Pretensioner Loading to Rear-Seat Occupants During Static and Dynamic Testing

References

• Andersson M, Bohman K, Osvalder AL. Effect of booster seat design on children's choice of seating positions during naturalistic riding. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:171–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Chen I, Durbin DR, Winston FK. Injury risks for children in child restraint systems in side impact crashes. International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI), Graz, Austria, September 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Locey CM, Zonfrillo MR. Differences in thoracic injury causation patterns between seat belt restrained children and adults. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:213–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beillas P, Alonzo F, Chevalier M-C, et al. Abdominal pressure twin sensors for the Q dummies: from Q3 to Q10. Proceedings of the ICrash Conference, Torino, Italy, July 18–20, 2012a.
   Google Scholar
• Beillas P, Alonzo F, Chevalier MC, et al. Abdominal twin pressure sensors for the assessment of abdominal injuries in Q dummies: in-dummy evaluation and performance in accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J. 2012b;56:387–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croatto S, Masuda M. Q10 and HIII10-YO in frontal impact: sensitivity to restraint system. The 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Seoul, Republic of Korea, May 27–30, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin DR, and the Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Child passenger safety. Pediatrics. 2011;127:e1050–e1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin DR, Elliott MR, Winston FK. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes. JAMA. 2003;289:2835–2840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickhoff B. Analyse, Mechanismen und Reduktion Gurtinduzierter Thoraxbelastungen im Frontalcrash [PhD dissertation]. Hamburg, Germany: Helmut Schmidt Universität; 2012. . Available at: http://opus.unibw-hamburg.de/volltexte/2013/3001/.
   Google Scholar
• Forman J, Lopez-Valdes F, Lessley D, et al. Rear seat occupant safety: an investigation of a progressive force-limiting, pretensioning 3-point belt system using adult PMHS in frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:49–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman J, Michaelson J, Kent R, Kuppa S, Bostrom O. Occupant restraint in the rear seat: ATD responses to standard and pre-tensioning, force-limiting belt restraints. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:141–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman J, Segui-Gomez M, Ash JH, Lopez-Valdes FJ. Child posture and shoulder belt fit during extended night-time traveling: an in-transit observational study. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Håland Y, Nilson G. Seat belt pretensioners to avoid the risk of submarining—a study of lap-belt slippage factors. The 13th International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Haxhija EQ, Nöres H, Schober P, Höllwarth ME. Lung contusion–lacerations after blunt thoracic trauma in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20:412–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard A, Rothman L, McKeag AM, et al. Children in side-impact motor vehicle crashes: seating positions and injury mechanisms. J Trauma. 2004;56:1276–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laituri TR, Prasad P, Sullivan K, Frankstein M, Thomas RS. Derivation and Evaluation of a Provisional, Age-Dependant, AIS3+ Thoracic Risk Curve for Belted Adults in Frontal Impacts. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2005. SAE Paper 2005-01-0297.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen P, Been B, Carroll J, et al. An advanced thorax–shoulder design for the THOR dummy. Proceedings of the 23rd ESV Conference, Seoul, Korea, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Valdez FJ, Forman J, Ash J, et al. The frontal-impact response of a booster-seated child-size PMHSI. International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Valdes FJ, Forman J, Kent R, Bostrom O, Segui-Gomez M. A comparison between a child-size PMHS and the Hybrid III 6 YO in a sled frontal impact. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009;53:237–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lund A. Recommended Procedures for Evaluating Occupant Injury Risk From Deploying Side Airbags. The Side Airbag Out-of-Position Injury Technical Working Group (A Joint Project of Alliance, AIAM, AORC and IIHS). Insurance Institute of Highway Safety; 2003. Available at: http:/www.iihs.org/media/020f855e-79e2-4f5c-b560-3ccc991bdfb2/-179381993/Raings/Protocols/current/twg_final_procedures.pdf. Accessed August 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz HJ, Driscoll GD, Lenox JB, Nyquist GW, Weber DA. Responses of Animals Exposed to Deployment of Various Passenger Inflatable Restraint System Concepts for a Variety of Collision Severities and Animal Positions. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 1982. SAE Technical Paper 826047.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz HJ, Irwin AL, Prasad P. Biomechanical and scaling bases for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:155–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NHTSA. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 208, 49 CFR 571.208. Author. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov. Accessed 2013.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Improving the Safety of Older Child Passengers—Steps for Kids. Washington, DC: Author; 2005. DOT HS 809 953.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. The 2009 National Survey of the Use of Booster Seats. Washington, DC: Author; 2010. DOT HS 811 377.
   Google Scholar
• Osvalder A-L, Bohman K. Misuse of booster cushions—an observation study of children's performance during buckling up. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:49–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parent D, Craig M, Ridella S, MacFadden J. Thoracic biofidelity assessment of the THOR Mod Kit ATD. Proceedings of the 23rd ESV Conference, Seoul, Korea, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pheasant S. Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and Design of Work. 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana SW, El-Jawahri RE, Laituri TR. Biomechanical considerations for abdominal loading by seat belt pretensioners, Stapp Car Crash J. 2010:54;381–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE J211/1. Instrumentation for Impact Tests – Part I – Electronic Instrumentation. Warrensdale, PA: SAE; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnevång C, Hynd D, Carroll J, Dahlgren M. Comparison of the THORAX Demonstrator and HIII sensitivity to crash severity and occupant restraint variation. International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. Regulation No. 44, Revision 3, Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power-driven vehicles (“Child Restraint Systems”). In: Europe UNECE; 2014.
   Google Scholar