Empirical Analysis of Crash Injury Severity on Mountainous and Nonmountainous Interstate Highways

References

• Abdel-Aty M. Analysis of driver injury severity levels at multiple locations using ordered probit models. J Safety Res. 2003;34:597–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos PC, Mannering FL. An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit models using crash- and non-crash-specific injury data. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1140–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR. Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transp Res Part B Method. 2003;37:837–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerwick DM, Gkritza K, Shaheed MS, Hans Z. A comparison of the mixed logit and latent class methods for crash severity analysis. Anal Method Accid Res. 2014;3–4:11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chang LY, Mannering F. Analysis of injury severity and vehicle occupancy in truck- and non-truck-involved accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 1999;31:579–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Chen S. Injury severities of truck drivers in single- and multi-vehicle accidents on rural highways. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1677–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimba D, Sando T. The prediction of highway traffic accident injury severity with neuromorphic techniques. Adv Transp Stud. 2009;19:17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chiou Y-C, Hwang C-C, Chang C-C, Fu C. Modeling two-vehicle crash severity by a bivariate generalized ordered probit approach. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;51:175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoforou Z, Cohen S, Karlaftis MG. Vehicle occupant injury severity on highways: an empirical investigation. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1606–1620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eluru N, Bagheri M, Miranda-Moreno LF, Fu L. A latent class modeling approach for identifying vehicle driver injury severity factors at highway–railway crossings. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;47:119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkritza K, Mannering FL. Mixed logit analysis of safety-belt use in single- and multi-occupant vehicles. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M, Hernandez S. Large truck–involved crashes: exploratory injury severity analysis. J Transp Eng. 2013a;139:596–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M, Hernandez S. Modeling injury outcomes of crashes involving heavy vehicles on Texas highways. Transp Res Rec. 2013b;2338:28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones S, Hensher DA. Evaluating the behavioural performance of alternative logit models: an application to corporate takeovers research. J Bus Financ Account. 2007;34:1193–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malyshkina NV, Mannering FL. Empirical assessment of the impact of highway design exceptions on the frequency and severity of vehicle accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannering FL, Bhat CR. Analytic methods in accident research: methodological frontier and future directions. Anal Method Accid Res. 2014;1:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: Manski D, McFadden D, eds. A Structrual Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1981:198–269.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ. 2000;15:447–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton JC, Shankar VN, Mannering FL. Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan A, Mannering FL. The effects of road-surface conditions, age, and gender on driver-injury severities. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1852–1863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleti R, Eluru N, Bhat CR. Examining the influence of aggressive driving behavior on driver injury severity in traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1839–1854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen P, Mannering F. Probabilistic models of motorcyclists’ injury severities in single- and multi-vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39:955–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen PT, Mannering FL, Lord D, Quddus MA. The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1666–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar V, Mannering F, Barfield W. Statistical analysis of accident rural freeways. Accid Anal Prev. 1996;28:391–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ulfarsson GF, Mannering FL. Differences in male and female injury severities in sport-utility vehicle, minivan, pickup and passenger car accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36(2):135–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington SP, Karlaftis MG, Mannering FL. Statistical and Econometric Method for Transportation Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HB, Kaplan S, Prato CG. Analysis of factors associated with injury severity in crashes involving young New Zealand drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;65:142–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Zhang Y, Liang F. Crash injury severity analysis using Bayesian ordered probit models. J Transp Eng. 2009;135:18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Zhao K, Huynh N. Analysis of driver injury severity in rural single-vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;47:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Mannering FL. The heterogeneous effects of guardian supervision on adolescent driver-injury severities: a finite-mixture random-parameters approach. Transp Res Part B Method. 2013;49:39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Shankar VN. Bivariate ordered-response probit model of driver's and passenger's injury severities in collisions with fixed objects. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36:869–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasmin S, Eluru N. Evaluating alternate discrete outcome frameworks for modeling crash injury severity. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;59:506–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye F, Lord D. Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: Multinomial logit, ordered probit and mixed logit models. Anal Method Accid Res. 2014;1:72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Yu R, Abdel-Aty M. Analyzing crash injury severity for a mountainous freeway incorporating real-time traffic and weather data. Saf Sci. 2014a;63:50–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu R, Abdel-Aty M. Using hierarchical Bayesian binary probit models to analyze crash injury severity on high speed facilities with real-time traffic data. Accid Anal Prev. 2014b;62:161–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar