Kinematics of Pediatric Crash Dummies Seated on Vehicle Seats with Realistic Belt Geometry

References

• American Academy of Pediatrics. Car Seat Safety. 2011. Available at: www.aap.org/healthopics/carseatsafety.cfm. Accessed March 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Andromeit D, Herger A. Motion sequence criteria and design proposals for restraint devices in order to avoid unfavorable biomechanic conditions and submarining. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 1975. SAE Technical Paper No. 751146.
   Google Scholar
• Ash J, Abdelilah Y, Crandall J, et al. Comparison of anthropomorphic test dummies with a pediatric cadaver restrained by a three point belt in frontal sled tests. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Beck B, Brown J, Bilston LE. Variations in rear seat cushion properties and the effects of submarining. Traffic Injury Prevention 2012;12(1):54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilston LE, Sagar N. Geometry of rear seats and child restraints compared to child anthropometry. Stapp car Crash Journal 2007;51;275–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bidez MW, Hauschild HW, Mergi KM, Syson SR. Small occupant dynamics in the rear seat: influence of impact angle and belt restraint design. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2005. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1708.
   Google Scholar
• Bussone W, Bove R, Thomas R, et al. Six-degree-of-freedom accelerations: linear arrays compared with angular rate sensors. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2010. SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1017.
   Google Scholar
• Chamouard F, Tarriere C, Baudrit P. Protection of children on board vehicles: Influence of pelvis design and thigh and abdomen stiffness on the submarining risk for dummies installed on a booster. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Paper Number 96-S7-O-03. Washington, DC: . National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Huang S, Reed MP. Comparison of child body dimensions with rear seat geometry. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2006. Technical Paper 2006-01-1142.
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations 49, Standard Number 210; Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, title 49, section 571.210 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations 49, Standard Number 213; Child Restraint Systems, title 49, section 571.213 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Girard B, Cirovec S. Kinematic Analysis of Submarining in Children. EPOCH Technical Report. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Huculak RD, Lankarani HM. Use of Euler parameters for the evaluation of ATD head trajectory from angular rate sensor and accelerometer data in aircraft seat certification testing. Int J Crashworthiness 2013;18(2):174–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS, Kallan MJ, Arbogast KB. Abdominal injury risk for children seated in belt positioning booster seats. 2007. ESV Paper Number 07–0441.
   Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Pritz HB, Beebe MS, Welty KA. Survey of older children in automotive restraints and booster seats. Technical Paper 94222. SAE Transactions: Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Reed MP, Orton NR, Manary MA, Rupp JD. Optimizing protection for rear seat occupants: assessing booster performance with realistic belt geometry using the Hybrid III 6YO ATD. DOT HS 811 608, National Technical Information Service; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Reed MP, Ritchie NL, et al. Assessing Child Belt Fit, Volume II: Effect of Restraint Configuration, Booster Seat Designs, Seating Procedure, and Belt Fit on the Dynamic Response of the Hybrid III 10YO ATD in Sled Tests. UM-2008–49–2; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Ritchie NL, Manary MA, Reed MP. Development of a more realistic pelvis for the Hybrid III 6YO ATD. Traffic Injury Prevention 2010;11(6):606–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle AC, Wing I, Szcepanowski RS, McGee BM, Voo LM, Kleinberger M. Evaluation of Angular Rate Sensor Technologies for Assessment of Rear Impact Occupant Responses. Technical Report. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2007
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2011. Available at: www.nhtsa.gov/safety/CPS. Accessed March 2011.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Child restraint use in 2008-overall results. Traffic Safety Facts DOT HS 811 135. 2009
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP. Measurement of contour and deflection of vehicle seats for comparison with the FMVSS 213 dynamic test bench. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2011. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0265.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Klinich KD, Manary MA. Assessing Child Belt Fit, Volume I: Effects of vehicle seat and belt geometry on belt fit for children with and without belt-positioning booster seats; 2008. UM 2008-49-1.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Sherwood CP, Klinich KD, Manary MA. Evaluation of the static belt fit provided by belt-positioning booster seats. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2009;41:598–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert-Hamilton SM, Flannagan CAC. Improving the Repeatability and Reproducibility of Belt Fit Measurement with 6YO and 10YO ATDs. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2011. Technical Report 2011–4.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert-Hamilton SM, Klinich KD, Manary MA, Rupp JD. Effects of vehicle seat and belt geometry on belt fit for children with and without belt positioning booster seats. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2013a;50:512–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert-Hamilton SM. Distribution of belt anchorage locations in the second row of passenger cars and light trucks. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2013b. SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1157.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert-Hamilton SM, Manary MA, Klinich KD, Schneider LW. Improved positioning procedures for 6YO and 10YO ATDs based on child occupant postures. Technical Paper 2006-22-0014. Stapp Car Crash Journal 2006;50:337–388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert-Hamilton SM. Distribution of belt anchorage locations in the second row of passenger vehicles and light trucks. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2013. Technical Paper 2013-01-1157.
   Google Scholar
• Seacrist T, Samuels M, García-España JF, et al. Kinematic comparison of the Hybrid III and Q-series pediatric ATDS to pediatric volunteers in low-speed frontal crashes. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:285–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar