Secondary Behavior of Drivers on Cell Phones

References

• Alosco ML, Spitznagel MB, Hall Fischer K, et al. Both texting and eating are associated with impaired simulated driving performance. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:468–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benden M, Fink R, Stafford J. Teen Driver Cell Phone Blocker. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute; 2012. Report No. UTCM 10-15-47.
   Google Scholar
• Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, et al. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study: Phase II—Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2006. Report No. DOT HS-810-583.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer CM, Klauer SG, McClafferty JA, Guo F. Relationship of near-crash/crash risk to time spent on a cell phone while driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015 (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Fitch GM, Soccolich SA, Guo F, et al. The Impact of Hand-held and Hands-free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2013. Report No. DOT HS-811-757.
   Google Scholar
• Foss RD, Goodwin AH, McCartt AT, Hellinga LA. Short-term effects of a teenage driver cell phone restriction. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41:419–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funkhouser DS, Sayer JR. A naturalistic cell phone use census. In: TRB 91st Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers [DVD]. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 2012. . Report No. 12-4104.
   Google Scholar
• Galera C, Orriols L, M'Bailara K, et al. Mind wandering and driving: responsibility case–control study. Br Med J. 2012;345:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin AH, Foss RD, Harrell SS, O'Brien NP. Distracted Driving Among Newly Licensed Teens. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Governors Highway Safety Association. Distracted Driving: What Research Shows and What States Can Do. Washington, DC: Governors Highway Safety Association; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Harbluk JL, Noy YI, Trbovich PL, Eizenman M. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39:372–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman IE, Boss SM, Wise BM, McKenzie KE, Caggiano JM. Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2009;24:597–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamson S. Driving with One Hand—A Driving Simulator Trial. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Klauer SG, Dingus TA, Neale VL, Sudweeks JD, Ramsey DJ. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2006. Report No. DOT HS-810-594.
   Google Scholar
• Klauer SG, Guo F, Sudweeks J, Dingus TA. An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach on 100-Car Data: Final Report. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2010. Report No. DOT HS-811-334.
   Google Scholar
• Koppel S, Charlton J, Kopinathan C, Taranto D. Are child occupants a significant source of driver distraction? Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1236–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT, et al. Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. Br Med J. 2005;331:428–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, Woodward M. The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39:1170–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Visual–manual NHTSA driver distraction guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices. Federal Register. 2012;77(37):11200–11250. 77 FR 11200.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts: Distracted Driving 2012. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 2014. Report No. DOT HS-812-012.
   Google Scholar
• Pickrell TM, Ye TJ. Driver Electronic Device Use in 2011. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2013. Report No. DOT HS-811-719.
   Google Scholar
• Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Eng J Med. 1997;336:453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal D. National Survey of Distracted and Drowsy Driving Attitudes and Behaviors: 2002; Volume : Findings. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2003. Report No. DOT HS-809-566.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT 9.3 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer J, Devonshire J, Flannagan C. Naturalistic driving performance during secondary tasks. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa; 2007:224–230.
   Google Scholar
• Stutts J, Feaganes J, Rodgman E, et al. Distractions in Everyday Driving. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Tefft BC, Williams AF, Grabowski JG. Teen Driver Risk in Relation to Age and Number of Passengers. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tison J, Chaudhary N, Cosgrove L. National Phone Survey on Distracted Driving Attitudes and Behaviors. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2011. Report No. DOT HS-811-555.
   Google Scholar
• Treat JR, Tumbas NS, McDonald ST, et al. Tri-Level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents: Final Report. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1977. Report No. DOT HS-805-085.
   Google Scholar
• Williams AF, Ferguson SA, McCartt AT. Passenger effects on teenage driving and opportunities for reducing the risks of such travel. J Safety Res. 2007;38:381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RA. Cell phone use and crash risk: evidence for positive bias. Epidemiology. 2012;23:1–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar