A Human Body Model With Active Muscles for Simulation of Pretensioned Restraints in Autonomous Braking Interventions

References

• An KN, Kaufman KR, Chao EYS. Physiological considerations of muscle force through the elbow joint. J Biomech. 1989;22:1249–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr M, Arnoux P-J, Serre T, Thollon L, Brunet C. Tonic finite element model of the lower limb. J Biomech Eng. 2006;128:223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose D, Crandall JR, Untaroiu CD, Maslen EH. Influence of pre-collision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision. Accident Anal Prev. 2010;42:1398–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brolin K, Halldin P, Leijonhufvud I. The effect of muscle activation on neck response. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6:67–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchanan TS, Delp SL, Solbeck JA. Muscular resistance to varus and valgus loads at the elbow. J Biomech Eng. 1998;120:634–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappon H, Mordaka J, van Rooij L, et al. A Computational Human Model With Stabilizing Spine: A Step Towards Active Safety. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2007. SAE 2007-01-1171.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson S, Davidsson J. Volunteer occupant kinematics during driver initiated and autonomous braking when driving in real traffic environments. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 14–16, 2011; Krakow, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Coelingh E, Jakobsson L, Lind H, Lindman M. Collision warning with auto brake—a real-life safety perspective. Paper presented at: 20th ESV Conference; June 18–21, 2007; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• de Jager MKJ. Mathematical Head–Neck Models for Acceleration Impacts [dissertation]. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Develet J-A, Carlsson A, Svensson M, et al. Evaluation of the biofidelity of the BioRID-II and THOR-NT anthropometric test devices under seatbelt pre-pretensioner loading in stationary conditions. Paper presented at: Ohio State University Injury Biomechanics Seminar; May 19–21, 2013; Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• de Vlugt E, Schouten AC, van der Helm FCT, Teerhuis PC, Brouwn GC. A force-controlled planar haptic device for movement control analysis of the human arm. J Neurosci Methods. 2003;129:151–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vlugt E, Schouten AC, van der Helm FCT. Quantification of intrinsic and reflexive properties during multijoint arm posture. J Neurosci Methods. 2006;155:328–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejima S, Ono K, Holcombe S, Kaneoka K, Fukushima M. A study on occupant kinematics behaviour and muscle activities during pre-impact braking based on volunteer tests. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 19–21, 2007; Maastricht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ejima S, Zama Y, Ono K, et al. Prediction of pre-impact occupant kinematic behavior based on the muscle activity during frontal collision. Paper presented at: 21st ESV Conference; June 5–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ejima S, Zama Y, Satou F, et al. Prediction of the physical motion of the human body based on muscle activity during pre-impact braking. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 17–19, 2008; Bern, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Fraga F, van Rooj L, Symeonidis I, et al. Development and preliminary validation of a motorcycle rider model with focus on head and neck biofidelity, recurring to line element muscle models and feedback control. Paper presented at: 21st ESV Conference; June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Good CA, Viano DC, Ronsky JL. Biomechanics of volunteers subject to loading by a motorized shoulder belt tensioner. Spine. 2008;33:E225–E235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzbaur KRS, Murray WM, Delp SL. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control. Ann Bio Eng. 2005;33:829–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovenga PE, Spit HH, Uijldert M, Dalenoort AM. Improved prediction of Hybrid-III injury values using advanced multibody techniques and objective rating. Paper presented at: SAE World Congress; April 11–14, 2005; Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Ito D, Ejima S, Kitajima S, et al. Occupant kinematic behavior and effects of a motorized seatbelt on occupant restraint of human volunteers during low speed frontal impact: mini-sled tests with mass production car seat. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H, Sugiyama T. Development of a human body finite element model with multiple muscles and their controller for estimating occupant motions and impact responses in frontal crash situations. Stapp Car Crash J. 2012;56:231–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mages M, Seyffert M, Class U. Analysis of the pre-crash benefit of reversible belt pre-pretensioning in different accident scenarios. Paper presented at: 22nd ESV Conference; June 13–16, 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer R, Broos J, Elrofai H, et al. Modelling of bracing in a multi-body active human model. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer R, Rodarius C, Adamec J, van Nunen E, van Rooij L. A first step in computer modeling of the active human response in a far-side impact. Int J Crashworthiness. 2008;13:643–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer R, van Hassel E, Broos J, et al. Development of a multi-body human model that predicts active and passive human behavior. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 12–14, 2012; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky N, van Rooij L. A new methodology for biofidelic head–neck postural control. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 15–16, 2010; Hanover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ólafsdóttir JM, Östh J, Davidsson J, Brolin K. Passenger kinematics and muscle responses in autonomous braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Östh J, Brolin K, Carlsson S, Davidsson J, Wismans J. The occupant response to autonomous braking: a modeling approach that accounts for active musculature. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:265–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östh J, Brolin K, Happee R. Active muscle response using feedback control of a finite element human arm model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2012;15:347–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östh J, Ólafsdóttir JM, Davidsson J, Brolin K. Driver kinematic and muscle responses in braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints: validation data for human models. Stapp Car Crash J. 2013;57:1–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson BW, Goldberg J, Bilotto G, Fuller JH. Cervicocollic reflex: its dynamic properties and interaction with vestibular reflexes. J Neurophys. 1985;54:90–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppen NK, Walker PS. Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1976;58:195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins DH, Schneider LW, Snyder RG, Pflug M, Haffner M. Seated posture of vehicle occupants. Paper presented at: 27th Stapp Car Crash Conference; October 17–19, 1983; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Schittenhelm H. The vision of accident free driving—how efficient are we actually in avoiding or mitigating longitudinal real world accidents. Paper presented at: 21st ESV Conference; June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schöneburg R, Baumann K-H, Fehring M. The efficiency of PRE-SAFE® systems in pre-braked frontal collision situations. Paper presented at: 22nd ESV Conference; June 13–16, 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Standring S, ed. Gray's Anatomy—The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. London, England: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Strandroth J, Rizzi M, Kullgren A, Tingvall C. Head‐on collisions between passenger cars and heavy goods vehicles: Injury risk functions and benefits of autonomous emergency braking. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 12–14, 2012; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Central Labs Inc. Users’ Guide of Computational Human Model THUMS®—AM50 Occupant Model: Version 3.0–080225. Nagakute, Aichi, Japan: Toyota Motor Corporation; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst M. Human Head Neck Response in Frontal, Lateral and Rear End Impact Loading—Modeling and Validation [dissertation]. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• van Drunen P, Maaswinkel E, van der Helm FCT, van Dieën JH, Happee R. Corrigendum to “Indentifying intrinsic and reflexive contributions to low-back stabilization” [J. Biomech. 2013;46:1440–1446]. J Biomech. 2014. Available at: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooij L, Pauwelussen J, Op den Camp O, Janssen R. Driver head displacement during (automatic) vehicle braking tests with varying levels of distraction. Paper presented at: 23rd ESV Conference; May 27–30, 2013; Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Woitsch G, Sinz W. Influences of pre-crash braking induced dummy—forward displacements on dummy behaviour during EuroNCAP frontal crash test. Accident Anal Prev. 2014;62:268–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac FE. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17:359–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar