183
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of Q3s ATD Biomechanical Responses to Pediatric Volunteers

, , , &
Pages S215-S222 | Received 18 Mar 2014, Accepted 10 Jun 2014, Published online: 11 Oct 2014

References

  • Arbogast KB, Balasubramanian S, Seacrist T, et al. Comparison of kinematic responses of the head and spine for children and adults in low-speed frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:329–372.
  • Arbogast KB, Durbin DR. Epidemiology of child motor vehicle crash injuries and fatalities. In: Crandall JR, Myers BS, Meaney DF, Zellers Schmidtke S, eds. Pediatric Injury Biomechanics: Archive & Textbook. New York, NY: Springer; 2013:33–86.
  • Arbogast KB, Gholve PA, Friedman JE, Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3–12 years old. Spine. 2007;32(10):309–315.
  • Arbogast KB, Mathews EA, Seacrist T, et al. The effect of pretensioning and age on torso rollout in restrained human volunteers in far-side lateral and oblique loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2012;56:443–467.
  • Ash J, Abdelilah Y, Crandall J, Comparison of anthropomorphic test dummies with a pediatric cadaver restrained by a three-point belt in frontal sled tests. Paper presented at: 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Bolte JHIV, Hines MH, Herriott RG, McFadden JD, Donnelly BR. Shoulder impact response and injury due to lateral and oblique loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:35–53.
  • Brown J, Jing Y, Wang S, Ehrlich P. Patterns of severe injury in pediatric car crash victims: Crash Injury Research Engineering Network database. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:362–367.
  • Burdi AR, Huelke DF, Snyder RG, Lowrey GH. Infants and children in the adult world of automobile safety design: pediatric and anatomical considerations for design of child restraints. J. Biomech. 1969;2:267–280.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars. Accessed 2010.
  • Irwin AL, Mertz HJ. Biomechanical basis for the CRABI and Hybrid III child dummie. Paper presented at: 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1997; Warrendale, PA.
  • Irwin AL, Mertz HJ, Elhagediab AM, Moss S, Beach PV. Guidelines for assessing the biofidelity of side impact dummies of various sizes and ages. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002;46:297–319.
  • Lopez-Valdes FJ, Forman J, Kent R, Bostrom O, Segui-Gomez M. A comparison between a child-size PMHS and the Hybrid III 6 YO in a sled frontal impact. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009;53:237–246.
  • Lubbe N. Comparison of Hybrid III 6yo and Q3 child dummies in high severity frontal impact tests. Paper presented at: Protection of Children in Cars; 2009; Munich, Germany.
  • Martin P. Anthropomorphic Test Devices; Q3s 3-Year-Old Child Side Impact Test Dummy, Incorporation of Reference. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation; 2013. DOT 202-366-9324.
  • McCray L, Scarboro M, Brewer J. Injuries to children one to three years old in side impact crashes. Paper presented at: 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; June 18–21, 2007; Lyon, France.
  • Melvin JW. Injury assessment reference values for the CRABI 6-month infant dummy in a rear-facing infant restraint with airbag deployment. Paper presented at: Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress and Exposition; 1995; Warrendale, PA.
  • Scarlat MM, Cuny C, Goldberg BA, Harryman DTII, Matsen FA. The lateral impaction of the shoulder. Int Orthop. 1999;23:302–307.
  • Seacrist T, Balasubramanian S, García-España JF, et al. Kinematic comparison of pediatric human volunteers and the Hybrid III 6-year-old anthropomorphic test device. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:97–108.
  • Seacrist T, Locey C, Mathews E, Evaluation of pediatric ATD biofidelity as compared to child volunteers in low-speed far-side oblique and lateral impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014.
  • Seacrist T, Mathews EA, Balasubramaninan S, Maltese M, Arbogast KB. Evaluation of the Hybrid III and Q-series pediatric ATD upper neck loads as compared to pediatric volunteers in low-speed front crashes. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41:2381–2390.
  • Seacrist T, Samuels M, García-España, et al. Kinematic comparison of the Hybrid III and Q-series pediatric ATDs to pediatric volunteers in low-speed frontal crashes. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:285–298.
  • Sherwood CP, Shaw CG, van Rooij L, et al. Prediction of cervical spine injury risk for the 6-year-old child in frontal crashes. Ann Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2002;46:231–247.
  • Starnes M, Eigen AM. Fatalities and Injuries to 0–8 Year Old Passenger Vehicle Occupants Based on Impact Attributes. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation; 2002. DOT HS 809 410.
  • Suntay B, Moorhouse K, Bolte IV J. Characterization of the pediatric shoulder's resistance to lateral loading conditions. Paper presented at: 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; June 13–16, 2011; Washington, DC.
  • Thollon L, Cavallero C, Pu M, Brunet PC. The thoracic member under side impact: an experimental approach. Int J Crashworthiness. 2001;6:307–319.
  • van Ratingen MR, Twisk D, Schrooten M, Biomechanically based design and performance old child crash targets for a 3-year old dummy for frontal and side impact. Paper presented at: 2nd Child Occupant Protection Symposium Society of Automotive Engineers; 1997; Warrendale, PA.
  • Viano DC, Parenteau CS. Fatalities of children 0–7 years old in the second row. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9:231–237.
  • Wolanin MJ, Mertz HJ, Nyznyk RS, Vincent JH. Description and basis of three-year-old child dummy for evaluating passenger inflatable restraint concepts. Paper presented at: 9th International Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles; 1982; Kyoto, Japan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.