Relationships of Frontal Offset Crash Test Results to Real-World Driver Fatality Rates

REFERENCES

• Cameron, M H, Newstead, S V, and Skalova, M., 1996. "The development of vehicle crashworthiness ratings in Australia, paper no. 96-S9-O-14". In: Proc. 15th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1996. pp. 1444–1457.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B J, 1982. "A comparison of NHTSA car safety ratings with injuries in highway crashes". In: Highway Safety Highlights. Vol. Vol. 15. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Centre; 1982. pp. 1–3, No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• European, N ew, and , Car Assessment Programme, 2003. Results. Belgium: Brussels; 2003, Available: http://www.euroncap.com.Accessed: October 22, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L, 1994. Car Size and Safety: A review focused on identifying causative factors, paper no. 94-S4-W-28. Presented at Proc. 14th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.
   Google Scholar
• Folksam, 2003. How Safe is Your Car?. Sweden: Stockholm; 2003, Available: http://www.folksam.se/engelsk/index.htmAccessed: October 22, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Grush, E S, Marsh, J C, and South, N E, 1983. "Comparison of high-speed crash test results with fatality rates". In: Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the American Association for Automotive Medicine. Arlington Heights, IL: American Association for Automotive Medicine; 1983. pp. 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, H, Hagg, A, Krafft, M, Kullgren, A, Malmstedt, B, Nygren, A, and Tingvall, C, 1989. Folksam car model safety rating 1989–90. Sweden: Folksam, Stockholm; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, G J, and Meeker, W Q, 1991. Statistical Intervals—A Guide for Practitioners. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2001. "Special issue: Crashworthiness improvements". In: Status Report. Vol. Vol. 36. Arlington, VA. 2001, Available: http://www.highwaysafety.org/srpdfs/sr3603.pdf Accessed: October 22, 2003. No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2003. Vehicle ratings. Arlington, VA. 2003, Available: http://www.highwaysafety.org/vehicle_ ratings/ratings.htmAccessed: October 22, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I S, and Whitfield, R A, 1988. Predicting injury risk with “New Car Assessment Program” crashworthiness ratings, Accid. Anal. Prev. Vol. 20 (1988), pp. 411–419, [PUBMED][INFOTRIEVE][CSA].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane, C J, Hackney, J R, and Berkowitz, A M, 1994. Correlation of vehicle performance in the new car assessment program with fatality risk in actual head-on collisions, paper no. 94-S8-O-11. Presented at Proc. 14th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.
   Google Scholar
• Lavelle, J P, 2001. NCAP—Field relevance of the metrics, paper no. 211. Presented at Proc. 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (CD ROM).
   Google Scholar
• Lie, A, and Tingvall, C, 2002. How do Euro NCAP results correlate with real-life injury risks? A paired comparison study of car-to-car crashes, Traffic Inj. Prev. Vol. 3 (2002), pp. 288–293, [CROSSREF][CSA].
   Google Scholar
• Lui, K -J, McGee, D, Rhodes, P, and Pollock, D, 1988. An application of a conditional logistic regression to study the effects of safety belts, principal impact points, and car weights on driver fatalities, J. Safety Res. Vol. 19 (1988), pp. 197–203, [CROSSREF].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Agency for Automotive Safety and Victims' Aid, 2003. New car assessment Japan—choosing a safer car. Tokyo, Japan. 2003, Available: http://www.nasva.go.jp/english/index.htmlAccessed: October 22, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2003. Buying a safer car. Washington, DC. 2003, Available: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/testing/ncap/Accessed: October 22, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2004. Traffic safety facts 2002. Report no. DOT-HS-809-620. Washington, DC. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Roads and Motorists' Association, 2003. ANCAP crash tests. Sydney, Australia. 2003, Available: http://www.mynrma.com.au/motoring/cars/crash_tests/ancap/index.shtmlAccessed: October 22, 2003..
   Google Scholar
• Newstead, S V, Narayan, S, Cameron, M H, and Farmer, C M, 2003. U.S. consumer crash test results and injury risk in police-reported crashes, Traffic Inj. Prev. Vol. 4 (2003), pp. 113–127, [CROSSREF][CSA].
   Google Scholar
• R.L. Polk & Company, 2003. National vehicle population profile (NVPP). Southfield, MI. 2003, Available: http://www.polk.com/products/nvpp.aspAccessed: October 22, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Automobile Club of Victoria, 2003. Used car safety ratings. Melbourne, Australia. 2003, Available: Available: http://motoring.racv.com.au/racvm/whichcar/UCSRdescription.cfm.Accessed: October 22, 2003..
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute, Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Ver. 6, . Vol. Vol. 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1989. pp. 1122–1125.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J R, and Rodgman, E A, 1985. Comparisons of NCAP test results with driver injury rates in highway crashes. Presented at Proc. 29th Annual Conference of the American Association for Automotive Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office, 1995. Highway safety: reliability and validity of DOT crash tests. Report no. GAO/PEMD-95-5. Washington, DC. 1995.
   Google Scholar