lubling Y, et al. p53 binds preferentially to genomic regions with high DNA-encoded nucleosome occupancy. Genome Res. 2010;20(10):1361–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu G, Wang D, Chen CB, et al. p53 binding to nucleosomal DNA depends on the rotational positioning of DNA response element. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(2):1321–1332. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laptenko O, Beckerman R, Freulich E, et al. p53 binding to nucleosomes within the p21 promoter in vivo leads to nucleosome loss and transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(26):10385–10390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons MA, Zhu J, Drake A, et al. TP53 engagement with the genome occurs in distinct local chromatin environments via pioneer factor activity. Genome Res. 2015;25(2):179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Buck MJ. Defining TP53 pioneering capabilities with competitive nucleosome binding assays. Genome Res. 2019;29(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui F, Zhurkin VB. Structure-based analysis of DNA sequence patterns guiding nucleosome positioning in vitro. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2010;27(6):821–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharbi BA, Alshammari TH, Felton NL, et al. nuMap: a web platform for accurate prediction of nucleosome positioning. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2014;12(5):249–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cui F, Chen L, LoVerso PR, et al. Prediction of nucleosome rotational positioning in yeast and human genomes based on sequence-dependent DNA anisotropy. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15(1):313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satchwell SC, Drew HR, Travers AA. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986;191(4):659–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui F, Zhurkin VB. Rotational positioning of nucleosomes facilitates selective binding of p53 to response elements associated with cell cycle arrest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(2):836–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M. CUTADAPT removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(9):1105–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12(6):996–1006. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, et al. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-Seq. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(1):46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-Seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyednasrollah F, Laiho A, Elo LL. Comparison of software packages for detecting differential expression in RNA-seq studies. Brief Bioinform. 2013;16:59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–515. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts A, Pimentel H, Trapnell C, et al. Identification of novel transcripts in annotated genomes using RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(17):2325–2329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts A, Trapnell C, Donaghey J, et al. Improving RNA-Seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias. Genome Biol. 2011;12(3):R22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HY, Long QY, Tang SB, et al. Histone demethylase KDM3A is required for enhancer activation of hippo target genes in colorectal cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:2349–2364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon CW, Challa A, Hyder U, et al. KAP1 is a chromatin reader that couples steps of RNA polymerase II transcription to sustain oncogenic programs. Mol Cell. 2020;78(6):1133–1151. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui F, Cole HA, Clark DJ, et al. Transcriptional activation of yeast genes disrupts intragenic nucleosome phasing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(21):10753–10764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui F, Sirotin MV, Zhurkin VB. Impact of Alu repeats on the evolution of human p53 binding sites. Biol Direct. 2011;6:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao F, LoVerso PR, Fish JN, et al. p53 binding sites in normal and cancer cells are characterized by distinct chromatin context. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:2073–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D, Baertsch R, et al. The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34( Database issue):D590–8. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei C, Wu Q, Vega VB, et al. A global map of p53 transcription-factor binding sites in the human genome. Cell. 2006;124(1):207–219. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botcheva K, McCorkle SR. Cell context dependent p53 genome-wide binding patterns and enrichment at repeats. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez Y, Segura V, Marin-Bejar O, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the human p53 transcriptional network unveils a lncRNA tumour suppressor signature. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):5812. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence M, Huber W, Pagès H, et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(8):e1003118. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, Gentleman R, Carey V. rtracklayer: an R package for interfacing with genome browsers. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1841–1842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Steiner L, Engeland K. The transcription factor p53: not a repressor, solely an activator. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(19):3037–3058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsolak F, Song JS, Liu XS, et al. High-throughput mapping of the chromatin structure of human promoters. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(2):244–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 1997;389(6648):251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey CA, Sargent DF, Luger K, et al. Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9Å resolution. J Mol Biol. 2002;319(5):1097–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong MS, Richmond TJ, Davey CA. DNA stretching and extreme kinking in the nucleosome core. J Mol Biol. 2007;368:1067–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contente A, Dittmer A, Koch MC, et al. A polymorphic microsatellite that mediates induction of PIG3 by p53. Nat Genet. 2002;30:315–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura M, Arimura Y, Nozawa K, et al. Linker DNA and histone contributions in nucleosome binding by p53. J Biochem. 2020;168:669–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teif VB, Rippe K. Nucleosome mediated crosstalk between transcription factors at eukaryotic enhancers. Phys Biol. 2011;8:044001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valouev A, Johnson SM, Boyd S, et al. Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature. 2011;474(7352):516–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai WKM, Pugh BF. Understanding nucleosome dynamics and their links to gene expression and DNA replication. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:548–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soufi A, Garcia MF, Jaroszewicz A, et al. Pioneer transcription factors target partial DNA motifs on nucleosomes to initiate reprogramming. Cell. 2015;161(3):555–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwafuchi-Doi M, Zaret KS. Pioneer transcription factors in cell reprogramming. Genes Dev. 2014;28:2679–2692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg RL, Veprintsev DB, Fersht AR. Cooperative binding of tetrameric p53 to DNA. J Mol Biol. 2004;341(5):1145–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar