Development and Validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) Toward Further Understanding of Occupant Injury Mechanisms in Precrash and During Crash

References

• Amis AA, Dowson D, Wright V. Analysis of elbow forces due to high-speed forearm movements. J Biomech. 1980;13:825–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson DE, Madigan ML, Nussbaum MA. Maximum voluntary joint torque as a function of joint angle and angular velocity: model development and application to the lower limb. J Biomech. 2007;40:3105–3113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Balasubramanian S, Seacrist T, et al. Comparison of kinematic responses of the head and spine for children and adults in low-speed frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:329–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Audrey HD, Frederic R, Pascal D, Herve M. Pre-crash phase analysis using a driving simulator. Influence of atypical position on injuries and airbag adaptation. Paper presented at: 21th ESV Conference; June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Begeman PC, Visarius H, Nolte LP, Prasad P. Viscoelastic shear responses of the cadaver and Hybrid III lumbar spine. Paper presented at: 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference; October 31–November 4, 1994; Fort Lauderdale, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Bendjellal F, Walfisch G, Fayon A, Tarriere C. APR Biomechanical Data. Nanterre, France: Association Peugeot-Renault; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan TS, Delp SL, Solbeck JA. Muscular resistance to varus and valgus loads at the elbow. J Biomech Eng. 1998;120:634–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibb AT, Cox CA, Nightingale RW, et al. Importance of muscle activations for biofidelic pediatric neck response in computational models. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14:S116–S127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans C. Fiber architecture and muscle function. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1982;10:106–107.
   Google Scholar
• Gayzik FS, Moreno DP, Vavalle NA, Rhyne AC, Stitzel JD. Development of a full human body finite element model for blunt injury prediction utilizing a multi-modality medical imaging protocol. Paper presented at: 12th International LS-DYNA Users Conference; June 3–5, 2012; Dearborn, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Gehre C, Gades H, Wernicke P. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. Paper presented at: 21th ESV Conference, June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Gehre C, Stahlschmidt S. Assessment of dummy models by using objective rating methods. Paper presented at: 22th ESV Conference, June 13–16, 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy WN, Schneider LW, Rouhana SW. Abdominal impact response to rigid-bar, seatbelt, and airbag loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2001;45:1–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayamizu N, Watanabe I, Ishihara T, Miki K. Measurement of impact response of pig lung [in Japanese]. Paper presented at: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering (JSME) Tokai Branch Conference; September 2, 2003; Mie, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TR 9790: Road Vehicles - Anthropomorphic Side Impact Dummy - Lateral Impact Response Requirements to Assess the Biofidelity of the Dummy. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Miki K, Mohammad M, et al. Development of a finite element model of the human shoulder. Stapp Car Crash J. 2000;44:281–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H, Sugiyama T, Min K. Development of a human body finite element model with multiple muscles and their controller for estimating occupant motions and impact responses in frontal crash situations. Stapp Car Crash J. 2012;56:231–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Tamura A, Kimpara H, Watanabe I, Miki K. Development of advanced human models in THUMS. Paper presented at: 6th European LS-DYNA Users’ Conference; May 29–30, 2007; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper A, Santago A, Sparks J, et al. Multi-scale biomechanical characterization of human liver and spleen. Paper presented at: 22nd ESV Conference; June 13–16, 2011; Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Lessley D, Sherwood C. Thoracic response to dynamic, non-impact loading from a hub, distributed belt, diagonal belt, double diagonal belts. Stapp Car Crash J. 2004;48:495–519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimpara H, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M, et al. Investigation of anteroposterior head–neck responses during severe frontal impacts using a brain–spinal cord complex FE model. Stapp Car Crash J. 2006;50:509–544.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitagawa Y, Ichikawa H, King AI, Levine RS. A severe ankle and foot injury in frontal crashes and its mechanism. Paper presented at: 42nd Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 2–4, 1998; Tempe, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Kroell CK, Schneider DC, Nahum AM. Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax. Paper presented at: 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 17–19, 1971; Coronado, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kroell CK, Schneider DC, Nahum AM. Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II. Paper presented at: 18th Stapp Car Crash Conference; December 4–5, 1974; Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer R, Broos J, Elrofai H, Bruijn E, Forbes P, Happee R. Modelling of bracing in a multi-body active human model. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Murray MP, Gardner GM, Mollinger LA, Sepic SB. Strength of isometric and isokinetic contractions: knee muscles of men aged 20 to 86. Phys Ther. 1980;60:412–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusholtz GS, Kaiker PS. Abdominal response to steering wheel loading. Paper presented at: 14th ESV Conference; May 23–26, 1994; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Osth J, Brolin K, Carlsson S, Wismans J, Davidsson J. The occupant response to autonomous braking: a modeling approach that accounts for active musculature. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:265–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Brand RA, White AA III, Haven N. Mechanical properties of human thoracic spine, J Bone Joint Surg. 1976;58A:642–652.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp JD, Miller CS, Reed MP, Madura NH, Klinich KD. Characterization of knee–thigh–hip response in frontal impacts using biomechanical testing and computational simulations. Stapp Car Crash J. 2008;52:421–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider LW, Robbins DH, Pflug MA, Snyder RG. Development of Anthropometrically Based Design Sepcifications for an Advanced Adult Anthropomorphic Dummy Family, Anthropometry of Motor Vehicle Occupants. US Department of Transportation, NHTSA; 1983. UMTRI-83-53-1.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz AB, Warwick DN, Berkson MH, Nachemson AL. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments—part I: Responses in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion. J Biomech Eng. 1979;101:46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen DG. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. Trans ASME. 2003;125:70–77.
   Google Scholar
• van Eijden TM, Weijs WA, Kouwenhoven E, Verburg J, Forces acting on the patella during maximal voluntary contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle at different knee flexion/extension angles. Acta Anat (Basel). 1987;129:310–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vezin P, Bruyère K, Bermond F. Comparison of head and thorax cadaver and Hybrid III responses to a frontal sled deceleration for the validation of a car occupant mathematical model. Paper presented at: 17th ESV Conference; June 4–7, 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Winters JM. Hill-based muscle models: a system engineering perspective. In: Winters JM, Woo S, eds. Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization. New York, NY: Springer; 1990:69–93, 726–749.
   Google Scholar
• Wismans J, Philippens M, Oorschot Ev, Kallieris D, Mattern R. Comparison of human volunteer and cadaver head–neck responses in frontal flexion. Paper presented at: 31st Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 9–11, 1987; New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada H. Strength of Biological Materials. Baltimore, MD: The Williams & Wilkins Company; 1970.
   Google Scholar