Resident Students’ Perception of Safety in On-Campus Residential Facilities: Does Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Make a Difference?

References

• Armitage, R. (1999). An evaluation of secured by design housing schemes throughout the West Yorkshire area. Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, R. (2000). An evaluation of secured by design housing within West Yorkshire. Home Office Briefing Note, 7, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, R. (2006). Predicting and preventing: Developing a risk assessment mechanism for residential housing. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 8(3), 137–149. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8150024
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, R. (2013). Crime prevention through housing design: Policy and practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, R., & Everson, S. (2003). Building for burglars? Crime Prevention and Community Safety: an International Journal, 5(4), 15–25. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140159
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, R., & Monchuk, L. (2011). Sustaining the crime reduction impact of designing out crime: Re-evaluating the Secured by Design scheme 10 years on. Security Journal, 24(4), 320–343. doi:10.1057/sj.2010.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, R., & Monchuk, L. (2017). What is CPTED? Reconnecting theory with application in the words of users and abusers. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. doi:10.1093/police/pax004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas, R. I. (2013). 21st century security and CPTED: Designing for critical infrastructure protection and crime prevention. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beavon, D. J., Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1994). The influence of street networks on the patterning of property offenses. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 115–148.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., & Wright, R. (1984). Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S. D., Guerette, R. T., Summers, L., & Poynton, S. (2011). Spatial displacement and diffusion of benefits among geographically focused policing initiatives: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(4), 347–374. doi:10.1007/s11292-011-9134-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., & Altman, I. (1983). Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: An environmental analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80001-2
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (1999). An evaluation of the secured by design initiative in Gwent, South Wales. MSc. Leicester, UK: Scarman Centre for the Study of Public Order, University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Casteel, C., & Peek-Asa, C. (2000). Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(4), 99–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. V., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Coupe, T., & Blake, L. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44(2), 431–464. doi:10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A review and current status of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 393–412. doi:10.1177/0885412215595440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozens, P., Pascoe, T., & Hillier, D. (2007). Critically reviewing the theory and practice of secured-by-design for residential new-build housing in Britain. In Burglary: International library of criminology, criminal justice and penology-second series (pp. 345–362). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cozens, P., & Sun, M. Y. (2018). Exploring crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) and students’ fear of crime at an Australian university campus using prospect and refuge theory. Property Management 37(2), 287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozens, P., & Tarca, M. (2016). Exploring housing maintenance and vacancy in Western Australia: Perceptions of crime and crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Property Management, 34(3), 199–220. doi:10.1108/PM-06-2015-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowdall, G. W. (2013). The role of alcohol abuse in college student victimization. In B. S. Fisher & J. J. Sloan (Eds.), CAMPUS CRIME: Legal, social, and policy perspectives (pp. 184–210). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, A. (2014, November 24). In U.S., 37% do not feel safe walking at night near home. Gallup Poll. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/179558/not-feel-safe-walking-night-near-home.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Eck, J. (2002). Preventing crime at places. In L. W. Sherman, D. L. MacKenzie, D. P. Farrington, & B. C. Welsh (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 241–294). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ekblom, P. (2011). Deconstructing CPTED and reconstructing it for practice, knowledge, management and research. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 17, 7–28. doi:10.1007/s10610-010-9132-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., Handy, S., Brownson, R. C., Clemente, O., & Winston, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S223–S240. doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez, M. F. (2005). Crime prevention and the perception of safety in campus design (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1483
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., & May, D. (2009). College students’ crime-related fears on campus: Are fear-provoking cues gendered? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25(3), 300–321. doi:10.1177/1043986209335013
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24(1), 35–65. doi:10.1177/0013916592241002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Sloan, J. J., Cullen, F. T., & Lu, C. (1998). Crime in the ivory tower: The level and sources of student victimization. Criminology, 36(3), 671–710. doi:10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, A. (2009). Crime prevention through environmental design. Portland, OR: Office of Neighborhood Involvement Crime Prevention Program.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, R. A. (1978). Design for safe neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. J. (2009). Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations. Criminology, 47(4), 1331–1368. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1745-9125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, V. A., & Stone, W. E. (1999). Campus crime: A victimization study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(4), 295–307. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., & Sahbaz, O. (2009). Crime and urban design: An evidence-based approach. In R. Cooper, G. Evans, & C. Boyko (Eds.), Designing sustainable cities. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., Gibson, V., & McCabe, M. (2014). Designing in crime prevention, designing out ambiguity: Practice issues with the CPTED knowledge framework available to professionals in the field and its potentially ambiguous nature. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 16(3), 147–168. doi:10.1057/cpcs.2014.3
