A Comparison of the Performance of Two Advanced Restraint Systems in Frontal Impacts

References

• Adomeit D. Seat Design—A Significant Factor for Safety Belt Effectiveness. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1979. SAE No. 791004.
   Google Scholar
• Adomeit D, Heger A. Motion sequence criteria and design proposals for restraint devices in order to avoid unfavorable biomechanic conditions and submarining. In: Proceedings of the 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Warrendale, PA, 1975:139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Balasubramanian S, Seacrist T, et al. Comparison of kinematic responses of the head and spine for children and adults in low-speed frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:329–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Severity Scale. Barrington, IL: Author; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bose D, Segui-Gomez M, Crandall JR. Vulnerability of female drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes: an analysis of US population at risk. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2368–2373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappozzo A, Croce UD, Leardini A, Chiari L. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. Gait Posture. 2005;21:186–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiari L, Croce UD, Leardini A, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. Gait Posture. 2005;21:197–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croce UD, Leardini A, Chiari L, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects in joint kinematics. Gait Posture. 2005;21:226–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. Demographic Report 2010. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2011. Commission Staff Working Document.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Lopez-Valdes F, Dennis N, Kent R, Tanji H, Higuchi K. An inflatable belt system in the rear seat occupant environment: investigating feasibility and benefit in frontal impact sled tests with a 50th percentile male ATD. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:111–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman JL, Kent R. The effect of calcification on the structural mechanics of the costal cartilage. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2014;17(2):94–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Lopez-Valdes F, Lessley D, et al. Rear seat occupant safety: an investigacion of a progressive force-limiting, pretensioning 3-point belt system using adult PMHS in frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:49–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman JL, Lopez-Valdes F, Lessley D, et al. Occupant kinematics and shoulder belt retention in far-side lateral and oblique collisions: a parametric study. Stapp Car Crash J. 2013;57:343–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman JL, Michaelson J, Kent R, Kuppa A, Bostrom O. Occupant restraint in the rear seat: ATD responses to standard and pre-tensioning, force-limiting belt restraints. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:141–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hynd D, Carroll J, Davidsson J, Vezin P. Biofidelity Requirements for the THORAX Project. THORAX D2.1 European Commission DG RTD 7th Framework Program.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Crandall JR, Bolton J, Prasad P, Nusholtz G, Mertz H. The influence of superficial soft tissues and restraint conditions on thoracic skeletal injury prediction. Stapp Car Crash J. 2001;45:183–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent R, Forman JL, Parent D, Kuppa S. Rear seat occupant protection in frontal crashes and its feasibility. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhances Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Lyon, France, June 18–21, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Lee SH, Darvish K, et al. Structural and material changes in the aging thorax and their role in crash protection for older occupants. Stapp Car Crash J. 2005;49:231–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent R, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Dennis NJ, et al. Assessment of a three-point restraint system with a pre-tensioned lap belt and an inflatable, force-limited shoulder belt. Stapp Car Crash J. 2011;55:141–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent R, Trowbridge M, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Segui-Gomez M. How many people are injured and killed as a result of aging? The elderly risk-exposure tradeoff assessed via a risk saturation model. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2009;53:41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Woods W, Bostrom O. Fatality risk and the presence of rib fractures. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;53:73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Leardini A, Chiari L, Croce UD, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3: soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture. 2005;21:212–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmen P, Been B, Carroll J, et al. An advanced thorax–shoulder design for the THOR dummy. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ESV Conference, Seoul, Korea, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Looker AC, Melton LJ III, Harris T, Borrud L, Shepherd J, McGowan J. Age, gender, and race/ethnic differences in total body and subregional bone density. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1141–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Valdes FJ, Lau A, Lamp J, et al. Analysis of spinal motion and loads during frontal impacts. Comparison between PMHS and ATD. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:61–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez-Valdes FJ, Riley PO, Lessley DJ, et al. The six degrees of freedom motion of the human head, spine, and pelvis in a frontal impact. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertz HJ, Irwin AI, Prasad P. Biomechanical and scaling bases for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:155–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parent D, Craig M, Ridella S, McFadden J. Thoracic biofidelity assessment of the THOR Mod-Kit ATD. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ESV Conference, Seoul, Korea, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ridella SA, Rupp JD, Poland K. Age-related differences in AIS3+ crash injury risk, types, causation and mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference 2012, Dublin, Ireland, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana SW, Sundararajan S, Board D, et al. Biomechanical considerations for assessing interactions of children and small occupants with inflatable seat belts. Stapp Car Crash J. 2013;57:89–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seacrist T, Balasubramanian S, Felipe Garcia-España J, et al. Kinematic comparison of pediatric human volunteers and the Hybrid III 6-year-old anthropomorphic test device. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:97–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw G, Crandall J, Butcher J. Biofidelity evaluation of the THOR advanced frontal crash dummy. In: Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference 2000, Montpellier, France, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw G, Parent D, Purtsezov S, et al. Impact response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests: skeletal deformation patterns under seat belt loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:1–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundararajan S, Rouhana SW, Board D, et al. Biomechanical assessment of a rear-seat inflatable seatbelt in frontal impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 2011;55:161–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sunnevång C, Hynd D. Sled Tests With Loading Condition and Restraint Variation Using Updated THOR and Hybrid III. 2013. THORAX Project GA No. 218516, Deliverable 4.3.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnevång C, Hynd D, Carroll J, Dahlgren M. Comparison of the THORAX Demonstrator and HIII sensitivity to crash severity and occupant restraint variation. In: Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Walz M. NCAP test improvements with pretensioners and load limiters. Traffic Inj Prev. 2004;5:18–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Schlick M, Moore J, Maiman D. Comparison of head–neck responses in frontal impacts using restrained human surrogates. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine/Annual Scientific Conference, Paris, France, 2011.
   Google Scholar