DUI Offenders’ Experience With an Ignition Interlock Program: Comparing Those Who Have and Have Not Adapted From Their Primary Drinking Location

References

• Anglin L, Caverson R, Fennel R, Giesbrecht N, Mann RE. A Study of Impaired Drivers Stopped by Police in Sudbury, Ontario. Toronto, ON, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Ahmed AU, Farkas ZA. Characteristics of DUI offenders with a high versus low perceived risk of arrest. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Rauch W, Baker E, Williams A. Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a random trial in Maryland. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1696–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damkot DK. Alcohol and the rural driver. In: Seixas F, Ed., Incurrence in Alcoholism. Vol. . New York, NY: Grune and Straten; 1979:319–325.
   Google Scholar
• Eby DW. The convicted drunk driver in Michigan: a profile of offenders. UMTRI Res Rev. 1995;25(52):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Elder RW, Voas R, Beirness D, et al., and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-related crashes: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:362–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss RD, Perrine MW, Meyers AM, Musty RE, Voas RB. A roadside survey in the computer age. In: Perrine MW, ed. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, October 24–27, 1989, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council; 1990:920–929.
   Google Scholar
• Marques PR. Why do ignition interlocks only temporarily reduce impaired driving? A likely explanation from alcohol biomarker data [Abstract 0215]. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012;36(Suppl 6):64A.
   Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts S, Allen J, et al. Estimating driver risk using alcohol biomarkers, interlock BAC tests, and psychometric assessments: Initial descriptives. Addiction. 2010;105:226–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Voas RB. Comparative and joint prediction of DUI recidivism from alcohol ignition interlock and driver records. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64:83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Voas RB, Beirness DJ. Predicting repeat DUI offenses with the alcohol interlock recorder. Accid Anal Prev. 2001;33:609–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas R. Are we near a limit, or can we get more safety from vehicle alcohol interlocks? [Editorial]. Addiction. 2012; 108(4):657–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas RB, Roth R, Tippetts AS. Evaluation of the New Mexico Ignition Interlock Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 2010. DOT HS 811 410.
   Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas RB, Tippetts AS. Behavioral measures of drinking: patterns in the interlock record. Addiction. 2003;98(Suppl 2):13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. Behavioral monitoring of DUI offenders with the alcohol ignition interlock recorder. Addiction. 1999;94:1861–1870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight AJ, Langston EA, Mcknight AS, Resnick JA, Lange JE. Why People Drink and Drive: The Bases of Drinking-and-Driving Decisions. Washington, DC: NHTSA, US Department of Transportation; 1995. DOT HS 808 251.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell M. Research on drinking locations of alcohol-impaired drivers: implications for prevention policies. J Public Health Policy. 1985;6:510–525.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Transport and Communications. The 1979 Ontario Roadside BAC Survey: Summary Report, Interministerial Committee on Drinking and Driving. Toronto, ON, Canada: Author; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer JW. Minnesota Roadside Survey: Alcohol Positive Drivers. Saint Cloud, MN: Saint Cloud University; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Rider R, Kelley-Baker T, Voas R, Murphy B, McKnight AJ, Levings C. The impact of a novel educational curriculum for first-time DUI offenders on intermediate outcomes relevant to DUI recidivism. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:482–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rider RP, Voas RB, Kelley-Baker T, Grosz M, Murphy B. Preventing alcohol-related convictions: the impact of a novel curriculum for first-time offenders on DUI recidivism. Traffic Inj Prev. 2007;8(2):147–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roth R. Roth Research Interlock Data. 2013. Available at: http://www.rothinterlock.org.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. The Alberta Interlock Program: the evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism. Addiction. 1999;94:1849–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis C, Lybrand S, Bellamy N. Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. Cochran Database Syst Rev. 2004;18(4):CD004168. Available at: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe AC. Characteristics of late-night, weekend drivers: results of the U.S. national roadside breath-testing survey and several local surveys. In: Israelstam S, Lambert S, eds. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs, and Traffic Safety. Toronto, ON, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario; 1975:411–449.
   Google Scholar