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and burglary risk: Are cul-de-sacs safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 89–111. doi:10.1007/s10940-009-9084-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. (2018, September 13) Education groups tell congress: Prohibit federal money from being used to arm teachers, education week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k12/2018/09/guns_teachers_advocates_letter_congress.html
   Google Scholar
• Kushmuk, J., & Whittemore, S. L. (1981). Re-evaluation of crime prevention through environmental design in Portland, Oregon-executive summary. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. A., & Maxfield, M. G. (1980). Fear in the neighborhoods: An investigation of the impact of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17(2), 160–189. doi:10.1177/002242788001700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzbali, M., Abdullah, A., Razak, N. A., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. (2012). The influence of crime prevention through environmental design on victimization and fear of crime. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnery, J. R., & Lim, B. (2005). Measuring crime prevention through environmental design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22(4), 330–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, A., Boxall, H., Lindeman, K., & Anderson, J. (2012). Effective crime prevention interventions for implementation by local government. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). The routine activities and criminal victimization of students: Life style and related factors. In B. S. Fisher & J. J. Sloan (Eds.), CAMPUS CRIME: Legal, social, and policy perspectives (pp. 158–183). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L., & Fisher, B. (1993). ‘Hot spots’ of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(3), 187–206. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Education Association. (2018, March 12). Educators are alarmed at White House’s dangerous proposal to arm teachers. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/72953.htm
   Google Scholar
• Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. US department of housing and urban development, office of policy development and research. Washington, DC: Institute for Community Design Analysis, Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, T. (1999). Evaluation of secured by design in public sector housing. Final Report. Watford, UK: BRE.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. D., Meeks, J. W., & Taylor, R. B. (1992). The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(1), 21–34. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80294-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petherick, N. (2000). Environmental design and fear: The prospect-refuge model and the university college of the Cariboo campus. Western Geography, 10(11), 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Poyner, B. (1993). What works in crime prevention: An overview of evaluations. Crime Prevention Studies, 1, 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• Poyner, B., & Webb, B. (1991). Crime free housing. London, UK: Butterworth-Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Rader, N. (2017, March). Fear of crime. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Prevention and Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynald, D. M. (2011). Factors associated with the guardianship of places: Assessing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and socio-demographic contexts in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 48, 110–142. doi:10.1177/0022427810384138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynald, D. M. (2015). Environmental design and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(1), 71–89. doi:10.1177/1043986214552618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. B. (1998). High aesthetics/low incivilities: Criminal victimization and perceptions of risk in a downtown environment. Journal of Security Administration, 21(2), 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. H. (2002). Planning for crime prevention: A transatlantic perspective. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, J. H., Kim, J. W., & Mackin, J. R. (1999). The impact of the built environment on crime and fear of crime in urban neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Technology, 6(3), 59–73. doi:10.1080/10630739983588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariati, A. (2017). An assessment of the role of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in campus safety (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3391
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., MacKenzie, D. L., Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 10). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. G., & Raymond, C. H. (1992). An ecological approach to violent crime on campus. Journal of Security Administration, 15(2), 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American cities. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, D. W. M. (2003). The nature and prevention of residential burglary: A review of the international literature with an eye towards prevention in Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.justitsministeriet.dk/sites/default/files/media/Arbejdsomraader/Forskning/Forskningspuljen/2011/2003/The_Nature_and_Prevention_of_Residential_Burglary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1984). Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21(4), 303–331. doi:10.1177/0022427884021004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teedon, P., Reid, T., Griffiths, P., & McFadyen, A. (2010). Evaluating Secured by Design door and window installations: Effects on residential crime. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 12(4), 246–262. doi:10.1057/cpcs.2010.15
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, C. H., Duane, J., & Hadipriono, F. (2004). Performance of campus parking garages in preventing crime. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 18(1), 21–28. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2004)18:1(21)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkwein, J. F., Szelest, B. P., & Lizotte, A. J. (1995). The relationship of campus crime to campus and student characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 36(6), 647–670. doi:10.1007/BF02208249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, A., & Ford, D.; Westinghouse National Issues Ctr, & United States of America. (1981). Crime prevention through environmental design: The commercial demonstration in Portland, Oregon: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Westinghouse National Issues Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, B., & Farrington, D. (2009). Making public places safer: Surveillance and crime prevention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, P., & Costello, A. (2000). The ‘road to nowhere’: The evidence for travelling criminals (Vol. 207). London, UK: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Zahm, D. (2007). Using crime prevention through environmental design in problem-solving. Collingdale, PA: DIANE Publishing.
   Google Scholar