The Problem of Suspended and Revoked Drivers Who Avoid Detection at Checkpoints

References

• Brar S. Estimation of Fatal Crash Rates for Suspended/Revoked and Unlicensed Drivers in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles; 2012. Report No. 238.
   Google Scholar
• Brown KM. Sobriety checkpoints: statutory guidelines to clear the roadblocks to constitutionality. Wash Univ J Urban Contemp Law. 1991;40:141–169.
   Google Scholar
• California Vehicle Code. State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles. January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Clark B, Bobevski I. Disqualified Drivers in Victoria: Literature Review and In-depth Focus Group Study. Victoria, Australia: Monash University Accident Research Centre; 2008. Report No. 274.
   Google Scholar
• Coppin RS, Van Oldenbeek G. Driving Under Suspension and Revocation. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles; 1965. Report No. 18.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung DJ. An evaluation of the specific deterrent effects of vehicle impoundment on suspended, revoked and unlicensed drivers in California. Accid Anal Prev. 1999;31(1/2):45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung DJ. Traffic safety impact of judicial and administrative driver license suspension . In: J. Awan (Ed.), Countermeasures to Address Impaired Driving Offenders: Toward an Integrated Model. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 2013:41–53. . Transportation Research Circular E-C174.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung DJ, Gebers MA, Peck RC. The impact of mail contact strategy on the effectiveness of driver license withdrawal. Accid Anal Prev. 1997;29:65–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder RW, Voas R, Beirness D, et al. Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes—a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:362–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebers MA, DeYoung DJ. An Examination of the Characteristics and Traffic Risk of Drivers Suspended/Revoked for Different Reasons. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles; 2002. Report No. 200.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen RE, McConnell EJ, Williams RE. Suspension and Revocation Effects on the DUI Offender. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles; 1980. Report No. 75.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll v Palmer, 43 Cal3d 1321, 241 Cal Rptr 42, 743 P2d 1299 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Knoebel KY, Ross HL. Effects of administrative license revocation on employment. Accid Anal Prev. 1997;29:595–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenton S, Fetherston J, Cercarelli, R. Recidivist drink drivers’ self-reported reasons for driving whilst unlicensed—a qualitative analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:637–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masten SV, Peck RC. Problem driver remediation: a meta-analysis of the driver improvement literature. J Safety Res. 2004;35:403–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartt A, Geary L, Berning A. Observational study of the extent of driving while suspended for alcohol impaired driving. Inj Prev. 2003;9(2):133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Low-Staffing Sobriety Checkpoints. Washington, DC: Author; 2006. DOT HS 810 590.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Countermeasures That Work: A Highway Safety Countermeasure Guide for State Highway Safety Offices. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Author; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers PN. The Specific Deterrent Impact of California's 0.08% Blood Alcohol Concentration Limit and Administrative per se License Suspension Laws. Vol 2 of An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of California's 0.08% Blood Alcohol Concentration Limit and Administrative per se License Suspension Laws. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles; 1997. Report No. 167.
   Google Scholar
• Ross HL, Gonzales P. Effects of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders. Accid Anal Prev. 1988;20:379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashima HN, Marelich WD. A Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness of Alternative Sanctions for DUI Offenders. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles; 1989. Report No. 122.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB, DeYoung DJ. Vehicle action: effective policy for controlling drunk and other high-risk drivers? Accid Anal Prev. 2002;34:263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar AC, Maldonado-Molina MM. Effects of drivers’ license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: long-term follow-up in forty-six states. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1399–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar