The use of navigation systems in naturalistic driving

References

• Aarts L, Van Schagen I. Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:215–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antin JF, Stanley LM, Cicora KF. Conventional versus moving-map navigation methods. Transp Res Rec. 2009;2138:34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhuis KA, De Waard D, Janssen WH. Behavioural impacts of advanced driver assistance systems—an overview. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 2001;1(3):245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett GE, Summerskill SJ, Porter JM. On-the-move destination entry for vehicle navigation systems: unsafe by any means? Behav Inf Technol. 2004;23(4):265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caird JK, Johnston KA, Willness CR, Asbridge M, Steel P. A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;71:311–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang DP, Brooks AM, Weir DH. On the highway measures of driver glance behavior with an example automobile navigation system. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(3):215–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton P, Agarwal P, Fraenkel N, Baichoo J, Masry A. Driving with navigational instructions: investigating user behaviour and performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:298–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingus TA, Hulse MC, Mollenhauer MA. Effects of age, system experience, and navigation technique on driving with an advanced traveler information system. Occup Health Ind Med. 1997;37(4):156.
   Google Scholar
• Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, et al. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II—Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment. 2006. Available at: http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash%20Avoidance/Driver%20Distraction/100CarMain.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Emmerson C, Guo W, Blythe P, Namdeo A, Edwards S. Fork in the road: in-vehicle navigation systems and older drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013;21:173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra PJ, Hogema JH, Vonk T. Traffic safety effects of navigation systems. Paper presented at: 2008 IEEE International Vehicle Symposium; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch GM, Soccolich SA, Guo F, et al. The Impact of Hand-held and Hands-free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2013. DOT HS 811 757.
   Google Scholar
• Funkhouser D, Sayer J. A naturalistic cell phone use census. Transp Res Rec. 2012;2321:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas. 2007;1:77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hurts K, Angell LS, Perez MA. The distracted driver: mechanisms, models and measurement. Rev Hum Factors Ergon. 2011;7(1):3–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jamson SL. What impact does legislation have on drivers’ in-vehicle use of nomadic devices? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013;16:138–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer SG, Guo F, Simons-Morton BG, Ouimet MC, Lee SE, Dingus TA. Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer SG, Guo F, Sudweeks JD, Dingus TA. An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach on 100-Car Data: Final Report. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2010. Available at: http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NVS/Crash%20Avoidance/Technical%20Publications/2010/811334.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lansdown TC. Individual differences and propensity to engage with in-vehicle distractions—a self-report survey. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2012;15:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma R, Kaber DB. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task. Ergonomics. 2007;50:1351–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merat N, Anttila V, Luoma J. Comparing the driving performance of average and older drivers: the effect of surrogate in-vehicle information systems. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2005;8(2):147–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz B, Schoch S, Just M, Kuhn F. How do drivers interact with navigation systems in real life conditions?: Results of a field-operational-test on navigation systems. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2014;24:146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowakowski C, Utsui Y, Green P. Navigation System Destination Entry: The Effects of Driver Workload and Input Devices, and Implications for SAE Recommended Practice. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2000. Technical Report No. UMTRI-2000-20.
   Google Scholar
• Olson RL, Hanowski RJ, Hickman JS, Bocanegra J. Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations. Washington, DC: Center for Truck and Bus Safety; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV Institute for Road Safety). Factsheet: Safety Effects of Navigation Systems. Den Haag, The Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tijerina L, Parmer E, Goodman MJ. Driver workload assessment of route guidance system destination entry while driving: a test track study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th ITS World Congress; 1998; Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. Speedometer. 2015. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedometer. Accessed January 10, 2015.
   Google Scholar